so it's like warhammer Fantasy with less models
That's what I like about WH: underworlds
>>65142345Isn't that kinda appealing?I dunno
It's derived from Bolt Action actually. Still a good game though. The ex-GW guys seem to be doing much better rulesets than GW proper.
>>65142345>Warlords of Nowhereebin
>>65142345It's closer to AoS rather than Fantasy.
>>65142766Eh, they are making games, sure. But I wouldn't agree they are any better or worse. Too bad they don't go anywhere eh?
>>65144780Like? Bolt Action is still popular to the point where it has spawned numerous spin offs like the one in the OP.
>>65145132Bolt action is popular for a niche game in a niche hobby. It's really not comparable to even gw's specialist games
>>65146120Exit the comic book shop game ghetto at some point, will you?
So it's like infinity but I can use any mini I want
>>65142766It's actually based off BtGoA
>>65146329Which is based off Bolt Action.Which is based off 3rd ed 40k.
It's fun, but why have gnolls and beastmen?
>>65148236They put Gnolls in because Priestley likes them and North Star have released a plastic boxset.
>>65142345What? It's nothing like it. Small units in open order, dice bag activation rather than alternating entire turns.As an aside I don't much like Bolt Action as a WW2 game, but aside from that the fundamentals are solid. Not hugely interested in Gates of Antares either, so now, the release of a setting agnostic fantasy adaptation really has me really interested.
>>65142766I wouldn't call Bolt Action a good game, it hasn't improved much from 40k, which was already quite stagnant in terms of game design.
Are there scans of this floating about yet?
>>65146120You would only think this if you only ever played in LGSHistoricals are way bigger than GW ever will be
Is this the year of fantasy wargaming? This has dropped, Saga's fantasy sourcebook is next month, Oathmark is being proofread currently...
quick bump before bed
Has a pdf of this dropped yet? I'd be genuinely curious to give it a go, but want to see what the quality's like before I drop £30 on a rulebook.
>>65142345So it's not warhammer? That sounds pretty cool anon. Perhaps this time you'll try something new instead of sticking to the cheeto stained usual.
>>65158682I always try before I buy, hasn't been a peep on this one yet.
>>65146220You can do that too in infinity.