Was Dungeons & Dragons furry before furry fandom was invented? If so, does it prove that D&D is really from Satan?
>>65735104That's not how inventions, D&D furries, proofs OR satan works!Inventions are created through forethought. The furry fandom isn't an invention, it's a fad, a stylistic choice, a mental illness. No-one sat down and said "I'm going to design and create a sexual attraction to upright standing animals".I don't think you can call D&D furry without giving some evidence that D&D pushes as many people as they can people into fucking said upright standing animals or wearing animal costumes.Proof is not just "something predated something else, therefore this means something entirely unconnected is true"! A proof demonstrates each step of your logic! Formal logic is something that can allow you to show how you get from the first fact to the last fact!Satanism is a different type of mental illness to furries! How are you linking it via D&D?
>>65735159Do you think somebody sat down and said "I'm going to create electricity"?
>>65735171>Do you think somebody sat down and said "I'm going to create electricity"?Do you think electricity is "invented"?
>>65735159The proper scientific definition of furry is anthropomorphic animal characters used as sex objects. And D&D clearly qualifies.Yiff in hell, Ed Greenwood.https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Forgotten_Realms#Forgotten_Realms_And_Sex
>>65735104You're pathological in your hatred of furries. Most people at this point are. Get some help.>Inb4 yiff in Hell furfagAin't seeing you go "hentai in Hell weeb", and yet they have plenty of the same kind of people you allegedly hate.
>>65735159There was some furry equivalent to ED I read awhile back.Basically when it started the furry fandom was just fans of stuff like Bugs Bunny, but one of the guys who helped organize the first furry convention was a pervert and spent the advertising budget on ads in the classifieds section of fetish magazines. So you had a whole bunch of fat gay guys with no real interest in cartoons showing up to the first convention and pretending to be skunks and foxes as yet another sexual kink.So insofar as furries being a sex thing, it was essentially "invented" by one guy forcing the hell out of it.
One of my players is a furry and it's getting problematichttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vOa8EkLdJYhttps://www.reddit.com/r/DnD/comments/53psyz/one_of_my_players_is_a_furry_and_its_getting/Always, always, always, remeber to PURGE THE FUR. Before it is too late.
>>65735104Fantasy has had beastfolk far longer than fuzfuck fandom has been a thing.
>>65735273>get helppretty sure you're the one who wants to fuck animals, bub
>>65735104Anthropomorphic animals always existed in some form since humans were able to paint/sculpt/draw them.Furries have just associated them with a fetish quite recently.
>>65735159Satanism is not even mental thing at all - it's two things, it's either a neo-pagan faith based on old god of venus, or bunch of atheists pissing off bunch of mormons by using religious terms to get some free stuff.
>>65735378People not able to inject their fetish eveywhere are terrible players in general
>>65735378That is not your video. You are just using stuff of reddit, that is probably made up. You know how I know it? I actually do have two furry players, I got a weeb too, because they know the systems I run and are decent players. Their whole porn preference however never really comes up since they all play humans and not beatmen.
>>65735502I think you meant to say people who inject their fetish into everything tend to be terrible players - that I can agree on, saddly have seen few cases of that in GMs.
>>65735273>Get some help.He says, while wanting to fuck literal animals.
>>65735523Technicly speaking, if you don't want to fuck literal animals you are either asexual or a freak who wants to fuck buildings, since humans are animals by definition of anthropology and biology. Unless you are talking bestiality, that is kinda more of a problem related to areas where people live being either shit, superstitious or both.
>>65735535Furry = Bestiality. This isn't even arguable.
>>65735104To answer your question on DnD being furry - it's yes and no, it was close to how furries draw their characters at first - humans with animal heads, but they aren't cute - here is a picture of early gnoll and if I find my complete book humanoids I can drop some other stuff for you to look at for yourself and be the judge. Later stuff become more monstrous and better in all regards.
Ancient Greeks, the greatest perverts in history, invented furries.
>>65735550No, unless we talk specific branch of furries - ferals I believe they are called, that is close, but even those fuckers like their "sex object" to be able to talk. Most of furry shit is basically human with different head, heck it's arguable a lot of hentai is more bestiality because they have only human head on an animals body, while furries have it other way around.
>>65735273Yiff in Hell furfag. >Ain't seeing you go "hentai in Hell weeb"I very much go "hentai in Hell weeb" at the weebs who are intolerable to the same degree as you.
>>65735600As a side observer I would not mind if you did it because at the moment we got threads on /tg/ much more intolerable then this furries post.I already called them out, but wouldn't mind if you proved it yourself friend.
>>65735273STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM THAT DOG
>>65735104IIRC modern furries started waaaaaay back before D&Dhttps://youtu.be/8aF2GxWi7Agbesides, you can always go back to the ancient asyria or egypt and see people with lion/aligator/ibis heads, so fuck off with this shitty bait
>>65735104anon you need to get a fucking grip on reality
This thread proves further that furries need to be nuked off the face of this world.
>>65735171they didn't know what electricity was but they were deliberately studying chemistry and found out how basic batteries worked
>>65735600>>65735523>>65735676>>65735462>They say, exactly proving my point.Protip: I'm not a furry. I'm just annoyed that people shit themselves over what constitutes "furry" and what doesn't, despite the fact that sexualized anthro animals are the only ones you could reasonably call "furry", something that hardly comes up in game artwork.
>>65735740How? Explain me how? If anything it proves that people obsessesd with satanism need nuking or that newfags follow old memes are truth.
>>65735273>pathalogical hatred of furriesI only hate furries because they go out of their way to post softcore porn in any possible thread that may or may not be remotely relatedI feel the same way about people trying to force porn into any thread and all the retards shoving loli gifs everywhere as though they watch the anime for the plot and not the 5 year olds
furries and lolicons get the rope
>>65735104No. Just Pathfinder.
>>65735775Nope, i call myself Furry and i dont want and need them sexualized, i hate it. Because there are some fucktards who sexualize everything doesnt mean all do it.
>>65735793You're right now trying to defend the fact that you furries want to fuck animals.
>>65735795I am with you on that, fuck people who post porn in threads where it has no place of being. I don't fucking care about beastmen, dwarfs, halflings and the like, as long as they aren't just chessecake shit, they can stay, all the rest got their own boards.
>>65735835How do you come to that conclusion? Please tell me, because it's same as saying anyone who goes to church fucks small children.
>>65735171>He thinks electricity didn't exist before homosapiens
>>65735775>Protip: I'm not a furry.Imagine whiteknighting for furries
>>65735891To explain that anons position from what I understood it's pretty simple - they are sick of /pol/tard level sperging whenever something that is not a human is brought up. It effectively only makes more people like furries since they are the victim in this argument, working in opposition to what you anon want. In other words, shut up about furries and they will get bored and move back to their board (which they don't actually have).
>>65735775all furries are closet zoophiles, just like all catholic priests are closet pedosand then you have that part of those groups who are open about those deviations and want to have them legalized
>>65735906>and move back to their board (which they don't actually have).don't they shit up the /cgl/ and /mlp/ to a certain extent?
>>65735923They got shunted to and overran /trash/
>>65735923Nah, they complain about /mlp/ because they find concept of fucking horses disturbing, basically furries don't like actual animals for porn, unless they are from the strain that are about as shit as your average redneck. Not sure about /cg/, never go there. But ya, problem here is really that mods of /d/, /aco/ and the like hate discussion, so people who want to have discussions are usually going to /tg/ since this is only place where they can do it. (This covers all porn threads)
>>65735947>and overran /trash/that's very, very fitting
>>65736050Don't worry, it's full of weebs too, so it's even more fitting.
>>65735906>which they don't actually haveThey do, which is fittingly called /trash/. The real problem here is that furries have a victim complex and this need to defend eachothers like a broodmother. I've noticed this "b-but what about weebs?! It's cool to hate them as well r-right?!" acting like it's a big surprise some people like anime on 4chan(nel) and tolerate smut featuring humans, this coming from someone who also dislike threads being overtaken by smutposting>shut up about furries and they will get bored and move back to their boardHow about stop crying when obvious trolls call anything not human furry like you said?
>>65736072Because said trolls are not actually trolls, I met them in other contexts, they are just that stupid. As for the weeb shit, ehh I kinda hate it more myself, since that one actually has ruined few games for me.
>>65735221>>65735864Thank you for being obstuse goofs.
>>65735378Im actually a furry and my table has no problem with me and my cute anthros because im not a sperg
>>65735104Nobody cares?Anti-furry and Satanic Panic are both vastly more pathetic and cringe inducing than anything within the fandoms that spawned them - though I suppose that technically applies to anti-anything to some extent....
>>65736060>Anon makes fun of furries>Goes "no u" about weebs without even knowing the anon is a weebWay to make weebs of all people seem more like decent people than furries
>>65736205How do you even make that from my post? I just confirmed that /trash/ really is trash and is full of the worst shit 4chan got to offer.
>>65736215Because for now only posts that defend furries have mentioned weebs, not even a single smug girl pic ITT
>>65736313>Lack of smug anime girls proves that furries are sperging.Your neurons are in the single digits. Please neither breed nor socialize, ever.To put it simply: the core >>65735273 's argument is that anime isn't shouted out of the room, but furry is, simply because y'all auto-associate furry with feticists, zoophiles and autists and what-have-you, to the point you lose your mind if an animal has a human posture.
>>65735910Get outta here you closet homo.
>>65735910And all Anti-furries are closet furfags.
>>65736393To add to this anon's statement - some anons lose their mind to the point where original post pales in comparison to the annoyance that it was.
>>65735288What's his name, location and date of birth?Just in case I get a shot at a time machine.
>>65736544You know what? I would support it. I think without him resulting furry fandom would be much more reasonable.
>>65736393No no no. It's>Lack of sperg by spergs proves that other type of spergs are sperging about previously mentioned non-sperging spergsTo put it on your shitty meme language if that's the only way you can communicateAnd I sure that even your braindead mind can peforms associantions so>Furry is animal porn>Gets shouted out of the room>Anime is not animal porn>Doesn't get shouted out of the roomAnd by the way, why are you trying so much to imply you're not the same furfag as>>65735273? How does this help your argument?
>>65736572As someone who deals with porn artists I got to tell you, good chunk of furry porn is ordered by non furries because it's cheaper and usually other artists can't be forced to draw that shit.I had to deal with hentai makers too and have to say, anime porn is kinda just as bad in its contents including anything from bestiality (real bestiality) to pedophilia.Basically furry porn is western equivalent to hentai shit - full of really weird shit paid by a loud minority.
>>65735104Probably and probably not, there cannot be concrete evidence in matters of faith, and crazy people have wanted to be/fuck animals since time immemorial.
>>65736647Sometimes using faith to allow them to fuck said animals.
>>65736617I don't care about what people fap to unless they're supporting an actual pedo/rape/zoophilia/whatever ring. Just keep it to yourself
>>65736661Morbidly curious question: since tabaxi, lupins, rakasta, gnolls, aranea, lizardfolk, centaurs, minotaurs, dragonborn and the wide array of other beastfolk races in the D&D multiverse are fully sapient creatures, with their own cultures, languages, art, religion, etc...If you meet one in a bar, ask it on a date, and get accepted, does that still count as zoophilia?
>>65736713Do we really have to go over the Harkness Test again?
>>65736713Nope because it's same as asking a human on a date - if they give you consent it's no longer zoophilia.I had a nice drawing to illustrate that idea but saddly lost it.
>>65736661Oh ya I agree, just telling to the people who don't actually know anything about it.If you want to hate something you should know about it for the art of war tells us to know our enemy and it's a good philosophy to follow (can't be bothered to research something, then just ignore it),
there's literally nothing wrong with zoophilia
>>65736826Only if you are an uneducated villager in middle of nowhere living by age old superstition and you are high all the time would it be considered acceptable.
>>65736844Why though?>it's unnaturalAbout as much as oral sex then>it's rapeNot if you're not a spastic retard or an actual rapist fuck>it's disgustingSo fucking what
>>65735104OD&D didn't have all the stupid shit it's got now. There were elves and dwarves you could have as a PC but that was it.
>>65736935You know what as a biologist I can't really argue much against it. Our morals are based on living in groups and trying best to ensure everyones survival....Fucking other species for pleasure is not unheard off in animal kingdom, thought I myself would be against violence against anyone without a good reason, but otherwise...it doesn't really change much you still are an ape, just you act more like an otter or a penguin at times.
>>65736948OD&D was also crap. AD&D is much better game even if still flawed and it's got options for both play styles.
>>65735171Yes, it was Ben Franklin who said it before chopping down the cherry tree.
>>65735104>before furry fandom was invented?People had fursonas in ancient egypt
>>65737959Bast invented furries, let's burn down the pyramids.
>>65735550What world do you live in where all animals are bipedal, have human-level intelligence, where clothes, and pretty much are just humans with extra hair and maybe an elongated tailbone?
>>65735273>You're pathological in your hatred of furries. Most people at this point are. Get some help.True enough. Think about all the poltards that now unironically masturbate to interracial cuckolding porn.>>65735288>So insofar as furries being a sex thing, it was essentially "invented" by one guy forcing the hell out of it.Furry was always a fetish culture in denial, but all these newfags freaking out over werewolves, minotaurs and gnolls because someone, somewhere might be jerking off to them is just tiresome.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2Pi1fljNyY
why you hate furries so much, what they ever did to you?
>>65740123furries are fucking awful and everyone needs to be reminded, lest it become public opinion to think that bestiality is acceptable.
>>65740234But anon, that is not what furries do, that is what people who hate furries are more likely to do since they are hillbillies.
>>65740123Nothing bad for me, their commissions bough my 40k army.
Furries are disgusting degenerates but people who lose their minds over any non human race are more immediatley and relevantly annoying to my hobbiesIf Halo had come out today the moral panic trad larping zoomers would have called elites furries for having digitrade legs
>>65735104D&D monsters, or at least the TSR era of D&D, were mostly based off of mythology. If you know anything about mythology then you'll know that mythology has furries in it.Because D&D existed from the late 1970's to early 1980's, before the furry fandom was really a thing (and I'm pretty sure the word "furry fandom" didn't even exist until the early 90's).
Is this the furriest furry of all D&D creatures ever?
>>65740123>>65740234I don't agree that they're zoophiles. Some are, I'm sure, but not most. I could be wrong, though.I think that why most people hate furries is simply because they're autistic. To varying degrees. Of course they can't be labeled that, not only for their own self esteem but to keep hatred of them publicly acceptable. But we all know that they're autistic, and the people who hate them hate them because they're autistic.
>>65740654It's a bit ironic when people who hate them are even more autistic.
>>65735104>uhuhuh the ancient egyptians were furries lol
>>65740435Space wolves, we hope ;-)
>>65736732>>65736739That just raises another question; given how prevalent furry and anthro fetishists are in OUR world, where such things do not exist beyond the imagination, in a world like D&D, where they actually DO exist as living beings...Wouldn't "furriness" be A: much more common, and/or B: regarded less as a fetish and more as a legitimate spectrum of sexuality, similar to homosexuality?
>>65736948>>65737001What exactly is the precise cut-off point between OD&D and BECMI? I've never figured that out. Because the latter was not shy in giving us weird races to play as.
>>65741815No, tyranids, space wolfs second hand cost a lot.
>>65740553No, it's just Iranian.
>>65737925There are so few STD zoonoses that it's almost a non-entity. And if the animal is properly taken care of (basic hygiene), the risk of "regular" zoonoses should be almost null too.
>>65741884In the Forgotten Realms, official magical realm of Ed Greenwood, everything goes. And this means EVERYTHING.https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Forgotten_Realms#Forgotten_Realms_And_Sex
>>65741884How are called furry people who have fetish for hairless species like humans?Skinnies?
No one:Nobody:Not a soul:Anti-furries: God furries are just the worst, constantly shoving their shitty mental illness kink into every single facet of their existence.You are worse than the problem you aim to solve. The only context I see furries mentioned in anymore is when you and your ilk decide you're suddenly assblasted about them again. The crusade ended long ago, let it go.
>>65744162They never been part of the crusade, they just heard embelihed stories that is the problem.