Why is the Houdini Donut so much worse than the Blender Donut?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VFFb4s_RSM
>>898022Because no Houdini users actually care about making a donut in Houdini. It's pointless for Houdini to even have modeling tools. Either the devs had too much time on their hands or they added the ability to model as a joke. The only time there would even be a donut in Houdini would be if it were imported, in order to be burned into ashes or blown up into peaces.
>>898026This donut could be improved aesthetically, even within the limits of Houdini, however there wouldn't be much use: the point isn't to make a nice donut but to learn how Houdini works. (There would be some use to the author though: sexier donuts get more clicks.)
Find yourself a better one.
>>898022Simulate the icing and you will have a better than blender donut.
>>898031Still looks more artificial than the Blender one.
>>898026Speak for yourself, faggot.Houdini is the superior modelling software.OP should kill himself with his garbage threads
>>898022Isn't the Houdini equivalent of the donut tutorial the smashing wine glass tutorial?https://www.sidefx.com/tutorials/smashing-wine-glass/?collection=74
>>898056>Speak for yourself, faggot.>Houdini is the superior modelling software.>OP should kill himself with his garbage threads
>>898056Blendturds need constant self reassurance for their meme app.
>>898022Skill issue, that's all.
>>898291>no icing>no plate>no mugDiscarded.
Embrace the max donut.
Houdini is for animation.
>>898992that looks revolting, exactly what i'd expect from max
>>898992looks genuinely disgusting desu
>>899016Idiot. Houdini is for everything related to procedualism.
What is the industry standard for modelling donuts?