>a world where only women have the magical fortitude to become adventurersWhy is this a bad idea?
>>66210616Because then the people whining about politics would be people from this website instead of other websites, blessed Cestreeposter
It's completely unbelievable. Suspension of disbelief can only go so far. Besides, There is 99% certainty such a concept would only arise either to satisfy a political agenda or someone's magical realm.
>>66210616Why are avatarfags like you still allowed?
>>66210616Matriarchal structures in social mammal groups are pretty damn rare.Make them bug based or something and you got a game.
>>66210689>thinks conjuring up a firestorm and giant flying lizards are fine>giant floating ball of eyes that shoot lasers, also fine>tentacle cats that warp spacetime around them, totes fin>women are the only ones with super powers? UNREALISTIC!! AGENDAS!!!1fukken lamo
>>66210616Because then I couldn't play a bard twink.
>>66210689There's been several anime with something along these lines, and while the marketability of large female casts is one of the major impeti for their creation, they also set out to explore unconventional arrangements and challenge expectations, rather than promote the idea that "this is how it should/could be".
>>66210724You would do yourself a great service to learn what avatar-fagging actually is. It's not "People posting characters you have an irrational hatred for."
>>66210616Because it insinuates that magical fortitude is necessary to go on an adventure without giving a reason why.
>>66210835>there's no middle ground, if you have anything even slightly unfamiliar to the real world then it can go full on fantasy with complete disregard for any sense of practicality, science, and laws of physics and do whatever it wants
>>66210616We got a thread about an RPG with that idea already. However there it's handled well all things considered
>>66210871>a man decides to challenge conventional wisdom and decides to become an adventurer despite having no magical aptitude, hoping to rely on natural physique developed through rigourous physical training, alongside his wits and skillsFund it.
>>66210779It could still be patriarchal, with men performing the administrative functions.
>>66210847>There's been several anime with something along these linesMato Seihei no Slave is probably the most recent manga along those lines.
>>66210616You know, Wheel of Time did this. Women were (initially) the only class that could use magic.Hilariously, it turns out men were actually way more powerful, if unstable.
>>66210616I'm down for it.
>>66210616It's not, run it OP
>>66210616The only bad part about this idea is how certain people on /tg/ will start screeching about badwrongfun, other than that there are no downsides>>66212396Wasn't that because the male magical god was both batshit insane and evil or something? And the fact that he would make sure all male mages went just as batshit as he was was the only reason male mages were a bad idea or something?
>>66210616>women are all but physically more powerful than than men and can use magic>men still dominate society because they're more competitive and aggressiveWhat stories would this setting naturally lead to?
>>66212676Nerdy fantasies, the best kind of nerdy fantasies
>>66210616Adventurers become very rare and mercenary work as well. Monsters become more of an issue and women are taken at birth to be trained as mindless soldiers to defend towns.Majority of women don't like getting dirty or strenuous/dangerous activities, so adventuring as a whole would be rarer and the balance of settings that focus around it would quickly fall.
>>66210940>the man realizes that mystical power is no substitute for animal cunning, and intent on putting an end to centuries of male subjugation beneath the magi-matriarchy, he becomes a cutthroat and merciless witch-hunter
>>66212676>women are supremely powerful but at the same time oppressed victimsWait a second... Marvel comics? Is that you?
>>66210616At best it's magical realm fuel, at worst it's heavy handed political commentary
>>66212676Freezing. Every woman is a moron, every man is a 4D genius. The most powerful female warrior in all of history lives as a scientist's mistress / housewife.The first man who got powers was invincible and borderline divine, since he could control women the way a hive king controls drones.
>>66212786That's why it's usually done with "non-human" races, preferably ones that look obviously non-human.
>>66212786>political commentary is worse than magic realming
>>66210616because women were a bad idea, we should have stopped with hard fem traps.
>>66212904Magical realm has a lot less fallout than inserting partisan politics into your tabletop.
>>66212904 I could at least get off if it's a magical realm
>>66212904Who's a bigger plague on the website, /pol/ or /d/?
>>66212669Not a magical god. 2 Unthinking forces of magic able to be accessed by those who can "channel"The Dark One retaliatorily said "Fuck You" by tainting the Male half after a guy called Lews Therin and his bro squad sealed him and his right-hand minions back into his prison, and those dudes proceeded to go mad and cause "The Breaking of the World". You can hold on to sanity, they just didn't know how to handle it, and new ones never learn how.Men get one half of the One Power, Women get the other.Men are more powerful, Women can link and increase their power artificially.There are also other things each half can do better, or even at all.
>>66212952You should see what /d/ did to /aco/. Hell, /tg/ is worksafe, and we barely keep those creepy idiots in check.
>>66212952Its about the same really, we see posts about "beastfolk", monster girls and fucking dragons just as much as we see "female warrior unrealistic" threads.
>>66213060Why put beastfolk in quotes?
>>66213072Its just furfaggotry, people just call it beast races.
>>66210616>a world where only elves have the magical fortitude to become adventurersWhy is this a bad idea?
>>66210835Yeah cause that's magic senpai.>superpowersWhy do only women have superpowers? That sounds arbitrary and cringey. I could suspend my disbelief for it no problem, I just would question why they are being so sexist. The lack of immersion would come from thinking about the author being a fat harpy. Also what purpose does it serve in the story other than being wank material for a male audience, or some lame-ass "muh women empowerment" shit?That said, men being melee fighters mostly due to their higher strength, and women tending to be more archery / magic oriented, makes perfect sense. >>66212952You are the biggest plague on the website. You knock both of the boards you listed out of the water.
>>66213126That's just Tolkien anon
>>66213162>You are the biggest plague on the website. You knock both of the boards you listed out of the water.How did you know I was from /v/?!?
>>66210616>a world where only women have the magical fortitude to become adventurersSo we talking only women mages or only women can go past level 5 or something?
>>66210616>a world where only women have the magical aptitude to become MAGES.There, this is more believable than denying an entire sex the very concept of adventuring.
>>66210616>>66213392>XP is a literal measure of a soul's strength>As such, in order to "level up"/become superhuman, one needs to be able to grow a soul>This ability is limited wholly to women, as the life giving sex they can grow new souls within their wombs, siphoning off a portion of their own to ensoul their child>This does mean that childbirth permanently strips the woman of however much power she invested in him, but it also means there is no limit to the heights they can reach while out questing>conversely, this means men are limited by how much power their mothers are willing to invest in them, but their power tends to not fluctuate as they go through lifeGood setting? Y/n?
>>66213720Go for it. The internet is a big place. You're certain to find an audience.
>>66213736Nah, I'm just tossing out ideas, right now, would need more fleshing out anyway
>>66210616because you don't worldbuild a magical girls setting or it turns very dark very fastjust do it and disregard logic
>>66214010>Magical girl adventurersI'd play it
>>66210616Because it restricts the kinds of stories you can tell without being interesting enough to lead to its own story hooks.
>>66213720This does raise questions of exactly how much XP/soul a typical woman has available to start - it presumably also would run the risk of a low-XP mother meaning you were hopelessly low level and incapable of going on adventures to get more XP, perpetuating a sort of NPC underclass.Or do all women gain XP passively as time goes on, gaining more if they adventure? In that case little old grannies would (rightly) be among the more terrifying beings around.Though then again, if menopause means they can't get any more XP, maybe those grannies can't level up any more - and the badasses are the ones who got their murderhoboing in while they were still below their 50's.You could certainly go with the "only women can use magic" approach of which Wheel of Time is fond (to start), which would doubtlessly cause a similar degree of shifting in social structures! And if magic is so OP that a more martially-inclined warrior has nearly no hope of competing, then "only women use magic" would pretty solidly make for a mostly-women-adventurers setting.
Its just not how men and women work, even if only women had magic the men wouldnt be comfortable staying behind, they would rather die pointlessly trying to insert themselves into the fray somehow
>>66210616Because adventuring is dangerous and having the child-bearing sex also being the one in the riskiest occupation is a recipe for generational collapse
>>66210867Yeah, I'm sure posting the same characters over and over again isn't avatarfagging. Fuck off
>>66210616Yeah, yeah, and half of them have dicks. We get it, it's your fetish.
>>66213720>the life giving sexI didn't know women could get themselves pregnant
>>66212952Isn't the bitter misogyny from /r9k/?
>>66214364>This does raise questions of exactly how much XP/soul a typical woman has available to start - it presumably also would run the risk of a low-XP mother meaning you were hopelessly low level and incapable of going on adventures to get more XP, perpetuating a sort of NPC underclass.Was thinking it was sorta assumed girls would usually just grow as time goes on while boys wouldn't, so girls usually don't have much XP to start with, though that does raise the question of how would the mother know the gender ahead of time?Maybe they just have to risk it>Or do all women gain XP passively as time goes on, gaining more if they adventure? In that case little old grannies would (rightly) be among the more terrifying beings around.See above, though I was assuming XP was gained as overcoming struggles and encounters, that could mean fight a monster, or it could mean navigate a difficult social encounter>Though then again, if menopause means they can't get any more XP, maybe those grannies can't level up any more - and the badasses are the ones who got their murderhoboing in while they were still below their 50's.That was something I was considering, linking it wholly to fertility, once you lose the ability to bare a child, that's it, you're stuck at that level>You could certainly go with the "only women can use magic" approach of which Wheel of Time is fond (to start), which would doubtlessly cause a similar degree of shifting in social structures! And if magic is so OP that a more martially-inclined warrior has nearly no hope of competing, then "only women use magic" would pretty solidly make for a mostly-women-adventurers setting.That too I suppose>>66214551There's actually be a few records of that happening, mind you that's usually as a side effect of chimerism/them absorbing a male sibling while in the womb, but it's been known to occur
I'm a hardcore dude who likes being a dude in my games. Nothing more, nothing less
>>66214850Fair enough, nothing wrong with that anon
>>66210616Any other setting details OP?Or is that the only one of note
>>66210689In other words you are retarded
>>66210835>women are the only ones with super powers? UNREALISTIC!! AGENDAS!!!1it's literally either to fulfill an magical realm or agenda there is not much other reason to have it be this way
>>66210847yes a few and most of them were porn
>>66216432>In other words you are retarded>what he siad was 100%>but he is the retarded one>>66212952/co/ and discord trannies >>66213060>female warrior unrealisticbecause there are unrealistic so long as you don't fundamentally change how humans work>>66214553>"bitter misogyny"would hold more weight if that was not just "opinions about women i don't like"
>>66217461Nice pic of yourself there, dumbass. Also female warriors existed unlike your brain
>>66217470>Nice pic of yourself there, dumbass. Also female warriors existed unlike your brainonly in the modern era and are still not as good as there average male counter part enjoy your empty skull
>>66217478Yes yes, everyone knows that retards who get butthurt about women warriors don't know anything. Also good job finding your skull fag lord, maybe at some point you will find your brain
>>66217573>Yes yes, everyone knows that retards who get butthurt about women warriors don't know anything. Also good job finding your skull fag lord, maybe at some point you will find your brainsorry you have a poor understanding of statistics and basic biology but hey better just keep to white knighting no matter how wrong you are
>>66217668Anon real life statistics don't work for fantasy since in scenario OP suggested women probably would be more like men mentally due to natural selection.
>>66217752>Anon real life statistics don't work for fantasy since in scenario OP suggested women probably would be more like men mentally due to natural selection.unless it's them men that get pregnant in the universe men would still be the primary go to for soldiers with women either to old to have kids or arn't able would be used men are still more expendable then the women would bealso>the only place women can excel in combat is a fantasy worldimangen defending shit world building that only exists for either fetish or agendanever mind in just realized i am talking with a neckbeard
>>66217668And there is the other thing retards who get butthurt about women warriors do: yell white knight when someone does not agree with their retardation.>>66217752The fact he is upset about women warriors should make it clear that thinking is not something he is good at.
>>66217810and you have no arguments as usual guess think is just to hard for the retards
>>66210616Right, because I'm a dick, lets do this:>Humans aren't a thing in setting, orcs are the main player race, like many animals outside of humanity female orcs are actually larger and stronger>Male orcs tend to be the shaman types of the tribe
Women are fucking great. Even actual literal faggots tend to think so.These people recoil with "realism" and other bullshit in a game where you regularly have monsters and magic, it just doesn't seem very honest.What are you so afraid of?That by interacting with fictional women you might reveal something about yourself, to yourself or to others?Like, fuck, live a little.
>>66217784Anon, you know fuck all of biology do you? Men being expendable works even better with female lead societies. However in this scenario we are talking magic users, and it so happens then in most settings a pregnant woman who is a spell caster is either not effected or more effective due to dual souls deal. Also female lead societies in natural does tend to show that they are more effective then male lead ones.
>>66217824Or maybe I do have them but you are too stupid to see it.
>>66218047>have pregnant women on the front lineand if she dies two lives will be lost instead of oneand she would also not be able to have more kids as a result of dyingin short it's just a waste of a life to send a women to the front lines not even mentioning child care after she give birth >Also female lead societies in natural does tend to show that they are more effective then male lead ones.i would ask for a citation but not even out of the stone age societies don't remotely compare to the first world. >>66218015because it's just fantasy is a shit excuse that only exists to defend bait threads
>>66218099>Or maybe I do have them but you are too stupid to see it.never make the arguements in any of the bait threads on subject no, i doubt you do have any you fucks get btfoed every time you try
>>66218102Well anon I was talking in nature, A.K.A big mammals and everyone else, as largest groups in mammal kingdom with social groups are those of hyenas. In other groups of animals they don't even have males like insects, instead just using sterile females since they are cheaper to raise. On the whole loosing someone in the front lines thing, if we are talking battles were magic is around, I don't think that kind of battles would even happen, instead wars would be much more like modern ones where it's all small skirmishes and thus hordes of men soldiers suddenly become less and less useful.
>>66218115Looking from the side anon, you are quite wrong, since it looks like you are running away from the argument instead of giving arguments for your position. It doesn't make you look smart, strong or cool, just kinda...cowardly.
>>66218124>Well anon I was talking in nature, A.K.A big mammals and everyone else, as largest groups in mammal kingdom with social groups are those of hyenas. In other groups of animals they don't even have males like insects, instead just using sterile females since they are cheaper to raise.as I said they would not be human>On the whole loosing someone in the front lines thing, if we are talking battles were magic is around, I don't think that kind of battles would even happen, instead wars would be much more like modern ones where it's all small skirmishes and thus hordes of men soldiers suddenly become less and less useful.1)numbers are still matter in modern warfare2)and it helps to be physical fit in that kind of combat
>>66218115So you are just projecting and a faggot
>>66218133>Looking from the side anon, you are quite wrong, since it looks like you are running away from the argument instead of giving arguments for your position. It doesn't make you look smart, strong or cool, just kinda...cowardlyi don't need to make an argument if they have not made one themselves and also i have been making arguments this whole time
>>66218154>So you are just projecting and a faggotliterally just a "no u"
>>66218151It's useful to be physically fit in our kind of warfare cause we need to move on foot, we don't have weapons that have power of rifles but weight nothing now do we?
>>66218179the weapon weighting another does not change the fact you need to be physically fit you still need to move fast and on foot for long periods of time
>>66218160Then why not continue that? Anon I find this whole thing a bit of a confusing mess. If we are talking fantasy we all need to agree no the rules of the setting before anything else is done.
>>66218218As finland shows up, that is not gender specific and instead trait of all humans. Of course it also shows that having good stealth and ranged weapons makes need for running long distances less dire.
>>66218219>Then why not continue that? Anon I find this whole thing a bit of a confusing mess. >If we are talking fantasy we all need to agree no the rules of the setting before anything else is done.because all they choose to do was sperg out and just resport to name calling and i am still having an argumentand i did set my standard for why>because there are unrealistic so long as you don't fundamentally change how humans workif women still are the ones having the kids then they are more important to society then the men are
>a world where women are magically cursed to be always barefootWhy is this a bad idea?
>>66218227still neededalso this does not work well you in offensive strategies
>>66218102>because it's just fantasy is a shit excuse >that only exists to defend bait threadsBitch, please. Do you think the game and the story is more fun with women in it? If the answer is no, you're a pathetic incel for sure. If the answer is yes, then stop making excuses and let it happen. Use that suspension of disbelief, brother. It's for a good cause, your own enjoyment.Besides, ~10% of women have problems being fertile, and only manage to conceive due to modern medicine. Sending them out to poke monsters with pointy sticks is no loss, from a societal standpoint.
>>66218263>Cry morestrange how you are the one who is sperging out here
>>66218278But what if it's less fun, you drooling mongoloid? What if I prefer my stories to be rooted in reality?
>>66210616Same reason making all cool bois men sucks. It's just overly limiting for no particular reason.If you have a really cool idea that for some reason can only work with this arrangement then fine, but otherwise its literally only hurting your setting.
>>66218279Nope, I am not the one who get buttblasted over women warriors existing, dumbass
>>66218278i do enjoy women in fictioni don't enjoy see the same sperg outs every time one of there bait threads get mocked for being retardedtake this tread for instance:with in the first couple of posts some one pointed out why this kind of setting would be madeand immediately "muh fantasy" was employed to defend the shit bait also 10% is not much of the female population compared to the amount of men that they would be beside in amor and that is ignore the fact they would on average not be as good at there job as the average man is
>>66218314>Nope, I am not the one who get buttblasted over women warriors existing, dumbassno your the one shitting them self in rage over some one pointing out reality
>>66218251If we agree that women are more important to the society you won't mind if we give them some ability to be an equilizer in case some idiots try to take them will you? This would make women more likely to fill important possitions?Of course this could lead to situations like real life where nobles were sent off to do random stuff because they were day...third or sixth son. Now we have similar deal just with daughters. After all tracking noble likes along the mother makes more sense.Now of course there is always a different case too, seen in Sci-Fi at least once - what if society is no longer born old fashion way? Grineer in Warframe are a matriarchy based on cloning with females taking up most important military roles, how do you feel about that?
>>66218333Anon whole this argument of being better for a job would not work always. If we employ realism suddenly we have to consider that women able to basically repel hostile men with ease would lead to societies were sexual selection could be different and thus you might end up with a setting where women are just as good at jobs men IRL had and men who are more fit as homewifes.
>>66218367>Now of course there is always a different case too, seen in Sci-Fi at least once - what if society is no longer born old fashion way? >Grineer in Warframe are a matriarchy based on cloning with females taking up most important military roles, how do you feel about that?the Grineer are a fun group and again mostly males make up the army.
>>66218410Well in there all women also are in military service so again if we talk grineer adventuring party is would probably be mostly female as women are stronger warriors usually
>>66218388>Anon whole this argument of being better for a job would not work always. >If we employ realism suddenly we have to consider that women able to basically repel hostile men with ease would lead to societies were sexual selection could be different and thus you might end up with a setting where women are just as good at jobs men IRL had and men who are more fit as homewifes.that is still unlikely 1)strong aggressive men still are better at unting and work then weak and soft men2)women would still be more important to protect then men even if they can defend themselves we have seen this irl as well, guns are the great equalizer
>>66218417not that many they are also usually the most obviously enhanced compared to the regular grunts
>>66218447for refernce here is a grunt
>>66218047Besides insects, animal societies are rarely leaded by females. And it's even debatable that the queens actually do any leading.
>>66218434Problem here is that women actually prefer smaller men who are good at being family men over strong ones and sexual selection is strong factor and if men suddenly can't rape women easily the society would change quite a bit.
>>66218447>>66218460>>66218417and here is the femalemost of them have limbs replaced and are often better equipped then the grunts it is clear either they feel the need to give the women more improvements or they need them (don't need but get any ways vs. need them)
>>66218447That is mostly cause they are humans and by law they must be enhanced to be better
>>66218304Bullshit you do. Nobody plays realistic history, realistic contemporary, or anything of the sort.You want magic, you want monsters, and you want to be part of a meaningful sequence of events, whether you're playing a hero, villain, or something in-between. Which one of those is, for you, rooted in reality? I'm guessing zero out of four.And yeah, it is less fun for you, because you're not doing what you were told. Suspend thy critical faculties and enjoy thyself, you fucking dimwit.
>>66218468>Problem here is that women actually prefer smaller men who are good at being family men over strong ones and sexual selection is strong factor and if men suddenly can't rape women easily the society would change quite a bit.they have always wanted family mennow that physical labor is not as much a way to success we are seeing the change to smart and successful men how well you can provide is still the main driving force here
>>66218483>That is mostly cause they are humans and by law they must be enhanced to be betterand due to the massive amount of deffects found in the grennier clones the females also still have more of them
>>66218484>Bullshit you do. Nobody plays realistic history, realistic contemporary, or anything of the sort.Game of thrones was the most popular show for a long time it's whole gimmick was gritty realism
>>66218472Anon in lore queen's ordered women to be armed better. Its combination of what you said and well basically show of great honour.
>>66218495You mean "realism" the whole "realism" thing is usually done by people who know fuck all about realism.
>>66218507>You mean "realism" the whole "realism" thing is usually done by people who know fuck all about realism.sure thing bud
>>66218518Anon are you stupid, uninformed or just new? Most of "realism" threads on /tg/ are done by people who are actually uninformed to a horrifying degree. If you ever been around during the past few years when the wave of that kind of spam happened you would have noticed just how stupid "realism" anons were....
>>66218495Legendary heroes, dragons, magic, fated mysticism, ridiculously convoluted intrigue, actual fucking time travel, and oh yes, women as warriors.Thanks for making my point.
>>66218537>Anon are you stupid, uninformed or just new? >Most of "realism" threads on /tg/ are done by people who are actually uninformed to a horrifying degree. If you ever been around during the past few years when the wave of that kind of spam happened you would have noticed just how stupid "realism" anons were....no i have been here for a whileand usually people like you just sperg out when your proven wrong
>>66218543>women as warriors.as an excessive minority >Thanks for making my point.i didn't but you can continue to be delusional
>>66218557But am I wrong? You know that "realism" fags are stupid and usually ideas instead of mechanism or never actually read anything about real life history or nature.
>>66218342You would not know reality if it was tea bagging you.
>>66218577>But am I wrong? You know that "realism" fags are stupid and usually ideas instead of mechanism or never actually read anything about real life history or nature.the people who try to add them as systems in games are retarded but doing it in world building tends not to have the same issues as bogging game mechanics down with unnecessary addions
>>66218333Or maybe it you being retarded.
>>66210616>Why is this a bad idea?Its been done
>>66218586>You would not know reality if it was tea bagging you.you should consider checking to a mental hospital
>>66218592You might have missunderstood what I meant. By mechanisms I am taking how people, animals and societies work, not some in game rules.They are useful when you are stuck with an idea and want to make it realistic, which is something a lot of people claiming to make "realistic" settings can't do.
>>66212807So, Herbert's "Dune"
>>66218593>Or maybe it you being retarded.great come back there you made not arguments out side of name calling because you couldn't refute the pointgo "pretend" to retarded else where
>>66218597So they can tell me to go get you? You go there and save me a trip.
>>66218608you mean like the tard who claimed tech would be wide spread though out the world because one nation had it and it would be common
>>66218617>So they can tell me to go get you? You go there and save me a trip.the levels of self delusion your willing to got to
>>66218622Yup. Or tards who use IRL religions as examples of religions in fantasy when they would work quite differently.
>>66218614Your retarded "point" is more or less women warriors make you butthurt.>>66218628Fine, I will drive you there. You big baby.
>>66218640it easier to pull from reality then to go though the process of thinking how would knowing god affect us
>>66218644funny your the one butt hurt hereall you have done is sperg out and act like a tard
>>66218654There is a point there, but also it's actually quite simple since mythology actually gives us that - most mythologies have gods coming down to do shit, just make so it's both a rumour and sometimes truth in your setting.
>>66218691cute you announcing what your doing project all you want it does not change the fact your the one crying on the internet because you saw some one besmirch women's honor
>>66218706Yes yes, you are too stupid to understand what is going on. Also nice job enforcing how much of a drooling retard you are by yelling white knight when someone does not get upset over women knights.
>>66218726>Yes yes, you are too stupid to understand what is going on. Also nice job enforcing how much of a drooling retard you are by yelling white knight when someone does not get upset over women knights.your the one that is upset your pissing your pants here because some one pointed out reality to yousorry to burst you bubnle and hurt you fee fees
>>66218737The only one pissing pants is you, retard. Like that other anon said those who make a big deal about realism tend to have no idea what they are talking about. You did not point out reality, you just acted like a moron
>>66210616Smells too much of politicking and fetishism. Also a special kind of unrealism combined with male discrimination.
IF YOU CAN'T GET A GF AT LEAST DO THE BOARD A SERVICE AND JACK OFF BEFORE YOU POST
>>66214490If posting the same characters over and over again was avatarfagging, we'd have to ban 40k from this board. Use your noggin a little.Avatarfagging was a style of posting that's almost never seen these days (mostly since it's banned), where a person would accompany every one of their posts with a character expression image, effectively treating the accompanying image as an avatar. It's something that annoyed a lot of people because it was something that seemed to be only done by annoying attention whores trying to stand out from the crowd, and can be compared to accompanying your post with a "signature" text, something that is also banned (in the exact same rule banning avatar use).People posting Ribbon or Cestree are not avatarfagging, not even when they use them as reaction images. They're often just selecting images from their /tg/ folders, and as characters that have been on this board for many years, there's literally hundreds of pictures of these characters, so it shouldn't be a surprise to you to see a few of them on occasion.
>>66218047>Most Dominant species in world history with ability to travel to other celestial bodies, comprehend scope of the universe.>Male Lead excluding a few tribal societies still stuck in the stone age>Some fucking Bees>Fenale LeadThis is not a functional argument, humans are as much a part of nature as everything else.
>>66219670Anon but look at our societies. We might be advances sure, but we also are really crap at it. Ants and bees with our intellect would be much higher tech level because unlike us, they got species that don't go to war with one another. Humans as a whole as far as animal life is concerned are kinda pathetic all things considered.
>>66210616Because the only things that use that premise are hentai or battle harems (where the MC is a guy who is mysteriously able to use magic)
>>66219744There are few good stories, but really if you want those you must move away as far as possible from japan.
>>66218609But Dune isn't trash, desu.
>>66210779Adventurers, not the people in charge. Female lions do the hunting.
>>66219753A quick search says that’s Brazil.
>>66219735Except were the most successful lifeforms in history period. We are literally the opposite of pathetic, and in fact are so powerful that we can erase other species without even knowing or caring that we're doing it.Also where exactly did you get the idea that ants and bees don't go to war? They do that all the time even within their own species. They are one of the few species other than humans that fight on a scale big enough to be called warfare.
>>66219744Claymore is unironically pretty good, though there are a few male claymores they all went insane mostly.Ending is bullshit though.
>>66219904Yes, there are species such as the horror know as Argentinian ants who not only don't war with one another, they got a global hive. As for your statement on humans being most successful lifeform in history....Yes that is bullshit because you don't know how success is counted do you?We almost whipped out ourselves way too many things to consider ourselves not pathetic. One during the moments when you realize your own flaws can you become better then you were before, and you anon are further from that then me.
>>66219943Wow, what a condescending asshole.I know damn well how I measure success, and it involves things like breaking open the shell of our atmosphere to enter the cosmos beyond.Also being really damn good at killing things, including each other, is a 100% positive trait for an animal presuming it's primary purpose is reproduction and survival. Your attempts to obfuscate human success are pathetic and inneffectual, and your desire to feel bad about yourself is whiney and useless.
>>66219984Anon I work in a museum that deals with cold war. I know better then anyone that humans are idiots that almost nuked the entire planet and themselves completely. I don't know about you anon, but I consider it a flaw when you kill yourself by killing your enemy. So yes, if you want humans to trully be superior, learn to coexist first.
>>66220070Fuck you, almost is not "did" and humanity did not nuke itself.Calling people idiots for something they thought about doing but considered against is utterly retarded.
Fact This is an obvious bait thread and all of you retards that are falling for it, should kill yourselves.And op should cut his wrists with a better knife.
>>66220070Wouldn't that indicate a superior species? Wiping out nearly all life on earth by your own hands is something no other singular species has ever come even close to achieving, coupled with other human achievements like rewriting the programming of life itself doesn't that essentially make humans Gods?
>>66220140While it is a bait thread I do feel it could’ve been leveraged into an interesting discussion, had anons not gotten bogged down into arguing about details and preferences like they always do
>>66218102Are you putting line breaks mid-sentence? Why would you do that?
>>66220142No, because that what was done by a bunch of purple single celled organisms few billion years ago. You really want to compare yourself to a fucking ameba?
>>66220243Sure, why not? We're still better than the amoeba so I see no reason we should compare ourselves to it.For someone desperate to put us below ants you're really not very consistent.
>>66210616What stops men from adventuring in this setting?
>>66220328I am just saying humans are not best sentient creature possible. Ant like societies would lead to faster progress.
>>66220345Nothing, I think it's pretty simple way to fix it - Women adventuring is like D&D, demigods doing powerful shit. Men and monster adventuring is like WHFB - you might die against a dog or accidentally slay a dragon.
>>66220345Extreme, near-certain-death-level danger? What?
>>66220378Why would they do that? WW2 and the cold war you complain about led to more progress than the past 2000 years before them combined.Eternal peace in a slave like hivemeind would result in eternal stagnation.
>>66220402Doesn't stop men in real life from doing it. Remember the Masai had an entire civilization where manhood was determined on killing a lion in single combat with a spear.
>>66220345Nothing other than high lethality/inability to level up
>>66220497Hoe much do levels matter? Does it work on cartoon physics where you can't chop some bodies arm off until they reach 0hp, or does it just make you stronger and faster?If it's the former there's almost no way to beat it short of finding exploits in the system, but if it's the latter than men would still be just as effective as they are IRL through superior coordination.
>>66220543I would say a mix, you can still do things a human could, but if you want to reach superhuman levels (the equivalent above level 5 in D&D), you need to level up
>>66220543>than men would still be just as effective as they are IRL through superior coordination.Depends on the difference in growth
>>66220482That's a lion. Lions have a challenge rating of 1.Imagine a world where there's monsters with challenge ratings of 10+ wandering around.
>>66218990wow, look at the complete lack of an argument. It's like you don't have one and are just spering out because your a retard.
>>66220543Stronger and faster as well as more powerful magic, but women can get superhuman while men are stuck being level 1
>>66210847And they never do it in an interesting way, they just make it into a shitty harem or yuri anime.
>>66219536Dumb fag, it's literally one guy who keeps making threads with his shitty OCs in the OP. He makes a couple threads every day, all with the same kind if vapid questions. The fact that you wrote a fucking essay in response to that other anon tells me that you're probably him too. Work on your art.
>>66210616Because women aren't humanoids. Done.
>>66221795Why do you persist with trying to lie like this?>it's literally one guyYou seem to vastly underestimate how popular these characters are. If you haven't noticed, one of them runs around in our banner.You're free to not like them, but if the reason you don't like them is because you honestly think it's just one person who makes these threads, your hate is irrational and based on your imagination.>The fact that you wrote a fucking essay in response to that other anon tells me that you're probably him too. Work on your art.Why are you eternally upset? It's not even just one artist, so it makes your entire premise ridiculous.Just get over yourself.
>>66222691Why are you replying to the troll?
>>66222691Good sir, might I most humbly recommend that you surrender this endeavour, for I doubt very much that anon's ability and or willingness to see reason as to the nature of "avatarfagging."
>>66222906if he doesn't the bait thread will die
>>66210616>Why is this a good ideaFixed that for you.
>>66210616> -4STR -2INT
>>66210616>a world where people practice basic anatomy before posting their artWhy is this a bad idea?
>>66223009Let it then>>66223102It’s fun
>>66210616Men would be reduced to breeding stock
>>66219744>battle haremsYou say that like those are bad things.
>>66223150Haha this is such a clever comment! How long did it take you to come up with this one, dude? Have a silver!
>>66221525Great job showing you have zero grasp of what is being said or what is going on retard. Also there is no need for you to post pic of yourself dumbass
>>66223150I don't see what your stats have to do with the thread.
>>66221764Simoun did it with a setting where everyone is born female, and then later on chooses their gender, with only people who have not chosen yet able to pilot their defensive mechs.And they did a lot with just that.
>>66223551I agree with the implied sentiment. Battle Harem makes the series of that nature a lot more tolerable because it gives them to do with the relationship dynamics besides bitch at each other. Sacred Band of Thebes wasn't a harem, but it works as good inspiration for how a group of people with close relationships can work together better.
>>66226968the word you are looking for is derp
>>66210616Because fertile females are a precious resource for any species and no civilization would let them willingly undergo dangerous job or adventures
>>66210616It's not, run it
>>66210616Because of all the half-monster races.And the half-monster races become so prolific because of all the rape.
>>66210616Because baiting people is too easy nowadays
>>66210616Cus its just plain boring. Youre only restricting play choices. Buuuut. If you swing it towards something like; Only women can reach high magical prowess, and only men can reach great feats of spirit and strength. Both can be adventures, but women tend to lead, with their edge in the arcane arts. Men are happy to adventure to protect the fairer sex, as the women could bolster the mens' combat prowess. Men adventures that explore alone, tend to do so to prove they are worth more than mere strength alone. They would wish to prove they can outwit might or magic, by delving into dangerous situations with high rewards.Now that is a game I wouldn't mind playing.
>>66210616Isn’t that Claymore?
>>66232070Is the shitty OC someone in this board keeps pushing.
>>66232711How new are you?
>>66230387Sad but true
>>66210616>World of powerful womenIt’s not
>>66210616>Why is this a bad idea?In-universe? Hypergamy.Women desire men who are "better" than they are: stronger, taller, richer, more intelligent, more established, of a higher rank, more resourceful et cetera. If you give women such a massive leg-up over men, there's absolutely no reason for women to desire men.Look at the contemporary West: look at the epidemic of career women in their 40s wondering where all the "good" men have gone, look at the fact that the odds of divorce skyrocket once the woman starts outearning the man. Now magnify that to a scale we cannot even begin to imagine. This is an extinction-level event not even a nuclear war can match in terms of long term impact for the human species.
>>66238105>If you give women such a massive leg-up over men, there's absolutely no reason for women to desire men.I would assume standards in what women want would change, if only due to natural selection
>>66232711He was talking about the idea of all-female adventurers in Claymore, not the image that triggers you so bad.
>>66210847The only anime I can think of besides hentai and ecchi is Claymore and that has some magical bullshitery to explain it.
>>66238105>HypergamyThat's not a real thing beyond that both men and women like to have the most attractive partner possible. That's not unique to women.>odds of divorce skyrocket once the woman starts outearning the manThe study that promoted that idea also said that the reason for that isn't the woman but the fact that men in that situation are five times more likely to be unfaithful to a wife who earns more than them.
>>66239080>That's not a real thingOK retard
>>66239126>I'm ignorant and proud of it.
>>66226539funny your the one who proved they have 0 grasp of what is being said and constantly oozes out but hurt but hey your just a retared troll who was triggered by some one pointing out reality to you
>>66210616I'm pretty sure because of Goblins.
>>66219821Bad choice, buckoWe got the largest japanese population outside of Japan
>>66210616Because then i cant go adventuring with cute boys you utter retard
>>66213125Just because you get a boner when you see it doesnt mean thats its purpose
>>66214575>shared body incestLol, thats a new one
>>66239972Yes yes it is clear things like facts and reality is not something you know anything about. It seems the one oozes out butthurt is you with retarded shitpost
>>66210847>>66210689Sailor Moon does it. Madoka does it. Sympho Gear does it. It's call the magical girl genre. It's very popular with girls and boys alike, mostly because boys can fap to it.
>>66212396It's part of the equal and opposite thing the author loved. Men were way stronger, but women could connect to other casters to pool their strength
>>66240975The irony is that a lot of gender-marketed anime have something to offer to the other gender. Want strong-independent womyn who don't need no man? Try any non-harem ecchi show. I can't think of a single tv show that passes the Bechdel test harder than Queen's Blade, where every major character is a strong and competent woman (who just also happens to be incredibly sexy). Their personalities are also very varied, from dignified and traditional Tomoe (best girl) to "sex positive" Echidna (also best girl but for different reasons).Want alpha dudes who aren't spineless beta's and don't take shit from thots? Shoujo is full of 'em. I think of men like the main love interest in DameKoi, who spends most of his time on-panel shitting on the main character and calling her an idiot. He pretty much does that shit where some Chad spends most of his time shitting on a girl but she only ends up liking him more for it.
>>66210616>Why is this a bad idea?BECAUESS MUH BENISES BETTER
>>66240923>hasn't provide a single fact to back up any of there claimswow I am in awe of the level of triggered you are over being wrong
>>66210689This, fuck everyone else.
>>66242921You would not know facts if it hit you in your butthurt face>>66242982t. retard
>>66243121>reeeeeee I have no evidence your wrong >reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeekeep going this quite entertaining to see you sperging out like this
>>66243205To bad you are looking in the wrong place seeing how the only one sperging out is your retarded ass
>>66243278>no ufunny you have only been sperging out and doing nothing else all threadbut I guess you can choose to believe in what ever delusion that makes you feel better
>>66243351>saying someone is going no u while just going no u all the time
>>66243494>you the one really doing the thing I have been doing this entire thread cry some more
Perks to remove any racial weaknesses from all jumper's kids and companions?
>>66243589Sorry not you
>>66243614Get a perk that removes yours then make them all a part of you
>>66210616work on your art.
>>66210867his hatred is 100% rational, avatarfag.
>>66210835all of those are more believable than female adventurers.
>>66210940have you tried any roleplaying game?
>>66243937>>66243973Try again after you found your brain
>>66212727killed by a mage
>>66212904yes, it is.
>>66214553what's wrong with misogyny?
>>66217752if they're the reproductive bottleneck, they won't be fighting, no matter what. if we change basic human biology to the point that this is no longer the case, then we are no longer discussing humans.
>>66218133he's the only one who has presented any agruments, support for which you may confirm for yourself with any biology textbook.
>>66218015femininity so fragile
>>66218124the numbers don't matter. losing five thousand women is worse than losing five thousand men. losing one woman is worse than losing one man. men are disposable. women are valuable.
>>66243669yes, thank for agreeing it not me that's butthurtyour on your first steps to accepting the fact your just sperging out
>>66244401Nope I agreed that you are butthut and you don't have any facts
>>66210616because i dont want to play as a woman, thats not my fantasy, thats not the kind of thing i want to do. And the people who would want to play that are not the kind of faggots i want to play with.
>>66239329Hypergamy is about status, the fact of the mater is men will marry up and down without much care, but women tend to only want to marry up.
>>66218015>Even actual literal faggots tend to think so.No we don't you dumb hole. Go back to being a parasite somewhere else.
>>66244512I am pretty sure most faggots are not bottomless stupid like you
>>66244512>>66244574Could you two stop flirting so publicly?
>>66218484I don't want any of that.
>>66218543even martin makes mistakes.
>>66218595name one thing that hasn't been.
its just dumb and adds nothing.
>>66244702First throw yourself into the sun
>>66219265imagine ever interacting with women for any reason lmao
>>66219735every species on earth wars with each others and itself.
>>66221434lol this pussyyou wanna become a man or not faggot
>>66223802seething roastie lmao
>>66233205he didn't say recently.
>>66244894t. stinking retard
>>66244493>Hypergamy is about status, the fact of the mater is men will marry up and down without much care, but women tend to only want to marry up.Except that's not true. Female Hypermany has decreased over the years according to studies, while the male analog (With men prioritising an appearance superior to their own over other factors) has not done so. Which is the issue with claiming that it's a female only thing, as both genders prefer to marry up but the 'up' is based off a different factor in each case.
>>66244702oh dont listen to him, hes just beeing a grump>>66244783aintcha pumpkin
>>66245123and yet we still get stuff like the e-harmony study, not to mention divorce has skyrocketed. Cause most divorces are initiated by women, wouldn't being forced to act less Hypergamus be a likely cause?
>>66244420>Nope I agreed that you are butthut and you don't have any factsweird none of those describe how I actedbut they do describe how you've been acting this entire timeyou may have some serous mental issues to get your self confused for me
>>66245395>Cause most divorces are initiated by women, wouldn't being forced to act less Hypergamus be a likely cause?No, studies tend to put that one at 'Men are 5x more likely to cheat if the wife earns more money than them'. That's not really on the women so much as men who don't handle someone else being the breadwinner well.
>>66245434it applies to the women that make more as wellyou didn't read the studies did you?
>>66245434except thats irreverent if woman still overwhelmingly cheat more than guys, which is consistent. The fact of the matter is divorce over feelings of satisfaction not infidelity make the majority of settlements, and agian majority initiated by women.
>>66210616Because of the women.
>>66245414It seem you need to go back and read your butthut posts, fag lord. They clearly say that you are butthurt and don't have any facts
>>66245574t.butthut fag literally every single one of your post have just been you being butt hurt
>>66245674t. butthurt faggot who found himself
>>66245892still going ?wow the butthurt is strong with this oneand you still getting yourself confused with meyou may need a therapist
>>66245936Yes the butthurt is strong with you. One who is confused is you and your face
>>66245958moving on to grade school insults?wow your actually were hurt by my word weren't you?
>>66245991Nope but it seems you know all about still being in grade school. The only one being hurt is you, not only from your butthurt over you not having facts but also because you like to hit yourself in the face with your socks
>>66246049yeah no.all your post have been nothing other then insults and "no u" meanwhile I have posted multiple time with arguments. none of which you responded to with any facts or arguments other then>reeeeeeeeee I am wrong but don't want to admit it reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
>>66246082But your butthurt posts can be summed up as 404 arguments not found. Before you can say you posted arguments you need to post arguments.
>>66246125I short you just ignored them and stuck you fingers in your ears and when "la la I can't here, I am no lissening" like 2 year old
>>66246142So yes you failed to post any arguments or facts and you are just butthurt now.
>>66210661That already happens.
>>66210835In my day we understood the difference between realism and verisimilitude.
>>66246189Yeah and maybe one day you will learn it
>>66246171> no u againwhy do you keep getting what your doing and what have done missed up?you may have a severe mental disorder
>>66246208considering you don't know it now that is quite humorous
>>66246262That was not a no u sir nutslicker. That was me saying again you did not post arguments or facts. Learn to read dumbass>>66246290Or I do and you just think you do
>>66210779I'd kill for a good campaign set in Hollow Knight's world
>>66246304>no u stilfunny you have yet to demonstrate that you do and will likely never will at this pace you have not made a single argument and sperg out any time some proves you wrong
>>66246335Oh, you think being butthurt that women warriors exist is a argument. It is not really one, it's just you being stupid. That being said I will play your dumb game for a bit. Here is a name for you to get stuff started: Tomoe Gozen. You still failed to post any facts
>>66246434>>>66246335 (You)>Oh, you think being butthurt that women warriors exist is a argument. It is not really one, it's just you being stupid. That being said I will play your dumb game for a bit. Here is a name for you to get stuff started: Tomoe Gozen. You still failed to post any facts>still making accusations instead of arguments dude we know your just butt hut and don't have any real argumentslook at the modern militaries gender balance and come back to me
>>66246476So you are so buttblasted that you are not even reading posts now and you missed the fact I never said women warriors were common Also your pic shows that women fighting is a thing which is my point even if I am talking about before modern era which is why a said Tomoe Gozen.
>>66212396>Nyan knave tugs her braid
>>66212727All you'd have to do is subtly insinuate that stacy thinks todd is cuteand then alice will bring the fucking pain, and becky will help her gurl stacy, and darla HATES becky so she'll help aliceAnd then after the war, there will be only men.
>>66246576wow what all you have>very few women were ever warriors and still are to this dayand why is that :they are on average weaker then men and tend to preform a necessary action for continuing the race, which is more important to fighting then them being warriors.that is ignoring the fact i was never but hurt over women being warriors at any point that was you spergining out and having to reach so you could make a semblance of a point
>>66246657I did not say that was all I had. I have more if you want but it seems your butt is already ruined. Again I never said they were common but it seems reading is too hard for you. Your butthurt about them was made clear by the fact you started whining like a retard when the topic of women warriors came up.
>>66219773half the characters in Dune also didn't have breasts larger than their heads, unfortunately
>>66246911>Your butthurt about them was made clear by the fact you started whining like a retard when the topic of women warriors came up.t.butthurt retad who sperged out the second anyone proved him wrong wow going back and editing history already? interesting
>>66244918oof look at all this butthurt
>>66247170But you did not proved me wrong. You failed to doing anything other than act like whiny retard who got butthurt.>>66247278Yes look at you
>>66247323wow i can find all your post be just looking at the most butthurt onesalso all you did was proved women can be warriors i proved it is an exream minority and men are still likely to be better at the job then them but your still a fag who is to much of a retard to do anything other then scream "rREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" at anything that proves you wronglike every post point out who op is a retard and so are you
>>66210616>only wamyn can use magicSure actually this could be a fun scenario >women using melee weapons instead of only magic, cunning and the occasional knife. Totally broke my immersion bro.
>>66247365More like you can find your posts by looking at the butthurt ones. I guess you proved women warriors were rare but I never said they were common. Again the only one screaming REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE like a butthurt fag is you. Also not OP, something you would know if you were not retarded as fuck
>>66247563hmmmmlet's see here your post history so far:>reeeeeee how dare you point out women being warriors is unrealsitic>reeeee how dare you provide evidence >reeeee i am not the butt hurt one here you are looks like a shit ton of sperging and butthurt
>>66247674>looks like a shit ton of sperging and butthurtYes from you>women being warriors is unrealsiticWomen warriors existed. I named one and you got buttblasted.>how dare you provide evidence You failed to do this. >i am not the butt hurt one here you are You did that all the thread
>>66247771>Yes from you>no u>Women warriors existed. I named one and you got buttblasted.as an extream minority and were less effective then there male peers, thus they are unrealistic >You failed to do this. no i haven't , but you did >You did that all the thread>another no uoof look like your letting your aching ass talk for you again
>>66247851>an minoritySo you agree that they existed good to see you are using your brain for once.>thus they are unrealisticSomething being rare does not make something unrealistic just something that does not pop up too often. For something to be unrealistic it would have to something that can't exist in real life and we already know women warrior can exist.>no i haven't , but you did All you did was I say so. I on the other hand named a woman warrior. Also you just said they exist though rare.>oof look like your letting your aching ass talk for you againNo unlike you I keep my butt away from the keyboard.
>>66247980>So you agree that they existed good to see you are using your brain for once.amazing reading comprehension you have there brought that up like about dozen posts ago>Something being rare does not make something unrealistic just something that does not pop up too often. For something to be unrealistic it would have to something that can't exist in real life and we already know women warrior can exist.yes and they tend to be less effective so haveing let say an army or a platoon of just female is unrealistic >All you did was I say so. I on the other hand named a woman warrior. Also you just said they exist though rare.no that was you i agree they exists a long time ago and highlighted why they arn't useful as soldiers i am sorry you lack the ability to keep track of other posts >No unlike you I keep my butt away from the keyboard.and your ass is still seething from that pounding you put it though
>>66248021>amazing reading comprehension Yes much better than what you have.>army or a platoon of just females Women warriors was too rare to really say how effective that is. Off the top of my head The Order of the Hatchet, Dahomey Amazons, and the Night Witches come to mind. those group existing disproves your dumb unrealistic claim.>i agree they exists a long time ago It did not look like you did, it looks like you are only agreeing with me after you got proved wrong.>Stuff about asses.Nope, my ass is fine. Your ass on the other hand is flopping around your room and high speed.
>>66248573>Yes much better than what you have.ha, is cute ho obvious that is not true >Women warriors was too rare to really say how effective that is. Off the top of my head The Order of the Hatchet, Dahomey Amazons, and the Night Witches come to mind. those group existing disproves your dumb unrealistic claim.the "exist" does not make they realistic for use in a military the fact they are rare proves this>It did not look like you did, it looks like you are only agreeing with me after you got proved wrong.oh look your reading comprehension is kicking in again >Nope, my ass is fine. Your ass on the other hand is flopping around your room and high speed.the salt is flowing with this poststay triggered fag
>>66248695>obvious that is not trueOr you obviously don't have reading comprehension.>for use in a military They are realistic in the fact they can exist and the reason that army or a platoon are rare is because women warrior are in themselves tend to be rare. As being effective again too rare to really say either way. >reading comprehensionNope I named a women warrior then you started agreeing with me on that point>the salt is flowing with this postYeah you are a salt mine.>stay triggered fagIronic coming from someone endlessly butthurt about women warriors existing
>>66248863>Or you obviously don't have reading comprehension.you haven't demonstrated any yes>They are realistic in the fact they can exist and the reason that army or a platoon are rare is because women warrior are in themselves tend to be rare. As being effective again too rare to really say either way. >muh they exists if they are still rare with modern weapons and warfare they are not realistic for use on the battle field >Nope I named a women warrior then you started agreeing with me on that point>what happend didn't happenthis again? really?>Yeah you are a salt mine.i am the miner your the mine>Ironic coming from someone endlessly butthurt about women warriors existingnot realy when all you did was sperg out all thread and then whined "they were real" yeah your not the trigged one here
>>66248905>you haven't demonstrated any yesYou are thinking of yourself again>not realistic for use on the battle field.Maybe if you are talking about having them being common on the battle field. Just them being a thing now and then is realistic.>this again? really?Yeah, you said some crap about no women fighting before modern era which then I named Tomoe Gozen disproving your dumb claim. Now the bit about the modern era is gone from your posts.>i am the miner your the mineMore like you are the mine and faggot lost in said mine.>sperg out all threadAgain Ironic coming from you>they were realWhich I proved. You on the other hand proved nothing
>>66249107>You are thinking of yourself again>no u for the millionth time>Again Ironic coming from youfunny comeing for the person spering out all thread but hey you were proven wrong by multiple poster all thread so it's understandable >muh they waz realzyeah and so what this is claiming cripples being warriors is realistic because a retard served once keep sperging and acting like you made a good point
so what happens ever time we have a female warriors thread happened here the idea gets btfoed in the first few posts and the retards spend all thread butt hurt
>>66249205>person spering outGood job finding yourself>proven wrong by multiple posterThis never happen. Try using your brain so you know what is going on>because a retard served once I did not know you served.> made a good pointI did and was able to back it up unlike what moron like you did.>>66249271>the idea gets btfoedRetards like you getting buttblasted about women warrior is not doing that.>the retards spend all thread butt hurtYes stupid faggots like you spent the thread being butthurt
>>66249343>reeeeee >the waz reel>i spent the entire thread sperging out >totally wasn't btfoed repeatedly >reeeeeee>I am act like a retard but you must totaly be the retatrdplease keep going retard
>>66249444>reeeeee, spent the entire thread sperging out, btfoed repeatedly, more reeeeeee, acting like a retard, and keep being retardThat pretty much sums up morons like youWhile dumbass like you were busy being whiny faggots I was able to give some proof of what I was saying.
>>66249508>While dumbass like you were busy being whiny faggots I was able to give some proof of what I was saying.you described your self there budyp
>>66249518Yeah I posted proof while retards like you were acting like whiny faggots
>>66249545>Yeah I posted proof while retards like you were acting like whiny faggotsno you really didn't all you did was chant "that waz realz" while ingnore all evidence they sucked at there jobs and continue to do sobut being a whiney faggot is what you have shown you do best
>>66249580Ah I see. You did not even read the thread and you are dumb. I even named three groups of women who did fighting>evidenceNone of you retard did that.>they sucked at their jobsNo one in this thread really did anything to show that they sucked at it and even if that was true that does not disprove that they existed, dumbass.>being a whiney faggot is what you have shown you do bestThat is some nice projecting fag lord
yep when exactly like all the other threads whiny white knight fags get btfoed and whine the rest of thread
>>66249703Whiny morons who get buttbasted about women warriors get btfoed and whine the rest of threadFixed that for you
>>66249689>Ah I see. You did not even read the thread and you are dumb. I even named three groups of women who did fighting3 small goups hundreds of years apartwowmuch usefulness>None of you retard did that.bearly provided any and it was shit evidence to begin with >No one in this thread really did anything to show that they sucked at it and even if that was true that does not disprove that they existed, dumbass.modern stats do exist and anrt favorable to women>That is some nice projecting fag lordyou spent the entire thread doing that
>>66249720>Whiny morons who get buttbasted about women warriors get btfoed and whine the rest of thread>Fixed that for youstill btfoed and whining like a fag I seegotta pretend yo
>>66249736Yeah more useful that anything you said>bearly provided any and it was shit evidence to begin with More like it was better anything you posted>modern stats do exist and anrt favorable to womenAnd that does not stop women warrior from existing>you spent the entire thread doing thatStil projecting I see>>66249743Nope that would still be you
>>66249763>Yeah more useful that anything you said>More like it was better anything you postedkeep pretending it was if that help your ego>And that does not stop women warrior from existingdidn't stop them for sucking>Nope that would still be youkeep pretending it wasn't you