Why can't gamefreak make a good looking game?
Small indie studio! Please understand!
Who cares? Pokemon getting cut is way more important then the graphics being average on an underpowered machine.
>>38929572I don't really care about graphics, missing Pokemon is the real dealbreaker.
It's looks fine... for a Switch game
>>38929596Aha! This is how they get you. Using a huge fuckup to distract from medium fuckups.
>>38929608No it doesn't
>>38929628>Medium fuckupsGraphics don't really make the quality of the game. Spamming the same graphics thread 20 times is trying to distract everyone from the real major issue here.
>>38929643Those are ps4 screenshots though
>>38929596I can get over shitty animations. But coupled with the cut Pokemon is just a bigger sign of their inability to handle the open world. I wish they had more time to work on it.
I say we boycott the game.
SwSh honestly looks like a Falcom game for the Vita, but seems to lack any of the redeeming features those titles have.
>>38929670That's what I'm saying. Pokemon getting cut is unacceptable.
>>38929572Pokemon Let's Go looks so much better than this drab eyesore. Seriously, how is it this bad when you literally made a much better looking game? Dynamax feels like they're jumping the shark too
incompetencethe moment they started trying to do epic, full-scale 3d in sm, everything started falling apart like a house of cardsthey can only do stylized stuff like in gen 4/5, gen 6 was really pushing it already
>>38929696honestly, the first two cold steel games look way better than swishy swoosh. this is despite the fact that falcom is a poorfag studio that was still getting used to 3d at the time.
>>38929593does he just not have eyelashes?