>Female DM constantly inserts "Lady knight" and "The mother of monsters" characters in her campaignIs this magical realm?
Depends if shes using it as a platform for her political views. How are men treated?
>>63933006what do politics have to do with magical realm?
>>63933006Why are you treating "Is this Magical Realm? Thread #4124242" seriously.Go on. Tell me why.
>>63933060Because it encourages him to make #4124243.Now you go. Explain yourself.
>>63933030Nothing else gets me hard anymore.
>>63933030Because you're complaining that shes inserting gender politics. Otherwise you wouldn't have an issue.
>>63932989Make the GM mother your monsters.Also, this thread has been made a million times and was never actually good.
>>63932989That depends, are the lady knights being turned into mothers for monsters?
>>63932989It wasn’t last time you posted this exact thread you lazy fuck.
>Female knight.No. Maybe it's a trope she likes or maybe it's just that girls make more girl characters and it's a fucking fantasy setting. Not magical realm either way.>Mother of Monsters.Possibly.
>>63932989You just make monster mother who is lady knight.Also this thread is boring since we have it too much.
>>63932989Perhaps not, but it certainly is mine.
Both are pretty well established fantasy/mythology tropes.
>>63932989Unless she's masturbating to it, no it's not magical realm.
>>63932989>Lady knightIt's Dame! Dame! The proper term is Dame! You fucking drooling retard!
>>63934102Lady Knight is less ambiguous since Dames can be men too, take Dame Edna Everage.
>>63932989I remember this thread from five months ago. Same picture even. When do you learn to drive?
>>63932989>The mother of monsters"If she fucks monster then maybe. Still hot.
>>63934200OP learned by shoving a wheel up his butt and making car sounds
>>63934223Also if it's lady knight turned into mother of monsters. Also hot.
>>63932989You already made this thread a whileback. The pasta is going to get stale
>>63934238This anon got the right idea.
>>63934238Does anyone have the comic about this, with the female adventurer getting raped by a dragon and then having a half dragon kid that she abuses and then the kid runs away and (I think) becomes an adventurer?I distinctly remember it, but haven't seen it in years.
>>63934297Don't have it, sounds fucked up.
>>63934297That is quite terrible, as far as comics goes. Just another cliche "mother gets raped by a monster and gives up"I want to see subversion of that cliche in some bloody manner.
>>63934456>subversionFuck off Rian.
>>63934475So you don't want to see an adventuring nun castrating orcs?
>Female NPCsEvery fucking time. At least there's no male NPCs so you know he's not gay.
>>63932989Perhaps. But as a heterosexual male I'm ok with female GM schlicking under the table as long as it doesn't impede the game too much.
My male DM does the ladyknight thing and I'm pretty sure it isn't magical realm. Dude's just big into Fire Emblem so most of them are probably just characters from those games with the serial numbers filed off.Having cute women on pegasi we can bum rides off of when we need to get places is pretty sweet.
>>63934627>cute women on pegasiYeah, this is 200% just fire emblem nonsense.You can't go five fucking minutes in those games without some lady on a winged stallion just inviting herself into your party without even asking.
>>63934456I dunno. I think a more fun subversion is like that one nipporn that had the lady who couldn't really connect with men all that well but found the companionship of dogs quite fulfilling.She ends up falling for one hound in particular and gets herself gene modded to be able to have his offspring and start a loving family.
>>63932989>Lady KnightJeanne D'Arc>Mother of MonstersLiterally the sobriquet of Echidna
>>63932989Oh man it's been a while since i've seen this thread. Sup man, how you doing? I hope everything is OK. These are trying times.Anyway I can't say I approve of you posting the same thread again, but it was good to see you
>>63934670Yeah... I'm also realizing how many people in Fire Emblem are actually dragons. So that explains some stuff. That was mostly the elf's fault though.All in all, the game's a total blast. It's like, half political intrigue half HIGH FANTASY NONSENSE STARTED HAPPENING, which is honestly a really fun balance.Going from: pretty sure the lord is corrupt to I'M GONNA DROP A HUGE FUCKING ROCK ON THAT VAMPIRE is pretty awesome.
According to the archive, there are 52 threads which start with ">Female DM constantly inserts "Lady knight" and "The mother of monsters" characters in her campaign"
>>63934826People like lady knights.
>>63932989>Female DMProbably notIf a male DM does it though it almost certainly is
>>63934902>If a male DM does it though it almost certainly issexist
>>63934340>>63934456I mean, it was kinda dark, but it was fun.
>>63932989It's *my* magical realm, I know that much.
>>63932989>Male GM constantly inserts "Man Knight" and "The Father of Monsters" characters into his campaignThis is magical realm and you can't prove me wrong
>>63935013let's try that image again
>>63935013>"The Father of Monsters"I wonder why this is not a thing, or is there something like that in mythology?
>>63935034Closest I found was a greek monster called Typhon
>>63935066He’s husband of the Mother of Monsters isn’t he?
>>63935109https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhon>According to Hesiod's Theogony, Typhon "was joined in love" to Echidna, a monstrous half-woman and half-snake, who bore Typhon "fierce offspring". First, according to Hesiod, there was Orthrus, the two-headed dog who guarded the Cattle of Geryon, second Cerberus, the multiheaded dog who guarded the gates of Hades, and third the Lernaean Hydra, the many-headed serpent who, when one of its heads was cut off, grew two more. The Theogony next mentions an ambiguous "she", which might refer to Echidna, as the mother of the Chimera (a fire-breathing beast that was part lion, part goat, and had a snake-headed tail) with Typhon then being the father.
>>63935034>I wonder why this is not a thing,https://www.novelupdates.com/series/the-devils-origin/This is why. This is exactly why.
>>63932989Not necessarily.Lady Knights is mostly just an inclusivity conceit that allows female PCs without forcing them into medieval gender roles.Mother of Monsters is a pretty old religious trope that ties Earth Mother Goddess to "shit heroes need to kill"Neither is, on their own, fetish shit, but both can easily be used in a way that is fetishy. Like if Lady Knights are played in a femdom or female degradation fashion, or the Monstermom gets a whole lot of really descriptive birthing scenes.
>>63934102>>63934158It also gives people the wrong idea entirely.
>>63935551I hope you don't mean to imply there is anything perverted about Lady Knights expecting forthright and disciplined behavior from their cohorts and subordinates. Such malfeasance and dereliction would be unbecoming and thus unacceptable. Very unacceptable.
>Female DM regularly has the evil sorceress put our characters in bondage and milk us for our mystical essence by pleasuring our anuses with tentaclesGee, is something wrong with this chick or is it just me?
>>63934555Jokes on you, women don't have sex drives.>>63934855Those people are wrong.
>>63933111>inserting gender politicsJust note, shit that's been around long enough to be cliche is gender politics. Politics, not even once.
Idk why people are responding to this thread like it's not a 0 effort copypastaNewfags I guess
>>63937942If that's wrong, I don't want to be right.
>>63932989No, just good tastes
>>63938634We need more GMs like that.
>>63933140>>63934238I prefer mothers of monsters becoming lady knights.
>>63938935Irresponsible, she needs to raise her monster babies and take care of them instead of chasing adventure in a reckless manner like a lady knight.
>>63934102No, the point of a lady knight isn't just a female in armor who can fight and has a nobiliary title. It's the combination of a chivalrous attitude and the feminine grace of a refined noblewoman in one package.
>>63932989>The mother of monstersno>Lady knightyes
>>63938935I played similar character, she was a broodmother (5e hombrew class) as a mad scientist who had small helpers that she created. Only problem was that she tried to be evil...and always end up helping civilians.
>>63939410That's still just a dame
>>63932989That depends. Can I roll to seduce?
>>63940093No, but she can
>>63933072Not him.4 scenarios:1. OP gets no replies.2. OP gets serious replies.3. OP gets angry, upset, "you're a bad poster" replies.4. OP gets a mix of serious replies and "you're a bad poster" replies.To the shitposter, these scenarios from most to least desirable are ranked 3=4>2>1. 1 would be the most discouraging, while angry replies only give the OP more of that dopamine feedback he's after. Of course, all replies do that, but speaking as a reformed shitposter, it's the ones you upset that really hit the spot. As an aside, if OP's still here he's likely giggling like a schoolgirl at this analysis I'm giving.We don't have scenario 1 because people are replying. They will always reply. That's how this goes. After we start giving serious replies, we have scenario 2. At this point, you show up and decide to make a post. Your post either keeps us in scenario 2 or shoots us to scenario 4. 4 is more encouraging to the OP.Here's the secret to beating it: if you post serious replies, the thread becomes just a little bit less shit. If you post "waaah this thread is baaad" then not only are you definitely not discouraging the OP, but the thread *stays* shitty. You "calling out" the OP doesn't fix that. Derailing the thread or discussing the topic as though it were fine and dandy does.
>>63941448>They will always reply.Not if people report him enough.You're a genuine idiot if you think "derailing" a thread does anything but stroke his ego. All he cares about is post count and keeping the thread bumped, and you saying that getting people to bump his thread with serious replies is the same as people calling for him to get banned is quite disingenuous.Shitposting is against the rules. Posts of low quality? Also against the rules.The idea isn't to tell the OP that he's a shitposter. He already knows. It's to help other people realize that this is a repeat thread of low-quality, and to encourage them to report these threads and otherwise discourage people from posting in them or taking them seriously.You're very far from being "reformed" if you're still trying to present the idea that bumping shitposting threads by "derailing" them is a valid option in the era when the post limit has been extended to 300+ posts. Maybe back when the post limit was half that and the catalog didn't exist, you might have a point, but it's been years since then and all you're doing is encouraging OP.
>>63941592> all you're doing is encouraging OP.As are you. Every single reply you or I or anybody makes does that.Saying "this is a shitpost" doesn't do anything special. We know. Everyone knows. Report it. Don't reply saying you did or telling other people to. That encourages him more.
>>63941592PS. You completely missed the point of derailing the thread. It's not to get back at OP for making such a bad thread. It's turning the thread from OP's terrible subject to something else, which makes the thread better by virtue of not being OP's thread anymore.
>>63941764>Everyone knows.Some people apparently don't know enough to not keep bumping this thread.>>63941799How about you do that in a non-shit thread instead?There's several that are on the verge of dying that would welcome being bumped, and would help to kill shitposting threads. And, it's not like derailing a thread for a few posts does anything to it aside from bumping it and adding to its post count.Seriously, what kind of fucking moronic logic are you even trying to come up with here?
>>63941892It's not worth trying to explain it to you anymore. Go ahead and reply, but make sure you type "sage" into the options field; that'll keep OP from getting the positive feedback from your reply.
>>63941940You're the one who clearly looks like he needs explaining to.No matter how much you think you're "derailing" the thread, all you're doing is adding to the post count. If you're really hoping to make a thread better, go to one of the already half decent or even good threads that are struggling to stay afloat amidst all the generals and shitposting threads, and go put your effort into them. Quit polishing turds and start mining diamonds.Really, this isn't rocket science.
>>63942027Every post puts us closer to bump limit
>>63942068You know I would rather talk about mothers of monsters as lady knights then argue about philosophy of shitposting, since at least I can use the former in games I play.
Mother of Monsters is either >>63934760 or Grendel's mommy in Beowulf
>>63939410>grace and refinement>implying that male knights aren't expected to have those qualities as well.
>>63942027> No matter how much you think you're "derailing" the threadI don't. I gave the options:> reply seriously> reply to a different subject that came up naturally> ignore the threadMy argument is "saying the thread is shit is worse than the above options.">>63942133Then do that.
>>63942068>300 postsThat's too many to push it to death unless you had a crew of autists. It's a lot better to just bump good threads to try and kill the bad ones.
>>63942197>I restrict the options to the one's the shitposter would like bestWowee, you're really tricking them.
>>63942197Then I will throw down few imagines for people to discuss before giving few ideas for mostly npcs for few universes I run my games in.
>>63933030The /pol/fag cannot get off unless he fantasizes about sucking Jew dick.
>>63942264The shitposter would like you to ignore his thread?What about "getting mad at OP?" Do you not understand that a huge draw for shitposting is the reactions?
>>63942353Hey I made that one! I really need to make a digital redo now.
>>63932989Worse anon, it is 'Menstrual Realm', like that God awful Tweet WotC put out the day after the election when the God Emperor won, and some adventure league lesbians were so upset, because how could they keep living, how could they after all the work they did to destroy make believe dragons in a PnP game now live in a world with a bad orange man in office?
>>63932989Some day I would like to just go full gonzo on a party of adventurers. "The Echidna aims her prehensile vaginal canal at your and fires a spawn as though her crotch were a T-shirt cannon." (roll dice) "You are now being grappled by a monstrous infant, and you take an additional 1d6 damage as the placenta strikes you as well."
>>63942392You're really not looking at the OP here.If he just wanted to get people angry, there's a hundred other, much more direct ways to do it. He'd be at 300+ already if he was just going for trying to get people mad at him.This is the kind of OP who wants certain people to ignore his thread, the people who call him out on remaking this same tired thread, because he's genuinely hoping to just be a lazy fuck and to be able to keep remaking it without getting banned for doing so.
>>63942669Does he or does he not get a sweet dopamine hit whenever people talk about him, negatively or otherwise?> This is the kind of OP who wants certain people to ignore his thread, the people who call him out on remaking this same tired thread, because he's genuinely hoping to just be a lazy fuck and to be able to keep remaking it without getting banned for doing so.It looks like you don't really care about having good threads as much as "punishing" bad posters. You think that there's anything more you can do to stop these threads than reporting them. There isn't.Here are your options:> reply seriously> don't reply> pretend like you're making OP cry and discouraging him from making this same thread next time
>>63939410>there is knight for men>there is dame for women>NO! I want male name but she's a womanI'm sure there is cardinal sin for such thing
>>63942791Or->make other people aware that this is a repeat threadNot everyone has as broad and expansive a memory for shitposting as you and I. Now, please, can you stop acting like "reply seriously" is an option for anyone except shitposters? For fuck's sake, it's one thing to argue "ignoring it is the best option", but you'd have to be absolutely brainless to think "replying seriously" is anything other than exactly what OP desperately wants because he's desperate for a screen to keep his threads from being deleted outright.
>>63943038> make other people aware that this is a repeat threadAnd then what? "Phew, thanks anon, I almost contributed to the thread, but now that I know we already had this thread before, I didn't!"> giving OP what he wantsSo what? If people reply and have a jolly old thread about Lady Knights and Monster Mothers, what does it matter that OP didn't get a spank on the behind? We have a thread that's repeated. Are we only allowed to talk about "Lady Knights" and "The mother of monsters" a certain number of times, and then NEVER again?> b-but the rulesRule 0. If the mods don't care, neither should you.
>>63943116>I'm just a shitposter desperate to keep this thread bumped and to keep getting attentionWell, you managed to trick me into arguing with you up to this point. But, your last post was just too fucking stupid and you kind of revealed your whole hand right there.At least other people will be able to see how shameless and desperate for attention you are, Mr. "Reformed" Shitposter.It seems what they say about a leopard's shorts is true.
>>63943200Oh, well. It really was a waste of time.Keep "fighting the good fight," anon.
>>63932989>Female DMshe better have cute feet or nice tits i dont know why you'd tolerate that
>>63942961Have you ever considered that dame and ladyknight may refer to two different concepts?>NO! I want male name but she's a womanHave you ever considered that this may be because the warrior cast the term 'knight' once referred to was exclusively male?>B-But look at this Buzzfeed article about these 12 medieval warrior babes!Language is not static. If there's a certain concept that doesn't have a term for it, a term will arise for it.
>OP keeps making the same thread every other weekIs this magical realm?
>>63944196Pregnancy is gross
>>63932989>female dmthere's your problem
>>63944196pregnancy is kind of hot
>>63944773If you are stupid
>>63939410That's literally what a Dame is, a female knight, in all senses of the word; that being a land-owning noblewoman with feminine grace, a chivalrous attitude, adherence to her lord, with a coat of arms, who can and will participate in duels, wars, and tournaments, holding true to both God and the fighting doctrine as dictated by the code of chivalry. "Lady Knight" is the equivalent of calling a gladitorix "a gladiator, but a girl."
>>63944960the only way you could think having a female GM can be good is if you grew up with a single mother.
>>63944984Or someone is not retarded like you.
>>63945023t. fem gm
>>63945036t. faggot that no one will play with
>>63945091Go cry to your mommy gf GM.
>>63945110Go cry to the GM you don't have.
>>63944974But, I mean...we do that in English all the time. We have Senators (female), not Senatrixes.
>>63945175I am the GM virgin
>>63932989I remember this thread from a month ago.
>>63945440Then go cry on yourself dumbass
>>63944268t. gay cuck
>>63933006>>63933030Being a woman is now excessively political to some people.
>>63937806She makes great calamari, though
>>63945418But Senator (Female) isn't the proper term, it's still just Senator in that case. Not all titles have gendered forms, nor is there a need to add their gender in most cases. Knight and Galdiator ARE gendered and have female equivalents.
>>63932989Magical realms are sexual.Mother of monsters/demons/whatever is an old trope. Shit is as old as the bible. The Whore of Babylon and Lilith as the mother of demons are ancient examples. Lady Knight is probably just her self-insert.She may lack creativity and originality, but it is only a magical realm if she masturbates to it.
>>63949455>if she masturbates to it.Well how do we know if she does?
>>63948818Yeah but do you really want to know where it's been?
>>63932989jesus, this is the third time you made this, from what i know. you have probably made more. fuck off
>>63948773It's aimed at D&D fags, so they won't see it like that.
>>63946527>cuckQuite the opposite. One could argue that disgust for pregnant women is some kind of anti-cucking mechanism by removing the attraction for women that have already been claimed by another man. >>63949455>Lady Knight is probably just her self-insert.That's only hot if she actually tries to live up to the standards of her self-insert. If she's one of the six women on this planet who actually lifts meaningful weights, that's hot.
>>63934826I'm convinced that this "female DM" who OP keeps bringing up doesn't actually exist, and "Lady knight" and "The mother of monsters" characters are just OP's magical realm.
>>63951780If it was he could at least join games which allows those and shop whining.
>>63932989How many times are you going to post this shitty OP?
>>63934297>>63934456I actually used it as a backstory for a male character, but you wouldn't be interested in it anyway.
>>63932989Maybe. In my experience female DM's usual have an mpreg magical realm that they trick a male PC into fulfilling
>>63949119I don't know the last time I saw the word "gladiatrix", and it's apparently sufficiently rare that my spellcheck doesn't recognize it. As well, the term "dame", especially in American English, is more commonly viewed as an outmoded slang term for any kind of woman, not a female equivalent of knight.Languages change over time, Anon, which is the entire reason why we have Senator (female) and not Senatrix. And why we now use the term "lady knight" instead of "dame".
>>63953574Enjoy the vacation?
>>63953574double plus mehtoo edge, too forced, too completely banal
>>63934555I am an unashamed Fire Emblem fag and I do this a lot. >>63934670At least they're usually useful units, unlike a lot of the drooling retards you pick up along the way.>>63934784>It's like, half political intrigue half HIGH FANTASY NONSENSE STARTED HAPPENING, which is honestly a really fun balance.Your campaign sounds amazing, honestly.
>>63954514>I am an unashamed Fire Emblem fag and I do this a lot.Schlick yourself underneath the table midgame?
>>63954556I meant "include female knights, pegasus/wyvern riders and the like."
>>63944196I don't normally like bellies that huge but I wanna impregnate and/or be unbirthed by that succubi
>>63954975The first option is possible...the second one not really since she prefers to do the opposite.
>>63955212Doesn't stop me from wanting it
>>63955268 Go to dA and you will find some character that is friend of her that likes to do that.
>>63955212She's more into being pregnant than giving birth (she often transfers pregnancy instead of giving birth), so she'd probably be fine with unbirth. However, I don't think it's part of her powerset.
>>63932989>this thread again
>>6395560010/10 would fight for dominance with sucy and probably end up half melted
>>63942961You have a good number of historical examples of women with the title of "King" (or the equivalent depending on culture) you know. Usually exploiting a legal loophole, sometimes as a sign of taking expected responsibilities, but in either case it is a thing.
>>63953574Who's the artist
>>63954975Keerlyna is surprizingly cute.
>>63953832Language doesn't change over time to fit a small group of individuals that choose to communicate in their own nonsense version of language. Nobody uses your alterations to the language because they're not a thing, they're forced memes.
>>63944196Hey, it's the random statblock I made for oen thread. I've actually seen it reposted on /aco/ as well, which I was suprised with.That's the older version, though; I made a slightly modified version on the same thread.I've though of making an upgraded version. Since Keerlyna is supposed to be a pretty high-ranking demon (she's the prime consort of a demon lord, IIRC), she could probably have a higher CR, but I wasn't sure how to make her powerful enough to justify higher CR without just making her hit harder. Her belly slam already hits almost as hard as a gore attack from an elephant.
>>63932989>Lady Knightok it's a fantasy world so ok whatever.>Mother of MonstersYup sounds about right
>>63960441No clue, but I could use few similar monsters for a campaign I plan to run. Maybe want to help make them? Could provide art for ideas. Or draw some.
>>63960795What kind of campaign would that be, and how'd you get players on board with that?
>>63961568Campaign would be of bunch of characters hired by a temple to help spread their services of their church to other island (basically world is classic floating islands. Temple itself is god of fertility, family and justice so it's got whole order of nuns that take in unwanted children via magical transfer pregnancy thing, as well as knights that just become helpers to single parents, hunters of fathers of basters to mae them pay child support and even monsters and other children of beasts and such used to hunt down child molesters. So yeah they are off to some other places to help people live better. Now I can talk more about the world in some other post, but on where I find the players, just look for players with kink for pregnancy or ones that don't mind it that much.
>>63959888For a demon.
>>63932989Magical realm means sexual content + negative impact on game. So, how was it received at the table? Are the knights interesting characters? Do the monsters prove good antagonists?
>>63933111That's... not what this thread is about means my lad. It's sexual stuff. She wants to feel empowered, she's a dominant kind of girl and probably can't exercise that enough in real life so she uses her own narratives to fulfil those desires.
>>63933030"politics" is a catch all word these days for "how do they perceive the world"its the most important thing about anyone and everything
>>63932989Nope, just hot
>>63935158>Horrific serpent that lures men to their death with the allure and voice of beauty>Mass of serpents who darkens the sky as he passes and challenges even the Gods>"Joined in Love"Aight then.
>>63960256>Language doesn't change over time to fit a small group of individualsIt does at first. It's not like every gangster got together in some kind of La Camorra Con in 1920 and decided that "dame" was going to change its meaning.
>being so anal about this termIt's not like it's really mean to portray actual "dames", but more of a fantasy trope.
>>63953832>I don't know the last time I saw the word "gladiatrix",It pops up fairly frequently in fetish porn about women brutalizing or killing each other.That's about it though.
>>63936606I don't play with idiots, but you do you.
>>63936606What a dolled up dame. Those gams have really got it.
>>63934102Not in all cases. Britain for example calls female knights Lady or Dame depending on which order they were knighted into.
>>63936606>his players don't know medieval 101Might as well just play a setting with gunplay and meme-references instead of trying to reinvent medieval society from scratch
>>63932989>mother of monstersThis is redundant. All children are monsters.
>>63967095They didn't have to but nobody is going to start typing or writing words with gender in brackets except /pol/ and other idiots. It's not that the language changes to suit the common discourse in this case. Instead you are actively trying to dismantle and regress the language through nonsensical grammars.
Solution: Make a very masculine, nudist flagellant that gets a hardon for violence and rape. Anyone who disagrees shall be subjected to the the two.
>>63932989>Male DM constantly insets "Gentleman knight" and "The father of monsters" characters" in his campaignShould we talk to him about his magical realming or just stop showing up?
>>63971432As a male GM I would probably kick you out for that idea.
>>63971432That's a nice way to get your character killed by the town guards in the first sessionThat and not getting invited to future sessions
>>63954574So that's a yes?
>>63960795>>63961731I can see not-Keerlyna functioning as the BBEG for that campaign, since the character concept sounds like pretty much the anti-Keerlyna.Hit me with some creature concepts and I'll see if there's anything that'll get my attention. I could also try doing an Epic Keerlyna (high CR version of the one I already did) while at it.
>>63972800Well some form of flying humanoids would be present, could be some mutated version of one of those (Think harpies, insect folk and wyvern like humanoids.)Other ideas I had was something akin to local "gods", like floating island is actually rocky covered monster or plant monster. And since my brain is a bit...low down I usually only come up with fey and animal like monsters, so celestial and demon like monsters are hard for me, but maybe low CR version of Keerlyn like demon would be neat?And lastly, could use some general fey like monsters I guess? (like perhaps fey that instead of stealing babies steal pregnancies and party has to bring that back, as I feel it fits the old fashion evil fey)
>>63972800>>63972886Few sketches for ideas, though the island monster would be probably coming in many forms. Sky folk is just generic body plan so a lot could be changedIsland Mother is stand in for a monster that could be inside the islands (or could have some beast that creates islands by eating small rubble and spiting out whole islands).Lastly one ideas for the fey, one eyed forest child thief.
>>63938935Based Lord Nomic.
Well, I wrote a CR20 version of Keerlyna as well, and went back to fix some things on the earlier version (also boosted her str a little because her damage was, and really still is, low for her CR).
>>63976378Looks like a goods stat block.
>>63944974>not using Galdiator insteadI mean, whatever floats your boat I guess.
>>63942353>>63942417I wrote stats for this race for random /tg/ project. I think it's mechanically pretty neat, actually, with the ability to pick from multiple racial traits to make each individual more unique. Probably a little broken, though, if people optimize their racial traits.If you redo the picture, could you use tranparen background and upload it somewhere, so I could add it to the document as illustration?
>>63976633Of course, I can do it tomrorrow if thread is still around.
>>63932989Some douchebag makes this thread at least 2 times each month, i doubt there are that many female gm's.Stop feeding the baiting troll, bet this makes him feel smart.
>>63976785It's fun thread to meet with other anons we haven't talked to in few months, about only good thing about this.
>>63932989https://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/61887788/Welcome back, OP.I don't even know why I remember this.
>>63976378Noticed I had a type there, and also upped the resolution a little.
>>63977331I think she could have weakness to radiant and maybe saves in lesser form?
>>63977361The basic version is pretty much a succubus statblock with few stat changes (increased Con and Str since she's higher CR and needs to be more durable and hit harder). The skills/resistances/senses/languages part in particular is taken straight from the succubus (with adjustment on the skill bonus from different CR).For the "epic" version I gave her some save bonus to compensate for some stats being relatively low for CR20.
>>63977455Could also give her some summons I think.
>>63932989No, not magical realm. It's just fantasy roleplaying.
>>63977541True. I was considering giving the CR20 version some spells. I could go back to do that.
>>63977810That could work. (Also I am same anon that asked for the monsters, so that might be neat thing to do later)
>>63977541>>63977810Would this work for innate spellcasting:>at will: suggestion, spirit guardians, conjure animals (beasts are considered fiends instead of fey).>3 times/day each: dominate person, conjure celestial (but conjures a fiend instead of celestial)>1/day: dominate monster5th edition is a bit lacking in summon spells. Aside from conjure celestial there's only a few to summon animals and elementals.
...And I just realized I accidentally posted the not-fully-censored version of an image. Is there a way to remove it?
>>63979055it's a bit too late for that, you could report it or just hope for the best.
>>63979055Well it ended well.
Learn a new line OP
>>63938935"GRONK!" is probably my favorite part of this. That never gets old.>>63943200>It seems what they say about a leopard's shorts is true.You know how it is. Leopards can't change their shorts. They're stuck with just the one pair.>>63972800Keerlyna seems too nice to be a BBEG, doesn't she?
>>63982438She is still a demon, and I think most people would take offence to her going around transferring demon babies to the wombs of random women.
>>63988002>She is still a demonWell, yes, that's true, if you want to get all technical about it.>and I think most people would take offence to her going around transferring demon babies to the wombs of random women.Bah! That's, what, a misdemeanor or something? It's not like it's REALLY evil.(Kidding aside, there does seem to be a sharp contrast between the cute art— >>63959888— and the "she's a demon who pumps humans full of demon babies" thing. Seems more like an intermittent quasi-ally than a true villain. Then again, I tend to like characters too much to let them hit serious puppy-kicking capital-E Evil.)
>>63947437>Being a woman is now excessively political to some people.It really is, it's weird.
>>63953574pretty damn good
>tfw there's an alternate timeline where /tg/ is all about fatties but I'd be inversed and all over hyperpregsuffering
>>63947437>>63989051I wouldn't say that being a woman as a naked fact is political. It's more the false assumption that women and men are completely interchangeable and should therefore have the same rights and duties that has politicized womanhood. Just an example, look at Hillary's election speeches and notice how often she refers to herself as a woman. It is that politicization of womanhood based on the false assumption of interchangeability. That assumption logically leads to womanhood becoming a political factor.>Premise 1: Men and women are completely interchangeable>Premise 2: America has never had a female president>Conclusion: America must be sexistIronically Obama's blackness was less of an issue than Hillary's womanhood, mostly because there are capable black men. Women are just literally wired differently.
>>63989539Yet there are many female politicians, even if there's less of them than male ones, and while America has not had a female president many other countries have. So clearly being a woman doesn't prevent you from being able to do your job as a politician. The gender imbalance in politics is probably due to less women pursuing a career in politics than women being inherently worse at being politicians.
>>63990180>Yet there are many female politicians, even if there's less of them than male onesYes. And? What's your point here. How does this debunk anything I said?>and while America has not had a female president many other countries haveAgain, what's your point?>So clearly being a woman doesn't prevent you from being able to do your job as a politicianYES. AND?>The gender imbalance in politics is probably due to less women pursuing a career in politics than women being inherently worse at being politicians.Oh, so what you're saying is that men and women are interchangeable but women just don't "want" to be politicians and we'd totally have a 50/50 split of politicians if more women wanted it to? So what causes this differential? Well, if men and women are the same then it's clearly socialization. You see this? This reasoning leads to the very logical outcome of Swedish kindergartens pursuing "gender-neutral" methods where they aren't even allowed to refer to the children as boys or girls anymore. The problem with "radical feminism" is that it is merely the logical extreme of assumptions the grand majority of society makes. It is logical. It is however wrong, because the premises it is based on are wrong.
>>63976633So before I finish the main drawing, here are some examples of minions with no background if you need it.
>>63976633The first sketch of the merirnane in digital format, before the lines are cleaned up. (I will add transperant background when it is finished and give a some colors if needed). Now question is, shall I keep the claw to show natural weapons or shall I remove it?
>>63990223My point was that your post seemed to imply that a woman can't be president because women couldn't do the job, which is disproved by there being female presidents that are perfectly competent at their job.While there are probably many reasons why less women are involved in politics, "their feeble female brain can't understand politics like men do" isn't one of them.
>>63990885Yeah, it's more because politics are full of old men who are stubborn old farts.
>>63991233Not really noDo you know the numbers of women who intend to pursue a career in politics ? They're really fucking low for a reason
>>63991309Yeah, it's because it's just annoying enviroment to work in for said women.
>>63942517This just calls to mind a monster projectile-birthing infants into an enthusiastic crowd at some kind of sporting event, complete with “THOOMP” sound effect.No two are alike! Everybody wants one!
>>63935013>Man Knight You mean like "Knight" ?
>>63991652It's because they are simply not interested. No one is discouraging women from getting into politics. Likewise, no one is encouraging women to be teachers or work with children in other ways. It's just that they decide as individuals what they are interested in, and women are more or less inclined to like certain things compared to men
>>63993183It's actually more societies presure. Over where I live we got quite a few women in politics since society does not really care about that and same goes for teachers, no one care you are a man or a woman.
>>63989539I can't believe you actually believe this shit
>>63990627Not a huge fan of the crab claw. I think long talons would do better at representing natural weapons.
>>63993518Ok, I can remove it and hide the arm behind the belly or give her some staff or other sign of class.
>>63993912Here is cleaned up version of the sketch, can send a version that is either totally transparent save for lines or just with transparent background.
>>63941448OP here, i don't care if i get replies or not, i will continue to make this thread every day long after the last stars in the universe have burnt out
>>63941892if they weren't shit they wouldn't be in danger of dying
>>63943265he's right, you're wrong
>>63994075Not sure which would be better on the background. Probably best if you upload both so I can compare the result.
>>63933039Because fuck "How would X fare in 40k #189758913758" and fuck you
>>63994517Here is clean with no background at all.
>>63994592Here is version where character itself still has color to it.
>>63932989this op has been posted before how is this thread not dead yet.
>>63994592The colorless version looks pretty good.Also trew the spawn picture on the first page due to there being some extra space. Kind of reminds me of the random pictures of grots, servoskulls and chaos mutants GW used to stick between pragraphs in 40k codices.
>>63994878I can color the spawn or make them similar without white bits if you want.
>>63995013the colorless version might work a bit better.
>>63995083Yeah I think I got better at my drawing since last time I drew this girl.
>>63994861I met with an old friend here, we talked about shit, got some art done, and just had some general chat. Don't worry once that is sorted thread can die.
>>63995161Thanks.I should probably get your name so I can actually put credits to the document I originally made this for.Also, combine this race with the centurion specialization of the 5th edition broodmother conversion and you can play a ladyknight mother of monsters.
>>63995585Well I can give you link to my dA account since I plan to post the drawings there:https://www.deviantart.com/vwpologt And yeah, I might use the idea of lady knigh mother of monsters some day.
>>63990885Let me make it simple for you. Are men and women different? In other words, if given equal opportunities and even after eliminating all social factors, should we or should we not expect significantly more men than women in politics?>>63991652It's an "annoying environment" for women to work in because women do not have the same dominance instinct as men (they have a hypergamy instinct). Furthermore they do not operate by justice based morality but care based morality which means they generally won't feel at home in politics (and when they do they veer hard left, Occasio-Cortez levels left). If you think this is "incel talk" keep in mind that this is the scientifically confirmed by Lawrence Kohlberg and affirmed by feminist(!) psychologist Carol Gillian. FEMINISTS acknowledge that women value feelings over justice. This is especially worrying given that the feminization of education has led to more and more judges being female. I can't imagine how horrible divorce courts will get in the next decades. Or can you imagine being a man accused of rape and being the only man in a court filled with emotion-centric diversity hires?
>>63996160I just came here to talk about mothers of monsters being lady knights, shut the fuck up and go to some place that is meant for politics.
>>63994395Seeing how you are replying to a two day old post I think it is safe to say you are the one seething here stupid
>>63996777nah you are
>>63997029nope ur mad
>>63932989>Female DMYou deserve everything you got.
>>63997037No you and your face is mad.>>63997078Anti-sage.>>63997095Said the moron replying to a pasta that was posts many times already.
>>63934102In the "nu-(fe)male" jargon lady just means women. Similar to how they call all groups etc. "folk". In the context of knights I can see how that becomes messy, but lady knight usually just means any female in armour. Or that's at least how I've seen it being used.
>>63995585Welp from play tests of centurion broodmother it's clear that Maiestas are above mortals in power.
>>63994861Because people took this as an excuse to post their fetishes.
>>63998858Yeah. Good these fetishes have decent trog tied to them.
>>63998678That's kind of a given. Part of the deal with Maiesta is that the gavs they're carrying grant them special powers that ordinary mortals don't have.
>>63932989Now let's be honest, mother of monsters can be pretty fucking magical realm.
>>63999785Well races idea is that each one looks unique but sure. Looks better then my artwork.
>>63993183>No one is discouraging women from getting into politicsI am. Women should never be in charge of anything important.
>>63999904t. moron that lives with his mom
>>63932989> This fucking copypasta yet again> 43 replies
I think this is a sailor moon enemy
>>63999985The furthest thing from an argument, the baseless accusation.
>>64000228Holt shit this looks good. Jealous of the skills. Also saved.
>>64000320Nope and nope.
>>63932989>female DMLet me stop you right there.
>>63932989No more shark threads
>>64002768>replying to old pasta just to say something stupidLet me stop you right there.
>>63932989I wonder... how many times has this thread been made? Surely OP wouldn't have some sort of petty agenda, would he?
>>64003420I don't get it. Assume he has an agenda. No product or kickstarter is being advertised. No one is being paid to make the threads (probably). What agenda could spamming a mediocre thread possibly serve?
>>64002785Shark threads?>>64003546Clearly spies are using shitposts on 4chan to communicate, like number stations.
>>63932989Are they fucking and it isn’t fading to black? or described in a sexual way? Is anything happening sexual on camera? If not then no.
>>64004517>Be young man>wanna be james bond>train physically every day>learn three languages>go to school and get straight As>finally graduate with my degree>join CIA>get sent to spy on some podunk asian state>"Johnson. It's your turn to go to that autistic forum and post the mission update.">gaze longingly at sidearm
>>64006704could be worse, could be doing this in /pol/ or /d/
>>64007185/pol/ is where mossad sends their encrypted messages. /d/ is where PSIA posts.
>>6400342052 times with the exact same op text, so far as the archive can remember.
>>64007185>secret code relayed through the exact angle, length and girth of the individual futacocks>to make sure the code stay fresh, reposts don't count>agents need to keep building massive collections to always have the necessary vocabulary at hand>sometimes desperately resorting to drawing the stuff themselves, knowing national security is at stake
>>64007273OP could at least make minor changes to this. Like talk about different fetish and GM each time.
>>63944196Pathfinder was a fucking mistake
>>64007287>another day, another parade of girlcock>wait>I recognize that dick>A planned military buildup along the border in North Korea?>This requires a presidential briefing!
>>64010131The Chad-zak vs the Virgin childbirth.