Smile like you've made more money than you've spent editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders normally have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://pastebin.com/ryMSvthn>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZPrevious thread >>3538206Quick FAQS>what’s the best camera available on a “budget”?The blackmagic pocket cinema camera 4k, by a considerable margin>>what’s a good beginner video camera?Buy a used canon m50>Can I use a zoom lens for video?Yes>Do I need cine lenses?No>Do I need 4k?No. It will make your footage look sharper if it’s in focus, and it gives you breathing room in post. But 1080p is still absolutely fine>Are camcorders okay?Yes
>>3549538you're thread-pics are always super retart
>>3549541this is a very good post
>>3549538this is a better OP, delete that trash from your files
>>3549541exactly, Joker overhyped mainstream shit for low-IQ muricans>society
Hai, I was looking for friendly advice for filming stage performance, like the open ones outside, where there are a lot of people around, I have a canon 60d, I was filming a performance but I had problems with using a telezoom lense, people going in front of the camera or trying to find a good spot where I can snipe without people in the scene.Can anybody recommend me a good lens or advice for these scenarios?
>>3549637Stand on a milk crate you manlet
"Joker is a cinematic masterpiece" and other shit incels say
>>3549755The shot of the century
>>3549755If move has villains and hero's, it's shit.
>>3549779but what if the hero and the villain are one person...
What are some good video lights you can get for a "mid-range" production under ~$300 to $400?When I say "mid-range", I mean something relatively simple and low budget, and the shots will most likely be medium shots at their furthest (with subject lighting a must, that is).I see that bh has a kit of the GVM 560AS lights for $200. Is this okay for the price or is there better?Also, in terms of three and four point lighting, are there any additional LED lights one would recommend?
>>3549880the one you have with you
>>3549881but I don't have any lights yet, would it be a good idea to get two of these kits?
>>3549882Yes because then they would be the one you had with you
>>3549538why are ff sensors not a good idea for film makeing? is the rolling shutter worse?
>>3549880I bought a godox light brand new for 20€ on used market. It did the job. Also bought tripod light for outside worker wich is a good compromise price /result.I built my own 60W led light (20€). And I am waiting for my new light stand (20€ on used market) to come.IMO it depend on where you need to shoot (full night or daylight, small space or large space). But what >>3549881 means is that you alreafy have a shitload of lights at home and you just need to find ways of attached them in the set.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6YssPfJTAo[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelRedmi Note 7Camera Softwarelavender-user 9 PKQ1.180904.001 V10.3.5.0.PFGEUXM release-keysEquipment MakeXiaomiSensing MethodUnknownFocal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopImage Created2019:09:27 12:33:51Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating200Exposure ProgramNot DefinedF-Numberf/1.8Exposure Time1/100 secFocal Length4.74 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardImage Height3000White BalanceAutoBrightness2.9 EVImage Width4000Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/1.8Color Space InformationsRGB
>>3549892yesa LF sensor with fast enough readout times and still a lot of latitude is only this fall starting to be possible at a sub 20k price point, see fx9, c500IIThe FF sensors used in stills cameras right now are pure jello wobble and IMO unusable for video, it will take quite a couple of years till that kind of sensor tech that dribbled down from the alexa lf, monstro, venice is available at a $2-3k point
>>3549892Who said full frame was no good for filmmaking?Rolling shutter is an independent issue that is sometimes worse in full frame cameras, sometimes not. But that's the pros and cons of a specific camera, not the format itself.No one's going to complain that a red dragon has too large of a sensor, that's completely ridiculous.
>>3549945It would be nice if we see a photo or video of that thing working pls
>>3550052Ok. I give you a webm tonight.
>>3549892Entry level ff tend to be worse, since they take shit ton of power and cooling to get running image suffers from obtrusive codec use, and low bit counts. They are getting there, but it's either low bit, and image problems as in sony's case, or heavy as fuck and pricey as in panasonics case.
>c-stand is two hundred dallas>ninja v without ssd and batteries is seven hundred dallas >aputures are fuckton hundreds of dallasI just want to do some overhead filming of my hands doing stuff, why does it have to be so goddamn expensive?..
>>3550216Sorry but poor people don't deserve good quality
>>3549950>>3550138Do you prefer p4k or an aps camera for filmmaking?
>>3550216If you want cheap you need to nigger rig your set up. Or buy used. Or buy Chinese knock-offs of what you want.If you don’t wanna buy cheap stuff or used stuff you need to spend your tax return on what you want to buy.
Is renting an Alexa worth it over buying a relatively cheap camera?
>>3550282Sometimes. Probably not.If you're fully funded and working on a professional set, then yes, of course.If you're making a low-budget independent film with a skeleton crew, then no.The difference in dynamic range isn't noticeable in 99% of situations. Like, noe one's going to watch the film and go "hmm, the highlight roll-off of those trees against the sky looks kind of lacking actually, how terrible".Compare an arri with a bmp6k (for example) and, even ignoring price, the arri is heavier and harder to use. The blackmagic records raw internally and can easily fit on a gimbal.But also, if you're contracted to do a job, clients will be a lot more impressed with an arri than pretty much anything else. And sometimes appearances are worth it.
Is there anywhere I can learn lighting where I don't have to read? Words hurt my brain and I can't visualize what they mean. Any videos or courses where a dude just takes a light and points it and tells you why it looks like that?
>>3552042>Words hurt my brain and I can't visualize what they mean.Have you tried ereader and dsylexic fonts?
>>3552042http://mattscottvisuals.com/lightingThis guy has a rad site with lots of setups/diagrams.
>>3552042https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6YssPfJTAoThis guy is a bible.
I'll soon have the opportunity to speak with a top exec at Sony's camera department. Anything I should ask him?
I am planning on running studio lighting from the lowel creator dv 44 light kit (a total of about 1500 watts) and from another green screen light kit that used 500 watt bulbs. I plan on turning a room in my apartment into a movie studio. How large a fuse would I need? Would a 20 amp fuse allow me to use my lighting? Compared to normal household appliances such as stoves and microwaves, how much power would my lighting draw? Could I use a standard 120 volt plug, or would I need to update my electric to handle a larger load?
>>3552402just don't put it all on one fuse and you're good
Overrated or workhorse?
>>3552512I love it because it's versatile, fast and clean, but the focus ring is way too short and often it's too clean for what I want, that's why I have a 1/4 black pro mist basically living on it all the timeSame goes for the 50-100 btwGet a cine modded/rehoused version for a couple of 100 more if you can to get a nicer focus ring without paying out of your ass for sigma's cine version
>>3552402watt = volt * ampereampere = watt / voltx = 2000/120x = 16.666
>>3552670When will the new firmware for the bmpcc 4k that allows anamorphic shooting and 120 FPS at over 2k be ready for download?
>>3552607Thanks anon. I’m not autistic enough to love math, but I’m autistic enough to buy gear I don’t really need.
>>3552675its pretty much ready but were finalising tests for it.
>>3552670Has anyone switched from Premiere to DaVinci? As a student I've got a pretty sweet deal with the Creative Cloud and bringing in enough to justify the subscription but I don't know if I'm going to be able to keep it going past December.
>>3552359would you touch a poop for $20?
>>3553044I did. It's a bit weird at first. They're very similar but the differences are annoying (small things like keyboard shortcuts).The worst thing about the switch, for me, is the way keyframes work. On premiere, you can add keyframes to literally anything so intuitively. This is not the case for davinci. You can easily add keyframes for obvious things like audio levels or picture positions, but adding key frames for things like colour correction or masks has stumped me so far.It is very good, the render times and playback alone are pretty compelling reasons to swap. But I'd still use premiere if it was a viable option.And that's without going into the whole spiel about the other adobe products like audition and after effects which work so seamlessly with premiere.
>>3552512Workhorse, almost everything I've shot for the past 3 years has been on this thing.
>>3553044As I shoot BRAW Da Vinci has now become my sole NLE and while it does have its quirks and there are certainly areas where it's still finding its feet as more than just grading software (not to mention there are still some significant bugs), it is fully functional and really well-made.As the other anon said the seamless workflow between Premiere, AE and Audition is sorely missed, and I'm having to take next weekend out to teach myself Fusion because from the looks of it it doesn't function in a remotely similar way to AE.
>>3552677Jesus Christ it's just arithmetic
>>3553226I am usually on Shrooms when I am videoing stuff and when I’m tripping my face off, arithmetic is the last thing I want to do.
>have decent camera that records good-quality dci 4k>whenever I film, the biggest issues are always sound related or issues surrounding the actors performing consistently, or accurately remembering their lines>the image quality is pretty much universally great>despite this, have the constant desire to buy a new camerafuck
>>3553044Yes and no. I was in a similar situation so, I tried making the switch. DaVinci Resolve is amazing and I truly believe that it can be used as a perferct substitute for Premiere, After Effect and Audition. The Edit Page is basically a combination of all the best features of the major NLE's. However, as a result, it has a surprisingly steep learning curve. The Edit Page, Color Page, Fairlight and Fusion are very different tools. There is no underlying logic that helps you navigate the app and, unlike the Adobe apps, mastering one tool won't aid you in mastering another. I'm still pretty bad at Fusion, but that's because I never really had time to master it. See, after college, I became a freelancer and, to my surprise, I wasn't getting the solo gigs. None of that "one man band"-stuff that you see on YouTube. Instead, I usually get hired to do one job, be it camera, lights, editing, animation/graphics, VFX, sound or color. I rarely get a say in what software to use because everyone uses Adobe. Your mileage may vary but, other than the Color Page, I just don't see the point of learning Resolve in a collaborative work environment.
>>3553044By the way, once your student subscription runs out, you'll be offered a discount: $35/month for a year.
>>3553044If you still have your college email you can get student discount for life.
>>3553282>>3553307That's my hope - BritBong here, so I get offered like £25 which isn't bad at all.Though one of my friends apparently got detected they were no longer enrolled. I've been doing some casual work for the Uni, so I'm trying to get a staff account too.
how do i achieve this look on set? what kind of lighting should i use?
>>3553631thats just a lut. probably just matched the white balance to the yellow skin
>>3552670lol, never update early, wait for people that update to complain about problems on the forum so you can see what you are getting into first.
Opinions on g80 for filiming? Does anybody have a recommended lens to go with it?
>>3553698Also, how loud is the built in stabilization? I'm wondering if a mic would pick it up.
>>3553700Don't know about g80, but cpu hum is louder than stabilization working. It's something you'll never worry about.
>>3553044Nah premiere is my workhorse can't live without it as it makes me money so u justify the 24 euros per month. I have it since 2017 i think i paid 700 until now
Anyone seen any good BMPCC footage that doesn't look like a retarded travel video
>>3553808>when you realize that BM products are all completely retarded and the only reason they are sold is the discount price.
>>3553808No?People making good films use the camera secondary. Very few people make good films for the sake of showing off a camera. A few try I guess.I have a friend who's using a 6k to make a feature film. It's hardly going be advertised on its camera. It's also not going to be on youtube anytime soon.Travel videos and blogs are basically the best you're going to get. Try some keywords in youtube and a few interesting vids might pop up but they'll be rare.
>>3553813>when you're a panasonic shill and you're finding it harder and harder to defend your brand
>>3553817panasonic is retarded as well.
>>3553813What's a good camera then for under 2.5k?
>>3553823z cam e2, sigma fp .. maaaayyybee canon c100, but I hate canon as well.
>>3553830>z cam e2So a hipster bmp4k?>sigma fpSo a camera that isn't even out yet? Christ you're full of shit
>>3553832>name better cams under 2.5k>name three>you're full of shitokay
>>3553837Z cam isn't better. Neither is the sigma fp. On top of that, the sigma isn't even out yet.Canon c100 is arguably better only in select circumstances. Once again, you're full of shit
>>3553832got some good zcam footage
>>3553838>neither is the sigma fplmfao
>>3553848https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQTiJiDt0y0It's objectively significantly worse. Shitposting won't change that.
>>3553851>fp is objectively significatally worse>posts a docu about a geisha shot on fpdude ... what is wrong with you?
>>3553854>a long video shot on one camera which clearly shows the visual short-comings of said camera isn't evidence that the camera is badI refuse to believe you're not trolling at this point. No one is this stupid or obtuse
>>3553880>I show you how bad this gun is>this guy shot 100 rounds and every missedc'mon .. how cheap is that? (besides your guy didn't miss, but yeah...)
I'm curious, what do you guys use when it rains on a run and gun shoot? Especially in regards to these more elaborate rigs with vmount batteries and monitors.
>>3553942you can get raincoats and stuff but usually youre not gonna shoot in the rain
>>3553823Bow to the king.
>>3553971Of rolling shutter
>>35498907 days later and my sides have finally decided to come back to my body
>>3553823Get a fuji xt3 or wait for xh2 if you want ibis
Just got a used gaming pc to edit on. How fucked am I?``` Oct 20, 2019 $1,247.68 + $99.81 tax - $100 ebay gift card promotion -5% of paypal ($67.37) credit card cashbackCPUAMD Ryzen 7 3700X 3.6 GHz 8-Core Processor CPU Cooler Noctua NH-D15 82.5 CFM CPU Cooler Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX X470-F Gaming ATX AM4 Motherboard Memory G.Skill Flare X 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-2400 Memory Storage Samsung 960 EVO 250 GB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive Kingston A400 240 GB 2.5" Solid State Drive PNY CS900 240 GB 2.5" Solid State Drive Intel 660p Series 512 GB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive Video Card MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11 GB GAMING X TRIO Video Card Case be quiet! Silent Base 600 ATX Mid Tower Case Power Supply EVGA 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-modular ATX Power Supply Case Fan Noctua NF-S12A PWM 120 mm Fan be quiet! Pure Wings 2 120 51.4 CFM 120 mm Fan be quiet! SilentWings 3 pwm 59.5 CFM 140 mm Fan be quiet! SilentWings 3 pwm 59.5 CFM 140 mm Fan MSI TORX FAN 12CM 71.27 CFM 120 mm Fan MSI TORX FAN 12CM 71.27 CFM 120 mm Fan Noctua NF-A12x15 PWM 55.44 CFM 120 mm Fan ```
>>3554179It's fineBut depending on what you're shooting you'll need way more storage
>>35541804k 10bit Apple pro rez :( I get the blue wd drives to shoot on and I Will get like a 4tb hdd as it becomes needed Here’s hoping ups ground doesn’t fuck it up in shipping
>>3554182You mean at least two drivesYou're doing backups, right
>>3554182Lol I asked a gamer friend about this and he said to never buy used, as it is impossible to tell over eBay if the thermal paste used isn’t just human feces
>>3554185Well I got the raw files on the capture drives...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width588Image Height434
>>3554187Which are going to be formatted for the next shootBackup your shit mate, hdds are dirt cheap
>>3554179apart from the gpu being kinda old all these specs are pretty good. the rams a bit slow though which matters for you cpu a lot. weird choice of ssds >>3554186this is one of the most retarded things ive ever read, congrats
>>3554179get more storage and some externals for backup
>>3553823the ursa mini 4.6 original
>>3554024The twerking of motion picture.
>>3554179>Samsung 960 EVO 250 GB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive>Kingston A400 240 GB 2.5" Solid State Drive>PNY CS900 240 GB 2.5" Solid State Drive>Intel 660p Series 512 GB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State DriveThe heck was this guy doing what build?>full disk>lemme just buy another ssdlol
https://vimeo.com/74193932Noob question the guy in the description say 'did some color grading and used the digital teleconverter to eliminate the vignette'What does he mean by 'digital teleconverter' ?
>>3555294Also, I'm on GH5, does this lens seems to be a good deal <35 $?
>>3555294He means he cropped in cameraThere's a digital zoom function in there called like that
>>3555305Ok that's nice.
>>3555305Does it regognize the cropping automaticly or is it just a fix parameter you choose?
The canon 1dxiii has been announced. On top of 10bit 4:2:2 60fps 4k internal recording, it's rumoured/stated to also allow raw video recording (which would make sense given that its nikon equivalent offers this feature via external recording and the 1dxii was considered a successor to the 1dc).So obviously panasonic fanboys gonna panasonic. But to everyone else, what do we think? It will likely retail around 4000 pounds/dollars. The recent 90d gives the impression that it should offer full frame recording without a crop (the 1dxii has a 1.3 crop for 4k shooting). Even without raw, that's incredibly great video recording capabilities and I imagine it will dominate the wedding videographer market.But full frame is kinda overrated and it's only advantage over the bmp6k is its auto focus and battery life. For a grand and a half more, it seems like it's not ideal for the pure video shooter. I suppose it gives hope that the 5dv will have similar video specs (though criticised heavily, the 5div's video capabilities are excellent once you get past the insane storage required).Also, the c200 isn't much more than the 1dxiii will be so I think really the camera will only appeal to people who need a great stills camera and video camera in one
>>3555294>>3555362Digital teleconverter magnifies output images without loosing pixel density. Say, you've 2x digital teleconverter as found on em10iii, and you're shooting 4k vid on 25mm lens. If you activate it, it will turn 25mm lens into 50mm lens with very few penalties. Native sensor resolution of the sensor is higher than 4k, so camera just uses centre pixels to still output 4k. It is video thing, but must not be confused with digital zoom. That one magnifies image at the cost of resolution.
>>3556387>dslr for videoThat ship has sailed.
the new firmware for the bmpcc 4k is finally here. yeah! Hallelujah. I can’t wait to play around with my new sperg toy.
>>3550240The IRS is being phased out of this timeline.
>>3556542Wait until you see what weve got lined up for our next release...
>>3556568> next release will be even betterIf it is even better than this release the bmpcc 4k is going to give this autist a massive boner and make for one happy sperg jerking off to his camera in his mommy’s basement.
Any opinions on filming with super 8? I'm thinking of getting into film making and I'm interested in using a super 8 camera, or would it be better to use a digital camera?
>>3556805I'm actually more interested in 16mm now, so I'm looking for opinions and tips on 26mm cameras for filming
Any feedback on the beginning of a script I'm working on?
>>3556820https://ctxt.io/2/AABAOAN5FA Today is not the brightest day for me
>>3556810You can't afford 16mm
>>3556823Fuck yeah I can't, I hadn't looked at film prices until now. I read some people were able to get 11 50 foot rolls for a little over 100 usd
>>3556836Buying the stock is one thing but getting it developed and scanned will ruin you
>>3556841There's another thing I didn't think about, is the process different than 35mm film for still photography?
Is there a document i can print out to have myself and my clients sign to make my work more legitimate until I start an LLC?
>>3556844Yeah you're working with fuckhueg long rolls you can't really cut, you want a specialized lab for perfect consistency across all frames and access to a scanner that can handle the rolls, can't treat thousands of frames of footage anything like still film
>>3556844yes, motion picture stock has an extra protective layer that needs to be stripped off during developing. Some labs do a thing called 'process paid' where buying the stock includes the price of developing and scanning, that way you only have to suck one dick to get a good deal.
>>3556568Are you ever planning on adding cinema dng or another form of true lossless raw back to the pocket series of cameras?
>>3557631Wow good timing. Currently we have no plans to add cinema DNG.
Hi noob questionI currently dont own any camera except an old bridge camera, no lenses either, so I am looking to buy my first real camera.I will need to shoot video with it, nothing like proffesional tier production but it will have to be decent as I will get money from those projects. Picture taking is not that important.I have been looking at various systems/brands and I found that sony autofocus is lightyears ahead of everything else, I tested friends a6500 and it was very good. It was so easy to use because of autofocus. Reading on internet and doing research I see that sony does 8bit video only. How big a deal is this in real world use? My use case would be mostly indoor/studio shooting
>>3557830>I found that sony autofocus is lightyears ahead of everything elseIncorrect. Canon's dual pixel autofocus is widely regarded as the best, though it depends who you ask.>8bit video only. How big a deal is this in real world use?Barely. It only really matters if you plan on doing heavy colour grading
>>3557830If you don't plan on shooting log or any profile that utilizes the whole dynamic range of the sensor then 8 bit video is fine, saves disk space. But for log look at cameras that offer 10 bit instead
Video should be banned as a technology. It would be a better world if we just used photographs.
>>3557850So you take just a series photographs24 of them per second
>>3549538My brother recently helped some friends at an event as a Wedding Photographer. At the event, the Videographer began shilling this stabilizer to himhttps://www.amazon.com/Handheld-Crane-2-Toolless-Adjustment-Weighing/dp/B075T3TQSD/ref=sr_1_3?crid=U5FUZGFWQ1UEIt seems to have made a number on him, because now he wants to buy it ASAP. I've never had a fancy Gimbal, so i don't know crap about this. Are there any other overall better Stabilizers/Gimbals in the same price range? It would help to have some alternatives because we mostly use Nikon cameras and we're about to get a BMPCC4K, but i heard the Follow Focus doesn't work with neither of them and that the whole feature set is made primarily Canon cameras, with other 2 being Panasonic and Sony.
guide on how to actually set up my camera (like what iso, f stop, sspeed, etc to use)? sticky covers pretty much everything else
>>3558337Use t1.3, ISO 800, 24fps, 180° shutter on your alexa mini with master primes
>>3558524why 180? isnide i have to use 270 or the lights flicker
>>3558528your arri m18s and skypanels shouldn't flicker
>>3557636If blackmagic won’t put cinema dng back on their pocket cameras. I can’t wait for them to add a lossless flavor of braw.
>>3558596Again you post just as I'm checking the board. We can't implement cDNG or BRAW lossless, not because we don't want to, but we can't until certain issues are cleared up.
>>3558118I heard you might need an extra cheeseplate to gimbal mount the BMPCC4K, I haven't tried mine on anything other than a glidecam.
>>3558608I can understand cdng due to the whole license issue shit, but why not lossless braw?Surely that would be either a processing issue (in which case the camera's just not powerful enough to do it) or else it would already be in there?
>>3558614Unfortunately I can't talk about it in more detail.
>>3558618Is it because of an issue with Red? Because,that’s what I’ve been hearing.
>>3558614It is probably not because of processing power. If processing power was the reason they could have implemented lossless braw at lesser resolution such as 2.8k.
>>3558677Ah, but then people would say that it was 'really' only a 2.8k camera and that the 4k/6k was just marketing hype[Not saying that processing power is the actual reason, just that I can't figure what other reason it could be]
>>3558674Yes, hopefully it's resolved quickly.
>>3558720You could probably record lossless raw in 4k and 6k. I think it’s more of a storage issue, than a processing issue. Unless you wanted to spend a lot on ssd drives and/or cfast cards, most people would opt to use 2.8k.
>>3554179Hey I’m this guy. The pc came in and there were two immediate problems with it1) the graphics card was propped up by this peice of metal bolted to the bottom of the case. This bends it slightly out of shape up, but without it being propped up the super long video card saga down under its own weight2) something must have happened to the cpu heat sink in the mail as it’s bent out of shape. It’s a two pronged sink (google the one in the listing) and it’s like pryed out into almost a v shape. Super concerningBut i turned it on loaded my now and everything ran like a dream :) full online raw 4k footage with multiple effects layers scrubbing in real time with no buffering
>>35536315k through silk into the windows, white walls help to bounce the light back to actors, bringing up details in the shadows on their faces.
>>3553660He's asking about the lighting not color dude.
>>3553808Are you asking about original or 4k?I've just finished working on an indie feature where we used it as a B cam. It's a great camera and its really easy to match it with more expensive options.
>>3558611It's possible to balance on a ronin s without a plate, but that's just painful.
>>3559431it just looks like natural light plus a bit, so i dont really get why youd ask about the light
>>3559432What did you use it next to? Things that I heard from people that use them is opposite. Even raw has weird tint to it. Offcourse all b cameras have these drawbacks. Sony is even worse, but I hear good things about new Panasonic.
i know your allowed to film anyone you want in public, but does anyone have a waiver i can print off and get people to sign? im going to be asking people on the street for interviews
>>3559621Look up standard forms. 500px has them for any kind of photography involving models.
anons- what's the best way to get past feeling like a useless lazy cunt when scripting/storyboarding? I feel like some kind of a project whore, seeking solace in one of the ten unfinished short (10-20min) serial narratives I have, never just focusing on completing one of them. I find myself trying write in details to the point of inanity, I know not how to abandon my insecurities of doing a video "wrong" due to lack of historical accuracy/wardrobe planning/location availability. (Thus the constant editing and rewriting of each short, hopefully until scheduling and resources can align). Is this prudent behavior or just another vain attempt to try and cling to the illusion of power? I need to get out of this rut and produce the diddily ding dong dang content
>>3560017I have a strong feeling that you should completely give up on doing movies. You sound like you are the least appropriate person to do this profession. I'd recommend to firstly stop every activity and then make a slow and careful thinking about youeself and what you can and want. I guarantee that you will be happier with something else, and it is just the question how much time you waste, but you actually know that you will end up with another profession anyways, so why later than sooner?Tl;dr: find something you have fun and joy with.
>>3560017I don't mean to sound harsh. But from the way you write you sound very arrogant and very pretentious. I'd fathom that the reason you haven't made anything is because the second you actually materialise any of your ideas, they become open to criticism and you'd have to face that you're not as perfect as you'd like to believe. Hence why you spend so long obsessing over details and spread yourself so thin.If you want to make something, you have to go out and make something. Sounds obvious, but most people fail this step. I'd recommend focusing on something that dosen't require elaborate costumes/locations so that you can focus on just telling an interesting story.Alternatively, there are many professions in the industry and director/writer might not be for you. Have you ever thought about being a production designer? Or a set decorator? Or a storyboard artist? You might be more content focusing your efforts on someone else's ideas. It will alleviate your insecurities of failing (since you'll have a 'boss' who ultimately takes responsibility) and you can handle multiple projects.
>>3560025ty based anon- I've forgotten how to have fun doing it. Have a blessed day
>>3560044You don't sound harsh at all- i am a pedantic asshole, trying to better those fellows over in hollywood. I am going to put a tack in the narrative crap for now and focus on consistency. I will report back to y'all with one 5-10 minute run n gun doc within the first half of november.
>>3559565It's natural + something around 5k as I said, just look how blown out the back looks and how directional the light is
>>35495383rd video I've posted here, got good feedback and was very appreciated. this one I tried to focus on lighting more and tighter edits to reduce drawn out scenes. I know the consistency of the color grade is non existent, any constructive criticism would be welcome! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERfpYD6Qj2w
Generally speaking, should I invest in a gimbal or a steadicam?
>>3560691speaking of which, how do i update my camera in gnu linux?
>>3561518ThisNew manfrotto 645 carbon series looks pretty damn good
>>3561044Not a fan storywise. Some technical problems on playback. Could be on my side but slomo parts were jerky.
>>3561478Steadicam and gimbals give you a completely different result. Learn to think about your needs when you look for a new equipment purchases. Also as other anons said - if you don't have a good tripod yet, make it a priority first.
>>3561478Heavier cameras tend to work better on a steadycam than on a gimbal. Gimbals use power to run, steadycams use your muscles to work.
What shutter speed do i want for 60p video? still 180 degrees?
>>3563427depends180-360 for more natural movement in real timeunder 180 for cleaner more "scientific" looking slomos with sharp details
>>356357090 would be good or can i go even lower?
>>3563613depends on how much light you haveI think for realtime anything faster than 180 looks like shit but you do you and for sharp slomo anything fast can be great as I said
>>3563427shoot tests in your apt
>>3563658>test shooting in your apartmentIt's called Limping now.
>>3549880godox sl60w150w if you need brighter. there are packages with barn doors or the apurture lightdome style softbox, get whatever suits your needs.>>3550216you can't buy your way into being good. what's holding you back is yourself, not your lack of funds. go shoot some weddings for easy money if you insist on making this a fulltime endeavor.For instance, you don't need to buy a bunch of sennheiser G3s right away, you can get by with rode wireless go.
>>3559621Related question: is it ok to publish without consent as long as you blur faces?
>>3565106america? you dont need consent for public at all. blurring and forms are just a nice thing to do. europe is a different
>>3565145In America if you try to profit off what you are making with out consent you can get sued. Burring faces makes it much harder for someone who is trying to sue you for using footage of them without permission to prove it was them.In America you can also get sued if you film from a public area into a private area using a creepshot lens, I mean a high powered zoom used by people who photograph birds and or Stacy’s beaver
>>3558528use 144 if in the US
Was it something valuable? I mean in the video render point of vew?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelRedmi Note 7Camera Softwarelavender-user 9 PKQ1.180904.001 V10.3.6.0.PFGEUXM release-keysEquipment MakeXiaomiSensing MethodUnknownFocal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopImage Created2019:11:09 11:54:00Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating320Exposure ProgramNot DefinedF-Numberf/1.8Exposure Time1/33 secFocal Length4.74 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardImage Height3000White BalanceAutoBrightness-0.5 EVImage Width4000Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/1.8Color Space InformationsRGB
>>3565803I'm sure it's not of any value for rendering video
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera ModelRedmi Note 7Camera Softwarelavender-user 9 PKQ1.180904.001 V10.3.6.0.PFGEUXM release-keysEquipment MakeXiaomiSensing MethodUnknownFocal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationRight-Hand, TopImage Created2019:11:09 11:53:47Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating400Exposure ProgramNot DefinedF-Numberf/1.8Exposure Time1/20 secFocal Length4.74 mmFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardImage Height3000White BalanceAutoBrightness-2.8 EVImage Width4000Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/1.8Color Space InformationsRGB
>>3565803Didn't you post this a few times already?
>>3565821Nop. I took the pic yesterday.
>>3554179Dude that thing's a God to edit on.Ryzen 7 processor that will just strangle anything Intel will put out productivity-wise, Niggervideo 1080Ti, dual channel RAM in duplex, SSD's for storage.It even has a very respectable power supply, which is where tons of people cheap out on and it shouldn't be
Check out the lighting for my apartment? Am I a sperg or what?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4032Image Height3024Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3566905 Check out the living room lighting of an autist who is a video-loving sperg.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2188Image Height3215
>>3566905>>3566908you're just going to burn your shit down with undimmed rifa lites as apartment lights
>>3565803does the shutter spin?
Does this now kill super35 cams for all purposes except action scenes?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qHW8uX6ikU
>>3566984no way fag
>>3566984>this $4000 camera that can't record raw internally and that has an average sensor is TOO good...sure
>>3566993>can't record raw internallyIt can't record RAW at all. Don't buy the prores PR crap; that's not RAW video.
>>3566984wake me up when one these prosumer cams has real outputs and timecode that works
>>3567006sleep well mate
>>3566985>>3566991>>3566993>>3566994>all these poormagic fans on suicide watch>4K video at 4:2:2 at 10bit vlog>6K vid at 4:2:0 at 10bit vlog>6x body stabilization
>>3567044>twice the price of a bmp6k and can't record raw internally
>>3566984A challenger appears.>>3567046Please don't mention inferior product that ship broken and have no use in professional cinematography.
>>3567044>>3567046My bad, I assumed you were talking about the s1h.The gh5s is just such a shit camera I didn't even imagine anyone mentioning it...
>>3567050>GH5S bad.I wonder who could hide behind this post...
>>3567046You can fool all day with raw on poormagic cams, but it's colors are so shitty nothing will help you.
>>3566984>>3566993>>3566994>>3567006>>3567044>>3567046>>3567049>>3567050>>3567054>>3567059fuck right off to one of the gear threads to bash your heads in with the rest of the brandfag retards
>>3567090>/vid/>NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST DISCUSS THE SPECS OF DIFFERENT CAMERAS' VIDEO SPECSErr... no?
>>3567092The problem is that /p/ is a majority of gearfag. I wonder where people discuss about movie technics around here and not only what is the best deal to get...
>>3567092>discussion>specs>your shit is broken>no yours is a toy>it's not raw unless I say so>your colors are shit>no uyeah I see
>>3567090>>3567098You only get mad when someone mentions superiority of Panasonic cameras.
Anyone knows of any docu or book on filming in the golden age of hollywood? Cinematography, technology, lighting and the like. Seams like that studios were very secretive regarding everything, including whole process.
>>3567130>>3567098Maybe we should start a 'post body' thing around /p/ so people trolling about gear-bullshit get annoyed by the facy they shitpost more than they work there stuff.>>3567240What the fuck dude. Do you know where you are :)Interested too.
>>3567240I read "Hollywood Lighting from the Silent Era to Film Noir" a couple of years ago and it was pretty good.not sure if it's 100% what you want because even though there's descriptions and examples of lighting systems and setups it's not a guide or not like a very technical handbook but more about the history and approaches that developed along with the personalities in that very fast developing period. also a bit cheesy and nostalgic at times but nontheless a good read.
>>3567240I can't answer your question, but recreating the look from that era is very straight-forward. They just used very harsh, bright lights in a typical 2 or 3 point lighting system.The cameras used are pretty easy to find out about. It was before the invention of super 35, so they were all just full-frame on panavisions or whatever.There was a really low-budget film made in that style recently actually. I can't remember its name, but it was like a romantic drama and looked stunning. It might have had an element of the occult too. The director really struggled with getting her crew to actually believe in her vision.
>>3567469I know of that one, it's mainly based on Alton's Painting with Light. As I remember he got a lot of heat from studios for revealing lighting secrets. Having trouble finding lens information. A lot of soft focus lenses were used, an even that interchangeably, soft for women, sharp for men. I'm having hard time finding anything on precise models of them.
>>3567535>There was a really low-budget film made in that style recently actually. I can't remember its name, but it was like a romantic drama and looked stunning. It might have had an element of the occult too. The director really struggled with getting her crew to actually believe in her vision.That sounds really interesting. Could you try finding the name, please?
>>3567538Found it, The Love Witchhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Love_Witch
>>3567542Oh. I saw that, thought it was absolute garbage as a movie, but it did look pretty nice.Thanks.
>>3567544>thought it was absolute garbage as a movieWell yeah. It was made by a radical feminist who idolises the golden age of hollywood while also hating masculinity (and men in general it seems based off of her twitter).It's like idolising the Dalai Lama but also believing that China did nothing wrong
>>3567547Goden age is up to the 60's with the fall of big studios, and Hay's production code.>>3567535It's not that simple. Film was extremely sensitive to different exposures, so they had to be very careful with exposures. No zoom shots, all was done on trolleys, or fixed rigs. And there's curious amount of fuckups present. Touch of Evil, with it's iconic opening scene has some absolutely atrocious interior lighting, with character shadows ending up on ceilings on few occasions.
>>3567542If you liked that look you should watch thishttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Fabric
Hi. Been around for a while. I want to get into the film industrie. I am based in France and I wish to go around in europe. My ultimate goal is to find a way to be a film director (I know that many people want that).I have got a engineer degree in electronic/computer science and it-s borinf af. Made couple of shorts but nothing amazing.Was thinking as my job contract is finishing next june that I could go for it.First I would like to be take a beginner job so I could see how the industry works.What are the jobs to be into, where will I learn a maximum of things, what people do in cinema that allows them to win some money doing movie stuff? Is video clip a reliable market? What do you do anon?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 7.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2019:11:01 19:24:28Exposure Time1/2500 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessSoft
>>3568137where in france are you?
>>3568137Depends on your direction, if you're more of a visually creative type or the narrative type who's more focused on storytelling. Nowadays everyone wants to work visually and go into videoclips and advertising, so I think that direction is more saturated than trying to work through storytelling. Of course that's also more complex as you have to learn story structure and screenwriting. Generally in Europe directors are also screenwriters, because noone wants to write for someone else for some reason.So tl;dr lots of people do videoclips and you probably won't impress anyone with that, but few people can actually write a screenplay, so that'll probably get you further.t. developing a short film with a producer to apply for gibs
>>3568524Why does it matter?
>>3568680That's the hard way. I like it because the advertising and the purely visual thing is so boring imo.However, how could I approach a producer. I know shit about the financing of a movie. That's why I wanted to find a job in the industry first.
>>3568695You would need to be the assistant that gets coffee. Then find someone to work for and watch and learn as you bring people their coffee or drugs or whatever they want you to bring them.
>>3568682He needs to know if you are going to be paid in baguette or kebab
>>3568695I literally just mailed my short film script plus a little dossier to any production company I could find. One turned out to be interested. Now we have to get all the paperwork together and present it to the authorities in the hope that it'll get a grant.
>>3568822If a production company wants to do it, why do you need a grant. Wouldn’t the production company pay to get it made? Or is it different for documentaries than it is for feature films.
I don't even know where else I would ask something like this, but does anyone here have access to an hour glass (doesn't have to last for a full hour, but at least 10 minutes) and a green screen? I need a video of an hourglass counting down against a greenscreen and I can't find a decent one anywhere.
>>3568954Why don't you just make one yourself?It can't cost more than like 20 bucks to order one off amazon. And they aren't big so you don't need a particularly large green screen. Could even use a black screen and it would be just as effective as long as you light it properly.
>>3568964I don't have the equipment. Just taking a shot in the dark that maybe someone here has the stuff and is willing to do someone a favor.
>>3553232What and why do you film while on shrooms?
>>3568822Where are you located?
>>3568810Red wine would be fine too.
>>3568137Production levels are way smaller in Europe, so I would say going to the film school is an easier route than in US or Canada. Film school will give you something to work on for a portfolio, but more importantly it will give you lots of connections. Also try to find a local Facebook group where people in the industry look for a crew to hire. Apply as a PA and work from there, real budget productions are way different from a no to small budget, so that experience will help you a lot. I recently finished working as a camera trainee on a feature and learned more that I learned working for 8 years in a music video business.
>>3569005Random stuff, I just drag my camera around while tripping and film random naturey stuff
why the fuck hasn't any company cloned the PXL 2000? free market capitalism my shitting asshole
>>3569258whats g about this?
>>3569259its lowfi emo as fuck like crazy serial killer snuff tape shit
>>3569258Crowd fund and make it yourself.
>>3568857Hahaha sweet summer child, in Europe production companies don't invest in production, they get public grant money to pay for it. The only private investment in films comes from TV networks (always coupled to public subsidies ofc) and maybe one of the extremely few commercial production companies (also coupled to subsidies). There's absolutely zero private investment in short films because they don't make money.>>3569017Switzerland
>>3569276It sure is different in America. In America production companies fund the film and rape the maker of all profits that the film makes.The only thing that gets grants is documentaries because their is not a lot of profit in most documentaries.And, very short films, are usually self-produced in America. Unless it’s porn, they because their is alway profit in that. Incels or asspies or trannies or furries will buy it all up.
Have a stupid editing question. I want to do stuff like this, but I can't for the life of me remember what the right term for this was nor do I remember how to do it. Can anyone help?
>>3569666this is a stupid editing question because it has absolutely nothing to do with video editing
>>3569340Yes, there's a big difference between how production works in America and in Europe. However both system are equally shit in their own way, don't fall for the "grass is greener on the other side" meme.In Europe only extremely few people can work consistently in films and they need "day jobs" like working on shitty tv content or commercial video, and that's the best case scenario. The amount of film productions is clearly limited by the amount of public subsidies.In America if you're good you can get work consistently and there's a lot of money being put into production, however you have to be a total sellout and get raped by kike producers.In america you have to make commercial shit according to what idiot producers think will make money.In europe you have to make pretentious pseudo-artsy shit that pleases the idiot apparatchik in charge of giving out the subsidies. The other day I saw an advert for a """""""""""""""""""swiss""""""""""""""""""" film called "Al-Shafaq" directed by Esen Işık and starring Kida Khodr Ramadan, Beren Tuna, Ismail Can Metin, Ahmed Kour Abdo, Serkan Ercan and many other very swiss names. Language, according to IMDB: Turkish | German | Swiss German | Arabic | Kurdish. Now if that doesn't promote SWISS culture I don't know what does!
>>3570093Finding your own film is the way to go in either system. Unless you just want the money, in that case sell out or make shitty art house films or get on your knees and start sucking a lot of dicks ..
>>3570093>In Europe only extremely few people can work consistently in films and they need "day jobs" like working on shitty tv content or commercial video, and that's the best case scenario. The amount of film productions is clearly limited by the amount of public subsidies.this is true >In europe you have to make pretentious pseudo-artsy shit that pleases the idiot apparatchik in charge of giving out the subsidies.this is not true
hello, me and some mates will be travelling through eastern africa. Just looking for any suggestions on really shitty cheap camcorders (which also look like shit) that we could buy a few of and take through our adventure? video quality if worse is probably better, gonna make a lil lofi montage. Cheers!
>>3570411I guess more so things that we'd be okay with getting stolen/wouldn't arouse too much intention.
>>3570151How do you want to make your own film if you can't get financing tho?>>3570380>>In europe you have to make pretentious pseudo-artsy shit that pleases the idiot apparatchik in charge of giving out the subsidies.>this is not truelmao you obviously don't know shit
>>3570432but i literally work 'in the industry' in a European country
>>3570432Do it guerrilla style. Make it w/o paying for anything at all.
>>3570441And I'm a chef at Wendy's and make 200k/yr
>>3570450Possible, but very limited in its possibilities and potential.I made my first two shorts that way, well I put a bit of money in it myself for the bare necessities, but like only a tiny fraction of what a normal production would have cost. The shorts went nowhere, but they did help me as a portfolio to promote myself afterwards, so that's something I guess.
>>3570441translation:>I'm a lowly PA and I don't know shit about how films are produced and financed so I'm just going to make myself seem important by saying "hurr I work in da industry" without explaining what I do or give an argument on why that other anon is wrong
>>3570462I'm actually a feature film director and have had my work shown at a-list festivals but you do you
>>3570465if you don't want to believe me then that's fine and I can't do anything about that, but I have no reason to lie
>>3570441>>3570464By any chance are you in the UK/ROI? Cause they don't really count as Europe.The alternative I could see leading to this argument is you and the other guy having different definitions of "pretentious pseudo-artsy".Like some people would say that a film like Loveless was that just because it's so different to Hollywood, while others would say it definitely wasn't since it's a very genuine realist story that doesn't ever linger more than it needs to. So I wonder if you're really arguing with each other or if this is just a communication issue.
>>3570472not UK in my country at least you can get state funding for anything that isn't straight up mainstream action romcom etc trash that's created to shill products covertly (though there is private funding for that). so basically with the state fund, yes you can make more artistically inclined films, but you can just as easily make more straight 'drama' stuff.I don't consider Loveless to be pretentious and would probably ascribe it to the aforementioned straight 'drama' category
Does anyone have expirience with smallrig products?Just got my BMPCC4k and I'm just trying to think out some ways of binding it to my Steadicam Merlin II. I'm still really comfortable with this stabalizer and it can still take much more weight.It uses special (very thin headed) tripod screws to mount the camera on the opposite side of (pictured) dovetail plate. The issue is that with only one point of contact the camera shifts slightly about the tripod screw (unbalancing the steadicam constantly). I own multiple of these screws as well as the locating pins that came with the device. I'm thinking this is a good opportunity for a smallrig cage, but the cage itself only has one 1/4-20 screw hole on the bottom. What kind of solutions do people do for this? I was looking at cheeseplates but i'm not sure if that's their purpose, and I might end up with different spacing of the holes. The other option is to hold out a few months till I can afford my metabones and just try to screw into that as well. TLDR; how do y'all make sure your camera doesn't shimmy around when you're on a stabalizer
I'm helping my friend record a music video set in a mall. Are there any legal problems with that, if people or brand names are in the background and the video is posted on youtube with ads? Or has anyone had problems recording in public places?
>>3570635Mall's count as private property so, assuming you're in the uk or america, it's illegal to do-so without permission.You'll probably be fine if you do it discreetly but they might ask you to leave and theoretically ban you from the premises.
>>3569729I'm sorry, what would this have to do with? I feel like a dipshit for not knowing this.
>>3570635The important thing with "legal problems" isn't if someone is going to come arrest you at the mall, but whether in 5 years your friend gets noticed and his cool music video gets taken down for any one of a million reasons. Here are some issues off the top of my head based on the words you said. >helping my friendis his ass gonna be on the line? or yours? are you the one filming? you should clearly define who's doing what for who, who gets the final product and who benefits from it. >record a music video set in a mallMalls and office buildings are the number one place you're going to get kicked out of by staff and possibly get banned depending on how fed up they are with people filming there.>Are there any legal problems with thatYes, depending on which country you're in you may or may not be able to video people in the mall without all of their permission. Especially if it's for commercial product which it sounds like youre doing. Some regions even require you have the release for the properties you used on a commercial product. >if people or brand names are in the background Yes, for exactly the reason you said, any brand logos featured in the video could have the video taken down because they dont want it to be used by just anyone. and the video is posted on youtube with ads?It's important to remember how hard it is to get a video monitized these days, just having logos and stores could get it taken off. Even then you have to think about the long term concequences of a video of theirs being DMCAd a year from nowOr has anyone had problems recording in public places?You can get away with a lot in public if you're friendly and you stay out of peoples way, it's what you do with the footage that can get you in trouble.
How hard is making a movie really? I have ADHD and have been telling my self I would for years so haven't attempted but for the people who have hard is it. Even something low budget with a few actors and a camera.
>>3570863Find friend to film, write a small scenario, try to make it, post product the thing and show us the result.You will find if it's hard or not :)
>>3570863I've been making a feature film for the last few months, using the same philosophy for making a short film but just longer.It's exponentially harder just because there's no "down-time". It's non-stop and I'm finding myself editing like a mad man while simultaneously having to cast new actors for the next scene and sort locations.Making a short film is relatively straight forward as long as you plan it out properly. It's an area where experience really helps a lot more than reading a guide
>>3570997>what is pre-production?such an amateur mistake ..
>>3571005Doing pre-production separately in advance would've increased the production time by double roughly, and would've meant counting on people to be reliable.You book an actor for a low wage 4 months in advance? Good chance they drop out when something better-paid comes along or when they realise they fucked up their schedules or twist their ankle or some other bullshit.You book an actor 2 weeks in advance? They're just glad to have a job for a period they thought they wouldn't.Same applies to getting locations.Doing things that far in advance costs more money and requires more organisation - tracking down emails from months ago to find the rep you talked with, finding someone who totally has an apartment you can film in in 6 months. Etc etc.It's not practical unless you're working in a larger team than a one-man band.
>>3568137Join La Fémis or Louis Lumière if you can pass the concours
>>3568137On peut les voir tes courts-métrage ?
Amazon has the Lumix G7 + 14-42mm and 45-150mm lens for $500. Is that my best option in that price range? Or one of the Canon's?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGoogleImage-Specific Properties:
>>3571190Depends whether you ask someone who uses canon cameras or someone who uses panasonics. It's probably worth the price. But you also have to think about things like the lens mount for when you want to upgrade
>>3571190It is, unless you're buying for on scene vloging. Tracking af is non-existent.
I have been recording 24fps videos at 60fps in obs. Is there any benefit to this? Like would i more likely be able to pause and take still frames from it better than if I was recording it at 24fps?
>>3571369No, actually the opposite. I'm assuming obs is an external recorder.Because 24 doesn't divide exactly into 60, it's highly likely that every 3rd frame is a blend of the two frames either side (60/24=2.5).Which means every 3rd frame will be a blurry mess, while the previous two frames will just be the same single frame that you'd get from recording 24p.What makes it worse than just recording is that if you were to then export your 60p video to 24p, your editor would have to interpret those blurry frames since it doesn't know that they are entirely pointless and can just be dropped. This process will therefore make all of your frames slightly blurrier than if you had just recorded at 24p in the first place.It's like upscaling a 2k image to 4k and then back down to 2k.Nb. I have never done this myself, this is just based on what I know from how the tech I use works. inb4 someone tells me this is inaccurate
Need a cam with completely custom frame rate to synch to pc crt monitor. From 60 to around 180. For example it must go exactly 61fps, 71fps, 95fps. Ideally it'd be even 61.1fps, but I know that does not exist.
>>3571437>Need a cam with completely custom frame rate to synch to pc crt monitor. From 60 to around 180. For example it must go exactly 61fps, 71fps, 95fps. Ideally it'd be even 61.1fps, but I know that does not exist.Panasonic GHs can do funky fps recording like 61fps etc.
>>3571525this, gh5 and gh5s can do syncro shutter mode or whatever it's called where you can nail your shutter down to .1 fps increments
>>3571636.1? Ok, that's ideal then. Time to start saving.
>>3571636Do you have any example of the result? I can't get the 0,1fps...
>>3570555dont these usually go on a cage? the p4k cage doesnt move at all unless you mount it wrong>>3571437doesnt the p4k off fps mode do this
>>3572315Plus blackmagic is always updating the firmware so if enough people want to shoot video at 61.1 fps they’ll add a feature update to let them do that.Why would somebody even want to do that?Couldn’t you shoot at 24 fps and change your frame rate in post?What are the benefits of shooting at odd frame rates?
>>3572360Crt monitors have fixed refresh rate that cause flickering when filmed. Actual refresh rate depends on game, software and resolutions used. Point it that you must shoot at exact refresh rate used to get footage out of it.GH5 is ok, but GH5s will be even better since it's using aa filter on sensor. Curvature of monitor will cause moire even with it.
Going to get the €150 25mm for my Lumix G6 :) want to be ready to film the comfy winter nightshopefully a few decent items on sale for black Friday... Any good places to keep an eye on for UK / Ireland?
>>3572530probably nevers1 pretty much is ff g6only jello shutter from here on now
>>3572531Nah, too big and heavy. There will be gh6 in the future. Will need hefty processing power if it's going to be 8k.
>>3572565I'm not ready for a a consumer dilc to have 8k video. And the idea of putting 8k onto a mft sensor seems fucking retarded cause the pixels will be tiny. The gh5 already has shitty noise in its shadows, anything worse would be unusable.
>>3572530When the a7siii releases and singlehandedly revolutionises video production
When is the BMPCC 4K gonna go on sale for $500?
>>3572669When the BMPCC 16k comes out!
Will be buying my first camera in a few weeks, thinking of going with the pocket black magic as it needs to shoot 4k. Better idea to buy a cheaper camera, and spend more on some lenses? Recommendations? Mainly short films and ad work.
>>3549538If you don't care about ProRes recording, what makes the BlackMagic Pocket better than, say, an X-T3?
>>3572743All the XT-3 footage I've seen looks dogshit
Tonight I'm gonna shoot my first scene of my new short. Wish me luck, give me the last sacraments /vid/ :)
>>3572821may there be enough light of beautiful softness and controllable spill and be the audio clear and crisp on every take
I'm finally starting to see the potential for pursuing a more "normal" career & just making nice videos / shorts in my spare time... Long may this feeling last
>>3572867another one bites the dust. good.
>>3572871Yes, less competition means more chance of your YouTube video getting over 10 views
>>3572743Bmp doesn't shoot prores. Do you mean raw?Blackmagic has better quality codecs than any consumer brands at that price range.It's also built for video as opposed to just being able to do a good job on video.But there are strengths and weaknesses. So an x-t3 is almost definitely better for run&gunning or vlogging. Honestly, if you want the nitty gritty, watch some reviews of the cameras.
>>3572872Hey, I have a youtube video with almost 400 views. Don't want to brag or anything but I'm kind of a big deal
>>3572887yes it does shoot prores
>>3572899Sorry, I read that in my head as prores raw. Blackmagic doesn't shoot prores raw.I'm tired, I apologise.The bmp4k only shoots raw or prores. So if you don't care about prores recording, I guess I need to ask what you mean by that?If you mean you won't be shooting prores, then you're only other option is to shoot raw with that camera.If you mean that you don't care about prores' advantages over fuji's codecs, then, in short, you don't care about video quality. There's not really a simpler way to put it then that. If you don't care about recording better quality video, then a camera designed to shoot great video won't have many advantages. It still has the other things like shutter angles, ergonomics, resolution, framerates etcBut the primary reason you'd want a blackmagic is for its image quality.
>>3572843My heart is pounding reading those words. Thanks.
how would you get a zoom similar to camcorders with an interchangeable lens camera?
Bump limit reached, new thread>>3573363>>3573363