[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/o/ - Auto


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



APOLOGIZE
>>
>>
MOPF
>>
File: 1533786521862.png (1.04 MB, 1029x1000)
1.04 MB
1.04 MB PNG
>>20385308
nice ride there bud.....
>>
MOPF has always been my favorite thing
>>
File: 4BvSmW.gif (3.21 MB, 400x300)
3.21 MB
3.21 MB GIF
>>20385308
So solly
>>
>>20385308
Looks like shit.
>>
>those wheel arches
ew
>>
File: chargers.jpg (36 KB, 720x434)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
surprisingly not that pifgat
>>
File: 1522131341322.jpg (76 KB, 500x500)
76 KB
76 KB JPG
>>20385308
>we bullitt now
>>
>>20385308
looks cool but I'm not sure what I'm apologizing for
>>
>>20385308
yuck city
>>
>>20385410
>>20385439
>>20385564
great post there my fellow hip contrarians
>>
MOPAR or no car
>>
File: mopargigachad.png (235 KB, 701x753)
235 KB
235 KB PNG
>>20385308
now that's a car I can drive
>>
>>20385570
sorry about your bad taste
>>
>>20385570
I don't think it's a contrarian opinion to think that abomination is ugly.
>>
>>20385553
Side by side with an origonal relly highlights how shit the restomod looks
>>
>>20385308
Looks like a charger effed a camaro.
>>
>>20385308
>American cars are pigf-

>3200lbs
>1200hp
>>
>>20385853
Dyno queens are shit too enjoy the cant turn shitboat.
>>
>>20385853
>entirely custom chassis and carbon fiber body
>still 3,200

PIGFAT
>>
>>20385895
pretty light for a muscle car
>>
>>20385895
Chargers are full sized cars. They're huge.
>>
>>20385919
Sure, but still pretty bad all things considering.
>>
>>20385934
But they're fun though
>>
>>20385553
that does make the proportions a little weird
taller car on the right looks narrower than it is
>>
>>20385938
Fun is subjective so it doesn't mean anything. I think 90's Civics are more fun than big block muscle cars.
>>
>>20385946
all cars are fun desu and muscle cars definitely fill a certain type of fun
>>
>>20385938
The cope
>>
>>20385308
this'd be pretty sweet if those rims weren't so FUCKOFF HUGE
>>
>>20386787
Fuck your taste is terribad.
>>
>>20386787
t. boomer who thinks nothing should be made over 15"
>>
>>20386787
Yup..and it has a 4x4 stance
>>
>>20386787
well it does have 1000hp
>>
File: 53253532532.jpg (23 KB, 250x228)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>20385308

>those wheels
>>
Apart from the rims it really doesn’t look THAT bad. I’m not a big mopar person but it’s not offensive to the eyes
>>
>>20387012
Everything they added/took away made it look worse.
>>
Remove the hood scoop, the wheel arches, and place in narrower tires and this concept is niceeeee.
>>
>>20385308
my hard melted when I saw it
then my ears heard that 1000hp 7L V8 with a 3L supercharger and I basically came
the sound of a low reving big displaced V8 is magical.
The looks are incredible for me as a muscle car lover pic related is the dream
(despite the fact that I would have preferred de '69 tail lights instead of what they did but anyway)

Fact is that if Dodge is able to pass pedestrian safety with this squared shape the vintage looking charger is going to sell like crazy
>>
>>20387114
the namefag is right on this one
>>
>>20387114
It has 1,000 hp it needs wide ass fuck tires and I'm damn sure that scoop is functional
>>
What car is the ideal for someone who is looking for something that is very small, that is eco friendly and does not contaminate, that has a friendly appearance and Nothing Rude and that very easy to drive.
>>
>>20386787
Agreed. Muscle should have sidewalls.
>>
>>20389305
>it has to look retarded for the retarded amount of power
k
>>
>>20389600
It's more
>it has to look retarded so we have excuses why it won't preform like we say it does and gets beaten by a luxury sedan.
>>
File: swagon.jpg (1.25 MB, 2048x1536)
1.25 MB
1.25 MB JPG
>>20389336
Well that car is pretty far from a "muscle car". When you have 16'' brake rotors you can't really run 14'' rims like muscle cars of the past. The rear brake rotors would be alot smaller so you could still fit some WELDS and some thick drag radials.
>>
>>20389620
american muscle cars always performed like shit around any track, who the fuck cares. they're supposed to be cheap, cool looking and have a v8, that's all they have to do.
>>
>>20386787
My only beef about the wheel size is that now there's a bunch of space between the rotor and the rim.

I believe that tires should fill the arches, and that brakes should fill the rim. About a 1" gap looks good to me. YMMV.
>>
>>20389620
I guess we're not supposed to have cars that are just different and fun to drive unless HURR DUURR 'RING TIMES.
>>
>>20385308
Sorry, now bring back the Turbo Mopars of the 80's you little shits.
>>
>>20389659
>wanting completely worthless piles of garbage
Oh wow.
>>
>>20389659
t. Someone who's never launched a GLH/S. In their day, they were hugely underrated. Fun at the strip, really fun for cone-fagging.
>>
>>20389640
>>20389656
Cope harder.
>>
>>20389663
>completely worthless
The Turbo Mopars, especially with the 2.2 litre intercooled Turbo II mated to the getrag 5 speed, were most excellent hoon and drag machines for tight budgets without sacrificing reliability and daily drivability. They weren't great like a 7 series BMW or a cadillac, but they weren't accord or corolla tier boring shitheaps.

>>20389673
t. Someone who has owned a couple of Turbo II LeBarons and a Daytona in the EU. We never got the Omni here, instead we got the Talbot Horizon the Omni was based on and the Lotus Sunbeam which was an RWD rally monster.
>>
>>20389679
>Cope harder.
What is that supposed to mean, anyway? Is that just something people throw up because they don't have any kind of actual argument?
>>
>>20389682
Still slow as fuck and were complete disposable trash. Rather have an Accord or Corolla over them.
>>
>>20389682
>Lotus Sunbeam which was an RWD rally monster.
*Goes to wiki to look up Lotus Sunbeam*
>>
>>20389691
And the accord and corolla weren't slow as shit and complete disposable trash? Seethe more
>>
>>20389305
I'm sure that the engineers at FCA can find a way to have wide tires that are flush and don't need ugly fenders
>>
>>20389698
Fuck yeah.
>>
File: s-l640.jpg (82 KB, 480x640)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>20389700
Meh, good job displaying your ignorance. Even the base models are more desirable than K-Car garbage.
>>
>>20389689
It means you will grasp at straws as to why the car is good when it is inferior to heaps. You will claim it is good at something until it is proven bad then backpedalling to hurr its fun. That is cope and you have it bad.
>>
>>20389709
>no turbo
>no power
>no torks
Yeah you can keep your slow shitbox
>>
>>20389705
>those tires
CHONKY BOIS
>>
File: Chrysler-is-a-failure.jpg (269 KB, 1038x1458)
269 KB
269 KB JPG
>>20389724
Meh, not complete garbage like a K-Car, how embarrassing. Enjoy your worthless throwaway shitboxes. Nothing more pathetic than Chrysler.
>>
>>20389749
>11 seconds to 60
Is that the NA model as I know that the Turbo II does 0-60 in 7 seconds.
>>
>>20389754
Nope, that's a turbo model, and real world test and not random stats from a site.
>>
>>20389757
Again, is it a Turbo I, II or III?
The Turbo I had like 150hp at best, the Turbo II had around 174 or so and the Turbo III had a Lotus 16 valve DOHC head and 224hp.
>>
>>20389767
What does it matter? It's slower than a 110 hp Corolla hatchback.
>>
>>20389770
I'm plenty sure the Turbo III for example won't be slower than some corolla or any factory road going corolla of the time period for that matter.
You seem quite mad that not everyone hates cheap and reliable power and praise some jap shitbox that barely moves.
>>
>>20389779
Meh, Turbo III cars were slower than Mustangs and Camaro V8s despite costing more. Those were garbage. All K-cars are garbage.
>>
File: 1381203520256.gif (1.08 MB, 276x260)
1.08 MB
1.08 MB GIF
>>20385878
https://youtu.be/VKWnsOvQ1Ic
https://youtu.be/ugMO_LzXhEY
>>
>>20385929
theyre actually what was considered midsized
>>
>>20389689
That namefag is literally retarded. Don’t even bother responding to “him”
>>
File: Capture.png (86 KB, 836x940)
86 KB
86 KB PNG
>>20391520
What would you consider a fast time for a 69 camaro with the aerodynamics of a brick shed?
>faster than the mid night chumps in a straight line
>probably faster up pikes, too
america wins again faggot
>>
>>20391580
street racing is for niggers though
>>
>>20385308
This thing looks it came out of one of The Crew games.
>>
File: 1530407519863.jpg (204 KB, 1024x1280)
204 KB
204 KB JPG
>>20385308
Would smash... errr I mean drive.
>>
>>20385308
It's too late.
>>
>>20389717
And you will just shit post for?
(You's)?
Lack of an actual life?
Dissatisfaction with your shitty pathetic life?
All of the above?
>>
>>20389754
That's the Shelby turbo z that does 7seconds not the Lebaron. Different tune and weight. Also this >>20389783
Fucking turbo 3 cost as much as a 5.0 without the speed. At least a prelude could still out turn a lot of similarly priced cars at the time.
>>
No cause it's fucking cool
>>
>>20386787
>>20386994

Those are the hellcat widebody rims. It only makes sense to throw that on a charger with widebody fender flares
>>
>>20395912
A whole lot of projection up in here.
>>
>>20386808
Boomers love chip foose, even boomers in new zealand
>>
>>20397412
The wheels are a lesser problem the rest of the ugly is hard to change.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.