[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:CommentScreenshotColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width750Image Height1000
>>3503684But that's a leica.
>>3503684Probably inherited his father's brains.
Have you seen some of his "work"? Utter garbage, wannabe ig thots are better at basic composure than this hack. "So hard to photograph" as if elephants arent fuck huge.
>>3503717ive seen children take better photos with more thought put into them using the dsi camera
>>3503719>>3503718Lmao, post more of these
>>3503718I don't think this is a good photo by any means, but what bothers me is that if this same picture was taken by some famous artsy artist, I'd be considered as a good photo
>>3503684I don't normally make fun of photographers, but this guys appears to be genuinely blind.Another confirmation:>Beckham dated American actress Chloë Grace Moretz.
>>3503684He's nothing remarkable right now at all, just a kid with an interest in photography. Never deserved the Burberry gig, and still doesn't deserve the magazine covers he's still somehow getting to shoot because of his elite family and their connections. He's a kid from the upper class. If you had the opportunity to exploit those connections you would too. Kid's still 20 though and he's only been doing this for a few years. Hopefully he doesn't take the easy way out and trade an opportunity to improve his work for just sitting back and letting mom throw fashion shoots his way.
>>3503723>urbanrawshotsFuck off back to instashit you absolute normal fag you take some of the most normie level instafag photos.>but what bothers me is that if this same picture was taken by some famous artsy artist, I'd be considered as a good photoThe faggot doesn't know how to take a photo, there is absolutely no integrity to this photo. If some "artsy artist" took this photo they would of at least made the composition better and make the outline of the elephant you know.. actually look like and elephant and not some black blob.Absolutely no integrity.
>>3503719Got my oc ty.
>>3503733>Fuck off back to instashit you absolute normal fag you take some of the most normie level instafag photos. lol what you even gonna do about it
>>3503746Call you a basic bitch faggot, faggot
>>3503746Fuck off, namefag. Nobody likes you.
>>3503718I guess Leicas don't have an exposure compensation dial.
>>3503718>>3503719I respect the trolling though.
>if everyone from /p/ combined all of their likes from all of their photos together, it still wouldn't be as many likes as just 1 (one) of this faggot's snapshitsHow does this make you feel?
>>3503765I don't give a shit!
>>3503719when auto mode sets your ss to 1" and you call it out of focus
>>3503765If 1 like = 1 dollar or if i were a dopamine addicted zoomer like >>3503767then maybe I'd give a shit.
>>3503783Found the guy that gets like 5 likes per photos.
>>3503725>Hopefully he doesn't take the easy way out and trade an opportunity to improve his work for just sitting back and letting mom throw fashion shoots his way.But that's exactly what he's doing. Fashion shoots are zero-sum games.
>>3503788Zero actually, but i don't expect some /p/tard zoomer to have functional eyes so it's ok.
>>3503793>refusing to adapt with the timesYour well on your way to yelling at kids to get off your lawn.
>>3503796I will once 1 like = 1 dollar.Till then im happy enough with being a dopamine dealer.
How can /p/ even compete?
>>3503765The thots that like his photo will be dumped by him after one night.
>>3503684Shoulda used full auto
>>3503803It can't. This looks like a portrait taken with a better lens & camera than /p/ usually uses.The Leica user on this image would however fit right in with the worst of /p/.
>>3503765Well I got 6 (You)'s the last time I posted to /rpt/ so that's got to count for something, r-right?
>>3503803Imagine your dad is star athlete that busted his ass his whole life to achieve all that he has. Then you walk outside dressed as pretentious as this asshat thinking that you're somebody because your dad worked hard. I'm not mad that he's rich, but I hate his personality and his unearned self-importance
>>3503718what the fuck
>>3503876here have another
anyone roll trips and I buy it and post all the pages on this board
>>3503937poorfag cope is always halarious to me.Ye must be salt of the earth in order to earn self-assurance and a likeable personality.
>>3503963Cope cope cope faggot you cannot buy talent as you can see in your pics lmfao!!
>>3503937>star athlete >busted his ass his whole lifeHAHAHAHA no.being good at playing games is not busting your ass.
>>3503959That's like ten bux, just fucking do it it'll be funny.
>>3503984Lmao. Says the fat neck beard that thinks it's easy to be an elite level professional athlete. You have no clue how hard it is
>>3504000lol looks like he's gotta do it now
>>3504006yep 44% genetics 45% talent10% luck1% hard work
>>3504006>>3504020I bet you're both no less than 300 lbs.
>>3504020You actually believe this, which is why you're a failure at life. You think it just comes easy, and you don't have to work hard for something hard. Which is also the reason why you've given up, you lie to yourself that it's just natural talent and luck. You're never going to git gud at anything you love doing because you have that mindset
>>3504000>>3503959do it faggot
>>3504000Nice trips, you didn't even expect to get em
>>350402015% concentrated power of will
>>3503765>likes=valueExactly how many of his Insta-likes have translated into meaningful print sales? Not even including le nepotism book.
>>3504000here we go
>>3504169YESTHIS GONNA BE GLORIOUS
>>3504145>likes=valueIn this day and age it literally does. It doesn't apply to him because his celebrity parentage already supersedes his instagram celebrity status. But any other photographers doing those kinds of numbers means they'll be highly sought after by people who want to hire them for their work.I mean, imagine a pair of trust fund zoomers wanting to hire a wedding photographer. If they had the choice of hiring a no name wedding photographer with 30 years of experience who consistently churns out solid work, or hiring fucking Peter McKinnon, who do you think they would rather hire? The answer is Peter McKinnon by the way.Of course this only applies to the upper echelon of instagram photographers with 50k+ followers, so I can understand how /p/ can look at their measly 200 followers and come to the conclusion that instagram followers could never translate to anything of substantial value.
>>3504000Done. Posting soon!
>>3504256based[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image Width3464Image Height3464Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution45 dpiVertical Resolution45 dpiImage Created2019:06:18 15:30:29Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1082Image Height1108
Lets keep this thread alive
>>3504256This is a good anon.
>>3504256looking forward to this
>>3504256Based Anon. Thank you.
>>3504206I'm saying just because a photo has a lot of "likes" doesn't make it universally good or suited to everyones tastes. More often than not yes a popular photographer with many followers has some "merit" but you also have to consider what the target audience or intent with the images is. i.e. Kim K's ass shots get millions of likes but this does not inherently make her a better photographer or artist than the local artist who gets a few thousand per post.
>>3504317Kim Kardashian’s ass is literally a work of art you fucking philistine.
>>3503719I've taken better photos of a dining hall using a 35mm compact camera when I was a child and had no bleeping clue whatsoever, entirely by accident.So I guess this congenital celebrity can at least appeal to "lol i trol u" and only be thrown out on the second glance.
>>3504206>trust fund zoomers>weddingFucking please. Maybe the incel groom but the bride is all about that "experimenting" aka Big Black Cock
>the sunI also admire that of all industries he's trying to make it in he picks photography, and then interns with Rankin, sure he got it through nepotism but it's hardly like a leading london fashion studio like that will be at all easy. the kid could've just gone into 'acting' and made bank that way. wouldn't have had to put up with shit from anyone other than critics either
I cannot imagine how much one might learn starting at basically nothing and interning with an established photographer. It must be an insane crash course.
>>3504371whats a trust fund zoomer?
>>3504399You would think that he would be taught the bare minimum basics within a day of his internship. At least getting shit in a focus. What the fuck is this nigga doing?
>>3504399>>3504436[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width400Image Height168Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3504317since i delved into browsing more art books and following curation blogs, i have learned that a large portion of established photogs have little social media presencefucking leibovitz doesn't have instaneither did half of the "upcoming young artists" list by momaamong my own followings, there are 3 people who only get 1/10ths of likes of a typical lifestyle insta photogs, but I know they reg shoot for very good fashion magsit's strange to see every now and then people mistaking insta as metric of any accuracy, when it's only a bubble for a certain demo, one of many of marketing channels at best
>>3504418Most likely a trust fund zoomer it seems.
>>3504450Arthoes are in bubble of their own. Just because they don't depend on instagram doesn't mean they're representative of photography as a whole.
>>3503718Dat sum full auto?
>>3503684Someone should post a complain on amazon's review:Pages are made of glossy paper, can't be used to wipe ass. 1/5
>>3503803what an absolute faggot
>>3504549Someone should change his diapers.
If he doesn't capitalise then it means it's art
>>3504685It’s just a kid getting into a hobby and having fun.The fact that he gets exposure and gigs and whatnot for being an average joe with a hobby shouldn’t make you mad at the kid. But you should be mad at the fucked up star system and in general the “caste” system (caste defined by wealth and fame), where if you’re in the upper caste you can do pretty much anything regardless of skill or hard work and still end up in far better position than someone working their ass off from a lower caste.Money makes money, and it’s actually the best and most efficient way to make money. That’s all there is to it.
>>3503959“What I see”Holy shit
>>3504763The mans 20 years old, hes not a kid
>>3505346Adulthood happens around 25-30.It's somehow worse than puberty.
Is it really his fault? He is in the position to do anything he wants, and is surrounded by sycophants and others who wont criticize him because of who his parents are. I looked through his book at a bookstore and it is what you would expect of a person raised in that way.
>>3505411>Is it really his fault?Somewhat. Since being rich and famous doesn't inherently stop him from not becoming ignorant. But why bother.
>>3504450>>3504469All I'm really trying to say is nothing should be put on a pedestal over the number of likes it gets.
>>3504256Waiting for OP (and Amazon) to deliver
>>3504685If he got his first camera in 2013 and it was a Fuji, wonder what model it was. X-Pro1 or X-T1?
>>3503733"would of" kys please
>>3503937why isn't he playing football?
>>3503718>So hard to photographHow? They're fucking everywhere in every national park.
>>35038766 rpt (you)s = 100k likes
>>3503959>14 reviews>2.5 starsBahahahaha
>>3506593he's saying that it's too dark and he doesn't know how to photograph it.
>>3506591He did and his dad's status got him into the Arsenal or Manchester's academy but he sucked at it so he quit.
>>3504256So, is this happening?
>>3503937What every Canadian thinks of Justin Trudeau as he talks down to us.
I don’t get why people keep trying to defend his shitty photos.>but anon he’s just a baby trying to get into a hobby No he’s not. He’s 20, he’s a grown ass adult who is trying to make this into a career. If you want to make art professionally, people are going to criticize your work. Especially if you’ve been doing photography since you were 14, had every opportunity to learn from industry professionals, and use the latest and greatest equipment, yet you still haven’t improved your work even a little bit from where you started 6 whole ass years ago.>he’s from a wealthy family, what do you expect?It really seems like he has interests, but the second he realizes that being good at that interest will take some hard work, he either quits or decides he’s fine being mediocre as long as he doesn’t have to work hard. And mommy and daddy don’t try to instill in him a work ethic or sense of pride in what you do.I mean look at Jacques Henri Lartigue. He was from a rich family and started photography at young age too. The difference is, Lartigue actually cared about what he was creating and ended up producing some nice photos because of it. I’m not mad about Lartigue because he took the opportunities he was given and chose to grow and improve. I guess I’m just mad about Brooklyn Beckham because he squanders away all these great opportunities and chooses to stay mediocre. It just seems like a waste.
>https://www.instagram.com/p/BydVCjkFg2h/ >https://www.instagram.com/p/BlqZYGzD1p1/The photos he's taken for magazines seem fine to me? They look like what you'd expect out of a fashion-focused magazine. >>3503718 and >>3503719 are really bad though. Pretentious and garbage..
>>3507457they seem fine probably because others did the lighting already and he's just there to spray the shutterwhile those "art photos" he took on his own look like shit because clearly he doesn't know how to operate a camera beyond auto-focus auto-exposure modei bet he's a lazy ass who took up photography because he thinks it just needs "creativity" and doesn't require learning anything
>>3507090>I guess I’m just mad about Brooklyn Beckham because he squanders away all these great opportunities and chooses to stay mediocre.This.I'm not a great photographer by any means, and I've actually been shooting less time than Beckham, but goddamnit, *I* could have exposed the elephant properly!
>>3507584It is possible he exposed it exactly as he intended?
>>3507586> elephants are hard to photographNope.
>>3504540Full auto film leicas oh boy
>>3504256starting to lose hope here
>>3504438Long time since I saw this meme. Perfect application
>>3507974>arriving july 18-25>its july 19>waaah where is it!This is your mind on digishit. #35mm#filmisnotdead#shootfilm#aesthetics#portra400#cinestill#classicsmag
>>3508130For some reason I thought it should have been delivered by now, my bad.
>>3508306I believe in you OP. Was tempted to have a look at the book online but... Make a new thread when the book turns up. The Amazon reviews are hilarious, I can't hardly wait :)
>>3507457they look like photos from a teen magazine, not from a fashion magazine in 2019
>>3507014I'm still waiting for it to be delivered. Will update asap with a new thread.
>>3503718So as someone who doesn't know how to take pictures. What's the best course of action in this scenario?
>>3508700Get light from the elephant, not from the bright sand. Done.
>>3503756Either true troll, or even better, true madman. I'm actually considering buying it. Kid deserves some cash.
god I wish my parents were famous and rich he must get so much free pussy and I bet they don’t even care that he’s pretty much a loser
>>3508755>LoserHe's out making shit and putting it into the world. That fact alone makes him orders of magnitude less a loser than most everyone who posts here.
>>3508700what is the light sourcewhat is compositionthe subject shouldn't be in the center, is also a general ruleThen you have all the technical aspects.
>>3508775it turns out having rich and famous parents also gets you a free defense squad on image boards
>>3508780He's garbage as a photographer, but that doesn't matter as much in terms of being a loser or not as actually going out and doing shit.
>>3508798that's true, but i doubt he gives a shit if people on 4chan think he's a loser
If he throws away the hipster film box and replaces it with a compact point and shoot, he could make great pictures using his money to travel around the world, discuss.
>>3504138lol underrated comment
>>3507586Even if that's what he intended it's still a really bad photograph.
>>3508896what if hes actually a visionary and subverting all traditional tropes and breaking the rules?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5 (12.0x20100115 [20100115.m.998 2010/01/15:02:00:00 cutoff; m branch]) WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiImage Created2010:06:07 15:31:50Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width544Image Height544
>>3508916Enough people might push for this to become consensus, if it was someone who's actually known. Nobody cares about this guy, though, so not enough spamming on facebook or whatever is gonna happen.
>>3503684the absolute state of leicucks
>>3508777>the subject shouldn't be in the center, is also a general ruleNo, not necessarily. Centering an elephant in the frame could create a great "eye-to-eye" impression I imagine. Its also great for focusing and drawing attention to a single subject.
>>3508916you can't subvert tropes or break rules if you don't know what they are
>>3509002Nigga I can barely see it’s an elephant, much less its eyes