[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/p/ - Photography


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: L1000295.jpg (768 KB, 1488x995)
768 KB
768 KB JPG
c+c please. I'm trying to be an abstraction photographer - like fine art stuff.

links etc are appreciated as well.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeLEICA CAMERA AG
Camera ModelLEICA X1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2019:05:14 20:11:45
Exposure Time1/2 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length24.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1488
Image Height995
RenderingCustom
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeLandscape
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
Why would you shoot this at 1/2 second shutter speed? Shits blurry senpai.

And if you want feedback, post more than one photo.
>>
kinda cool anon post more
>>
>>3479854
you're a dumb piece of shit.

MUH SHARPNESS PICTHUH RUININD
>>
>>3479866

This isn't even about sharpness, it's about understanding fundamentals.
>>
>>3479867
I'm past the fundamentals, kiddo. is it underexposed? composition shit? subject retarded? bitching about sharpness on a piece like this strongly suggests you literally don't even have a grasp of the fundamentals.
>>
>>3479869
This dude has litterally ascended. He is litterally the next stiegletz, why would anybody critique his technique?
>>
>another single image guys CC me xDDDD shitter thread
great
well here's my CC: take more than one fucking picture
>>
>>3479919
Wtf is stiglictz some kind of wannabe newfriend? This is from a series I'm doing on the banality of suburbanity. I'd like some actual c+c please.
>>
>>3480253
Crossing my fingers that you're not trolling.

The picture is nice but if you want critique for photos that are meant for series, or critique that can point out recurring places that need work, you should post more than one picture.
>>
>scene that is crying out for sharpness
>isn't sharp
>>
>>3480260
"Sharpness if pretty gay, man"

-Harry Cardboard Breadson
>>
>>3480272
'Be best'

-Melania Trump
>>
>>3480275
"backdoor sex"

-Stiffy Jobs
>>
So. No c+c and no links or anything constructive?

Hey I'm actually sugar, can you please shit on me now???!?!
>>
>>3481176
Why don’t you post more images if this is part of a series.

Compositionally it’s nice. I would have preferred that the door wasn’t there, as it’s texture isn’t smooth like the wall. But it doesn’t bother me that much.
>>
>>3479825
The fact I could tell what this photo was of from a the thumbnail while browsing on my phone makes this a massive fail as far as abstraction goes
>>
The only thing banal in this thread is your taste.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.