[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/3/ - 3DCG

[Advertise on 4chan]

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 24 posters in this thread.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1591508902507.jpg (20 KB, 481x474)
20 KB
20 KB JPG
Why everything open source sucks dicks?
>>
>>>/g/
>>
Just because the open source software for your faggy 3d modeling doesn't mean all open source software sucks
>>
>>848683
true it's only all FOSS 3d software, 2d graphics software and audio software that sucks
>>
>>848680
The FOSS scene is for noobs and schizo autists. You expect competent people to devalue their profession by working for free?
>>
This whole thread is backwards. Just because FOSS software isn't the tip of the spear it's quite amazing how capable a lot of it is.

I never been a blendlet but I've kept tabs on it and I am impressed where it's gotten thruout the years.
If you think blender sucks dick it's pretty much because you suck dick.

Perhaps you wont be swallowing even the balls, deepthroating every mm of shaft if you switch to another software but you will still be at choke depth.
If you can't make good art with blender you will remain a weaksauce crying kitty no matter where you go.
>>
>>848680
Because is made by trannies, dont believe, just check the staff of Rust
>>
>>848680
Use open source for stuff it can do and use some paid softwares here and there to fill in the gaps.
>>
>>848680
Rawtherapee is good
>>
because entitled fucks like you expect someone else to do the work of making a good product for you while you don't work on the project
>wahhh I don't have the time/experience/skills
Then don't complain
>>
File: 1509783104759.png (165 KB, 667x408)
165 KB
165 KB PNG
>>848680
glow harder
>>
>>848680
the people that steal from you end up with more
shocking
>>
>>850978
>meanwhile blender is literally copying all their new shit wholesale from zbrush and houdini
>>
>>850982
you cannot own an idea
>>
>>850984
so how can they "steal" from FOSS projects.

And don't even act like pixologic or sidefx are taking code from blender or armorpaint or whatever LMAO
>>
>>848689
>Just because FOSS software isn't the tip of the spear
Blender literally had the best UV unwrapping tools in the industry at one point. Also open source is used in research so quite often it's ahead of the game technologically, but unfortunately that also means less optimised.
>>
>>851016
>Blender literally had the best UV unwrapping tools in the industry at one point.
I'm curious, when did this happen?
>>
>>848689
Yuck. TMI fag.
>>
>>851017
In his dreams - so basically never.
>>
>>851017
I can't remember exactly, somewhere around 2010 I guess? All the industry fags started doing their unwrapping in Blender because it added pinning and had the latest unwrapping algorithm.

Also all you zoomer faggots forget that Blender started life as closed source inhouse software. It was only made open source later on.
>>
If you're good at something, why would you do it for free?

If you're shit at something, no one wants it unkrsd you give it out for free.

Hmmmmmmm
>>
>>851017
According to wiki it was 2004, fuck I'm old.
>>
>>851025
>>851028
I've been reading about Blender since the OSS Funding Drive was still raising money.
I read about blender in magaazines for years, back when paper mags actually talked about interesting stuff.
When the 2600 magazine started adding a "Fiction" section it was basically over.

"HTML5 will be the fastest HTML evar!" -total falsehood
>>
>>848680
>Why everything open source sucks dicks?
>linux
>bsd
>android
>emacs
>VLC
>bittorrent
>firefox
>audacity
>OBS
>sucks
I see you don't know anything about software.
>>848685
>>851026
>FOSS is working for free
It's about the freedom, not the price you dumbfuck. Besides, companies make more money out of SaaS and tech support than with selling software itself.
>>
>>851034
>This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
>it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by

*CLICK*
*DRAG*
*DELETE*

It's my code now sir. 19,95$ per month.
>>
>>851037
I don't really care about the terms of a license, but if you use proprietary shit on a daily basis, you simply are a cuck.
>>
>>851038
>"if you use proprietary shit on a daily basis, you simply are a cuck,"
he said, sending his message across hundreds of proprietary network systems.
>>
>>851048
I'm behind 7 proxies
>>
>>851037
>It's my code now sir. 19,95$ per month.
*Downloads free forked version*
Pfft, nuthin' personal.
>>
>>848689
agreed
i remember when blender was totally fucking unusable, now it's basically fine. maybe you can't make 600kb waifus in it, but it's very good for what it is

>>851034
also libreoffice is good. that's free
>>
Lol...
Krita and Audacity are the best software of their respective fields...
Godot is getting better, give it 5 years and they'll surpass unity
Blender is as good as Max and in s few years will surpass Zbrush and Houdini
>>
>>850988
>impying that i'm complaining about Zbrush """Stealing""" from Blender

>>848680
FOSS needs your help anon. for whatever reason you want others to make it for you. this is the problem with first world countries. everyone gets someone else to do it for them.
>>
>>851048
>implying im paying for my ISP.
>implying i dont have my own tower
>>
>>852981
>Blender is as good as Max and in s few years will surpass Zbrush and Houdini
This won't happen in 1000 years. Blender devs aren't even able to create basic UV tools or baking utilities.
>>
>>852981
>Blender is as good as Max and in s few years will surpass Zbrush and Houdini
Blender isn't as good as Max and it will never surpass Zbrush and Houdini, you delusional retard.
>>
Autodesk's afraid.
>>
>>853005
Of what exactly?
Media is like 3-5% of their revenue, they make all their $$$ in the manufacturing industry.
Even if they would loose that market completely (which they wont), you think they are afraid of a loss in that percentage?
Are you actually retarded or just meming?
>>
>>853008
>n-no we're not





Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.