What the fuck is that
this is how viruses getting into your system
>>10717111Probably another one of those models that have no resemblence to the actual thing they're modeling.
>>10717111I'm really looking forward to imaging and simulation technology getting better so that we can see what this stuff is actually shaped like and how it moves IRL instead of this kind of ridiculous bullshit. There's no way the soupy shit in cells actually looks anything like that, and I don't mean just the coloring and lighting
>>10717111looks like myosin
>>10717140are you implying that we dont have electron microscopes
>>10717158Is there a real video of this then?
>>10717111Myosin? This is a protein involved in muscles, this reminds me of how I can't build any
>>10717140I don't think you understand the point of this image
>>10717163the movement and color is cgi, but they do look like this.
>>10717111Protein, also known as nanobots
>>10717181OP is a simulated depiction of a motor protein. Your pic seems like a SEM image of a bacteriophage.
>>10717140>imaging technologyfundamentally impossible>simulation technologythis is it>what it actually looks likeFucking microbiologists are so stupid and have 0 reasoning skills. These chemical compounds are literally the building blocks of cells and matter. There are no eyes precise enough to see what this stuff actually "looks like" because it doesn't have a physical appearance. 3D models might not even be capable of accurately depicting what goes on at that level.>>10717158>electron microscopesthe concept of developing a 3D video model of what goes on at a level that requires an electron microscope for an image is fundamentally flawed.
>>10717163To be able to image something with an electron microscope you're using a dead sample to get the image. It works by drilling a precise stream of electrons at something and detecting what bounces back to image something smaller than the wavelength of visible light.If shit is moving around you'd get a blurry image back.
>>10717193Mines a virus, but that's not the point whatsoever.
>>10717203How is it fundamentally flawed.>it doesn't have a physical appearance??
>>10717214Does a helium atom have a physical appearance? No, of course not. Why? Physical appearance is limited by our eyes and interpreted by our brains. We use lens microscopes to get around the inability to see microorganisms, and this works because a lens microscope augments our vision by trivial magnification. Electron microscopes work a la >>10717204 so the information we get from them is open to interpretation. We cannot expect to view the universe in terms of smaller and smaller 3D building blocks when we can't even draw the line between what does and does not require an electron microscope to "view" aka gather more precise data from.
>>10717111Kinesin motor protein, carrying a vesicle.
>>10717239Is that real time?
>>10717208bacteriophage = virusbrainlet
>>10717208Kek nice one pseud
>>10717111He's a smart boi, he likes reading.
>>10717142>imagine thinking this
>>10717304>Physical appearance is limited by our eyesI would like to reason with you on this. If something is, then it has form. This we can agree on, surely. When you say helium has no appearance, you cannot dismiss it's atomic envelope as "invisible", can you?
>>10717111This is not a virus, it's a kinesin, it transports vesicles throughout the cell on small cytoskeletal filaments, alongside their counterparts, dyneins.
>>10717330Absolutely not. That's slowed down a lot.
>>10717555that would be horrifying. I think a human would go insane if they could be shrunk down to view the sub-cellular world.
>>10717208What a fucking retard.
>>10717917Your comment, whilst essentially correct, fails however to impart the necessary detail required to fully understand the complexity of the issue.I would suggest you resubmit your comment after further research and due consideration of all the information available to you.However, in the interests of expediency, I shall resubmit it for you, adding in the required fields that you erroneously neglected to include.Therefore:>What a goddamned stupid ass fucking retard.There is no need to thank me.
That's big pimp daddy myosin
>>10717239LMFAO where did you find that?
>>10718013Since you asked ..... https://jerrywolkoff.blogspot.com/2015/12/happiness-cant-be-boughtits-elusive-its.htmlgoogle lead me to the most batshit of placesDon't even bother clicking it.More googling lead me to find a power point presentation with a citation for the gif>Hand-Over-Hand Motility Matthew L. Walker, Stan A. Burgess, James R. Sellers, Fei Wang, John A. Hammer III, John Trinick & Peter J. Knight. Nature, 405, 804-807 (2000).
>>10717327This or Dynein
>>10717111oh this? its my cross to bear and this is the meaningful path
>>10717130one virus does not simply walk into your system
>>10718193In the original video it seems it's moving away from the core (centrosome), so the polarity of microtubules is - - > +, which fits for kinesin. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Inner_Life_of_the_Cell
>>10717239look at him go
>>10717520Is there proof that a helium atom has the form that you say it has? It is proven to not be a perfect sphere with two orbiting much smaller perfect spheres... and it is proven not to be about 4 perfect spheres of almost the same size almost stuck together with 2 much smaller perfect spheres orbiting... can we go smaller? Perhaps, but then we get into 1 dimensional string theory etc. things that have no form. A helium atom may have a form, it may have a form that changes minutely occasionally, or it may have a form that is not well defined. But that is too much of an assumption for the question... the processes of life require the equivalent of too many helium atoms all being connected in a well defined form, and all having a rarely changing, well defined form.
>>10717111Nanomachines that emerged from pre determined chemical reactions>Like fucking magic anons
>>10718238>>10717327>>10718193How brainlets couldn't recognize this immediately really shows the state of /sci/
>>10717111It is Sisyphus doing his thing
>>10717111Play this at the same time and it will all make sense.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_izvAbhExY
>>10717330>Is that real time?>>10717555>Absolutely not. That's slowed down a lot.Why are so many science animations so horribly altered like that? Nobody has any idea what any of this stuff actually looks like because some asshole slows it down by a massive factor or adds random colors or just substitutes an animation that is completely off scale.Even something as simple as the solar system is depicted like all the planets are nearly the same size and right next to each other revolving around a barely larger sun. Would be better not to show anything at all than to misrepresent things that much.
>>10718669You're more of a brainlet if you DO instantly recognize this since it's a retarded normie meme that was plastered everywhere years ago under the false pretense of being "what happiness molecules in the brain look like."
>>10718902Because a more accurate representation of scale would be retarded. Showing motor proteins that close up in real time would just be an unrecognizable blur.If you showed a real scale solar system out to Neptune, the Sun would be a tiny dot and you would only just be able to make out Jupiter and Saturn. If the model is big enough to see all the planets in some detail, be ready to walk a few miles.
>>10717111It's a kinesin protein walking along a intracellular microtubule, if my degree isn't too rusty.>>10717142Oh I guess it could be myosin/actin?
>>10717239Is than an actual video of a single protein moving, or a composite of various proteins that were captured at different times?
>>10718943That's what I'm saying. It'd be better not to show anything at all.
>>10719026Misleading people with horribly altered non-models is much worse than giving people accurate text based descriptions instead.
>>10719033How about models + a description telling you in which ways they're accurate and in which they're inaccurate?
>>10719012Imagine coming to a science board without knowing basic science.
>>10719050That'd be better than just misreprepresenting without clarification.>>10719087If you knew about science you'd know how far off these different misleading models are. Accurate text based information is way better than misleading imagery.
>>10719011I believe it's several snap shot pictures of the same protein stitched together.
>>10718785lmao the beat almost matches up it's barely too fast
>>10719189If you knew about science you wouldn't be an all-or-nothing brainlet and would use models and text in a complementary manner, as is normally done in (surprise!) science.
>>10719398Francis Crick made the same exact complaint about solar system models being horribly misleading you brainlet. Read a book.
>>10719409>>10719409>thinks high school clay solar systems are the same as scientific models>completely ignorant of computer simulations with scalable gui and the endless ways of graphically visualizing data>uses and argument of authority and literally nothing elseHow does it feel to have the brain of a monkey?
>>10717111what happens when "evolution" happens.Evolutionists believe this is actually the result of a chain of random mutations that were all perfectly functional and all managed to reproduce until now.
>>10718232Maybe you pay your epithelial cells well
>>10718903>being this retarded
>>10717472>bacteriophage = virusL0Lno fgt pls
>>10719555>Evolutionists believeGTFO /pol/itard
>>10717695From OP source file it also includes DNA repair and or replication mechanisms. They're said by the professor discussing it that the speed depicted that particular function is rather slow. I forget the speed analogy. But I'd say it's like 100X the scaled down speed of a modern microprocessor. It's fair comparison to make. As there is data correction and error checking happening in both systems. When you can grasp what's going on at that level and the accuracy, let alone speed. It's truly of awe.
>>10717111>they see me strollin
>>10720106pol believes in evolution you fucking idiot
>>10717520>it's atomic envelope>it is atomic envelope
>>10720258it's not a contraction
>>10720252Yeah not really it’s full of Christcucks
>>10720989>he thinks evolution is the only possible scientific explanationyou're the religious zealot here.
>>10717111WELL YOU CAN TELL BY THE WAY I USE MY WALK IM WOMANS MAN NO TIME TO TALK
>>10717111The proof that God exists
>>10721108MUSIC LOUD AND WOMEN WARM, I'VE BEEN KICKED AROUND SINCE I WAS BORN
>>10717181thats a bacteriophage not a protein what?
>>10718903>kinesin using ATP hydrolysis transporting shit along a microtubule (likely towards the tip of an axon) is a retarded normie memedid you not take biology in high school?
>>10717111Looks like a motor protein. But it's probably really fast or super slow in reality. This render has it at a normal walking pace, but renders are almost always wrong.Whatever it is, it was necessary to create complex life that would observe it. No matter how complex or convoluted something is, just know that it was designed so anthropogenic observation could be made. There is no such thing as coincidence. The stars, the planets, every asteroid and comet, the culmination of all evolutionary decisions, every protein and virus, every bomb and bullet in every war, nothing is random, but necessary.
>>10719555>tfw was just reading a paper on how pathogens hijack intracellular motor proteins Th-thanks intelligent designer
>>10722084>99,99...% of all life is extinct>prokaryotes the most abdundant life from>evolution had goalthe absolute state of eukaroytes
>>10717111Your momma's chicken legs struggling to carry her behemoth size.
>>10720252pol believes in everything and nothing so that's a blank statement
>>10720106Imagine falling for bait this obvious
>>10720234>it also includes DNA repair and or replication mechanisms.
>>10718997No it is a kinesin protein. You are the only correct one here. I just learned about it in neuroscience.
>>10718214Underrated anti-Semite post.
>>10725693Thing I'm thinking of is akin to a crack addict stripping insulation off copper wire from a building site.
>>10725732what's anti-Semitic about it?
>>10717524is a kinesin alive?
We humans are just biological robots and mechanical robots are the next stepits all a net of connections that goes from the smallest subatomic particles to galactic clusters
>>10717239The Chad Stride
>>10717111me leading ur mom into the bedroom
>>10725693why are they still connected by an umbilical cord after the cell finishes dividing?wtf is that?
>>10726899seriously, wtf is that?
>>10720369I believe he was bullying the use of "it's", the contraction, when "its" is what is used in the English language to show possession to it.
>>10717140I want to see what atoms look like.
>>10728502>I want to see what atoms look like.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGWSX6pStd0
>>10728535Well that's pretty cool. Atoms are basically just dark spheres.
>>10718902true, but e have an easier time imagining it. what it needs to be is slowed down or like presented more simply BUT it must clearly say like "this is slowed down by x times" or whatever.