c+c please. I'm trying to be an abstraction photographer - like fine art stuff.links etc are appreciated as well.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLEICA CAMERA AGCamera ModelLEICA X1Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2019:05:14 20:11:45Exposure Time1/2 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1488Image Height995RenderingCustomWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeLandscapeContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Why would you shoot this at 1/2 second shutter speed? Shits blurry senpai.And if you want feedback, post more than one photo.
kinda cool anon post more
>>3479854you're a dumb piece of shit. MUH SHARPNESS PICTHUH RUININD
>>3479866This isn't even about sharpness, it's about understanding fundamentals.
>>3479867 I'm past the fundamentals, kiddo. is it underexposed? composition shit? subject retarded? bitching about sharpness on a piece like this strongly suggests you literally don't even have a grasp of the fundamentals.
>>3479869This dude has litterally ascended. He is litterally the next stiegletz, why would anybody critique his technique?
>another single image guys CC me xDDDD shitter threadgreatwell here's my CC: take more than one fucking picture
>>3479919Wtf is stiglictz some kind of wannabe newfriend? This is from a series I'm doing on the banality of suburbanity. I'd like some actual c+c please.
>>3480253Crossing my fingers that you're not trolling.The picture is nice but if you want critique for photos that are meant for series, or critique that can point out recurring places that need work, you should post more than one picture.
>scene that is crying out for sharpness>isn't sharp
>>3480260"Sharpness if pretty gay, man"-Harry Cardboard Breadson
>>3480272'Be best'-Melania Trump
>>3480275"backdoor sex"-Stiffy Jobs
So. No c+c and no links or anything constructive? Hey I'm actually sugar, can you please shit on me now???!?!
>>3481176Why don’t you post more images if this is part of a series. Compositionally it’s nice. I would have preferred that the door wasn’t there, as it’s texture isn’t smooth like the wall. But it doesn’t bother me that much.
>>3479825The fact I could tell what this photo was of from a the thumbnail while browsing on my phone makes this a massive fail as far as abstraction goes
The only thing banal in this thread is your taste.