The new version is out. Why didn't they just make it a plugin instead? I mean, seriously? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX4A-3aJrwk
>>864513Its was an in-house tool for animation. Why would they make it a plugin for another tool like Maya if it replaces it? So they can pay license fees for Maya? Also did you seriously made a new thread for an update, or so that you can bitch and moan about it?
>>864514renderman was in house, and now its a plugin for blender, houdini, maya, etc. Not an excuse>Also did you seriously made a new thread for an update, or so that you can bitch and moan about it?grow up
>>864515Wait, Renderman for Blender? I missed that.
>>864545it doesnt work on the latest version though
>>864545>>864547The last version it supports is 2.92 due to Blender upgrading Python from 3.7.4 (Blender 2.81) to 3.9.1 in 2.93.
>>864547>>864550OK, I am not doing much on the rendering department but having more render engines is always a good thing.
>>864513ngmi so OP will COMPLAIN instead
>>864515Renderman is a renderer you dumb fuck. A renderer without a host program is basically useless. >not an excuseThey don't need to justify/excuse their decisions. Deal with it!>grow upno, never
>>864667>Renderman is a renderer you dumb fuck. A renderer without a host program is basically useless.are you fucking retarded? Anyone who actually knows renderman knows how to compose and fully utilize raw .rib! Fuck off kid!
>>864667>A renderer without a host program is basically uselessGet a load of this non-industry fag
>retards argue about anything but not the topic of OPshut the fuck up.I wanna know if cascadeur is good or not.
>>864765more like cashcadeur. Someone really needs to write an open source alternative
>>864782Yes we definitely need more half assed open sores garbage shitting up this industry with more low skill pajeets
>>864859what we dont need is more closed source monopolies
>>864782I agree. Someone (not me) should definitely make it. Reverse engineering the algorithms looks hard but I can make the logo!