Hey guys.What kind of film Terry Richardson use ?For color and bw
>>3479225I'd be willing to bet he's using Ektar. Just look at that exaggerated color and weird skin tones.Then again I wouldn't be surprised if he's just running UltraMax to emphasize the whole snapshit aesthetic
Pretty sure he just shoots digital these days, and this photo is likely digital.But probably used Kodak Portra.
>>3479857No. Like other anon said, skin tones dont pop like they would with Porta. I would bet he is using Fuji or some other shit
>>3480307r I c o h ic o h[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS2 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)1200 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Created2010:06:22 19:23:57Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length800.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height1494RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeDistant View
>>3479225I sincerely doubt this hack fraud even bothers with film anymore.My money is on some digital point and shoot, why bother putting in effort when cucks will worship you anyway?
>>3480317he has his unique aesthetic and style. you can see his cheap 35mm p&s flash and shoot influence everywhere. but faggots like you screech for no reason
>>3480320Do you think somebody whose entire aesthetic is "I don't give a fuck" is going to bother with film anymore?
>>3480329no one forget their roots anon. and with the old age people start going back to their roots
>>3480309Oh look, a popup flash!
>>3480317anyone with half a brain and has read any of his interview knows that smarphone selfie is the new richardson point and shoottwo sides of the same coin, both with the same philosophy of spontaneity, man himselft likely endorses it tooand there's nothing special about the richardson look too, it's brutal harsh lighting fashion portrait that has been around since the 90sa lot of his stuff isn't even shot with a pns, the shadows clearly tell that it's way off camera flash, sometimes there's two of thembut dumb fanboys like op will screech hurr it must be a contax pns durr ektar portra, because they don't have a clue about lighting