A general dedicated to the best free & open source 3D modeling suite.Download it here:https://www.blender.org/Learn it here:https://cgcookie.com/https://studio.blender.org/https://academy.cgboost.com/https://www.cgpeers.to/Create your boob jiggle with this:https://github.com/artellblender/springbonesPrevious thread: >>891464
How do I export a model from Blender > Zbrush > Blender without losing the textures? I have a figure from Daz imported with diffeomorphic, tried to import a base mesh as obj into Zbrush while keeping vertex order, made sculpting edits on Zbrush and can't get the model back without breaking the materials. I'm a good sculptor but I don't understand the 3d pipeline, can someone shed some light and explain to me like I was a retarded child?
>>896018GoB add-on will suck in any textures tooAlso doubt on the good at sculpting part Mr Daz editor lol
>>896019I'm a Zbrush sculptor not a Daz pedo
>>896009Is there a modifier I can use to smooth out the poly edges inside the dress? It's supposed to be a cloth material which I finally weight painted somewhat correctly, but increasing the amount of subdivisions makes the edges stand out more. The dress is already shaded smooth.
>>896038That's weird. What does the wireframe look like? What's your modifier stack? Also did you try smoothing your weights?
>>896039Wireframe is pic related in rest position.Modifier Stack is:>Solidify>Subdivision>ArmatureThe weights are smoothed out as far as I can tell.
Which is the better way for exporting a character animation from Blender to Unreal?Rigged or Baked?What are the pros and cons for each?
>>896043Rigged if you're using animation blueprints and blend spaces.Baked for one-shot animations.
just started a fresh Instagram account for art shit, how can I gain an audience ? is it just hashtags? is making a Twitter account better?
>>896075you gain an audience by producing smut
>>896076guess i will be a nobody
>>896079>>896076>>896075People get this wrong all the time. It's not the smut, it's pandering in any form, porn is just one way about it. Do some easily shareable relatable content or fanart for more popular artists and you'll get the same effect.
>>896081could i get an example? i mean how can i get the reach to pander to popular artists?
>>896083>how can i get the reach@
The baking plugin I use auto set-ups normal maps like that and I don't understand why.What does adding a bump map node after a normal map do? Muting it doesn't seem to change anything.
are there any good videos that show off the workflow for sketching in 3d like in these vids:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0u3gV_cm_8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R3dkyGRKNwI’ve seen a lot of people creating things like this with the grease pencil but can never find a video properly outlining how they do it.
>>896094I think you're going to be disappointed, they probably have a model already or roughly blockout the model and then sketch over it with the origin point set to surface.
>>896096I figured something like that might be the case, but some videos I’ll catch the person just doodling freely in the 3d space. Either way I’d like to see the work flow. Been using Blender for 2d animation to work on a show for kiddos and it’s surprisingly powerful, but I really would like to make some assets that mimic that sort of 3 dimensional sketch art style. The end goal would be something like this guys demo reel:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0r7GdC5Bu0
>>896102Also, another small thing I’m having an issue with is when I use the lineart modifier and bake the lineart I get a bunch of useless frames that you see here. I didn’t know if there was a way to more specifically just back for the keyframes of my models animation or if I’ll just have to apply the modifier each time to the individual frames. It wouldn’t be that big of a deal if it was the latter option, but it’ll slow down my own workflow a bit.
Any hard surface tutorials that's not about low poly shit or donuts? I have all the basics in Blender, I know what most of the operations and modifiers too but my polymodeling skills are shit so I'm searching for something that's a little bit more advanced and make you do shit.
I am learning how to texture stuff. Before this I would just unwrap my models and hand paint textures. Then I would export them in OBJ format and upload them on sketchfab.So I started learning material nodes like pic related eyes are entirely made out of a node and well I can't properly upload it in sketchfab.Am I missing a step? Am I supposed to bake the stuff or something?>>896106>Any hard surface tutorials that's not about low poly shit or donuts? I have all the basics in Blender, I know what most of the operations and modifiers too but my polymodeling skills are shit so I'm searching for something that's a little bit more advanced and make you do shit.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-AOYkDIgWc&ab_channel=Guu%E3%83%BB%E3%82%B0%E3%82%A5
>>896018Can someone help me? How can I quickly transfer the materials to the new mesh? I don't make any new topology I just use Zbrush to fix some errors and sculpt better muscles for drawing reference.
What's erm um the best way to model breasts? Some kind of physics simulation?
>>896199Checked and read da sticky.
>>896201I know about the boob jiggle bones but I mean actually modeling the booba.Do people really just sculpt them?
>>896204Darn I guess I'll just try my hardest doing it the hard way...
blendlets will never compete with autodesk>t. former blendlet
Any tips on how to improve exterior lighting on a character during daytime? I use HDRI, rotate it to have sun on the side. It looks okay but a little flat. Shadowy areas don't pop. Is it done by playing with exposure and photoshop?
This was my first attempt at sculpting. I think I have natural talent, but if you REALLY think there's any pointers you could give me, I GUESS I could hear you out.
Training hard surface but I'm depressed thinking about cleaning this mesh later
>>896220if you want photoshoot-esque results you don't have to limit yourself to just a single hdri.additional lights, reflectors, bounce cards, blockers get used all the time irl. but yes, also photoshop and/or luts.
>>896220You should learn how to use compositing in blender, you can include additional passes in your render.
Are Light Groups in 3.2 a gamechanger?
>doing a tutorial on modeling characters>23 minutes into the tutorial he tells us we need to keep our shapes square and that triangles are badHe's already forced me to restart once when he didn't properly explain the reference sketch he told us to make.Is there an easy way of untriangling my thing? it's all connected in a weird way. Is it that bad if I just leave it triangly?
so im making good progress on my mask thing, is there a way to smooth out these random bumps without having to fumble around with the meshI mean the shit around the side of the mask, I want it to be nice and smooth so I dont have to sand the thing too much
Does Cycles have an AMD GPU denoiser yet?
I'm trying to do a fluid sim but it's not working, as in the domain isn't wrapping a mesh around my inflow, and instead ist just a block in my scene.Are there hidden parameters for it to work? Like size, scale, clipping etc?I'm working with a scene where my domain is 200m wideI've gotten fluid to work sometimes and on smaller scales so I do know what to click to set up domain, inflow etc
I'm working on my first project and I have a few questionsWhy is my water texture not applying its boolean modifier to intersect with the sphere?How can I make it so that when a boolean cuts an object in half, it displays a face there? Do I just do that manually?
>>896009I used Blender a bit for some game mesh mods and for making desktop background s. So I know basics.I got around zero knowledge about bones, rigs and animations.Must I learn all of that there is about bones and rigs and animating or is there a quick and fast way to animate models from vidya? Rigify or whatnot?Most of the models have original bones.What do?
>>896414nobody uses blender for animation
>>896425its not supposed to be a joke.
Haha boing boing
>>896429doesnt look realistic, like rubber and not sand
>>896430Realism is boring
>>896431you're being lazy and also being sexist
>>896432Enjoy your soulless, lifeless BORING not bouncy breasts. Do these look like happy tiddies to you?
Anyone have a list of useful hotkeys? I remember all the navigation and camera keys well enough, but object and edit keys I’ve almost completely forgotten.
>>896432>stylized boob jiggle is sexistRethink your life.
>>896437A (& AA), G (& GG), R, S, X, E, I, F, M, H and ctrl+R are probably the only ones you need to remember. Maybe O, K, alt+Z, ctrl++, ctrl+- and ctrl+i too. For the rest there's F3 and quick favorites.
>>896440Gotcha, thank you. trying them out now. Remembering some of them already. Feels like blender is kinda like a bike where with a little refresher you can get right back into it which is nice.
How do I turn a material I copied from another object into a seperate one so that messign with the new materials nodes doesn't affect the first one?
Which is better, Autorig Pro or Rigify?
>>896458Rigify is free
>>896473He asked which one is better, retard.
>>896477He asked a retarded question and got a retarded answer.
>>896446>create new material>link material you want to modify(icon before material name)>click on the number icon after the material name - this will make the material uniqe>done
>>896009Why do my cycles animations keep flickering even at a resolution of 1920x1080 and high sample count like 256? They're not smooth like eevee animations.
Does it really matter whether you use the denoiser in the compositer with nodes or directly from the render properties tab? Aren't they both the same?
>>896489thats not high use 1k samples. you can also blur in compositor and use clamping to fight flicker and ai denoise but basically it always flickers. in sprite fright they used geometry nodes to fight flicker with zdepth geometry and projected 4k textures. luxcore is a viable alternative, especially for interiors i like it
>>896403I don't know how to fix your problems, but I like your render
First time poster on /3/. I spent all of yesterday working on this.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wD8AKEfO8oo
good examples of geometry nodes?
>>8965041k? Man... I need a new computer haha. Thanks for the help though
>>896478No, you're a complete moron.
I'm trying to get some wetmaps using dynamic paint and a fluid simulation, but whenever I connect the image sequence into a material it turns pink, like the texture is missing (when it clearly isn't)?
>>896426you will never be a comedian
I started using displacement maps, that I make in photoshop, to get consistent details in my sculpt.It also give me a non-destructive layer effect for the details.The only downside if that I can only make it work well with a multires modifier, since I have to UV unwrap.
>>896018I still need help
With 3D models, why are eyes typically modeled with a cylindrical hole in them? Shouldn't eyes be spheres? Why is the iris area flat, and the pupil is a hole?
>>896594Watch a tutorial on GoB(it's the Blener <--> Zbrush addon); whatever problem you're having is so utterly basic, so utterly trivial and simplistic, that you can neither describe it to us sufficiently nor are we able to guess at what you mean.Therefore there's probably a check box you have turned off, or a drag 'n drop you didn't know you could do, or some simple hotkey combo you weren't aware of.If you REALLY can't figure it out even after watching a video, then record yourself importing/exporting and make a webm
>>896041Armature needs to be first
>>896075>>896079>>896083>>896097Your work has to stand out, be engaging, be interesting, and without the viewer needing to know anything about what they're looking at in order to be engaged.>that's really vague and broadIt is but things like Composition and Color Theory and the Golden Ratio and on and on and on are all available to be studied.I mean it's basically just like Photography and trying to create a stand out photo. If your work doesn't grab people, no one will ever notice or care.Smut succeeds because it's inherently interesting, inherently has a built in audience, has a barrier to entry (lots of talented people are afraid of backlash).Very few people actively go out of their way to go view "poorly lit archviz scene of badly made glasses sitting on a book next to a coffee cup with an incorrectly placed handle while an HDRI meant for lighting is made to begrudgingly do the work of an actual background image all while the same dull glossy finish coats everything like a thin veneer of mediocrity">wow those are some mean words you just saidGit gud or fade into eternity. The world needs more porn, it doesn't need more "fine art"
>>896094>>896102There aren't any good all encompassing tutorials, it's spread out over many different videos.It's pretty fiddly in that you do need a little bit of geometry as a starting point, and you need to do weird counter intuitive things at times to get shapes to go where you want them.This covers the basics/fundamentals, cheats a bit by making a box out of a box:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZyB30-xZFsA little more advanced but also a lot harder to understand by virtue of the poor presentation:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c57qq2nE3B0This person's videos are pretty rough but informative if you can plow through:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_4-0wJ-JXQ&t=0sYou'll never find a high quality single tutorial series on grease pencil. Somebody like the guy whose reel you posted 1) probably isn't a good teacher, 2) has no incentive to help other people skip over all the pain and suffering he had to go through to learn
>>896106Start stealing long form multi-part tutorial series off of cgpersia.There's no skipping around and no "but I only want to make TRAINS, I hate GUNS!", you've just got to grind away at all the gun tutorials and the tank tutorials and the grenades and the generic scifi soldiers until you can finally make your trains or whatever
>>896211If you mean box modeling, go look at some subdiv booba models and also look at the anatomy of the booba.It's not a sphere that projects from the chest, it's a weird ziplock bag of flesh that hangs off the top of the chest.Seriously, look at a naked elevated booba (elevated as in like when a woman gets a mamogram); if it's an A cup or smaller it looks like a nice little spheroid but if it's larger it's like god took that A cup and used the Scale tool and just inflated it without changing where the bottom edge of the breast is.
>>896220Just like with real photography you cheat the fuck out of it. Whether that's in post with levels, full on paint over, etc or whether it's in scene with artificial lighting and exposure time, just fucking cheat."More real than real" is the key. But of course you need a solid grounding in reality so that you don't get carried away and end up with some nightmarish Willy Wonka shit
>>8962361) Fix that disgusting ngon right now 2) Make a library of procedurally generated components you can kitbash together3) Static meshes don't need to have good toplogy unless they're going to deform but obviously if you have literal ngons, stars, poles, non-manifold geometry, weird ass edge case shit where the viewport recomputes it ten thousand times a second with a different result every time you rotate, then you need to fix that.
>>896600>is but things like Composition and Color Theory and the Golden Ratio and on and on and on are all available to be studied.>I mean it's basically just like Photography and trying to create a stand out photo. If your work doesn't grab people, no one will ever notice or care.>>Smut succeeds because it's inherently interesting, inherently has a built in audience, has a barrier to entry (lots of talented people are afraid of backlash).>Very few people actively go out of their way to go view "poorly lit archviz scene of badly made glasses sitting on a book next to a coffee cup with an incorrectly placed handle while an HDRI meant for lighting is made to begrudgingly do the work of an actual background image all while the same dull glossy finish coats everything like a thin veneer of mediocrity"holy fucking shit, I didn't expect you to conclude with this >Git gud or fade into eternity. The world needs more porn, it doesn't need more "fine art"after roasting the fuck out of my render but i get your points, gonna strive for more uniqueness
>>896252"Squares" are called quads, triangley are called "triangles".Quads matter for several reasons: 1) they subdivide nicely (however there are tricks with triangles and subdividing too but that's master class shit) 2) you get nice edge flow that allows you to add in loops3) quads are an illusion, all of reality is composed of triangles, triangles all the way down, which is why when you export your mesh to a game engine it has to be "triangulated" (turned into triangles); by having it in quads the engine can only solve that triangulation problem one way. If there are ngons or the like, the engine can generate a different result (possibly continuously, creating that weird flickering artifact). Secondarily it looks like you have a lot of geometric fuckery going on with a number of edges that are missing verts (they're just floating lines intersecting other parts of the mesh). That's called non-manifold geometry; that's like 3d mesh object thingies that can't exist in reality but can exist mathematically so the 3D program is willing to approximate it for you but in fact you're seeing garbage that will be lit very strangely, textures will look weird, etc etc because the math starts to break down as it goes beyond "dots in space" and into "non-blackbody dielectric object"Anyway don't get frustrated. Tutorials are rarely uniformly perfect, there will often be gaps in knowledge or technique where the presenter has assumed you already know something or forgot to include something because it's just second nature to them or this is attempt number 25 at recording this part of the video or whatever.The solution is to go as far as you can, then if you become stuck or too frustrated, go do someone else's tutorial and then come back to this one.>if I do someone else's tutorial on [SUBJECT], why would I come back to another tutorial on the same [SUBJECT]?Because you'll learn something that was left out of the other tutorial because that tutorial is imperfect too.
>>896467>>896537Mixamo is the best paid autorigging solution. Auto rig pro can be easily stolen, like all paid blender addons, because the authors have to redistribute the full source (which is kind of automatic since it's a .py file) and are barred from doing anything to take down other people.>yes but which one is THE VERY VERY VERY STRONGESThttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ve3C9Xj6b38
I rigged a flying animal and behold parts of the wings are coming lose during posing. Is there a non-retarded way to fix this? Someome modifier(weld?)? cheers lads
>>896615I know it's taboo to admit this but I already deleted the mesh anon... (I don't have much space left on my HDD with all the tuts and shit).Are you talking about this ngon or do you see another one?> if you have literal ngons, stars, polesI may be wrong but these aren't completely evil, right? I made a lot of other meshes that had no shading issues but had a lot of ngons, stars and poles and I didn't see any problem. I'm modeling for video games so no sub-d at all.
>>896636Nevermind, cant delete this post but I solved it by remeshing
What's your go-to addon for UV unwrapping?I tried a couple to straughten UVs and didn't get good results.
>>896668Why do you need uv unwrapping addon? I keep hearing that people dont like UV unwrap tools in blender but I dont see a problem with it. I like to think I'm not a blind blendet as blender does have its problems but UV unwrapping has never been one for me.
>>896671A man who has lived in a cave his whole life doesn't yearn for sunlight, once you've UV'd somewhere else you'll understand.The packing is garbage, the weird way the editor can be connected and unconnected to the viewport and some stuff doesn't work in both modes is garbage, lots of basic stuff like scaling an island to fill the entire 0 to 1 area is annoying af requiring futzing with the 3d cursor. I didn't think it was so bad until I started having to UV in Maya for work
>>896671I like to have my hair strands in a straight grid so they deform the texture.Anytime I try to do something more complicated than unwrapping and packing I start a movie on the side because it's long and tedious.I think you'll understand when you try to managed the level of details, the amount of space they take up on the texture, for the different parts of your model.
>>896009Can you guys teach me how to make wireframe renders like this in blender
>>896048And how about facial expressions?Do you really need to import all these facial bones or can we make transitions between 2 expressions?
>>896724Follow this guide and make sure you watch absolutely every video:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdcL5aF8ZcJvCyqWeCBYVGKbQgrQngen3
What's the best way to animate the Unreal Skeleton? Mr Mannequin is outdated and not optimized for Blender 3 or Unreal 5.
>>896703Like what? Try the wireframe modifier?
Which is the best Blender hard surface modeling addon, Hard Ops, MESHMachine or Fluent?
>>896252what tutorial are you following?I was searching for anime tutorials but at this point any good introduction to modeling characters will do.
So im finally far with the mesh editing on my thing that I'd consider it good enough. Before I apply the mirror, subdivision and solidify is there a way later on to remove those if I need to edit it again. also I intend to print this thing to wear it, can I split it in two parts inside blender or is meshmixer the only way?
>>896822how are you going to breathe with no mouth or nose holes you moron
>>896823im built different fool
>>896823also how would I put in holes in the existing mesh. if I were using solidworks I can just extrude cut, this is my first blender project so im working it out as it goes. will put the holes under the cheekbone curve and have some ''tunnels'' running to the nose and mouth
>>896822Once you apply modifiers they're applied and there's no going back.So before you apply, Shift D to duplicate, suffix BACKUP and move it to another collection or something.>>896825If you're printing then topology doesn't matter as much and you can punch holes with a boolean modifier (that's considered bad practice because it really messes up the topology).
>>896840>If you're printing then topology doesn't matter as muchjust because im trying to learn blender properly I did manage to keep every face rectengular and definetly didnt leave one single triangle around the eyes, so dont look for it.is it possible to split it into two parts though, I want the back to come off so I sculpt connection points for magnets that will keep the two parts on when worn. or did I fuck up by just making it once piece from the getgo
>>896776I can't speak to the others but my criticism of HardOps is that it's almost like an entire thing unto itself in terms of all the hotkeys and stuff.Maybe that's just an unavoidable problem or maybe that's changed
>>896849Not him, not super certain what you're saying but if you have a super dense mesh (like from a sculpt) such that you can't do things in edit mode very reasonably, then you can Alt B (I think? Ctrl B? one of those) to draw a box around the model and hide everything outside the box (but this does nothing to modify the geometry).If you want to specifically break out a piece because you're going to then do something to it, like the workflow that is sometimes used to make clothing, then in this case you're probably going to need to do some shit with booleans to chop out just the part you want to modify.If you're going to modify that part via sculpting, I'd mask the edges so they can't be sculpted that way you can still seamlessly plug the piece back into the original sculpt If that's not the answer you're looking for, maybe record a gif or webm and/or do a doodle of what you're trying to achieve
>>896703>>896772 sorry guys i meant do you know how to make this in blender https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/v3-reilly-201c917375c143309e650fd6562a50e1
>>896840>they're applied and there's no going back.what if you press "undo" ?
>>896009is blender better than stock c4d? everything I try to do in c4d requires redshift or octane, is cycles at least comparable?
>>896604Dang, those are most of the videos I’ve found before as well. This one wasn’t too bad:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu0KMOdkXgkBut it also pretty much is just what others have shared which is making a basic 3d model and drawing on top of it. I just figured it was a neat style and wanted to fool around with it, though it’s not really what I’m using blender for at the moment. I appreciate the help all the same though. Guess I’ll just have to keep fumbling around it until I find a smoothish work flow using the various videos provided.
Will I run into much trouble if I just rig a sculpted model if all I care about is the figures silhouette? It’s a bit faster to get the general shapes I want via sculpting over editing, and I don’t need any sort of details on my models. Still, I heard that improper topology can cause issues when rigging them for movement.
>>896909You undo history can run out
>>896873>maybe record a gif or webm and/or do a doodle of what you're trying to achievebasically this, it allows dissasembly to actually put on the thing. I have to split the helmet in two and then sculpt in the small bumps that I can put the magnets in.
is there an equivalent to Illustrator's alignment guides in blender?
>>896924it is simply always better to have a subdivision version when sculpting, even if it's just a zremesh style automated topology, it means you can make bigger changes to the silhouette of the model without disturbing details by moving it on subdivision 1 and allows you to UV and yes, even rig your sculpt for posing easily. I often send subdiv 1 out of zbrush, autorig it in blender for posing then send it back in for example.
>>896913cycles is very much comparable but will maybe lack speed and certain nodes suck (no good curvature node for example)isn't octane free though?
>>896895make it using bezier curves/ paths then just add thickness to them in the curve options.
>>896942>cycles is very much comparable but will maybe lack speed and certain nodes suck (no good curvature node for example)interesting, thanks for the response>isn't octane free though?no, I think it's like $700 - $900but it looks like an older version is free for blender but not for c4d, might make it worth the switch though
>>896937>>896939>and then sculpt in the small bumps that I can put the magnets in.Don't bother, just use a soldering iron to melt your holes after you print it.
>>896968I later want to produce these things to sell and im i'll automate the process as much as I can. the holes have to be done when its printing and I have to split it in half regardless. The shell wont be thick enough to allow for the magnets to be put in place as is as well
>>896944octane is subscription. The free (and paid) version for Blender lags slightly behind since it isn't an addon for Blender but a compiled Blender version with Octane implemented. You don't have to switch completely to Blender, but you could outsource your shading/lighting and rendering to Blender and use Octane for free. Only limitation is that it only allows the usage of 1 GPU.
Why am I running out of ram when I have 32gb?
>>897041What GPU do you have? I can't fit more that 3.5 + (((0.5))) GB in mine
>>897044then you should have 8GB VRam to work with - no idea what could be taking up that much space
>>897041Blender loves a good memory leak
>>896009Hello people, I am working on a commission which required cel shading, I made this based on a tutorial and it works quite well, I added a bit around the end to allow for transparency when needed and I also found the bit I would need to add if I wanted to add normal maps (not pictured), however now I need to add highlights which I did a few days back but lost the file where I was experimenting with it, can someone help me with the node setup?
How do you feel about the Amaranth Toolset?
I am going to snap. There are dozens of tutorials on how to shade stuff in EVEE, metal, burger meat, hair etc etcBut no one show how to bake it which uses CYCLES and so everything that I make is crap that I can't put in game engine or any art website because the material nodes don't work outside of blender.How am I suppose to figure out baking on my own? Why doesn't evee even offer a baking option.
>>897356give up on blender baking and pirate substance painter, trust me.
Hello, retard here.Is there a way to export texture from Blender in order to convert to pointcloud? It didn't work with STL
> "20 Minute Tutorial"> ,Took me 2+ hoursI'm pretty bad at Blender.
Is there a better way to use displacement than adaptive subdiv? Shit is killing my RAM.
Can I transfer rigify rig into the model with same proportions but different topology (I am doing a retopo)?
I don't understand why there are literally MILLIONS of models being added on deviantart every day in xps format, but it's some obscure program from the 2000s and you can't import them into blender without breaking the materials. What's up with that? it's not like the program does some cool thing like MMD which makes it worthy of being a file format right?
>>897547Kinda comfy, anon. Would the tutorial you followed be suitable for a complete beginner?
I spend thousand of hours trying to understand how blender works and I finally did it
>>896009How to make porn
What's the use case of angle-based unwrap method, opposed to conformal? It always ends up looking like shit, so I always use conformal.
>>897818use camera film fucki fucki
>>897716i guessing because xna was used to rip models from games. It takes more knowledge and skill to set up a model for use after ripping and just as much to convert to mmd and setup as a working pmx. Some people are quick and dirty rippers, who just want to get there first. even if the output is shit. there is a xps to mmd converter but it's output is dependent on the state of the input. some might be rigged before so come out semi decent afterwards but some might not have a rig or might just have errors due to ripping and either will be unusable or wont convert. mmd/pmx is just as old btw. and has it's own problems, but it probably wont change for a long time, because no one is gonna make something better opensource, and even so it be take time for people to shift to a new platform. saying that i''ve noticed a few people use cycles or eevee in blender for mmd videos.
>>896009Anybody got any free Glados model from portal ? i want to play around and do some animations in blender.