Who's your lensfu, /p/? For me it's my SMC Takumar 135 f2.5, I've never enjoyed a lens more. Absolutely gorgeous in every way.
>>3465853For me, it's the fuji 23mm f/1.4
>>3465853For me it's unironically this chinkshit 35/1.7Lives permanently on my a6000. Apparently on tests it's sharper than the sony 35/1.8https://youtube.com/watch?v=SOXhRcp1ICc
smegma is k
Stupid sharp lens[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D5100Camera SoftwareVer.1.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern37638Focal Length (35mm Equiv)57 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2016:01:01 22:35:37Exposure Time1/5 secF-Numberf/22.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating640Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length38.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2464Image Height1632RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used640Image QualityFINEWhite BalanceAUTOFocus ModeMANUALFlash SettingNORMALFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested640Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation0.0 EVLens TypeNikon D SeriesLens Range18.0 - 50.0 mm; f/2.8Shooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations10139
mc rokkor 58mm f1.2
>>3465880thissmegma 85mil is life
Nikon Af-s 80-200mm 2.8 ED requiescat in pace my full metal darling
This cheap piece of shit kit lens has helped me capture some crispy wildlife shots. It's also missed a fuckton with slow or imprecise focus.It's a love hate relationship
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D200Camera SoftwareVer.2.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern984Focal Length (35mm Equiv)300 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2017:10:11 14:17:18White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/200 secF-Numberf/18.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length200.00 mmCommentCOPYRIGHT (Sam Moore)Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2896Image Height1944RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used400Color ModeCOLORImage QualityNORMALWhite Balance5000KImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeAF-SFlash SettingNORMALFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested400Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation0.0 EVTone CompensationAUTOLens TypeNikon G SeriesLens Range18.0 - 200.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6Auto FocusSingle Area, Center Selected, Top FocusedShooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffColor ModeMODE1Lighting TypeCOLOREDNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations52797Image OptimizationCUSTOMSaturation 2AUTO
love this combodo not love the 86mm thread
>>3465853I have loved many a lens, but my one true lensfu was still the Voigtlander 40mm 1.4 MC. She was the one that got away.Sony 55mm f1.8, Sony 90mm f2.8,Leica 50mm f3.5, and Nikkor Ai-S 50mm f1.4 have all been some pretty nice pieces of ass too though.
>>3465954Don't forget it has better weather sealing than most L glass
Biogon 35mm f/2
This might sound dumb to a lot of folks, bit I’m gonna go with my EF-S 24mm pancake. Inexpensive, small, sharp, and not too slow (although not fast either, to be realistic). Second choice for me is probably my 50mm f1.4 MD. Nice, fast piece of glass.
>>3465853For me its the makinon 300mm f4, very soft desaturated rendering, as well as enjoyable to use and look at.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image Width3427Image Height1458Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution238 dpiVertical Resolution238 dpiImage Created2019:04:18 12:43:46Exposure Time1.6 secExposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness-5.2 EVExposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1200Image Height834RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Canon 35mm f/2 LTM ez
>>3465919>>3465921I have this too. I love shooting in low light with it.
>>3466065First fun lens besides the kit lens was a Jupiter 50 1.5. Fucking great lens.
I love the Canon 24-105mm f/4-5.6 IS STM and have 3 of them. Often I bring all with me where having either of those fixed to a focal length with duct tape, often 35mm, 85mm, 105mm. Soon I'll get another for that sweet 50mm as now I favour 85mm a bit more.
>>3465853Contax Zeiss 35-70mm f/3.4
>>3466153i have a really cheap offer for a Carl Zeiss Jena MF 35-70mm f/3.5-4.5 MC Macro Jenazoom is that the same thing and would you recommend i can get it for like 20 bucks
>>3466158Not the same thing.
for me its the Yashinon-DX 1.7 50mm auto its a little bit radioactive, not too much gather and has really beautiful colours because of the thorium coating, is sharp as fuck and is built like a tank, istill kinda get paranoid when im shooting strait into somebodies head>>3466159thanks, ive been eyeing the one ive mentioned for a month now for its macro capabilities but i think ill pass cuz there aint enough reviews online
Zeiss Flektogon 35mm f/2.4
Sigma 16mm f/1.4 on my a6000, its replaced the kit 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 that came with it. I figured theres nothing I can zoom onto that I can't walk towards. Only thing I wish I'd done befotr is research if the lens had inbuilt stab. or not which it didn't, as the a6000 itself does not.
lovely little lens
>>3466181You can usually compensate by opening up the aperture and achieve shorter shutter speed.
>>3466094>soviet glass on a Leicawowe
>>3466253The J8 is not any worse than an original Sonnar.
Ricoh 18.3mm f/2.8
Industar 61 2,8/50still want a Jupiter 9 but those are a bit too expensive for my taste.
105mm 2.4 6x7
>>3465853Nikkor 80-200mm f2.8D EDI use it for almost everything, especially portraits.Although sadly having to send it in for repair.
>>3466253Okay, so, you can see a lot of examples of my photography around the board. Most of the recent ones have been taken with the Leica and either an Industar or the Jupiter. Do you look at those photos and think “the only thing wrong with these photos is that they are not Leica-glass sharp”?
>>3466094Based commieglass, I'm building a FED-2 system again and scored one of these from /p/ years ago when we had giveaway threads where anons just gave shit they weren't using away for free. If you did that now you would get doxxed.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D700Camera SoftwareVer.1.02PhotographerVlad Nevynny 2013Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern806Focal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2017:06:25 15:34:44Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/9.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/9.0Exposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.63 mMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length105.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationHighSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknown
As shit as it is, it's the lens I've used by far the most, since it's compact. It's not my favorite and I'm going to ditch her, but I guess that's pretty much my wife until the divorce is settled.That said, I took pictures I like better with it than with my Sony full frame equivalent 28-70mm kit lens, so I guess it's alright as far as kit lenses go.
>>3466567Stupid idiot, forgetting the picture.
>>3465853Currently, the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8It mostly stays on my camera as my general walk around lens. Feels good, man.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-G85Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.8Image-Specific Properties:Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/3.8ISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/3.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length32.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAuto
Meyer 3.5/80 Primotar. Lacking a functional Pentacon Six body, I use it with a Minolta shift adapter. Sharp as tack and looks sexy.
I can’t keep my hands off my Voigtlander 15mm F4.5 Super Wide Heliar.>>3466222Gilfu.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7SCamera SoftwareCapture One 9 MacintoshMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.5Focal Length (35mm Equiv)15 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness9.1 EVExposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length15.00 mmImage Width1368Image Height2048RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastSoftSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>3465853I got the bayonet version of this, still haven't used it much. Do these differ a lot?
I have the 18-70 Nikon kit lens off my old D70 permanently on my D3300. I have other glass, some with stabilisation, but none as sharp and versatile.
I cant believe this is my most used lens.
God I wish it were mine irl
>>3466640This lens is pretty overrated. The 50 Lux is much better in all regards, except for speed. When was the last you thought you had to shoot at such low light that you couldn't pump the iso one stop?Also, it weights around 700g. Have fun dragging this thing around a whole day. The whole point of shooting M is its size/weight and portability.
>>3466636I can, shooting ultrawides is the crack cocaine hit of photography.
>>3465857I'm thinking of getting rid of mine and getting the f2 version, and the 50mm.
>>3465853My baby[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G950U1Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:04:19 20:52:22Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/1.7Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating143Lens Aperturef/1.7Brightness0.7 EVExposure Bias-0.7 EVSubject DistanceInfinityMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.25 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2642Image Height2110RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
I love the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 II IS and have 2 of them. Often I bring all with me where having either of those attached on another camera, often 5D4 and 30V. Soon I'll get another for that sweet 6D as now I favour the 5D4 a bit more.
>>3466640It's an interesting lens just to know exists but not really good for shooting.weight isn't much of an issue as >>3466653 but he is pretty much right about the rest. The lens does impede into the finder which is really annoying. If it's a shelf piece, great! It gives you a lot of bragging rights.If you look around to see what shooters actually use, few people shoot the Noct or the Lux. I think you'll find the Cron is the lens of choice among people who use their Leicas and don't just talk about them.
>>3466698The Cron is just an amazing lens. Small and light compared to Noctilux and Summilux. Best thing about the Cron is that it's sharp wide open and renders beautifully. Of course you can stop down the Lux, but that defeats its point.
>>3466663I haven't use the 23mm f/2, but i did own the 35mm f/2 and didn't like it.
>>3466698There's two problems with the Leitz f/0.95, besides its blistering price. The first is that even f/1.4 is bloody near impossible to focus closer than 1.5m with a rangefinder. The second is that at and after f/1.4, oriental substitutes for the Noctilux are like 85-95% as good at 10% the price; so why would one own a Noctilux, let alone use one outside of a studio or otherwise controlled environment?Also, lulzy viewfinder blockage. My Nokton 50mm f/1.1 gets so very very close to the RF spot as well. But dem borks, and the f/1.5 is actually more expensive...
fuji 35f2 is bae
I just found an old lense my grandpa (RIP) used to shoot with.It's a Pentacon 2.8/135 with slight fungus.Tested it on a 24 megapixel crop sensor to see how sharp it actualy is, here the results of a plane 400m away:[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 2000DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Express (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:04:19 17:57:04Exposure Time1/2000 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
I'm pretty pleased with the results, probably going to clean it and hope it gets even better.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 2000DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Express (Android)Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:04:19 16:43:08Exposure Time1/2000 secExposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3466673I though that was a lens on a phone
>>3466734Loved that lens. Was my fave while i had it.
>>3466758I'm sure it is :^)
>>3466758>I though that was a lens on a phoneThat's the joke.
This little lens is great, everybody slobbers all over the AI-S version but this one is almost as good for a fraction of the price. And 28mm on aps-c is so comfy.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T1Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)42 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:04:20 10:41:46Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness-2.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length28.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1366Image Height911RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>3465875lOL muh sharpness.As if sharpness were the only important parameter.
It's just magic
>>3467100>And 28mm on aps-c is so 35mmFTFY.
>>3467299are you saying that 35mm is bad?I'm more a 85mm guy myself but 35mm is perfect for just casual snapping and the fact that phones use 28mm equivalents piss me off
>>3467302>are you saying that 35mm is bad?Not at all. Just pointing out that the 28mm on a DSLR is the same as 35mm on a full-sized sensor or SLR. I actually use a 35mm on my DSLR as a prime as this is the equivalent of the old "natural" 50mm most film SLRs came with. I don't use a phone camera and my phone doesn't have one, for reasons.
>>3467299You're trolling me, right? 42mm is totally different from 35mm.For me 35 feels too wide and unfocused but 42mm is tight, feels natural, and isn't a bit claustrophobic like 50mm can be.
I've used a lot of 85mm lenses. This one is just beautiful.
>>346729928mm on APS-C is equivalent to 42 (or 45 on Canon). Maybe you were thinking 24mm? Or APS-H?
>>3465853I've lately been shooting the hell out of my 85mm 1.8. it's nothing magical, but I find I really like short tele.
>>3467679>You're trolling me, right? 42mm is totally different from 35mm.7mm of focal length in the normal range isn't "totally different".
>>3467746Nope, haven't even owned a zoom in years. Alrighty, if you're shooting on m43, sure there's an almost large difference between the two, but no 7mm of focal length just doesn't make that big of a difference with normals.
Just started with photography few months ago, I find the kit lens kinda not sharp .. 18-55 mm f/3.5 . It's the lens that come with the Nikon d3500. I was thinking of buying the cheap Nikon 35mm f1.8, would a prime lens usually be sharper than a zoom lens?
>>3467756A broken bottle from a back alley is sharper than most kit lenses. But yeah, a super common first prime lens is a 50mm 1.8. 35s are fun, as are 40mm pancakes.
I am so fucking close to buying this shitS+++ grade stabilization and extremely good wide aperture sharpness and performance for $350
>>3467758came here to post this, have only owned it for a little while but i'm very happy with it
>>3467759care to give me a small review?based on what I'm seeing from samples and people's experiences it seems so good
>>3465880was thinking about grabbing their 18-35 1.8 as a kit lens upgrade
>>3467757I like 35mm for its wider view though, 50mm seems like I can't take nice landscapes with it.Would the 35mm f1.8 be sharper than the kit lens? Also I guess I need to look for lens with AF-P or AF-S since my camera doesn't have a autofocus motor right?
>>3467761build quality feels great, like even the front/back caps feel of higher quality than my other lenses, focus ring is nice and smooth too. the 1.8 and vc combo is fucking awesome for low light handheld shooting (pic related shot at night time). nice performance wide open too, with the only real shortcoming being a bit of fringing, but 2 seconds with the sliders in camera raw takes care of that pretty well[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS M5Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4872Image Height3184Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2019:04:21 01:47:45Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias-1/3 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length45.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2000Image Height1307RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>3467770thank youI'm sold
Just posting again this time a pic of my two girls
>>3469271Your macro is weak, old man
I would like to thank ken rockwell and ken "fat fuck" wheeler for letting me know how fucking sharp and contrasty this tiny and cheap lens is.
>>3466663Keep the 1.4 and get the 50 f2.
>>3465853An old Cosinon 55mm f1.2At 1.2 it has a terrible glow and is super soft. At f2 and higher, you could cut a diamond with how sharp it is stopped down.Definitely my favorite so far.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution0 dpVertical Resolution0 dpColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width500Image Height500
>>3469271>>3469278Plebs.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution96 dpiVertical Resolution96 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width450Image Height450Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3469295and the the 35mm is fucking AESTHETIC[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width666Image Height490Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3467764Not him, I started with a d3300 a couple of years ago, and the 35mm 1.8 is my favorite. I usually carry that and the 55-200 kit because I'm cheap. You want af-s.
Shitty old sigma super wide II 24mm 2,8 'macro' left best memories, as it turns out.
>>3469295bestmacro[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGooglePhotographerPicasaImage-Specific Properties:Image Width811Image Height1108
>>3469295>comparing walkaround zooms with good macro capability to dedicated macro primesThe ancient meme ghost of George Costanza seriously hopes you don't do this
Nikon 135mm DC
>>3469296Most useless dof scale I've ever seen.
I like my Zuiko glasses very much. Especially the 100 mm F2 and the 50 mm F2 macro. Also the 21 mm F3.5 is very nice. Pic was shot with the 100 mm on Provia.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNikonCamera ModelLS-9000Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution970 dpiVertical Resolution970 dpiImage Created2019:04:26 21:50:24
>>3470207[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNikonCamera ModelLS-9000Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution970 dpiVertical Resolution970 dpiImage Created2019:04:26 22:08:09
>>3470207Nice posts. You got any more?
>>3470216yes, this is zeiss planar 80mm/f2.8[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2019:04:26 22:36:53
>>3470225[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2019:04:26 22:41:35
>>3466734Better than the f1.4?I'm thinking of picking up a fuji 35mm, but at 'only' f2 how much wider (and what effect) is it over the kit at the same length?
>>3467749the lower the focal length, the greater the difference between each mm of difference.35~40 is still a big difference. it's not until you get to 55+ that the difference diminishes significantly, note the big jump in focal lengths offered past the 50s
>>3467289yes sharp lense is irrelevant as we can do cool instagram style oversharpening in photoshop right after we push vibrance slider to the max and contrast slider halfway the maximum
>>3466347This one, it's favorite fov for my favorite crop, and it's very smooth.
I love the Canon Extender EF 2x III and have 2 of them. Often I bring all with me where having either of those on different cameras. Soon I'll get another for that sweet Canon EOS M5 as now I favour dslr a bit more.
>>3466604w2c minolta sr mount shift adapter
>Olympus F-mount 20mm f3.5Not super common, can be expensive, but also the only dedicated ~28mm equivalent half-frame lens.>Pentax 6x7 45mm f4My only lens this wide so far. A lot of fun to shoot, and the prints/scans look great.
The Laowa 100mm 2:1 macro whenever it finally comes out.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width225Image Height350Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>3465853Are those radioactive too or is only with the wider fast lenses? It's quite fast for old 135mm so it could be treated with who knows what.Currently I have Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135 3.5 and I have been using it for the compression and isolation effect on subjects. Just walk further away.
Rented this baby for a weekend once, like most of the women, way off my budget to actually own one, but holy hell it was lovely weekend...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width800Image Height491
>>3466409Any lenses you would recommend? Building a FED-1(g) system here.
>>347282435mm Biogon copy and 50/2, collapsible if you can find it
Just ordered it
>>3466409I was about to buy this for my D7100 but i ended up buying a Voigtlander 58mm 1.4 SL II
>>3467756Actually, that kit lens is pretty fucking sharp mate. Look up some reviews. For Instagram it will do its job very well.
>>3467764Every photographer should own a 50mm and a 35 mm.
>>3469283Ken fat fuck wheeler sold me on that lens. I love it, its fucking amazing.
>>3470229Which version of the planar is this?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K100DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 MacintoshPhotographerHong-Viet LUONGSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:12:21 20:41:37Exposure Time1/8 secExposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/6.7Exposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastHardSaturationNormalSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeMacro
Nikkor-P 105mm f 2.5, in love with this lens. Sharp, fast and can sometimes produce some *swirly bokeh* for all you hipsters out there
>>3473360A bit of that bokeh swirl
>>3473360>>3473373Wrong image ffs
>>3466362i found one for sale for 150$, it wold within minutes and i was too lateit still hurts to this day, fuck the faggot who bought it
>>3465853[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS5.1 WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1499Image Height998Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2013:12:10 11:58:48Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width620Image Height413
>>3474047as if you own these, lmao
Quality thread, guys! Have a bump!>>3466099>>3466692>>3471266[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark IVCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 7.5 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2019:05:12 13:30:01Exposure Time1/8 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePartialFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSaturationNormalSharpnessHard
>>3478472Btw. the Canon 24-105mm f/4-5.6 IS STM on the left is fixed to approx. 65mm to result in 105mm in respect of the 1.6 crop of the M5. The retracted lens has not been used for several weeks now.. The one used for this shot is fixed to 50mm, though.
i bought a used a canon 6d and then a used 85mm f/1.8 and the 50mm f/1.8 ii. never owned a camera before this week. should i keep going with this theme and get a 24mm prime?