This is a thread to comment on stupid things people do to cars.>air suspension>shaved door handles>Vatozone gauges>'90s interior swapsWhat pisses you off most, /o/?
>'90s interior swaps
>>20819447Shaved door handles, because they're surprisingly hard to reverse.
>>20819447>waaah I don't like what other people do to their personal property>I dont like that other human being have their own personal preferences and life choices>lets all make fun of it>im a closet communist and like ordering people what to do or thinkInsufferable bus rider. As if you can even afford the new Supra anyway. An absolute scumbag or a child.
>>208194692/2Yes, it's the same car
>>20819447You sound like you're jealous because you're too poor to build a classic show car
>>20819447Any car with a 350 and flowmasters. Could you have any less of an independent thought?
>>20819594"LS Nation! LS swap the world!"
>>20819612I hate those faggots.
>>20819551No amount of money will make shaving the door handles on a '63 Lincoln cool. It's literally only cool because of its doors.
>>20819454dumb things are dumb
>>20819648Is that what the car in the OP is?
>>20819473New edge interior, auto, and fucking mach 1 seats? There is probably a fucking 4 cylinder under the hood to square it all off. I'm triggered and I own a fucking new edge mustang.
DRIVES LIKE A MODERN CAR
>>20819692Look at the doors and window pillars.
>>20819663Looks like it.
>>20819473>>20819477>>20819485>>20819489>>20819497>>20819501>>20819506>>20819713>>20819732This shit is pure garbage
What the fuck are boomers doing?
>>20819779Not dying fast enough. >>20819756Based
Just wanted you guys to see this one.This was done by Mercedes in house.
>>20819756I don't get this. If cars really were better "back in your day" why would you want to take the shittiest part of new cars and add them to old cars. I get engine swaps. Old engines were shit. This shit makes no sense.
>>20819497This one isnt that bad
What the fuck are people thinking?Are they fucking thinking at all?
>>20819889It looks "generic '80s" and is the best of the bunch, but stock looks better.
>>20819447This shit.The wheels/lift is bad enough.Then the advertising as style motif.
>>20819657Glad you're finally recognizing your mental deficiencies.
>>20819855Nice, fitting dubs. The 300SL gullwing is my dream car. This kills me.
Hid bulbs in non projector housings is pure automotive aids.
>>20819923Put them on steelies with fat sidewall tires and a duckwing spoiler and you'd get me fucking going man
>>20820112i've never understood why more people don't do NASCAR-style builds to cars like the buick regal. it's a super neat style
>>20820126I can smell the stale beer from here. I'm oddly OK with this.
>>20819875I don’t even know, old interiors had style and personality to them, modern interiors while objectively better are just plain ugly and boring in comparison.
>>20820164It's like shaving the door handles on a car, but leaving the rest of the chrome trim. It's a stupid amount of work to make things more complicated and adds nothing.
That fucking shit mexicans do where they put in so many spacers that the wheels protrude from the car by a couple inches
>>20819489No real loss there
>>20819447>>20819648>>20820173Why do you hate shaving door handles so much OP. I'll admit like you said it's a bit stupid if people don't remove trim as well, but the cars people do this on are generally show cars that I doubt you'd want to buy anyway, if you could afford them which you probably couldn't.The 90's interior shit is absolutely disgusting though, I'll give you that.
>>20819447>air suspensionthis isn't stupid. with air ride i can drag the bumpers down the boulevard during a cruise and pop up to get over a speed bump. Not worrying about scraping on speed bumps priceless.
>>20819923It's called a donk, you uncultured swine.
>>20820222It's a personal thing, as 99% of the cars without door handles retain chrome trim or add extra bits; most notably that boomer fake spotlight.>>20820227Why do you want your car to look like it has a broken suspension? Is $10k worth being able to simulate blown shocks when you park? I bet you don't even have a car with it.
>>20820257not him but I only paid like half that and yeah it's mostly for going low but still having a nice ride.
none of them because i'm not a retard who screeches autistically about other people liking different things
>>20820289I don't get it. I have $10k in my motor/trans and it seems a waste with good shocks and springs.
>>20820385personally speaking I have another car to go fast in because I like that just as much, my daily driver is bagged, but otherwise it's just different strokes for different folks I guess.
>>20819501>>20819506honestly im kind of ok with this, ive always liked the 1972-1973 Mustang Mach 1's but the interiors are classic 70s garbage with ergonomics straight out of the Soviet Union. if you could fit a 2011+ facelift S197 interior in there, go for it, it will be a complete improvement (as long as they retain the fold down rear seat deck).
>>20819447I think air suspension's neat. Obviously superior to stancefags because I can drive at a reasonable height and then drop it down when I'm parked. Would love to have a 72 continental on airbags.
>Landau topsToday I saw a white Town Car with a navy blue fabric roof. Utterly tasteless.
>>20821560>thisIt's the proper way to stance a car
>>20821654i always see these in nj. they are always toyotas and always owned by indians.
>>20820075i always give these a 5-second flash of my rigid industries 50.000 lumen LED bar
>>20820126daytonaaaalets go away