[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/o/ - Auto


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: FB_IMG_1531365121853.jpg (52 KB, 960x410)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
This is a thread to comment on stupid things people do to cars.
>air suspension
>shaved door handles
>Vatozone gauges
>'90s interior swaps
What pisses you off most, /o/?
>>
>'90s interior swaps
>>
>>20819447
Shaved door handles, because they're surprisingly hard to reverse.
>>
File: Stinky-People.jpg (29 KB, 510x399)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>>20819447
>waaah I don't like what other people do to their personal property
>I dont like that other human being have their own personal preferences and life choices
>lets all make fun of it
>im a closet communist and like ordering people what to do or think

Insufferable bus rider. As if you can even afford the new Supra anyway. An absolute scumbag or a child.
>>
>>20819449
1/2
>>
File: 3711444756_3924b4e55e_b.jpg (266 KB, 1024x768)
266 KB
266 KB JPG
>>20819469
2/2
Yes, it's the same car
>>
File: FB_IMG_1541458435171.jpg (60 KB, 960x540)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
'66 Lincoln
>>
File: IMG_1021.jpg (80 KB, 700x525)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
1956 Cadillac
>>
'67 Camaro
>>
1951 Kaiser
>>
1971 Mustang
>>
1969 Mustang
>>
>>20819447
You sound like you're jealous because you're too poor to build a classic show car
>>
>>20819485
jesus wept
>>
>>20819447
Any car with a 350 and flowmasters. Could you have any less of an independent thought?
>>
>>20819594
"LS Nation! LS swap the world!"
>>
>>20819612
I hate those faggots.
>>
>>20819551
No amount of money will make shaving the door handles on a '63 Lincoln cool. It's literally only cool because of its doors.
>>
>>20819454
dumb things are dumb
>>
>>20819648
Is that what the car in the OP is?
>>
>>20819473
New edge interior, auto, and fucking mach 1 seats? There is probably a fucking 4 cylinder under the hood to square it all off. I'm triggered and I own a fucking new edge mustang.
>>
DRIVES LIKE A MODERN CAR
>>
>>20819473
BASED
>>
>>20819485
youre lying
>>
>>20819692
Look at the doors and window pillars.
>>
>>20819698
wow
>>
File: 4-1510952267515.jpg (72 KB, 832x468)
72 KB
72 KB JPG
>>20819692
I wish.
https://motonetworks.com/1948-madame-v-cadillac-not-every-day-restomod/amp/?usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D
>>
>>20819713
https://www.motorious.com/articles/news/344693/this-1957-cadillac-eldorado-restomod-is-a-showstopper/amp?usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D
>>
File: 1.jpg (64 KB, 533x400)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
>>20819663
Looks like it.
>>
>>20819737
That's retarded.
>>
>>20819473
>>20819477
>>20819485
>>20819489
>>20819497
>>20819501
>>20819506
>>20819713
>>20819732
This shit is pure garbage
>>
What the fuck are boomers doing?
>>
>>20819779
Not dying fast enough.
>>20819756
Based
>>
Just wanted you guys to see this one.
This was done by Mercedes in house.
>>
>>20819756
I don't get this. If cars really were better "back in your day" why would you want to take the shittiest part of new cars and add them to old cars. I get engine swaps. Old engines were shit. This shit makes no sense.
>>
>>20819855
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeed!
>>
>>20819497
This one isnt that bad
>>
File: Holy.jpg (17 KB, 480x448)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
What the fuck are people thinking?
Are they fucking thinking at all?
>>
>>20819889
It looks "generic '80s" and is the best of the bunch, but stock looks better.
>>
File: donk_newports.jpg (85 KB, 600x452)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
>>20819447
This shit.
The wheels/lift is bad enough.
Then the advertising as style motif.
>>
>>20819657
Glad you're finally recognizing your mental deficiencies.
>>
>>20819855
Nice, fitting dubs. The 300SL gullwing is my dream car. This kills me.
>>
Hid bulbs in non projector housings is pure automotive aids.
>>
>>20819923
Put them on steelies with fat sidewall tires and a duckwing spoiler and you'd get me fucking going man
>>
>>20820112
i've never understood why more people don't do NASCAR-style builds to cars like the buick regal. it's a super neat style
>>
>>20820126
I can smell the stale beer from here. I'm oddly OK with this.
>>
>>20819875
I don’t even know, old interiors had style and personality to them, modern interiors while objectively better are just plain ugly and boring in comparison.
>>
>>20820164
It's like shaving the door handles on a car, but leaving the rest of the chrome trim. It's a stupid amount of work to make things more complicated and adds nothing.
>>
That fucking shit mexicans do where they put in so many spacers that the wheels protrude from the car by a couple inches
>>
>>20819489
No real loss there
>>
>>20819447
>>20819648
>>20820173
Why do you hate shaving door handles so much OP. I'll admit like you said it's a bit stupid if people don't remove trim as well, but the cars people do this on are generally show cars that I doubt you'd want to buy anyway, if you could afford them which you probably couldn't.
The 90's interior shit is absolutely disgusting though, I'll give you that.
>>
>>20819447
>air suspension
this isn't stupid. with air ride i can drag the bumpers down the boulevard during a cruise and pop up to get over a speed bump. Not worrying about scraping on speed bumps priceless.
>>
>>20819923
It's called a donk, you uncultured swine.
>>
>>20820222
It's a personal thing, as 99% of the cars without door handles retain chrome trim or add extra bits; most notably that boomer fake spotlight.

>>20820227
Why do you want your car to look like it has a broken suspension? Is $10k worth being able to simulate blown shocks when you park? I bet you don't even have a car with it.
>>
File: Earl.png (880 KB, 739x1110)
880 KB
880 KB PNG
>>20820239
>donk
>culture
>>
>>20820257
not him but I only paid like half that and yeah it's mostly for going low but still having a nice ride.
>>
none of them because i'm not a retard who screeches autistically about other people liking different things
>>
>>20820289
I don't get it. I have $10k in my motor/trans and it seems a waste with good shocks and springs.
>>
>>20820385
personally speaking I have another car to go fast in because I like that just as much, my daily driver is bagged, but otherwise it's just different strokes for different folks I guess.
>>
File: 1972_00049_05.jpg (37 KB, 640x480)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>>20819501
>>20819506
honestly im kind of ok with this, ive always liked the 1972-1973 Mustang Mach 1's but the interiors are classic 70s garbage with ergonomics straight out of the Soviet Union. if you could fit a 2011+ facelift S197 interior in there, go for it, it will be a complete improvement (as long as they retain the fold down rear seat deck).
>>
>>20819447
I think air suspension's neat. Obviously superior to stancefags because I can drive at a reasonable height and then drop it down when I'm parked. Would love to have a 72 continental on airbags.
>>
File: landau-camry.jpg (37 KB, 620x414)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>Landau tops

Today I saw a white Town Car with a navy blue fabric roof. Utterly tasteless.
>>
>>20821560
>this

It's the proper way to stance a car
>>
>>20819473
saved
>>
>>20821654
i always see these in nj. they are always toyotas and always owned by indians.
>>
>>20820075
i always give these a 5-second flash of my rigid industries 50.000 lumen LED bar
>>
>>20820126
daytonaaaa
lets go away
>>
File: images (1).jpg (10 KB, 227x222)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>cckckkkkkttktktkttkkccccckktktktktkssshhshshslkkckct
>>
>>20820239
N



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.