[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Settings Home
/news/ - Current News

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 1559974599086.jpg (156 KB, 464x464)
156 KB
156 KB JPG
WASHINGTON — The deal to avert tariffs that President Trump announced with great fanfare on Friday night consists largely of actions that Mexico had already promised to take in prior discussions with the United States over the past several months, according to officials from both countries who are familiar with the negotiations.

Friday’s joint declaration says Mexico agreed to the “deployment of its National Guard throughout Mexico, giving priority to its southern border.” But the Mexican government had already pledged to do that in March during secret talks in Miami between Kirstjen Nielsen, then the secretary of homeland security, and Olga Sanchez, the Mexican secretary of the interior, the officials said.

The centerpiece of Mr. Trump’s deal was an expansion of a program to allow asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico while their legal cases proceed. But that arrangement was reached in December in a pair of painstakingly negotiated diplomatic notes that the two countries exchanged. Ms. Nielsen announced the Migrant Protection Protocols during a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee five days before Christmas.

And over the past week, negotiators failed to persuade Mexico to accept a “safe third country” treaty that would have given the United States the legal ability to reject asylum seekers if they had not sought refuge in Mexico first.

Mr. Trump hailed the agreement anyway on Saturday, writing on Twitter: “Everyone very excited about the new deal with Mexico!” He thanked the president of Mexico for “working so long and hard” on a plan to reduce the surge of migration into the United States.

31 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>create a crisis out of thin air
>"fix" the crisis by either changing his mind, lying about deals being made or agreeing to terms that were already agreed to months before
>claim victory

His knuckle-dragging base and GOP shills have slurped this up a thousand times before why would they stop now?
Mexico & GOP donors force Trump back down on tariff threat; State Dept utilized for damage control
funny subject, because its obviously been working
> Mexican govt. find caravan funds from foreign sources
And then lied abut it and then lied about what the other side did.
And it was just exposed Trump's 'trade deal' is absolutely nothing.
Mexico wins again.
Voters are not smart, especially american voters.

File: jew.jpg (421 KB, 1403x2000)
421 KB
421 KB JPG
>Want to secretly, legally send money to Jared Kushner? Here’s how to do it.

Imagine there was a completely secret, perfectly legal way to bribe a government official. Well, let’s not say “bribe”: Let’s imagine that you could channel money to this official — large amounts of money — and never have to reveal your name. Imagine that this official could accept this money, and then use it to make more money, without ever revealing that fact to the public.

Actually, there is no need to imagine such a thing, because it already exists. The thing is called an “opaque offshore vehicle.” Although that sounds like a motorboat with blackout curtains, this one is in fact a kind of bank account, based in the Cayman Islands, a tax haven where business deals are legally shrouded in secrecy. According to a report this week in the British newspaper the Guardian, Goldman Sachs, the investment bank, uses an account like this to funnel money from unnamed investors to a company called Cadre. Cadre, to oversimplify slightly, pools investments in real estate. One of Cadre’s co-founders is Jared Kushner; another co-founder is Kushner’s brother. Cadre’s headquarters are in a building in Manhattan owned by Kushner’s family real estate company.

16 replies omitted. Click here to view.

dude. Soros foundation is a fucking crime money wash machine for CIA. when he gives some money around it means state dep does helping its buddies..
…to create a single authoritarian world government for a borderless planet with no trade trade barriers, all ruled by a handful messianic jewish bankers in new york who feel that its their place to run the whole show because their pet feelings of semitic supremacy tells them that its right and good to do so.
Why aren't the goodgoys of the left ecstatic about Trump now that he is a Soros-owned property?
Because only /pol/fags are that obsessed and need to Cope by thinking like that
If I was a Soros-loving Hillary voter, I'd be laughing my ass off if she lost and Soros just went and bought the other guy. It almost would be like Soros was spending his private money for my personal benefit. If Trump runs the country the same way Hillary would have because Soros is pulling the strings then the people who voted for Hillary should want Trump to stay in office as long as possible, they're getting what they wanted for free because George Soros is sacrificing his personal wealth and free time to make it happen.

26 year old child gets radicalized into a Nazi by YouTube videos, this is terrifying. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/08/technology/youtube-radical.html
170 replies omitted. Click here to view.
You unironically think that the left will start a civil war? Show me when a leftist has ever killed a magaturd and I'll show you 10 trans people who were killed by transphobes. You people act like such a fucking victim it's hilarious. Reverse this one too I dare you
>10 trans people who were killed by transphobes
This is mostly black people and Muslims they do this, who both vote liberal
Fake news
Alt-right is just a fad. They got successful because it was something new and different but even on /pol/ it's getting stale now.
Just look at this pathetic thread. Lots of poor low energy attempts.
They live on through memes. It’s the only way to survive now. But even memes fade away.


Heavy.com is one of my favorite journalist sites. They are actually unbiased and very good giving the public quick access to information about curious news stories.

File: 15102976823411.jpg (62 KB, 600x517)
62 KB
<<< all your rule34s would be illegal. And imageboards and galleries would either not operate in your country or would have to shut down completely. And if this passes, it will eventually make its way to the US, guaranteed.
Support this if you like some crotchety old men and women who think the internet is scary and it's better when internet content is corporatized and sanitized before reaching them.

>What is Article 13?

The European Union has passed a wide-reaching update to copyright laws, the first since 2001. Most of the changes in the EU Copyright Directive are uncontroversial, setting out how copyright contracts are managed and licensed, but Article 13 could have a huge impact on how material is shared online. Put simply, it makes websites responsible for ensuring that content uploaded to their platforms doesn’t breach copyright. The updates will become law once member states enshrine the rules in legislation in their own countries.

>OK, but what does that mean?

The EU says the directive is about making “copyright rules fit for the digital era”. To comply with Article 13, platforms such as YouTube and Soundcloud will need to ensure that any copyrighted material on their sites is licensed, guaranteeing the original artist receives payment for its use.

>Why do we need it?

Rightsholders say that the rules will put an end to the days of pirating music and video online, and ensure artists receive a fair payment for their work. Supporters of the directive include musicians Debbie Harry and Paul McCartney.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
23 replies omitted. Click here to view.
anyone in music who supports this is a fucking faggot, all of music and the culture around it is based on communism i.e. copy other peoples shit
>Although websites less than three years old, or with less than €10 million annual turnover

delete the site every 2.9 years lmao
eh, more like anarcho capitalist. Nobody forcibly redistributes other peoples riffs (unless you're led zepplin yuck yuck)
electronic music and sampling as a whole would be dead overnight in the EU lmao
politician genocide when

The Australia media doesn't address the main issues but the comment section does!

3 replies omitted. Click here to view.
I can't understand how they live with themselves.
Self centered people who are constantly looking for some way to guilt trip and play the victim and dishonestly manipulate people into giving them freemoney don't have consciences, they don't experience empathy other than recognizing it in others and taking advantage. They live with themselves very happily surrounded by sadistic symbols of success, stolen wealth and act like they're proud of their achievements while they display the products of someone else's labor.
haha I have no money

my waifu works...

house in her name

2 kids

my assets in BTC.

I have videos of her insanity in case she pull and i will get custody.

play it like that
identify as a woman!!!! then they have to include you
Maybe they should just check their privilege.
>tfw The Red Pill, a documentary about men's issues including male suicide, was heavily protested by Australian feminists
>they got it banned from several theaters and even universities because they unironically believe that addressing male suicide is misogynistic
in the US, divorced men are 10x more likely to commit suicide than divorced women.
desu these guys should start self-immolating or doing hunger strikes or something. If you're going to anhero at least raise awareness of the fucked up system that drove you to suicide.

President Trump told aides to deny that his internal polling showed him trailing former Vice President Joe Biden in key states, according to a new report from The New York Times.
Later, when the polling in 17 states conducted by Tony Fabrizio leaked, Trump told aides to tell reporters that other data showed him doing better, according to the Times story written by Annie Karni and Maggie Haberman.

The polling reportedly showed Trump behind Biden in a number of the states he needs to take to win reelection, though the Times report did not identify them.
“No one has ever asked us to lie about anything," a Trump campaign official told The Hill in a statement on Tuesday. "The poll in question shows President Trump beating a defined Democrat opponent.”
Beyond Trump's internal polling, a series of recent surveys have shown the president trailing Biden in several important states.
Last week, a Quinnipiac University poll found Biden 4 points ahead of Trump in Texas, a state Democrats haven't won in the presidential election since 1976.
A different poll released last week found Trump trailing Biden and several other 2020 Democrats in Michigan, a state he narrowly won in 2016.
Trump was the first Republican presidential candidate to win Michigan and Pennsylvania since 1988. He also won Wisconsin, the first time a Republican had taken that state since 1984.
If Trump were to lose those three states in 2020 and the Democratic nominee held the other states carried by Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016, Trump would lose the Electoral College.
Trump has been focused on Biden, who has been the front-runner in the Democratic campaign so far. He and Biden will both be campaigning on Tuesday in Iowa, which will host the first caucuses early next year.

91 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>Biden has a 99% of being the next president.
>Trump BTFO

Think women are going to help make Uncle McFeelie Creeperson POTUS?
>You mean Biden is setting things up for the real candidate. He's going to get Bernie'd for either Harris or Hillary.

Harris? Ha! Michael Obama was the last negress we will see in the White House for at least 50 years.
Yes. Women despise Trump in aggregate and don’t seem effected by his handsyness.
>b-b-but muh memes
Yes your memes are very cute. That is for playing but the polls show they have no impact.
They made a man who multiple times talked on national media forums unsolicited about how bang able his daughter is and how he would if he wasn't her dad president. Of course this probably plays to the base in Kentucky and the hollers of WV

File: vzmwurxzhqnwa4hijgt2.jpg (1.42 MB, 4752x2672)
1.42 MB
1.42 MB JPG

A few months ago, Google announced changes were coming to improve privacy, security, and performance with regard to Chrome extensions. In particular, one change didn’t sit well with ad blocker developers, who claimed Google was looking to diminish their efficacy. At the time, at least one company threatened to pursue filing an antitrust complaint.

Yesterday, Google hit back with a blog that basically says, “Nuh uh. We’re not trying to kill ad blockers, we just want to make them safer.” At the core of the issue is the Web Request API. Google announced it was replacing some parts of that particular API with what it calls the Declarative Net Request API. In Google’s words, the change means an extension “does not need access to all a user’s sensitive data in order to block content.” It goes on to explain the current Web Request API requires users to grant permission for Chrome to pass along all information in a network request, and that can include private data such as emails and photos. However, the company claims the new API will allow extensions to block content without requiring users to give access to private data.

“There’s been a lot of confusion and misconception around both the motivations and implications of this change, including speculation that these changes were designed to prevent or weaken ad blockers,” Google writes in a separate blog detailing the differences between the two APIs. “This is absolutely not the goal. In fact, this change is meant to give developers a way to create safer and more performant ad blockers.”
6 replies omitted. Click here to view.
i use chrome with umatrix mostly incognito
if they kill umatrix i'll threaten to switch to another browser and then not switch because i'm too lazy
i will complain a lot about it though
The internet back in 2006/2007 was literally the wild west compared to the NPC-infested doubleplusconforming hellscape we have now
Smartphones were a grave fucking mistake
Ad blockers block unsafe crap, i call shenanigans on Google
Any ghostery users here?
Oh no whatever will i do? It's the end of adblock i guess. Gone are the days of watching youtube without eight shitty virus ads in a row per video.
Oh no wait i don't use chrome.


DUBAI (Reuters) - Two oil tankers were hit in suspected attacks in the Gulf of Oman, shipping firms and industry sources said on Thursday, sending oil prices as much as 4% higher a month after four other tankers were damaged by limpet mines in the region.

One of the tankers, the Front Altair, carrying a cargo of petrochemical feedstock, was ablaze in waters between Gulf Arab states and Iran.

Iran’s state news agency said it had sunk, although the Norwegian owner had said it was afloat and its crew were safe. The other tanker was adrift without any crew.

The Bahrain-based U.S. Navy Fifth Fleet said it was assisting the tankers after receiving distress calls. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations, part of Britain’s Royal Navy, said it was investigating with its partners.

Full details about Thursday’s incident were not immediately clear. The firm which chartered one of the vessels said it suspected a torpedo had hit the ship, while a source said the other might have been damaged by a magnetic mine.

An investigation blamed limpet mines for last month’s attacks on four tankers. Saudi Arabia and the United States blamed Iran for those attacks, a charge Tehran denies.

Oil prices surged as much as 4% after Thursday’s news. The region was already on edge following attacks in May on Gulf oil assets that occurred amid a dispute between Iran and the United States over Tehran’s nuclear program.
33 replies omitted. Click here to view.
Hillary was one of many people who voted from the Iraq War because the Bush administration sold it on fabricated data and Congress was collectively too stupid to suspect that the executive branch was lying out their ass.

But you don't need to identify Hillary's views on Iraq to extrapolate to her views on Iran, because she's made her position clear: she supports the JCPOA.
Well, foreign policy isn't generally decided by one person, it tends to come out of think tanks. Now, while I'm sure that Trump is the sort to ignore a think tank full of experts more educated and informed on the subject than he is and go off and do "his own thang", there was more than one group hinting towards the idea of using the JCPOA as a stop-gap measure, to get inspectors on the ground and make sure Iran didn't pick up nukes, before the situation with ISIS, Syria, and Yemen could wind down, which they now have. It did prevent Iran from getting nukes and get us a free eye on the inside, but it didn't address the more fundamental problem of conflicts of interests between it, the US, Israel, and the Saudis, and the various resulting proxy wars and skirmishes.

Seems more likely he killed the treaty just to piss on Obama's legacy and galvanize his base (given that seems to be his motive for near everything he does), but if being approached by such a proposal was also part of it, and that was just icing on the cake, Hillary, being the cold pragmatic bitch she is, might have gone the sane route (though I suspect she'd at least find some way to accuse Iran of violating the treaty, and thus not lose the sanction group in the process - bitch be evil, but she knows her stuff.)
>sane route
same route* - didn't mean to imply said route was necessarily sane.
Gadhafi played nice, gave up his chemical weapons, and got raped to death by a mob with a blade under her blessing.
Neglecting the bit where he tried to create a new standard for oil trade via a gold backed Dinar, while attempting to get the PLO and most of the rest of the region on board.

Fucker was dead at that point, whether Hillary existed or not. You simply do not mess with US WRC status, and not expect to get "liberated".

Granted, I suspect he did expect it, and it was just one last "fuck you" failed martyrdom.


This story was originally published by The Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit, nonpartisan investigative news organization in Washington, D.C.

WASHINGTON — "Do we love law enforcement or what?" President Donald Trump asked a cheering crowd during his "Make America Great Again" political rally Oct. 12 in Lebanon, Ohio.

"Thank you, law enforcement!" the president later told officers, who he called "heroes."

But when Lebanon City Hall sent Trump's campaign a $16,191 invoice for police and other public safety costs associated with his event, Trump didn't respond. Trump's campaign likewise ignored Lebanon officials' follow-up reminders to cover the sum — one rich enough to fund the entire police force for nearly two days in this modest city of 21,000, between Dayton and Cincinnati.

The bill remains unpaid.

"There's a lot of benefit when a president comes here: economic benefits, more visibility for our community," Lebanon Mayor Amy Brewer said. "But I would hope and believe the Trump campaign would pay its bills. It's our taxpayer dollars."


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
30 replies omitted. Click here to view.
I don’t speak clicks get back to your adobe you barefoot bastard
>Middling bait.
>Decent level of banter.
>Low confidence that you actually care about anything you’re saying.

Now this is 4chan. I personally enjoy individuals who stick to the roots of 4chans anarchy. Even while you’re ostensibly posing as a trumpster baby, I can respect the spirit of your character. Now troll for /b/rother /b/ernie and we can be frens
Bet they don’t charge obama or Clinton a dime. Trumps the head man in charge he doesn’t have to pay shit. Those cities sent those cops on their own volition, Trump didn’t make any kind of deal with em. Fuck em.
I pick no sides. I’m just a tumbleweed troll

File: 1559744187742.png (938 KB, 861x641)
938 KB
938 KB PNG

WASHINGTON — The House Armed Services Committee voted to establish a United States Space Corps within the Department of the Air Force. The vote came in the overnight hours Thursday. The committee began its markup of the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act Wednesday morning. After a nearly 21-hour session, the committee passed the NDAA 33-24.

The Space Corps amendment was offered by the HASC Strategic Forces subcommittee leaders Chairman Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.) and Ranking Member Mike Rogers (R-Ala.). The proposal is similar to what the committee proposed in the 2018 NDAA, including the name of the new space service, U.S. Space Corps, rather than the Trump administration’s preferred name, U.S. Space Force.

Like the Marine Corps, the Space Corps would be led by a four-star Commandant who would be a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The HASC amendment will have to be reconciled with the language in the Senate Armed Services Committee’s version of the 2020 NDAA, which authorizes a U.S. Space Force led by a four-star Commander.
According to the Cooper-Rogers amendment:

• The Space Corps will have personnel and assets transferred by the Air Force but may not include the personnel or assets of the National Reconnaissance Office or the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

• The Space Corps will he organized, trained, and equipped to provide freedom of operation for the United States in, from and to space. The Space Corps will “protect the interests of the United States in space; deter aggression, from and to space and conduct space operations.”

• The secretary of the Air Force may establish a separate, alternative acquisition system for defense space acquisitions. The Deputy Secretary of Defense will submit the plan to the congressional defense committees. The alternative acquisition system will cover defense space acquisitions except those overseen by the intelligence community.

• The secretary of defense can transfer to the Space Corps “functions, assets and obligations of the space elements of the Air Force (including all property, records, installations, activities, facilities, agencies and projects). Personnel that can be transferred include commissioned officers and enlisted members of the space elements of the Air Force.

• While the SASC language sets a one-year transition period for the Space Force to figure out its organization, the HASC bill says the transition period begins on January 1, 2021; and ends not later than December 31, 2023.

• The secretary of defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a detailed plan for the organizational structure of the Space Corps, and how the Space Corps will coordinate with the United States Space Command, the Space Development Agency, and other space elements of the armed forces.
Fuck when do we get ODST?
>desire to know more intensifies
For what
>we dont need a highly trained future army equipped with power armor and cybernetically enhanced railguns to protect our atmospheric border from space mexicans
Exorcise your stinking presence from this thread at once you gay communist

File: 153854765138573.png (206 KB, 432x412)
206 KB
206 KB PNG
Trump muses about how he'd "probably" listen to dirt on an opponent if presented to him by foreigners... liberals spit and froth as usual about how that is indisputable proof he is compromised... JUST in time for Trump to expose how the Clinton campaign did exactly that!

I think I’d take it’: In exclusive interview, Trump says he would listen if foreigners offered dirt on opponents

President Trump said in an interview that he would accept foreign information on political opponents, saying “they all do it.”

Mr. Trump told George Stephanopoulos of ABC News that the origin of opposition research would not overly concern him and that he may or may not go to the FBI if such an offer came from abroad.

“Someone comes up and says ‘hey, I have information on your opponent.’ You call the FBI?” he said in a video clip posted Wednesday by ABC News. “Give me a break. Life doesn’t work like that.”

He denied Mr. Stephanopoulos’s claim that taking information from foreigners constitutes collusion with their interference in U.S. elections.

“It’s not an interference. They have information. I think I’d take it,” he said.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
68 replies omitted. Click here to view.
Sure is Boomer in that list. Apparently you can't separate opinion, editorialization, and news. It's mainly old farts that watch broadcast or cable television anymore.
Anyone who thinks Fox News is balanced are on some of the best drugs known to man. They prop up dummy Dems so that their far right pundits can “totally pwn the libs”. They are by far the most egregiously imbalanced networks on TV. How do I know this? Exactly zero democrats watch Fox News.

So the democratic opposition they do have on that network are controlled so that they come off as balanced but in reality are only there so that their slightly less brainwashed viewers are coddled into a sense of hearing the other side. And most of their Dems are castrated and ineffective.

Most of the time the network is pounding home insane far right bollycock for their mindless viewers. Not even CNN gets away with such outright fabrications of reality.
This accounts for the first 100 days of Trumps presidency, btw. Back when Rupert Murdoch wasn’t sure if Old trump would live up to his campaign of draining the swamp.

Now that it’s clear he’s one of the most grossly pro rich presidents since the 1800s, Murdoch has changed his assignment for the network.
That's not what happened
Coverage of the president over 100 days = Complete political stance of a news agency that covers more than just this presidency?

Washington (CNN)Attorney General William Barr's review of the origins of the 2016 Russia investigation and surveillance issues surrounding President Donald Trump's campaign will be "broad in scope and multifaceted," examining actions by US and foreign intelligence agencies, "as well as non-governmental organizations and individuals."

This latest description of Barr's controversial project was in a letter from the Justice Department to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, marking the first time the department had explained in detail the information being gathered from the intelligence community since Trump granted Barr broad authority to declassify sensitive intelligence materials late last month.

Monday's letter was released publicly just as the committee began a separate hearing on "lessons" learned from special counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Russia probe.
The focus on foreign intelligence has already had some key allies wary of being dragged into what some see as a political probe, as CNN previously reported, and the letter notes that Barr will work closely with the intelligence community regarding declassification of any relevant information.
"It is of great importance to the Department to protect classified information by preventing the unwarranted disclosure of sensitive sources, methods, and techniques and materials where such disclosure would endanger the personal safety of US government employees or friendly foreign partners, harm US national security interests, or compromise the ability of US government agencies," wrote assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd.

6 replies omitted. Click here to view.
>Monday's letter was released publicly just as the committee began a separate hearing on "lessons" learned from special counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Russia probe.
I am not sure why it is stylized as ' "lessens" learned '
lessons learned are a standard part many forms of investigations and the word lessons does not need to be quoted
Because it's a fake news article written by retards
Holy fuck trumpfags are delusional.
How will you react when they hang Obama on live TV?
How will you react when this investigation becomes a nothing burger?

File: D7m-sEvX4AECn5g.jpg (112 KB, 960x540)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
Newly revealed documents appeared to confirm Thursday what many critics had long suspected — that the Trump administration’s drive to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census began as a plan to bolster Republicans and to undercut Democrats in state legislatures and Congress.

Thomas Hofeller, a Republican expert on redistricting and gerrymandering, died last year in North Carolina. His daughter found documents on his computer hard drive urging the Commerce Department to change the census to ask all residents about whether they are citizens.

With this data, states could draw new election maps based on the number of eligible voters, not the total population. That “would be advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic Whites” and “would clearly be a disadvantage for the Democrats,” he wrote.

His advice came to light Thursday because the Supreme Court is weighing whether to uphold the Trump administration’s plan to add a citizenship question to next year’s census.

Federal district judges in New York, San Francisco and Baltimore blocked the move, holding that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross had not put forth a legitimate explanation for such a significant change.

Census Bureau experts had predicted that millions of immigrants would refuse to answer the question, for fear of drawing attention, thereby creating a severe undercount in some areas.

Lawyers who challenged the proposed question noted that the Constitution calls for “an actual enumeration” that includes “counting the whole number of persons in each state.”

But when the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in April in the case of Department of Commerce vs. New York, the five conservative justices sounded ready to rule for the administration.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
242 replies omitted. Click here to view.
anon said:
>Democrats would probably lose 10 to 20% of their representation in Congress if only american citizens were considered
then you said:
well im not going to quote it because it was a bunch of unrelated gibberish, but you explain your thought process behind that post here:
>>I make up numbers (illegal spice register and vote even though I have no evidence of this)

fist of all anon said "probably" so he admits he was guesstimating. you are asking for a source for a guys thoughts. silly. also there is no evidence that anon was making an argument about voting. he may have been simply talking about counting illegals presence which would make their state more populated and give them more power in the house. you assumed his argument without inquiring because you assumed he was a racist. just like you did me.
Especially with all the progressives and socialists already there.
Oh shiiiiit, is that a "I'm rubber, you're glue" comeback? A fuckin' classic mate. Haven't seen that one since the 4th grade. Thanks for the nostalgia.
It's like he only knows one word.

File: 1548894628580.jpg (46 KB, 600x424)
46 KB

Not a credible news source
fuck off /pol/

copypaste the story next time

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.