[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/n/ - Transportation

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 9 posters in this thread.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]



ITT: we come up with new transportation ideas and concepts.
I'll start with pic related. I call it the ducted open rotor. Improves the efficiency of the open rotor even further while reducing noise. I predict it will be the next evolutionary step after airliners are done switching to open rotors.
>>
Have you run simulations? No? Then it's a useless fantasy
>>
>>1346067
>OP doesn’t know about turbofans
>>
>>1346067
So, a turbofan?
>>
>>1346082
>>1346085

You just solved /n/
>>
>>1346067
do the props spin clockwise or counter-clockwise?
>>
>>1346108
Both
>>
>>1346108
Called "contra-rotating" props
>>
I was reading an article about the company developing open rotor engines. They aren't certain it will get selected by any aircraft manufacturer, and if so could be 20-30 years away. I think they got some big R&D tax breaks as part of an aircraft efficiency research program, and some of the technology might be transferable to other projects.
>>
>>1346306
Did that company retrofit them on a 727 for the outside pods and the tail pod remained a JT8D?
>>
>>1346313
I think they only did ground testing, not even that much of it as the article mentions just 70 hours of testing on a static rig. There are pictures of the engine on airframes, but I think those are just graphic mockups.

If it was anything more than a proof of concept I would expect hundreds to thousands of hours of test operation. The whole project is likely mothballed pending interest from an aircraft manufacturer.

https://www.safran-group.com/media/what-does-future-hold-store-open-rotor-20190328

I mis-remembered their speculative timeframe, it mentioned 2030s not 20 years.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.