[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/3/ - 3DCG

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 24 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now closed. Thank you to everyone who applied!




How are we feeling about this, /3/?

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/40-series/
>>
>only 24GB
>only 16GB
>only 12GB
trash
>>
>>918920

>we feeling Who the fuck cares about feelings are you a woman?
>>
Not even paper launch, straight up vaporware that's how i feel. Fuck electronics.
>>
not /3/


fuck off
>>
>>918920
very underwhelming
>>
>>918962
>hardware for accelerating 3D rendering
>utilized in 3D rendering applications
>not /3/
>>
>>918964
>brings absolutely nothing new to 3D, just more computing power and processing speed
Not /3/
>>
I don't even know when I'm gonna update my PC nor what GPU to buy anymore. I've been using my laptop for years at this point, I've got gtx 960 in my desktop lol. I can't even use Nanite in Unreal, performance is not the best either. And I realy don't want to wait ANOTHER 2 years for 5xxx series.
>>
>>918970
take it to /g/

closing this thread.
>>
>>918920
we typically discuss cut down castrated bricks for goymers with "rtx" fad cores in /v/ or /g/
>>
They had to gimp the 4080 12gb didn't they.
>>
Incoming 4070 with 2 variants, 10 GB and 8 GB
$749 for the 10 GB and $649 for the 8GB.

Such AI, much models.
>>
>>918920
>2X-4X IMPROVEMENT!
>compares baseline without DLSS vs new DLSS
>refuses to elaborate further

to the trash it goes
>>
this: >>919001. probably a 15% uplift for rendering and general compute at best

>>918979
i think the 4080 12gb is just a last minute rebrand of what was supposed to be a 4070
>>
>>918966
Agree.
>>
Between getting a 3090 and a 4090, is it worth the price difference? Does DLSS 3 benefit us in something?
>>
>>919126
t bh 2x 3090 + nvlink might actually be the secret smart move depending on your memory requirements.
>>
>>919162
This. This is what I've done. 24GB is such a large limitation even with the performance a 4090 could give you.

I bought a second 3090 2nd hand as soon as I heard they had dropped NV-Link for the 4000 series
>>
>>919162
NV llink doesnt really do anything for multi gpu rendering.
>>
Despite having 3x more transistors and paper teraflops, raw performance seems to be barely higher than Ampere. Looks like all those transistors went to DLSS 3.0. They get "4x more performance" by rendering every 4th frame and interpolating the rest. Not helpful to us in any way.
>>
>>919173
I'm >>919126
what would you say then?
>>
>>919173
iirc scenes need to be loaded completely onto each gpu so you'd get capped at 24 gigs despite having multiple gpus in the box. nvlink would pool the memory and allow larger scenes. there is a perf cost i believe, but it's better than out of core.

>>919213
go ask somewhere smarter than here like the discord community of your renderer of choice.

>>919195
otoy's making some big claims about perf but they shill pretty hard. it'll take awhile before the renderers update anyway.
>>
>>919215
even without nv link each gpu gets things loaded into it. what nvlink used to do was to pool it together true, but now its pretty much a gimmick.
You would get about 1-2% increased efficiency with NVlink - data gets loaded into each card either way.

>>919213
currently You can get 3090TI for 1000 bucks if not less if used.

I can only speculate but it is not worth to spend 600+ bucks more for 10-15% increased workspeed. you might as well get 2x 3090's.
>>
>>919126
>Does DLSS 3 benefit us in something?
no
DLSS 3.0 uses motion vectors to create blend frames, if you want 1 frame performance for super fast renders this wont do shit for you, and even in animation rendering there is nothing to be gained
>>
>>
>>918920
>>3.5 slots
it's a chunky boi
>>
>>919235
>nvidia provided comparisons
I would be very careful anon.
>>
>>919341
Good point, but at least they can't cheat with DLSS here.
>>
File: Nvidyas_dancve.webm (1.28 MB, 720x900)
1.28 MB
1.28 MB WEBM
Hopefully there's an affordable 4070 with 16gb for offline render. Maybe a sub $1000 3090 would be best bang for buck with both offline and UE5?
>>
>>919369
I doubt it considering the base 4080 is only 12gb. We will have to wait for the TI variants of these, which will probably be 2 years away, seeing how the market is going.
>>
>>919366
watch it them comparing the image clarity for long render without AI denoiser
vs
comparable quality with new AI denosier.

most of the time their AI denoiser is only good for stills and not animation/motion (see glitches during gameplay)
>>
>>919166
>they had dropped NV-Link for the 4000 series
So.. if I have space in my motherboard for 2 GPUs then it's pointless if I have 4 series?

I can't buy two 4090 and make a pool of VRAM?
>>
>>920052
It was always pointles buy A6000 goy
>>
>>920064
what?
>>
>>920064
You are retarded. The biggest reason to pay a premium for those is on-demand driver support, which only enterprises need.
>>
>>920064
>buy A6000
>DO NOT BUY WATER COOLER BLOCK SEVERAL 3090TI'S THIS IS NOT THE WAY GOYIM



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.