[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 9 posters in this thread.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]

File: 7751952850944_o.jpg (363 KB, 1875x1242)
363 KB
363 KB JPG
this is how the new ektachrome slide film looks like.
File: missedfocus.jpg (483 KB, 662x530)
483 KB
483 KB JPG
I have some too, from a pro lab that I now understand to not be the destination for E6.

Is dwayne's best for E6?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKI
Camera ModelEZ Controller
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3024
Image Height2005
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2019:05:16 02:53:14
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width662
Image Height530
It's so plain and boring. Old ektachrome is beautiful but this shit is just as bad as portra

Is ektar the only good thing kodak makes...
>this is how the new ektachrome slide film looks like.
This is how the new Ektachrome slide film looks like when you cuck yourself by getting the lab to scan your film
>film shooters in the past: favored low contrast stuff because they knew emulsion is only the base, the final colors and contrast depend on printing in the darkroom
>film shooters now: "halp which stock will instantly make my photos lit sooc (straight out of scan, whatever this means)
mmm smells like vsco plebs in here
holy fuck. they simply destroyed the best film they ever had.

i dont get how they managed to get film to look like pre 2010 digital shit, but they sure did, from the retarded colors to the boring and plain and shit ass everything. kodak is dead to me.
i mean both of those are garbage shit trash ass pictures with no redeeming qualities
File: Velvia100_ (24).jpg (497 KB, 1200x812)
497 KB
497 KB JPG
>It's so plain and boring.
Not really. It's a dull gray day and a dull subject, what did you expect.
Here's another dull gray day and dull subject, this is Velvia (100). You think it's any better?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakePlustek
Camera ModelOpticFilm 8100
Camera SoftwareSilverFast 8.8.0 r15 (Mar 1 2019) 5e078a5 01.03.
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Width1200
Image Height812
It's a daylight balanced film so I'd expect to be best in direct sunlight. My mistake for testing it on a cloudy day lol.

That’s fucked yo
>You think it's any better?
yes, looks better.
>what did you expect.
i expected it to at least look like slide film.
you always come as devils advocate, and you always get your ass handed off to you, you dumbshit giannis.
>daylight balanced
only relevant for white balance, and thats correctible. but that image has soul. film got killed.
new portra is shit. old portra = good.

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.