Short and simple:>shots at nightLong exposure, strobes, trails, astro, speedguns, fire, what have you. I would ask that you try to keep the shitflinging to a minimum and shoot, but well, this is /p/.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D810Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern860Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:05:12 13:55:06Exposure Time30 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
well this shit actually has me interested this time, time to actually go outside.fucking love the dark
Not that impressive but it's my first time doing trails
>>3479912I bet the drivers thought you were a cop with a speed camera.
>>3479954Haha possibly, I did have a homeless person stare at me and kept getting close, thought he was gonna run off with it. 3am is a shit time to get trails I guess.
>>3478622Is Deep space stuff accepted here? I started a couple of months back shooting through my telescope lens, here's bodes galaxy and cigar galaxy (M81 & M82)[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeHUAWEICamera ModelCLT-L09Camera SoftwareWindows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3648Image Height2736Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:05:15 20:08:28Exposure Time20 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness0 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo FlashFocal Length3.95 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3648Image Height2736RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3480127>snow on the ground>filename says March 14thThe whole point of the weekly challenge is for you to go out and take a new photo, not to just post one from your archives.
>>3480154My mistake. Didn't realize this was a weekly challenge. That wasn't explicitly mentioned anywhere... For future reference, how do I know that?
>>3480212Nevermind...I'm an idiot and didnt look closely enough at OP's photo.
>>3480214For what it's worth, these threads usually explicitly state that they're weekly challenges. On the plus side, now you've got a reason to go out and take photos.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D810Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.3 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern866Focal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:05:15 21:14:40Exposure Time15 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/5.6Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3480126This would be an amazing picture if it had less exposure and less noise.
>>3480273Ew wtf this is disgusting. What did you run this through snapseed>structure 100
>>3478622First time trying Astro.Need to work on my exposure time I think[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>>3480315>4.8mb>missed focusExposure is the least of your worries anon keep practicing
>>3480303>>structure 100I love when idiots are idiots.
>>3480403Learn to take criticism or shut your fucking crybaby mouth and stop posting here. Your picture is bad and you should feel bad. Fucking idiot
>>3480448>Learn to take criticism or shut your fucking crybaby mouth and stop posting here. Your picture is bad and you should feel bad. Fucking idiotI'm cool with you not liking it.I'm just pointing out that you're an idiot for thinking that I used anything like texture, structure, clarity, or dehaze on that image.It's not my fault you're really bad at something you think you're really good at.
>>3480451You mean to tell me you didn't use any of that and still managed to make the grass and trees look like that? Christ your editing as even worse than I thought dude. Lurk moar
>>3480448>Learn to take criticismI like how you're telling him to learn to take criticism and IN THE VERY SAME POST flipping out about his disagreeing with your criticism as if you're a toddler who's just been told he's not allowed to have a chocolate.
>>3480498Top kek samefagging on an anonymous Nigerian blogging board. What a fucking faggot. Your PICTURES ARE GARBAGE AND YOU ARE A HORRIBLE PHOTOGRAPHER. FACE REALITY FUCK NUTS
>>3480496Negroid, that's basically SOOC. I may have accidentally sharpened it twice (might have left on the sharpening in export), but other than that, I just cropped and played lightly with curves.
>>3480544>samefaggingI have no way to prove I'm not, but I know I'm not, and the guy you're yelling at knows I'm not, and as you say, there's not actually any incentive for him to samefag.So, I mean, if it helps you sleep at night to assume that it's him samefagging, go for it. But it's not. I don't think his photo's that great either, but you're the one acting like an angrier baby.
y'knowit doesn't get dark where I live, I'm going to try to head out in a couple of hours and get some snapshits regardless whether it's dark or not.
>>3480590Technically the subject is "night" not dark, it'd be pretty slick to get a shot where it's light out but with some other proof of it actually being very late.
>>3480273This pic makes me remember of a place I used to party. I like it
>>3480719>fart-doctor-fart.jpg>>3480722>testicles-testicles-ham.jpg*holds up spork*
How can I shoot the ISS going over without star trailsIs this possible without using a trackerWith my current lens I'm limited to 13 second exposures before I get star trailsIs there some way I can use deep sky stacker or another program to stack the stars but keep the trail from the ISS
>>3479910Kinda boring. There's almost some interesting texture to the water, but you've done little to focus attention on that.>>3479912If you're going to do trails, try to do something with them like using them as leading lines to something, to high light an object of interest, or similar.>>3480125Neat. Dunno shit about deep sky to say anything of use.>>3480126This is a more interesting use of trails. I think part of what hampered this image from being a bit better was not being able to get even higher, plus I'm not a big fan of the composition. I would have aimed the camera up a bit and cut off the railing.>>3480127Take new shit, plus what did doing this at night add? Additionally, your composition is weirdly balanced. >>3480273Kinda cool cross in the bush. Should have worked that harder and filled the frame with that.>>3480315Bring a flashlight next time and you can paint in your foreground stuff, or failing that, make sure that the silhouette you are leaving adds to the image in some way and isn't just "black blob" for 1/3 of the frame.>>3480719Remember, shooting architecture is all about being autistic as fuck and obsessing over all the little details. >>3480722Cutting off the sign and that star thing gives this the impression of being just a snapshit. Good idea, marginal execution.>>3480946The composition is as mehish as humanly possible. Being closer to the intersection of that corner to cut down on how the sidewalky area is just dead even for breathing room would help. Also would like to see a shot like this but with a longer shutter to get a bit more motion blur from the people.
>>3478622Taken about a week or so ago.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D750Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2 (Macintosh)PhotographerGlenn C. SilvaMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern948Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution600 dpiVertical Resolution600 dpiImage Created2019:05:09 11:44:15Exposure Time255 secF-Numberf/22.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/22.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4895Image Height3268RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownUnique Image ID1303af82bf434de30000000000000000
>>3482212Your watermark is literal cancer. Just put your name in some normal font (a sans font if you want to be cool and modern, a serif font if you want to be classy) or the company name (I assume that's what ASttE Photo is supposed to be), remove the (c) and the year.Watermarks are just for branding. Nothing more.
>>3482224Actually as a commercial photographer/ photojournalist, anything I'm going to post in a public message board will have this. This is an image used by my editor anyways. So... Also I just lost a good friend to pancreatic cancer stage 4. This watermark comment was inappropriate... But it is 4chan after all. Comments on the photo in general are welcome tho.
>>3482230if you would just read the sticky that says images should be 1000px there would be no issue no one wants to steal your tiny imagealso I could literally just crop out your watermark and have zero effect on the image so whats the point
>>3482232Whatever man. That's why I work for a pretty large media outlet that has people that handle people just like you in the real world. There was no reason for your negativity. I was just adding a picture to the thread. More than I can say you have.
>>3482235[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>3482230>>3482235You're larping as some poor schlub trying to get us to fuck with him.
>>3482230Genuine question. How did you find this place?
>>3482248Glenn didn't. Someone found his pictures and posted them here hoping we'd be a personal army.