Getting this for cheap instead of a point and shoot. Would it be worth it?
>>3501314sure if the price is right, probably better spec'd than most point and shoots
>>3501314How much ?
250 used. Without lens.
>>3501314Yes, it's surprisingly nice to use.
>>3501314Dad got one for a holiday snapshitter and it's quite good for the money. You can find lenses dirt cheap too because Nikon abandoned the system.
get a c-mount adapter too
I’ve got that camera and a lot of lenses for it. I’m pretty happy with it for what it is. And what it is is a super tiny camera with interchangeable lenses. I’m super pissed that they dropped it, one of the potential upsides to mirrorless was exactly that. I’m getting an X-T3 from Fuji now. It’s not quite as tiny but at least they won’t drop the entire line in a few years.
>>3501342You can get an X-T10 body for that kinda money, or a lower end XA with a decent kit lens.... They'll be a similar size with a bigger sensor.
>>3501342Massively overpriced. I saw a J3 for about 60 USD in Japan and lenses for 40-50 each, and that was at an expensive bloody store that charged 20-30% more than elsewhere for shit. The most expensive J shit there was a J5+lens for 175
>>3501314Pentax Q is better