[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/sci/ - Science & Math



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




>Scientists have stated the dna percentages are too small for a human group to be classified as a subspecies. Do any of you anons know the exact DNA % between human races? We share 96% of our dna with chimps but chimps are classified as a separate species.
>>
>>10288726
>We share 96% of our dna with chimps
but only 50% with our siblings
>>
>>10289043
Therefore our siblings must be chimps
>>
>>10289043
wat
>>
>>10289043
Share =/= identical.
>>
>>10289063
You mean "not shared =/= "not identical"
>>
>96% of the coding DNA
No surprises that when you look at the junk dn- oh I mean the intergenic zones, we aren't similar. We also share some 70% with a banana, you wouldn't claim to be related to a banana
>>
>>10289248
we all live in a society
>>
File: kySt1ob.png (818 KB, 1933x1365)
818 KB
818 KB PNG
>>10288726
Well, races don't exist, so I'm going to assume you mean "ethnic groups".
>>
>>10289248
Isn't the claim that we are related to everything on Earth?
>>
>>10288726
Same dna isn't enough, coding regions, regulatory networks etc. are more important. On a micro scale, 16sRNA is used because it's conserved more than DNA which changes easily and can be transferred through horizontal harlotry.
>>
>>10288726
Humans are already a subspecies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens_idaltu
>>
>>10289284
Yes, so it's a useless claim. That's like saying I'm related to everyone in England. What's the point?
>>
>>10289471
The point is creating a tree of life using genetic data and studying genetic drift in various species.
>>
Why is there different dog breeds but only one human species
>>
>>10290119
because there's only one dog species
>>
>>10289043
You share 50% inherited traits with your siblings not DNA similarity.
>>
>>10290146
Why dont we have different breeds of humans then?
>>
>>10288726
Races don't exist, but we have to eliminate the white race.

The Jewish race must be given a special status.
>>
>>10290168
we do.
There's gentiles and jews.
>>
>>10290170
there's a billion whites. When there's 200 million or so left, then you have my permission to play victim. Till then stop being a whiny bitch
>>
>>10290168
We do, human races are basically breeds adapted for certain geographies, that's pretty much as simple as it gets.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.