[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/3/ - 3DCG

[Advertise on 4chan]

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 87 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: booper.png (633 KB, 800x400)
633 KB
633 KB PNG
Previous thread: >>846083
>>
welp, we all saw this coming miles away
>>
>>850793
RIP
>>
Will they ever make grease pencil work with panoramic cameras?
>>
>>850793

He will literally convert blendoits to Zfags when he starts using Zbrush again. Therefore Zfags will always win
>>
File: Texture Selector.jpg (468 KB, 1991x1552)
468 KB
468 KB JPG
>>850791
Hey, scripting retard here, I was wondering if someone can write up a quick script that opens up a folder of images and connects each of the nodes to this bad boy. Like pic related.

I use it to randomly select textures from an array of inputs, plugging in a object>random node or attribute node to choose between each of the textures.
It's super useful for things that are similarly shaped but have different images, like labels, or building windows.

But yeah, I'd just like to 1-click all the images into place. I'm perfectly capable of connecting them manually, but I figured there's be a less-tedious way.
Thanks
>>
>>850810
he has a copy of Substance Painter too, it was one of the things that he had planed to do after the sculpt vertex colors.
>>
>>850807
Do they not?
I thought grease pencil objects were 3d objects and rendered the same as anything else in the scene.
So as long as you're rendering in cycles it should work fine with panoramic cameras.
Or are you forced to use Eevee with GP? Since Eevee doesn't support pano cameras for some reason.
>>
>>850813
couldn't you just use udims and manipulate the texture coordinates lmao
>>
File: screenshot.png (291 KB, 1340x1164)
291 KB
291 KB PNG
First from-scratch model and first character, anybody have any good rigging tutorials to spoonfeed me with?
I've used Pose and Edit mode a little before with preexisting armatures from game models, but never rigged anything myself.
>>
>>850898
https://youtu.be/w0w4UxgzBcY
>>
File: bufu3025j5w41.jpg (674 KB, 2880x2160)
674 KB
674 KB JPG
Blender render with SFM style anon here.
from the last thread:
>>850196
>>850220
>>850223

I think I found some media that is pretty close to the SFM rendering style.
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijg-4YBK_qs
If I am right the director behind the animation project did a 40k book adaptation in the SFM. Its the closest the Source Filmmaker community ever got to a feature length "film."
The second closest was a canceled animation project by the director of the movie "9" called "Deep"

If any of you have advice on getting SFM looking renders in Blender I would love to hear it.
Is EEVEE essentially the "realtime" renderer for Blender? It makes things look like a 2018 AAA video game on max settings, right? That's kind of what SFM can do with a bit more "refinement" if that even helps to get me closer to the SFM render style.

>pic related
Arguably one of the best "scenebuild" renditions in the Source Filmmaker
A great example of the kind of Source Filmmaker look I want to mimic in Blender.

So a buddy of mine says he has a spare 1080 graphics card he has to look for. Hopefully soon I can replace my 1060 that died.
>>
>>850898

fuck you gonna rig he aint got no knees or elbows
>>
>>850902
To clarify my only experience with Blender is mostly from watching tutorials and reading PDFs.
Might as well say that I'm a complete Blender noob.
My old laptop I'm posting from right now can't handle Blender.
>>
File: screenshot 2.png (324 KB, 1392x1158)
324 KB
324 KB PNG
>>850903
He's got secret elbows, silly.
>>
File: fig.jpg (90 KB, 1893x698)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>>850870
GP works in either renderer but it seems to be a separate rendering process to 3D objects. It treats panoramic cameras as regular ones.
>>
>>850955
Also a sucky thing: Eevee can't do proper panoramic cameras either.
>>
>>850791
why did C4D copy blender's layout?
>>
>>850975
They keep losing marketshare and now try to position themselves as THE next step up for people who started out with Blender a while ago and are now looking for "professional" tools to upgrade to
>>
File: 1604329506854.png (301 KB, 1463x863)
301 KB
301 KB PNG
how do i deform it like the reference's bottom?
>>
File: screen.png (323 KB, 1205x1008)
323 KB
323 KB PNG
>>851009
>>
so i made my characters clothing and armour with the subdivision modifier on. am i supposed to apply it before i unwrap and texture? and would that be too high poly for animation?
also if i wanted to make normal map with more detail i could subdivide a copy even further and sculpt detail on?
>>
>>850992
>THE next step up for people who started out with Blender a while ago and are now looking for "professional" tools to upgrade to
Lets just assume they are right in their implication that C4d is a step up, why would people choose C4d rather than Maya, Max or Houdini (which are measurable steps above Blender) ?
Why make one step, if you can jump ahead all the way?
It seems like they weren't thinking clearly when formulating this "strategy".
>>
>>851012
thanks anon
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (705 KB, 3536x1248)
705 KB
705 KB JPG
>>850791
What's the solution to mirroring walk animations and ensuring the f-curves are the same? (this is for a game, so I'll only be using 120 frames)
The areas circled in orange in picrel would ideally be identical. Is it just a case of copying the keyframes multiple times and just taking a cross section of the animation into the game?
Seems inelegant to do it that way. Surely there's a way to mirror keyframes so that the curves are also mirrored the same even if the copied keyframe is planted mid animation.
>>
File: Capture.jpg (119 KB, 2124x445)
119 KB
119 KB JPG
>>851035
To clarify, this seems to be my issue.
These selected keyframes in the curves should have the same bezier handles, but they don't. (one of the keyframes is just a mirrored version of the other, offset by 60 frames).
(In this image I've made the curves cyclic to illustrate the problem)
>>
>>851035
Also, I'm wondering if there's a solution that doesn't involve modifying each bone individually.
>>
File: Capture.jpg (93 KB, 2086x381)
93 KB
93 KB JPG
>>851039
Also, I'm aware that I can do this (picrel) since I'm only using frames 0 - 120 and can discard the rest, just wondering if there's a better solution.
>>
>>851027
C4d is quite a big name in motion graphics still so the name is still in heavy rotation in the professional field which works well for baiting people who're looking to step up from their noob level.
There's a huge crowd of people who started out with Blender in the last couple years and it seems like they're really focusing on that crowd. Many of those people still think that Blender is just a starting point and you have to switch to some big brand to get anywhere.
>>
>>850872
That wouldn't be random then.
And if it would, it would be based on the material, so every object would share the same texture.
Not to mention UDIMS would be more work than this.
>>
>>850950
That still looks like it aint' gonna deform too good. Throw your character into Mixamo (look it up on Jewgle) and do a quick rig test to see if the model will deform properly.
In my noobish knowledge, at least 2 things affect proper deformation:
1) amount of polygons (too few and stretching will become noticeable, too many and the program will struggle to process it all, a middle ground seems ideal)
2) topology
As a beginner it might be advisable to focus on poly amount first, and proper topology second
Lastly your character's feet appear to be merged together. That can't be good
>>
>>851022
>would that be too high poly
Depends on the animation: if it's for a game, the average standard is about 15000 faces (quads, I believe, so 30k triangles, other anons please correct me if I'm wrong) for a model; if it's for a cinematic short, you can go higher but I don't know exactly by how much
>>
File: ref1.png (145 KB, 743x756)
145 KB
145 KB PNG
rigging amateur question:
how do you reconcile the root bone of an armature with the foot IK controllers?
if the foot IK controllers are children of the root bone, and you make an animation with root motion, the foot IKs are bound to slide around and you can't get them to stay in one place on the ground.
the easiest solution is to just unparent the root bone from the foot IK controllers, but doesn't that defeat the purpose of having a root bone in the first place?
>>
>>850793
>1 day later
>sculpting semen demons on twitch
>>
>>851075
This is but the first step of his journey.
>>
>>851075

HE keeps all his coom-stained 3d sculpts in his C:\ drive.
>>
>>851075
that's all he's been doing the last few months anyway
>>
>>851075
He can't keep getting away with this!
>>
>>851075
Can anyone make that grid preview work with nvidia on windows? only work with amd to me, I have tested that with a 980 and a 660 ........
>>
Guys, give advice to a retard. I wanted to model a chess set like another anon did here, but what I cannot quite get right is how to light up a chess board so that it looks good from a high angle, in the sense that the board looks like it's on a well lit table, but also the fine details on the pieces are visible. All tutorials for retards are talking about how to set up lighting to showcase one model, which does not seem the case here. Or maybe I should do other things first, like texture the table, put more work into pieces and their materials and think about lights last?
>>
File: studio hdri.jpg (639 KB, 1792x1345)
639 KB
639 KB JPG
>>851118
Get some normal maps or other surface imperfections on the board that catch the light. Look at existing chess boards (or other game boardss) IRL to see that they're not just a flat, perfectly smooth plane.
Use your normal lights, but also set up an accompanying HDRI for reflections of the environment and some more ambient/secondary lighting.
If you want to continue the studio look, look into HDRIs that replicate a studio setup.
>>
>>851124
Thanks anon. It's a fair point that I need to put more work into the surface of the board. For now I just tried to warp the edges a bit (and they are a bit less flat than what it seems), but in fact the whole surface needs to be imperfect.
>>
>>851124
DOSCH DESIGN had some amazing studio HDRI collection years ago, specifically crated for product presentation. No idea if they are still around, but I still have most of the physical media.
>>
>>851124
>>851195
So I am supposed to have actual lights, but also keep an hdri? I guess the issue that I faced is that by trying to have the board well lit (I don't quite like dim environments) I made the lighting too flat so the hdri I used when shading individual objects didn't really have any effect. But I guess I should make the scene more detailed and revisit lighting after that.
>>
File: blender.png (206 KB, 1414x792)
206 KB
206 KB PNG
>>850791
Hey I am trying to learn blender for moddelling. I have this very simple character, and in the simple view it looks fine to me but when I add sub divisons it completely falls apart.
I have seen other people in tutorials do this to a similar figure and it works fine.
Can you help me find out why it is so bad for me?
>>
>>851239
it's because those verts aren't connected
select all and merge by distance
>>
File: merged1.png (70 KB, 526x730)
70 KB
70 KB PNG
fixed thanks to a kind anon
"Select al vertices in edit mode > press f3 > merge vertices"
>>851247
thanks anon for replying, I am not sure how I caused the issue but I will try and understand why
>>
>>851248
Another anon. Could be that you pressed 'extrude' or 'inset' or somerhing like that and then forgot to move the created geometry or undo. Happens to me all the time.
>>
>>851239
>>851248
Actually no, in your case these look like unmerged vertices along the seam of a mirrored object. Can happen if in the order of modifiers mirror comes after subdiv. Then Blender will subdivide half the model and then mirror the result which can look like your pic.
>>
File: 1631675933671.jpg (97 KB, 700x691)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
I tried using Blender once when I was in high school and I gave up after 3 minutes. I'm basically an expert.
>>
File: 1.png (116 KB, 505x658)
116 KB
116 KB PNG
am i gonna make it
>>
Thoughts on combining stylized characters with realistic landscapes?
>>
>>851283
yeah I have some
>>
>>851230
>So I am supposed to have actual lights, but also keep an hdri?
Yeah generally you want the HDRI for reflections, not so much lighting (though in some instances you can use it for that). Things will look even more flat if you don't have an environment for your objects to reflect. So if you just used lights, and a solid color background, you're losing a lot of detail from your model since each part reflects the environment differently. With a solid color, everything looks homogeneous since the environment is the same all around.

If things are too flat, you might want to re-think your lighting setup, and either tone them down and adjust the exposure, or move them around.
Just come back to it later like you said. Lighting is an entire field on its own.
>>
What are some essential Blender addons?

How do you guys feel about:

Hard Ops
Ice Tools Pro
Autorig Pro
MeshMachine
Speedflow
Retopoflow
UV Squares
BPainter
>>
>>851292
mmd importer
sfm importer

thank me later
>>
>>851292
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzlefBEB3ko
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV0gcfXQgAQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpkxGzuuuPg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfbXeP8LgEg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRVnk1PMDTs
>>
>>851299
>>851300
Retard
>>
How do you make rigs with the armatures imported from games/sfm?
>>
>>851303
if there is an armature, then why do you want to re rig it
>>
>>851305
I want the rig controls to actually animate the model instead of bone by bone, sorry if I explained it wrong.
>>
>>851308
rotate the bones, dont translate
>>
>>851305
>>851310

based retard

>>851303
https://youtu.be/Ts9LModAFp4
>>
>>850791
So I just learn UV mapping and unwrapping from Guru and want to confirm something
Is this how people make HD textures?
>Place seams and unwrap the model, see if it's pretty spaced out and undisorted
>Save it
>Open UV Mesh in a art or photo editing program
>Draw, paint, color whatever the fuck you want
>Save it/Export
>Reopen it in Blender/3D program
>Make sure it fits good on your model.
Am I understanding how professionals do this, right?
>>
>>851333
Professionals don't use Blender, bro.
>>
>>851333
>Open UV Mesh in a art or photo editing program
>Draw, paint, color whatever the fuck you want
No, this is just one workflow, and it's only really viable with clean, not overly complicated objects like wooden planks. Most artists will actually paint directly on the model.

Here's the true redpill:

1. Place your seams
2. UV unwrap. Make sure you organize it cleanly, overlap the parts that are meant to look the same, make sure you have the bleed configured properly, etc.
3. Set up your materials in the shader editor and bake whatever you want (AO, metallic, normalmap, etc)
4. Start Texture Painting.

If you want to go for the hand-painted look and work primarily with your graphics tablet, consider 3D Coat or using the Blender texture painting tools.

If you want PBR texturing that utilizes smart materials, check out Quixel Mixer, Substance Painter, Mari and Marmoset Toolbag 4. It's more technical than a pure artistic workflow.
>>
>>851333
if you're gonna learn proper UVing you'll have to look outside the spectre of blender tutorials, the guru especially is not gonna be able to teach you shit get off that scammer ASAP.

https://youtu.be/L3654VGZObg - blender UV tips

UV info no blender tutorial ever gives you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e6zvJqVqlA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVsIIkJNkjM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyQ9RMeU0s0 (Uv smoothing)
>>
>>851338
>>851336
Wow. UV stuff has more going on than I initially thought. Lot to learn in the future though. 3D has a lot going on than you think.
>>
>>851341
3D Coat is pretty comfy, and Blender natively supports it so you can export and import in between with ease now too.
>>
am i going crazy, or didn't blender's transform tool used to only display unlocked channels? like if you had Z and Y rotation locked, it'd only display the red X circle when you hit R to rotate. now it shows all three axes even if they're locked
is there a setting somewhere for this?
>>
>>851292
None of these.
Blender already comes packed with the essentials.
Anything else is pretty frivolous.

Though I will put in a suggestion of the Wiggle Armature addon. It's one that I use in just about everything. It's great for more than just boobs.
>>
>>851362
>Blender already comes packed with the essentials.
>Anything else is pretty frivolous.

wanna know how I know you suck at UVs
>>
Is it just me or has blender's shaders compilation become unbearably slow in 2.93?
>>
>>851283
look up scott mcloud masking effect
>>
>>851334
why are you here? lol
>>
>>851368
UVs are simple as fuck.
The fact that you NEED an addon to cut fucking shapes is how I know you suck at UVs.
>>
>>851431
>The fact that you NEED an addon to cut fucking shapes is how I know you suck at UVs.
Blender packing algorithm is old and slow as fuck, you need at least TexTools and UVPackmaster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XVy_BC_unI
>>
>>851431
How am I evaluating Texel density or UV utilisation without add-ons, why are you manually straightening every loop of an island?
>>
>>850793
>Broke edit mode performance
>Broke pinch brush behavior
>Broke texture paint brush
>Added a bunch of unfinished cloth sculpting brushes with shitty convoluted behaviors
>Still hasn't fixed vertex paint performance
>Pose brush is still jank as fuck
>Remesher is still nowhere near what he proposed when he first showed it off
>"Alright later guys I'm off to take a break :)"
Is Pablo secretly based?
>>
>>851447
>Broke edit mode performance
??? it works better than ever before in 3.0 alpha
>Broke texture paint brush
what exactly?
>Pose brush is still jank as fuck
elaborate
>Still hasn't fixed vertex paint performance
vertex paint mode is trash. have you even tried his sculpt mode vertex paint? night and day difference and actually works
>>
>>851447
>Still hasn't fixed vertex paint performance
Sculpt Vertex Colors
>Pose brush is still jank as fuck
You have to use face sets and automasking
>>
File: screen shot.png (65 KB, 660x280)
65 KB
65 KB PNG
>>851068
If I'm subdividing it like this how many segments would you recommend for the arms?
>>
File: 1602494715169.jpg (699 KB, 683x935)
699 KB
699 KB JPG
>spend the better part of two days building a skirt rig using spline ik
>it's more of a pain to animate with than just using chains of fk bones like the japs do
>>
>>851455
for something this simple put in about 16 spans and set your model up for subdivision, that'll give you enough topology to work with bendy bones and form a smooth curve when subdivided.

>>851447
think of how many people he prevented from swapping to zbrush for sculpting sooner with his false hope, truly incredible time wasting.
>>
File: 1571609387372.jpg (121 KB, 1242x1224)
121 KB
121 KB JPG
Fucking hell you guys I'm stuck in this weird limbo. I know rigify super well-; I like the control rig it produces and have used it for many hours. I built rigs from scratch before I learned rigify and although they weren't as advanced, I liked them well enough. But why, why is it so hard for me to transition out of rigify, into my own advanced custom rigs ? My main snag right now is with the duplicated deform skeleton, producing the Control and Mechanism skeletons directly on top. Like it begins to get stupid hard to even select the bones in the viewport once you reach that stage. It just makes me angry that the "correct" advancement is filled with pitfalls and workarounds- More grief than I've run into learning or overcoming any challenges thus far in 3d after 2 years. Makes me want to scream in frustration. Don't even get me started on the weight painting either. FUCK
>>
>>851475
>My main snag right now is with the duplicated deform skeleton, producing the Control and Mechanism skeletons directly on top. Like it begins to get stupid hard to even select the bones in the viewport once you reach that stage.
Yeah using rig layers is a major pain in the ass and feels super limted, hopefully they'll fix that with the planned animations updates but it will probably take a couple of years.
>Don't even get me started on the weight painting either. FUCK
Just use more bones and let the automatic weights do its work :^)
AI weight painting for the masses can't come soon enough
>>
>>851436
>needing an algorithm to put jigsaw pieces together
>thinking an algorithm knows what parts of your mesh are important

>>851443
>How am I evaluating Texel density
Use your fuckin eyes lmao.
>why are you manually straightening every loop of an island
Select a squared-off face, select all or linked, follow active quads. Literally 2 keystrokes. Hardly what I'd consider "manually straightening every loop"
>>
>>850793
>>851447
Lol rip blender sculpting forever.
>>
>>851447
Well, since he was never a coder to begin with, it's no wonder he just messed everything up.

Finally with him gone, Blender Institute can hire someone who can actually code to work on Sculpting.
>>
>>851488
>Use your fuckin eyes lmao.

yeah your work is getting rejected lmao

you will find out when you get an actual 3d job
>>
>>851455
You should typically have three or more loops around joints for them to deform nicely.
>>
File: Screenshot_2.png (990 KB, 1263x547)
990 KB
990 KB PNG
Hey anon could you answer either of these questions regarding UV editing please? If yes, here they are:
1) see pic related, how do I "duplicate" UV faces? For instance how do I make face B be both the same shape AND have the same location as face A?
2) the image tex looks really flat, is there a way with nodes in which I can make the image texture magically have more depth?
3) sometimes when I UV unwrap the faces come out distorted in the UV editor, for instance in Edit mode a face looks normal and then in the UV editor it's longer than it should be or sometimes full-on distorted and fucky. What gives?
>>
>>851538
1. For something this simple just enable snapping to vertex and snap the points of island A onto island B.

2. You could generate a normal with photoshop, crazybump or the like. It won't be great, use mats with normal and/or height and metalness/roughness ready.

3. Apply all transforms to the model before unwrapping.
>>
>>851539
Roger, thanks for the intel m80
>>
File: 1602175952511.jpg (570 KB, 886x873)
570 KB
570 KB JPG
>>851508
they could
but they won't
>>
File: Engco5Hg_400x400.jpg (22 KB, 400x400)
22 KB
22 KB JPG
>>851575
>>851508
>Blender Institute can hire someone who can actually code to work on Sculpting.
Rumored Thomas Dinges to work as community manager, no more sculpt/vertex paint/texturing/retopo/cad shit lmao.
>>
File: transitioning.jpg (161 KB, 1280x720)
161 KB
161 KB JPG
I guess that's what you turn into when you surround yourself with the default cube guy and other questionable individuals
>>
I'm doing vertex painting set to multiply, and when I paint with white over something I already painted with a darker color, it doesn't seem to be doing anything. To my understanding it should work as an eraser since it's white on multiply? Selecting "set vertex colors" works, but I'd rather use the paint feature.
>>
>>851511
I have an actual 3d job, but nice try.
If you can't manage to UV by yourself, then you have no business being hired by anyone.
There's nothing that needs an addon that you can't do yourself with minimal effort.
>>
>>851303
>>851308
>>851326
It's impossible because game rigs aren't control rigs.
>>
File: water_sim.webm (2.97 MB, 800x600)
2.97 MB
2.97 MB WEBM
Thoughts on this Water?
I think the Shader for it came out looking well, and the Ocean Sim wasn't that hard too use.

Any idea on how I could make the water splashes when the objects go in and out of the water though? I tried faking it with a particle systems but it doesn't seem to work that well. And the fluid sim just doesn't work properly for whatever reason, maybe I just don't know how to use it.
>>
>>851647
Movement is nice, the foam looks a bit like spiderweb though
>>
>>851647
Looks cool but it sure isn't water.
>>
>>851647
looks like mycelium
>>
>>851636
uv mapping in blender is objectively pure tedium without addons, suffering pointlessly doesnt make you more 'legit' lmao
>>
File: water_sim_2.webm (2.96 MB, 800x600)
2.96 MB
2.96 MB WEBM
>>851649
>>851650
>>851655
Okay, maybe I overdid it a bit with the foam.
This looking any better?
>>
>>851665
Yeah, still moves a bit sluggish though, as if there was an oil spill or something.

The feeling of depth and the reflections are great.
>>
>>851665
Looks way better but the water material seems a bit strange. Try some sky box with sharp clouds so the water has something interesting to reflect instead of a grey room. Maybe it's just because of the grey nothing around the water
>>851667
>still moves a bit sluggish though
That is usually because of scale.
The scene is most likely really big and if that's the default cube then it is 2 m3 big.
>>
>>851665
Water, no matter if resting, whitewater or deep water, needs a few things to pass as such;
double-sided reflections with correct refraction, absorption and Fresnel values.
You also want to NEVER place your water surface alone in a scene when tweaking settings; no matter if its the ground in a puddle or the 3000 m distant ocean floor.
>>
>>851676
>You also want to NEVER place your water surface alone in a scene when tweaking settings; no matter if its the ground in a puddle or the 3000 m distant ocean floor.
not him, but if I understand you right, you're saying that we should work on water always in the context of the intended environment, right?
>>
>>851684
Yes. Otherwise you are in for some ugly surprises when swapping your assets between scenes.

That unfortunately goes for a lot of surface types. PBR materials might get you 80% there in most cases, but the remaining 20% is still time consuming tweaking and massaging settings in my experience. Something I hoped we were finally free from when the switch to PBR was done ages ago, but practically it wasn't.
>>
>>851690
P.S. bit convoluted and muddled but what I'm trying to say is that generating standardized materials that look good in absolutely every scene and condition is still pretty much impossible. Your "standard" materials will likely not look like total shit, but not good either.
>>
Here are your nodes, bro
>>
>>851692
larger screenshot, maybe?
>>
>>851695
not mine, saw it in the devtalk
>>
I've been using blender to make a character model and switched to Marvelous Designer to make her outfit, now I have to make her shoes, specifically sneakers

What's the best software to do that? Seems a bit too detailed for MD
>>
Anybody here setup their own render farm? I have a problem with rendering on the nodes any kind of partical or fluid sim. I was wondering what else besides packing and making paths relative that I need to be doing.
>>
File: 0021.png (656 KB, 1096x434)
656 KB
656 KB PNG
>>851676
>double-sided reflections with correct refraction, absorption and Fresnel values.
I'm using the water in Eevee so getting that to work is kind of retarded because some of the things I tried were:
>using a Glossy Shader since it gives you
proper reflections on top with good refraction
>Good refraction when looking at the things at the top from under the water
>But the Water now looks like cancer and you can't actually see the things that are being submerged
>If I try to slap in a Transparent BSDF, the refractions no longer work and what you can see underwater now is static without all the deformations you'd get from the waves

The alternative which seems to be better is using a Principled BSDF, Specular, as well as Transmission maxed out, but the problem... If I have the Water Material's Screen Space Reflections disabled, I get proper reflection on top of the water with good refractions, but I can't see anything that's submerged. If I enable the SSR for the Water material, I get proper Refractions of any submerged model, as well as being able to see what's above the water if I'm under it. But the reflections on top of the water now stop working properly.

>Left: SSR disable
>Right: SSR enabled
>>
What are some GOOD updated rigging tutorial for 2.9?
Last time I used blender was 2 years ago so I'm a bit behind the loop, and everyone seems to be using the rigify thing so there's nothing much to learn from them.
>>
>>851656
There's no suffering to be had,
you literally just mark seams, unwrap, and put the UVs in the right spot.
I'm sorry but if you can't do that, you're fucking retarded.
>>
>>851723
>Eevee
Here's the problem.
>>
is there a way to put armature animations into one master blender file, and make a bunch variants like "clothings" into other blender files, while inheriting the master blender file.
And can I render the master blender all the sub blender files get rendered too, in a way where I can add in a new animation for the rig and it would apply to all animations?
trying to make a pre-rendered 3D game, and would like it if people could collaborate, but it would be a pain if it was all in one monolithic blender file.
>>
>>851732
And you keep revealing how noob you are at UVs if you think that's all you need to do
>>
>tfw you can't shape key your multires sculpts
>>
>>851761
zbrush.

now.
>>
>>851764
probably going to but Zbrush Core soon, but how would I be able to use that for shape keying?
>>
>>851766
don't go zbrush core, pirate full zbrush (core has no UVs), if you want to buy it use the pirated version until you can get the full version for real.

Shape keying is a bit harder with blender compared to maya but I get around it by just GoZing it with layers turned up and down and making a shape key from mesh with the duplicates.

the advantage here is more for making wrinkle maps and working on things while you're actually sculpting (like being able to open/close eyelids for bakes), if you're just making shape keys for your base rigged mesh then bake out the displacement from your multires and do them without multires.
>>
>>851753
apparently I can do this by "linking", and I could probably automate it with a bat file that just renders every .blend file manually.
>>
>>851769
>core has no UVs
can't you import a model that already has UV maps?

Also, just to make sure I'm understanding it right:
>make my model and shape keys
>bring neutral pose into Zbrush for normal map
>bring shape keys into Zbrush for wrinle maps
>bring normal map and wrinkle map into blender. don't use multires at all

I think I've got something wrong
>>
>>851755
>if you think that's all you need to do
If you know what the fuck you're doing when unwrapping and laying down seams, it really is.
>>
How do I get a specific selection of a mesh to use a separate UV image?
>>
>>851926
>UV image?
Explain what you mean with that.
You want to have specific parts of the mesh have its own UV-Map?
>>
File: 3.png (16 KB, 308x276)
16 KB
16 KB PNG
how can i bake normals from the high res onto the combined uv map of all of the objects above it? i need them to be separate
>>
>>851930
copy all your individual objects, merge them into one, then bake the normal map on that one unified object.
Now you can delete the unified object (you don't need it anymore), apply normal map to shader and apply shader to all your individual objects.
Also train your brain to be able to come up with solutions like this yourself...
>>
>>851930
Why not just make a merged duplicate and then bake the normal map? If the UVs are all done right, you should be able to just use that one normal map on each part.

You did unwrap these separate bodyparts for a single texture map, right...?
>>
>>851725
I saw this playlist being recommended by a bunch of people
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkX50pkZT1s&list=PLL3OEv6vd5VA8_FBkeitaeqC0kbcrhMTC&index=1
Otherwise this paid course has a lot of great reviews
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kNLgpc2mlA

Rigify is awesome and you can learn a lot about rigging by using it. Best reference about it is https://www.youtube.com/c/CGDive/videos

Rigging hasn't changed much over the past few years so even old tutorials are probably still useful.
>>
>>851928
>You want to have specific parts of the mesh have its own UV-Map?
That is exactly what I mean.

I want part of my mesh to have it's own UV image, separate from the rest of the mesh's UVs.
>>
File: xps.png (375 KB, 1047x637)
375 KB
375 KB PNG
I'm using the XPS addon to import XPS files, and they look like pic related. Why is this?

The only way to prevent those blocky transparent squares from appearing is to render in Cycles (including the viewport). Eevee and Material View both render a broken subject.
>>
>>851941
Just create a new (second) UV and unwrap your specific mesh pieces on that second UV. You then have 2 UVs, and you need to tell the Shader which UVmap to use for the specific part of the mesh (you should be even able to mix several UV's in one shader or you separate them into 2 shaders).
Its pretty straightforward.
>>
>>851947
>and unwrap your specific mesh pieces on that second UV
I very specifically want to copy my current unwrapped UV selection to the new image.
>>
File: novice.png (1.53 MB, 1600x900)
1.53 MB
1.53 MB PNG
>>850791
Noob here, been using blender maybe a half a year? Kinda interested in environments, been looking at old game interiors as inspirations. just curious if heading in right direction or some youtube channels to peruse...
>I also use pinterest, thus the voxel design
>>
>>851949
then just copy the first UVmap.
>>
>>851963
It's edited and aligned in a specific way that's difficult to copy/redo. I'd like to be able to just directly copy a UV selection onto a different UV image.
>>
>>851946
Recalculate the normals
>>
>>851946
change your materials from alpha blend to alpha hashed or opaque
>>
>>851964
then you need an addon for that. I don't remember the name, but there is one and it should be free (there are severals probably).
>>
>>851946
I'm using that shit often to animate character from other video games. You need to click each part of the model in Object View that is transparent, then in the material tab change them from Alpha Blend to either Alpha Hashed or Opaque.
>>
File: JUST.png (344 KB, 620x700)
344 KB
344 KB PNG
I'm seriously gonna blow my fucking head off. Why are the strokes of Texture Paint brushes so jagged? What am I doing wrong? I upped the resolution of my Basic Color texture to 4k (that in the picture is 2k) and it still is jagged as fuck, just how high do I have to amp it up if I wanna have the strokes be smooth? Tried fiddling with the falloff too, but I can't seem to make that work either. Should I look for alternative brushes instead? I used Blender's default one, the one and only
>>
>>852139
if you're doing it real time, textures are dependent on the resolution of your model

If I were to do it in zbrush I would just bake the textures from the high poly onto the low poly so that it would look clean.
>>
>>852139
finish the mouth area first
>>
Is there a way to have instance models in blender carry over to an Unity project?
>>
>>852154
Instance models? like LOD meshes? dun get it
>>
>>852139
>What am I doing wrong?
Serious question?
Furry shit, you're doing furry shit.
It's not only wrong, but a sure sign of mental illness and degeneration.
Do the world a favour and suck on a shotgun, do hara-kiri with a rusty chainsaw or dive under a train/bus/18 wheeler.
>>
>>852143
>resolution of your model
You mean the polycount? My model has about 10k-11k faces. I did make this from a sculpt but I'm trying a bakeless hand made workflow, see if I can get away with it.
You did mention real time too. So are you saying that if I open my PNG file in any photo manipulation program that I can work on them freely, with a higher accuracy without that compromising the overall model/textures in a way or the other further down the line? Is that safe?
>>
>>852163
kill yourself, i bet you masturbate to your shitty soulless japshit cartoons. you're not any better
>>
>>850793
'Become a better artist' is code for 'start my transitioning'
>>
>>852159
Instanced copies of an object. Like pillars or furniture. It would be nice if there's an automated way to make those prefabs in Unity without having to manually replace them all.
>>
>>851755
he wont listen, just let him waste hours of his life in peace
>>
>>852238
>hours
Takes literal minutes if you're not a fag.
>>
>>852170
you're better off in substance painter
>>
>>852245
I hope you step on a landmine one day.
>>
>>852349
>I hope you step on a landmine one day.
Doubt that'll ever happen. Unlike you, I don't live in a 3rd world country where landmines are strewn about like dog turds.
>>
>>852192
[disclaimer: unity noob here]
so far, i unfortunately see no methods to extract already instanced assets from blender to unity, you have to export the individual mesh and re-instance it in unity
>>
>>852353
Well then i hope you step on a dog turd.
>>
Live2D might support Blender soon(tm)
>>
>>852645
In what sense? From what I've seen of Live2D, it's just texture planes with a lot of vismes and sliders for tracking. Surprised blender can't make those for free.
>>
>have a friend who works at an animation studio
>bring up the fact that employers seem to look down upon people who use blender
>he says it's true, but he doesn't think it will be that way for long
>one of their former department heads would use blender and swore by it

There's hope for us, blenderbros
>>
File: nanite-combo[1].jpg (561 KB, 2000x1100)
561 KB
561 KB JPG
>>852662
I'd say it's much more accepted in the industry than it used to be. We were look for ways to cut down on software licensing in the art department and I proposed Blender but since we work with models that are on average over 100M triangles Blender just explodes and it doesn't look like 3.0 performance is going to be anywhere it needs to be for it to be useable for us. They need to step up their optimization game because now that Unreal Engine 5 can support up to 100 billion triangles per scene people are going to be expecting to work with even higher polycounts.
>>
>>852669
they aren't interested in the pixtols from Zbrush or the dinamic lod from Nanite, they are focusing on cycles, eevee, the new geometry nodes and that's it.
>>
>>852662
>>852669
You can instantly tell how "professional" a studio is by how much they care about the general "reputation" of tools used.
Actual professionals simply use whatever helps them getting the job done the quickest. If some dude at the studio is blazing fast at modeling using blender, faster than his colleagues using the ~industry standard~ (including staying smooth in the pipeline to all others, so no export/import struggles) then there's simply no reason to fag around. He gets the job done fast and up to the studio's quality level, end of story.
Blender may not be ready for the real prime time yet but some people do know how to work it really efficiently for certain parts in production.
>>
Jesus weight painting is a pain in the ass. You spend 90% of the time clicking around different viewports and the rig and the mesh than you do actually painting the damn thing. And it's really uneasy on the eyes too. Christ.
>>
File: 11838.png (8 KB, 350x19)
8 KB
8 KB PNG
>>852680
Yeah its fucked up how crazy frustrating it can be. A very unintuitive and clunky workflow- Vertex assignment can be a bit tedious, but I rely on it for a much more reliable workflow
>>
>>852670
>cycles, eevee, the new geometry nodes and that's it.
So shit that's useless to everyone except people who use Blender exclusively for everything. Fucking fantastic.
>>
File: loading cat.jpg (53 KB, 800x450)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>852694
that's how it is, environment artists everywhere are picking up blender but fuck them we gotta pretend to be pixar
>>
File: Malekith rigify.png (610 KB, 1273x1150)
610 KB
610 KB PNG
why wont rifigy attach to my mesh im gonna kill myself. Ive seen nothing but 20IQ youtubers using it to pair to asset flips and throw premade animations on and all I want to do is give him a pose so I can print and I cant.
>>
File: Malekith rigify 2.png (668 KB, 1411x1165)
668 KB
668 KB PNG
>>852713
And when it does attach it only attaches a root bone and none of the others work. What am I missing
>>
>>852713
rigify is obsolete, get mr. mannequin tools
https://youtu.be/Ts9LModAFp4
>>
>>852713
Rigify is meant for simple humanoid models. Get your model as close to a mannequin as you can, then reattach any loose part.
>>
>>852732
>Rigify is meant for simple humanoid models
Not really relevant to the question but I can say that's false. You just need to know how it recognizes bone names.
https://youtu.be/-JSFcSxsaTs
>>
>>852717
Not an expert but maybe it's a Transforms problem? As in, did you apply all Transforms (Location, Rotation, Scale)? If yes then sorry man but I can't help you further. Does your character have multiple rigs? Maybe Blender is getting confused if that's the case
>>
File: rigging.png (514 KB, 1303x655)
514 KB
514 KB PNG
In a bit of a Rigging conundrum.
I started rigging my character with a Human Metarig with all bones except for the face bones, which I deleted. Now I want to rig the face too but I got some doubts:
1) I'm thinking of making a hybrid by connecting the face rig of a Wolf Metarig to my original rig since its shape more closely resembles that of my character, but I'm also planning to generate a Rigify rig later. If I create a hybrid rig, the Rigify operation won't work, right? Should I just stick with attaching the human facerig back to my original rig (which, again, was originally a Human Metarig but with the face bones deleted) and make adjustments from there?
2) once the face bones are back in place do I need to reparent the entire mesh to the rig again? I already weight painted the original rig (without the face bones) and I'd really, REALLY like to preserve the already done work
>>
File: 1396144682759.gif (566 KB, 230x230)
566 KB
566 KB GIF
gotta say cycles x is preddy damn gud.
I especially like how it knows which parts to update when you move stuff around in a scene.
>>
>>852745
No extra rigs. Just the one mesh.
Transforms didn't help either.
Thanks for tryinphtkag
>>
File: ex dee.jpg (136 KB, 448x398)
136 KB
136 KB JPG
>>852760
My new Nvidia comes in a few days. I cannot wait to go from a 5 year old AMD turd rendering with OpenCL to a brand new Nvidia that can now run CUDA and Cycles X. Its gonna be like going from the Wright flyer to an F15.
>>
>>852781
I'm still on my 1070 and already with that one it's really really nice. You'll have tons of fun.
>>
Any way to disable all shape keys at once? I'm using a model with a shitton of them for animation and they aren't kind to my frames. I know you can delete all of them, but that's gonna be a lot of different headaches down the line.
>>
File: 1632516536643.webm (323 KB, 624x656)
323 KB
323 KB WEBM
Why would blendlets do this
>>
>>852813
Maya time
>>
>>852838
I think that guy uses C4D.
>>
might be a rarted question but why do my headphones buzz when I orbit/pan in a scene?
>>
>>852856
Its not your headphones, its coils in the GPU.
>>
>>852859
it's not coil whine, the card itself is mostly silent
the sound is similar but it's entirely in my headphones
shittier quality headphones make it a lot louder and harsher
>>
>>852856
AMD?

mine does that too
>>
>>852861
Im almost certain its the same effect, maybe the extra work inducing some noise in your headphone cable. My card screams when I orbit, but its also an unstable prototype from the trash bin, so maybe its drowning out the headphone noise.
>>
>>852871
nope, this was my first build and I went with the names I knew, so intel, msi, and nvidia
definitely have my eyes on amd for future projects, though
>>852874
a friend that's into music mentioned something about ground loop noise, so that's worth looking into
>>
>>850791
Is there a way to prevent blender from hogging GPU resources when rendering?
>>
>>852855
>I think that guy uses C4D.
The motion blur makes it incredibly obvious.
I used to think people were full of shit being able to tell just from little things like that, but now it's pretty easy to tell the difference between the two renderers.
C4D just has this "look" about it. I'm not really a fan of it either.
>>
>>852854
Well, fuck me.
>>
>>852813
import bpy

for kb in bpy.context.active_object.data.shape_keys.key_blocks[1:]:
kb.mute = True
>>
>>852923
Thank you, anon! Works like a charm, both on and off, even though I'm code-illiterate. Animating with around 20fps in the preview is frustrating, to say the least. You're a life-saver.
>>
>>850793
I knew he was gonna quit once he complained about people suggesting features a couple of months ago.
>>
>>852896
render on cpu
>>
>>850793
bruh did he quit development and leave the sculpting with this full crash bug
>>
File: 425tr23f.png (438 KB, 580x578)
438 KB
438 KB PNG
AAAAAAHHHHH
Why is it doing this the opposite side is perfectly fine
>>
>>853103
how does the UV look?
>>
File: 4223f3.png (26 KB, 458x429)
26 KB
26 KB PNG
>>853104
nothing too out of the ordinary but even so it would be doing it to the other side, no? since both sides of the mesh are uv'd identically
>>
File: 1628669287525.png (46 KB, 455x548)
46 KB
46 KB PNG
>>853103
looks like pic related is happening, try recalculating or flipping the normals on that offending piece
>>
File: 62333.png (487 KB, 597x426)
487 KB
487 KB PNG
>>853109
That was one of the first things ive checked because that would obviously seem like it would be the issue but I checked all of that and its fine
>>
>>853112
might need to mirror the uv, then
it can have similar effects
>>
File: 635621.png (381 KB, 520x402)
381 KB
381 KB PNG
>>853113
that kind of worked, but still for some reason the area is still lighter, might have to bring it into photoshop to edit
>>
>>853113
>>853114
Nevermind fixed it
>>
So it's been a while since I used Blender and I'm having an issue.
The move/rotate/scale gizmo is no longer positioned to a selected object, it's just anchored to a single point.
I start a new file, and it switches between objects and positions central to the object, my current file, it refuses to move.
I can't progress with my modelling until this stops doing that.
>>
File: file.png (173 KB, 574x548)
173 KB
173 KB PNG
>>853130
It's something to do with the object properties, but I'm not sure what.
I select the shirt piece, the gizmo anchors to well below it.
I select the cube, it moves central to it.
>>
>>853131
That's the location of your object's origin. For the shirt, it's at the world origin, but for the cube, it's in the cube's center.
One way to change the location of the origin is to open up the properties panel (shortcut "n", on the right of the 3D view, and under the "tool" tab, under "options" "transform," check "[affect only] origins," and then you can move around only the objects' origins until you uncheck that box.
>>
File: THIS_FUCKIN_GUY.jpg (79 KB, 834x684)
79 KB
79 KB JPG
>>853138
Oh fucking hell, thankyou.
Can always rely on the chans for help.
>>
>kinda ideafaggy post ahead, skip if you can't stand those
I wish to create a character and clothing system as seen in Skyrim or Fallout 4 in Unity.
The following are the characteristics I had in mind and wish to implement:
- mix and matcheable clothes, specifically head, torso (encompassing chest, abdomen, arms), hands (for optional gloves), legs (hip to feet), two extra accessories slot for chest (for bandoliers or chest armor, so above the torso slot) and back (for backpacks)
- morphable face
- morphable body that is compatible with the clothes, meaning that they're shaped depending on the body type (planned body types are 3: ectomorphic, mesomorphic, endomorphic); this feature has the lowest priority, optional.

Do you know useful tutorials that go into that stuff? I know what you're thinking, that it's an order too tall, but I just wanna experiment with it, see if I can do anything at all
>>
File: blender_NZu48pZjSC.png (361 KB, 727x770)
361 KB
361 KB PNG
Having another bloody issue.
Not sure if it's the fact I've applied weighting to my model, but now nothing is moving, the co-ordinates there move but the objects all remain anchored in place.
>>
Is there a way to control the inherencies and restraints of bones in an armature?

The context is I'm trying to adapt a vroid body to fit a character and thought I could use the bones themselves as a starting point. Problems are you can't just move a joint around in Pose like you can in Edit mode and any scaling effect all the children in the scene.

I guess I could just disconnect all the bones from eachother but then that means their tail points are going all over the place.
>>
>>853266
Do you have the "affect only origins" box checked?
>>
>>853282
Ah shit so I did, would never have fukkin' guessed.
>>
File: KLY6lCA.jpg (2.83 MB, 1916x2075)
2.83 MB
2.83 MB JPG
I create a bezier curve, I create a plane, I subdivide the plane with ctrl+r, I use a modifier curve, I apply the modifer curve to the bezier curve. Then the plane don't follows the curve, for some reason it moves above, or below, or behind. I need the plane to be aligned with the curve like in this video.

* https://youtu.be/lo_FxdSe_F8?t=450 (the link jumps to the important part)

The origins of both the plane and the bezier curve are exactly the same but it moves anyway. I already tried many combinations with origin of the curve, the origin of the plane, and the position of the plane. It always move, WHY!?

* https://imgur.com/a/EOblg1l

In the first image you can see how I aligned the origins of the plane and the curve to the exact same point. In the second image you can see how the plane moved. That don't happens in the video.
>>
>>853305
See the "deformation axis" option under the curve modifier? It may be set to the wrong axis. Try others and see if one works.
>>
File: 080.png (17 KB, 475x375)
17 KB
17 KB PNG
>>853317

I already tried that, I also tried all kind of rotation combinations, they just fuck my plane even more. I don't know the fuck is happening but it's related to 6 variables:

The rotation of the bezier curves and plane, their origin and position. And all of them interact somehow between them, but how exactly it's a fucking mystery.

Sometimes I can get some curve modifier to work (I need 3 to work together) but then it fucks another, and I can just rotate the curves because I need them on certain position.
Testing all the fucking variables would take forever, it would be easier if I understood the theory behind but where the fuck I learn that?! An even then I shouldn't need to learn some fucking advanced virtual physics to get a damn curve to work.

I had similar problems with blender before but I just needed to google some things or watch some videos but this too fucking much.

Should I switch to another program?

Fuck this, I'm going to try another method.
>>
So I have some other model's bit that's less poly's than the model I have.
I want to attach it to my model, will it keep the applied modifiers like multires and subsurface?
>>
>>853138
adding on to this, the default hotkey shortcut to toggle transforming origins is Ctrl + . (period key)
>>
>>852917
>it's pretty easy to tell the difference between the two renderers.
>C4D just has this "look" about it. I'm not really a fan of it either.
People stereotypically use Octane or Redshift with C4D, and there are also Arnold, V-Ray, Corona, Cycles, LuxRender, U-Render, etc. for C4D. There's no "C4D look" as much as there's "Octane look", "Redshift look", etc.
That video does look like it was made with C4D's built-in Standard/Physical renderer though. It's not bad, but it's CPU-only and generally stagnated ("abandoned by Maxon" would be more precise at this point). Kind of a time capsule from the state of renderers 10-15 years ago.
>>
File: 295.gif (1.62 MB, 1000x715)
1.62 MB
1.62 MB GIF
>>853305
>>853322


SOLUTION to this, kinda

Apply the modifier to the plane
Add the other curve modifier
Rotate the plane on all axis until one work
Apply the modifier to the plane
Repeat if more curve modifiers are needed

This of course makes all the process more destructive but it works. The point of using the tutorial in the video above was to modify the plane in a not destructive way but at least this method works.
>>
modeling in maya i feel like i model at sonic speed, but when trying to model in blender i feel like im slowed down 100 struggling with navigation etc, any tips on getting comfortable?
>>
>>853491
Just gotta get used to it I think. Im pretty fast in Blender but whenever I have to swap between it and any other program it feels like someone's moved all my furniture a foot to the left while I was on vacation and I dont know why Im banging my shin on the coffee table.
>>
I like how they're still using that fox, even for the live streams.
The fox is just the best
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BqvcfKMiJg
>>
Need a VR headset to test my projects and got bigwigs to approve on $500(all my work going forward is for VR) and have no professional friends working on VR environments to ask, but the go-to for testing still Quest 2/Pro from my understanding of specs?
>>
>>853529
quest 2 is a downgrade
>>
>>853533
From? We have no headsets available to use whatsoever at current
>>
>>853534
quest 1, it's kinda garbage even compared to other vr headsets, so if it runs on q2 it'll probably run on other headsets
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (81 KB, 1280x720)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>>850793
4 weeks without sculpt vertex paint and texture module report
>>
Can anyone recommend a book on rigging? I'm stuck at the beginner level with my basic ass IK rig and don't know where to go.
>>
Is there anywhere where you can go to get the brick and marble textures in the blender guru donut tutorial without making an account on poliigon?
>>
>>853529
Quest 2 does have the advantage of being stand-alone and only taking half a minute to set up a play area. So far better for taking to other people to try than a whole pc setup. You'd have to be wary of the specs when doing details and effects though.





Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.