If you sport coloured tires you are a faggot.Tyres should be black, to signify a no-compromise design.
>black>colo(((u)))redonly white rolls right
>>1297603>>1297597please kys immediately and stop shitting up this board with your zero effort shitposting
>>1297597what about gumwall?>>1297603white bikes are bad luck
But that's racyst, hehe /s
the green vittoria paves (rip) were pretty iconic
they've won at paris-roubaix & flanders, dozens of times
maybe it's just a classic thing and belongs in the past, but you gotta show a bit of respect op
>>1297746Me on the left
>>1297747nah it still belongs but only if you're pro as fuarjk
>>1297597I actually don't give a shit about this.OP is a fag. Have non-black tires if you want.>>1297603(You), however, are a 2edgy4me faggot and should KYS in the slowest most painful way possible, you /pol/ piece of shit. GTFO.
>>1297603God I love the look of zertzThis is now a zertz thread
>>1297597No-compromise design is actually milky white. Black is from added soot.
this looks sick and you know it
>>1298350why do they add soot, even in high performance tires where every gram counts?
>>1298369you're right, I want to fucking vomit from looking at that consumerist trash
>>1298369Don't steal ghost bikes.
>>1298370>where every gram countsis this post from 1983????
>>1298377that bike is lavender, not white.
>>1298380>1983 + 36>every gram doesn't matter
>>1298407getting below the UCI limit is easy grampa
>>1298408rotational weight is different lad
>>1298409and aero is king sit down grampabelieve me you have not discovered a secret that tire manufacturers haven’t been oblivious to for decades, you are not smart
>>1298408>mfw you let the UCI tell you how to ride
>>1298416that was my first post about thisi think it's either>there are preformance/ durability reasons for them to be black (quick googling seems to suggest this)>pro cycle racing is after all about selling bikes to freds, so they're just not allowedif there were actually marginal gains to be had, and dropping even 5 grams of rotational weight at no other cost would be one, i think they'd have done it
>manual cagers are so insecure they need others to approve of their fucking tyre colour scheme
>>1298408>caring about the UCI rules outside pro racesLet's be honest there are no pro riders in /n/ so the only place where any of us would have to comply to the UCI rules is if we happen to race in the national championships for whatever irrelevant country we happen to live in.
All the best tires are blackSchwalbe marathon plusSchwalbe marathon supremeSchwalbe DuranoSchwalbe racing ralphSchwalbe nobby nickSchwalbe delta cruiser
>>1298369>not terracottaI am disappoint.(also, fuck that shitty over-exposed photo)
g u m w a l l s
>>1298590A R E F O R N I G G E R S
>>1298590Black walls. Gum surface. Gomfl
>>1298473>Let's be honest there are no pro riders in /n/ so the only place where any of us would have to comply to the UCI rules is if we happen to race in the national championshipsIf you go up and sign up for a Cat 5 amateur race that is under USA Cycling you will have to follow UCI rules.
>>1298779Shame that ACP and Courier Cup aren’t UCI eh
>>1297597I bet youre fun at parties
>>1298779And when is the last time you've seen anyone check bikes for their weight, if the frames and wheelsets are UCI approved, or if the setup follows the rules?
>>1298790shut the fuck up and never use this shitty phrase again
>>1298818found the gumwall faggot>>1298350Its not soot it is carbon black.It aids in increasing grip and prolonging theblifespan of the tire.
>>1297744They were cool. Boonen's tires are cooler, though.