Spaceship ThreadCivilian Edition>Spaceship that aren't/weren't specifically built/meant for combat>Lightly defended cargo/explorer ship>Improvised combat spaceshipSmall minimal-crew spacecraft are ok if they follow the same rules.Previous thread:>>17503304
>>17544775Are these the Thunderbirds?
Civilian spiky dildos inbound!
phalanx class space battleship (Usurper of the Sun)length:80mcrew:4power plant : solar panel engine : 4 x nuclear thermal rocket engine(useing liquid hydrogen)armament : 9 x nuclear missile
>>17545734is this post ironic
>>17544775>>17545074>>17545323One of the things I really love about the new Thunderbirds series is how they've massively expanded the use of space as a setting. The original series had like, what, three episodes using Thunderbird 3? In the new series we've got several space stations in Earth orbit, fleets of civilian spaceships, moon surface stations, moon orbit stations, space junkyards, space hotels, a mining operation on Mercury, a colony on Mars, even a documentary expedition on Europa.Hell, Thunderbird FIVE has been taking active part in rescues!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkQW25zWET4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3IRevQU4mghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_sE887waYIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-yiDwG2ruY
>>17545546That looks cool, pardon me for asking but where's it from?
>>17546847Galaxy-class starships were ABSOLUTELY built with combat in mind. They had an extra bridge specifically for just that!>The Galaxy-class was equipped with twelve phaser banks, distributed in phaser arrays at various points along both hulls. One array was located on the dorsal of the battle section and could only be used following a separation. Multiple phaser beams could be fired simultaneously from a single array. (DS9: "Sacrifice of Angels") There were also fore and aft torpedo launchers on the engineering section. (TNG: "Conundrum") Each launch tube was capable of firing at least five photon torpedoes simultaneously, each torpedo capable of being independently targeted. (TNG: "The Arsenal of Freedom", "Yesterday's Enterprise") In the 2360s, Galaxy-class ships typically carried about 250 photon torpedoes. The torpedo launchers were also capable of launching probes. The Galaxy-class also carried antimatter mines and supported a high-capacity deflector shield grid. (TNG: "Chain of Command, Part II", "Conundrum")
Dang, I have all these cool spaceships I wanted to post, but none of them are civilian grade. Bah.
>>17546864I'd give it a technical pass. It wasn't "specifically built for combat": it was intended for multiple roles, with combat being a secondary role. However, the purpose of the OP is clearly to prevent the same ships from being posted over and over again, and if anything fits into that category, it's Trek.
Civilian Edition - Addendum >>17544746>Spaceship are to be considered "civilian" and "lightly defended" as per the criteria of their own designer.>Are accepted military vessel meant to stay away from any form of combat>Jon's Law for SF authors is unavoidable but kept under the "improvisation" rule and is to be put into spoiler to not shock.This rule shall become effective as of 17/06/2019 | 19:29>>17546847As I was making this thread I just KNEW someone would bring up Star Trek and their PACIFIST WEAPONRY that make civilization shit their pant.What with the ability to teleport antimatter bomb at will against inferior civilization
Sadly my civilian spiky dildo folder is somewhat thin, so I'll post this. In some alternate universe we built a bunch of these in the 80s and 90s
>>17548289Which would give way to the infinitely superior NSWR sometime in the early 2000's
The Toy Box from Planetes
The unarmed shuttle in the foreground.
>>17548304You sir, have garbage truck taste
>>17548560Addendum Edition >>17544746 (OP)>In composite pictures the civilian spaceship must be the focus of the scene or occupy most of the picturebut nevermind, you are ok in my book
Looks like I'm all alone, more or less
>>17549817FUUUUN FUUUN FUUUUUN. IN THE SUUUUN SUUUUN SUUUUN!!!(Pic not related)
>>17547998We really need more ships like this.
Not too many civilian ships from the spiked dildo universe
SSSA liners from ARIA, absolutely civilian
>>17546864It was a mostly civilian ship for long range expeditions with self defence in mind, no match for a romulan warbird or a klingon cuiser.Combat was quite obviously not its primary objective as, while armed decently overall, it had most of its volume used for stuff that is pointless in a warship.The later Defiant and Souvereign class ships where warships, the galaxy class not so much.Although one could count the later dominion-war era Galaxy-class ships as makeshift warships since they where stripped of many non-essential systems and recived upgraded weapons as well as shields.
>>17544746There is no such thing as a "lightly armed starship"You have strong shields/armor to protect yourself from hypervelocity impacts, be it micrometeroids, railgun shots or beam weapons of some sort.You are able to acellerate yourself and a payload to a good percentage of lightspeed, be it cargo, a relativistic slug, antimatter or even kamikaze.There is a good chance you have a powerfull laser/maser for communication and possibly the ability to warp spacetime, the laser/maser could seriously harm a ship when running at full power and a tight beam and warping spacetime leaves so many options.TL;DR You could take down capital ships with the right tactics, even when not having any "real weapons" onboard.
sometimes I think spaceships are the superior visual element, the very pinnacle of design and flare and proficiency in the craft. There is such a wealth of design and creativity. You can draw from such a varied history of real world naval vessels like subs and boat, airplanes and jets, ocean life such as fish or whale or squid or shark. There are "natural" spaceships from converted asteroids, Fanciful magic or so advanced it might as well be magic designs. Alien ships that are alien by nature and don't fit our conceptions of spacecraft.The well from which you can draw from is limitless in ways normal manned mecha design cannot even hope to come close to. This doesn't even bring the different weaponry and functionality that ships can bring to the table. I fucking love spaceships.
>>17557473First, any of those are covered by OP >>17544746 or this notarized addendum >>17547540Second, a car can be used to as a kamikaze it doesn't make it a "heavily armed battletank". If it take a series of minor miracle and incompetent enemies for this to happen (unaware of what are the most basic & fundamental "tactic" known to mankind), then you failed trying to be a smartass.Looking at airliner regulation your civilian spaceship could be hardcoded to be incapable of any maneuver that leave it on an impact course, or be incapable of using its communication maser unless it identify and aim at the proper receiver on the target.To the point that if you still manage to do damage, it will be by using a military ship with full clearance to push it like a projectile.TL;DRDestroying a warship doesn't make a ship as powerful as one.
Make a picture like that for Amazon and I would believe it
Don't mind me, Civilian gateway to hell
>>17559774Almost didn't find this one too
>>17546842The Metabarons book by Jodorowsky
>>17561142You dislike impracticality
>>17563267This CIVILIAN spaceship look a little threatening.Surely this is a rusty firetruck with a squirtgun.
>>17551712I love the Outlaw Star and all but it was definitely a military ship that was just stolen and used by civilians.
>>17553442That's a strike-craft, not a civilian spacecraft.
>>17559787I think you mean the warp.
Civilian ship with it's escorts
>>17547540Sauce on this image anon? Is there more neat Known Space art i'm unaware of?
>>17563912That was just something I took from the Atomic Rocket website.If not for the Explanation text (along the name of the picture creator *wink*) it just a generic spaceship to me.
is eve online /m/?
>>17565557I'm afraid it is
Can you guys help me out? I cant seem to find where this space ship is from
I mean, technically it's a civilian ship
>>17576875Pretty sure those 2 pic have been choosen as the cover for the book "Kirinyaga" which is a 'ok' book about Culture only existing at a fixed point in time and change being unavoidable. (saved you the trouble of reading it)
Someone should just make a "Chris Foss spaceship.rar" and give the link here to save time
Someday I should try to build up a "Spaceship liner & cruise ship" folder,
>>17569141That is an Orion class destroyer, is it not?No way a spaceborne aircraft carrier is a civvie ship. Wrong shape to be the sleeper ship from Blue Planet.
No Starbridge, /m/ ?I am disappoint.
I just remembered the the Great Harbour Ship of Bentus is the previous Flagship of a super-advanced trader race who abandoned their weapons.still have one powerful self-destruct
>>17580488a trader race, Phoenicians, Carthaginians? I do like the Harbor of Carthage thing that it has going on. Image not related
>>17545734>>17545489what setting is that?
>>17580658I'm the resident spiky Dildo poster and >>17545489 is the Ten World's setting of the game Attack Vector: Tactical. That pic is of a trade convoy leaving the planet Alpha Mensae II.
I wonder, can Culture ship be considered Civilian? They host entire civilization
>>17585756Yes, in fact GSV's are the rare multipurpose class.
For a race of humanoid living weapon who only know of war.What would they call a civilian ship? The supply one?
>>17580488Which was a stupid retcon considering they had the best ion weapons in HW1 and Cataclysm.
Just harmless merry merchants passing by.
>>17587875HW2 made the Bentusi more interesting as an hyper advanced civilization, better than an upgrade shop.
>>17588271HW2 did more to downgrade them to flying plot exposition machines than really build them up as any sort of 'hyper-advanced civilization'. Whereas previously they were players in the galactic council and a functioning nation in their own right, they were reduced to a single prophecy-spewing ship that existed solely to commit suicide and gift the Hiigarans a precursor relic that would have been completely safe from Makaan had they done literally anything else.And don't get me started on the whole 3 hyperspace core bullshit, which is its own dumpster-fire of a plot mistake.
>>17588522Homeworld 1 plot was a pretext for a simple single space fleet and a gamey shop for upgrade.Homeworld 2 is the one who rebuilt a proper setting over the mess left by HW1 and "Cataclysm", adding technologies that explain the power discrepancy and a sense of mythological awe over the history lost through time.You can like the design and HW2 have its flaws but you are a retard if you can't accept improvement.http://www.homeworldaccess.net/downloads/hw2docs/history_of_hiigara.pdf>a precursor relic that would have been completely safe from MakaanSure letting the good guys dies and giving Makaan more time to secure power and reverse engineer all the ancient technologies and defense would have solved their problems. The mythological aspect doesn't even exclude them finding other cores. Even Sajuuk is just ONE relic of a greater civilization who built foundry ship far bigger. It's made obvious that the 3 cores were just the ones powering the Foundry ship who would naturally forge more (how do you think it moved around?).If your autism is triggered by the idea of a triforce I can't help you. Plenty of real technology have this sort of multi core synergy.
>>17545734>Using solar power when you've got four perfectly good nuclear reactors right there attached to the ship.
>>17590346I'd hesitate to call the addition of the Pre-Exile Hiigaran history a complete improvement. I more preferred it when the history was unknown and it was up in the air whether the Hiigarans deserved to be exiled to Kharak or not, but I did like the inclusion that the ancient Hiigarans were warmongers and did end up deserving their treatment by the Taiidan later down the line.>Letting the good guys die and give Makaan more time to reverse engineer ancient tech.Makaan's entire powerbase is built on the claim that he is the Sajuuk-Khar, which necessitates him being able to unite the Trinity and activate the ship. Had the remaining Bentusi chucked the core into a black hole, played keep-away through constant far-jumping, or even left the galaxy with it entirely (which was technology they possessed) then Makaan would be unable to back his claims, which leaves him a failed religious leader that can still be beaten thru conventional tactics and not a nigh-messianic figure that can do no wrong to his followers. Furthermore, there's no guarantee the Foundry (or any other progenitor relic) has the ability to build more cores at all, but if they are still able, it shocks me that no-one else decided to make a run for Karos and do exactly what you suggested in the 10,000 years between the Bentusi finding the first and Makaan finding the third.What I really take exception to is two things: that the ancient Hiigarans were able recover and smuggle the second core to Kharak without anyone becoming suspicious or even checking for the core on Angel Moon or the departing Exile fleet, and that only progenitor tech at the present time is able to FarJump, despite the fact that it's explicitly stated in the original manual that the Kushan reverse-engineered the Khar-Toba's own drive module for the Mothership and just scaled it up twelve times to compensate. Retconning this makes the progenitors essentially the reason for the Hiigaran return rather than their own ingenuity.
>>17587756So...what, is Bodolza basically a giant 600km wide tumor?
>>17590951As religions goes, only having one or two of the KNOWN godlike core wouldn't have made Makaan any weaker. I will argue that having a religious quest to keep looking for would preserve his reign longer than having all core and his follower asking "Now what?" with free time to plan a coup.Having the Bentusi "chuck the relic of a godlike lost tech into a black hole" you would only end up with the smartest civilization stuck at "short jump" speed and ready to be killed by Makaan while he take over the galaxy and find another core.Plus those god damn cores are so durable with their safety feature they LOOK sentient, I can imagine one jumping away tweeting "NOPE">Furthermore, there's no guarantee the Foundry (or any other progenitor relic) has the ability to build more cores at all, but if they are still able, Going over the obvious mystical parable this is still a world where science exist. The progenitor had all reason to build as many cores as they needed, especially the Foundry ship (their own mothership) that outmass Sajuuk. The most common fanfiction and over used plot is them leaving ONE of their recent "Sajuuk-class" ship as bait for other civilizations.>it shocks me that no-one else decided to make a run for Karos and do exactly what you suggested in the 10,000 years between the Bentusi finding the first and Makaan finding the third.Easily justified. It's not that nobody tried, it's that nobody succeeded and came back alive.Remember what defend them? The keepers who are either a grossly overpowered npc of an unfinished game or the proof that progenitors knew to make smaller ship with amazing hyperspace core and sensor.And only those with an hyperspace core (+ oracle) would have been able to reach most of those place.
(continued)>>17592416>that the ancient Hiigarans were able recover and smuggle the second core to Kharak without anyone becoming suspicious or even checking for the core on Angel Moon or the departing Exile fleetExplained in the document, no one knew where to look except the Hiigaran, they left so fast everyone else could have believed the core was still "somewhere else" and if you take the new retcon from Desert of Kharak, the Hyperspace core defended them by warping unsuspecting attackers elsewhere. Which IS after all the core ability of that drive.>and that only progenitor tech at the present time is able to FarJump, despite the fact that it's explicitly stated in the original manual that the Kushan reverse-engineered the Khar-Toba's own drive module for the Mothership and just scaled it up twelve times to compensate. Retconning this makes the progenitors essentially the reason for the Hiigaran return rather than their own ingenuity.The first game leave bigger holes in the power ratio than any plothole of Homeworld 2. You were asked to assume a few clans of refugees that spent millennia reinventing the wheels are fit to survive and escape a galactic Civilization, even corrupt, (buying some upgrade from the Bentus mid-game shop).Retconning them the means to Farjump (and DoK retconning them getting fresh spaceship wrecks) evened the odds while also setting a mystical plot more interesting than "Blue vs Red".You can even retcon the Kadeshi as being incapable of Farjump but learning to make the hyperspace inhibitor the Bentus used on them.A cool challenge is to retcon the ugly hacker-ship as an oracle.We all know the true ingenuity of the Hiigaran is to SALVAGE EVERYTHING.
So I am asking there because I know that people that post in this thread have played it: Is Children of a Dead Earth good? What is the gameplay like? Should I expect something like Homeworld (RTS)? I have seen some videos but I can't really grasp what really the game is about. Sorry for off-topic.
>>17598962It's good if you are looking for a game like ChoDE.TL;DRSandbox with realistic physics and ship building tool, there's some solo mission to give you a real-space buzz, but beyond you have to engineer to get the full potential.LONG VERSION:It's definitely not a RTS (by definition as you control timewarp), consider it more like a simulation. The first missions you get are mostly a tutorial teaching you the control but also some orbital mechanic that are unfortunately poorly understood by common people. Note that if you played Kerbal Space Program you are no longer a "common person".You can control a fleet but don't expect to click a ship and click the position were it have to go, what you control is their Vector, they won't be stationary relative to a target unless you tell them to do the maneuver that will achieve that.Sometime it can be tricky despite the orders choice.The pace is deceptive, it's slow but everything can go irreversibly wrong (or good) in an instant. Such is space warfare.By mid-game you get to design your own ships/fleet. By then you'll learn that while the physic of the game is top notch, not having Military-grade ship-AIs restrict what you can do. Late game unlock the design of submodule (making custom engine, guns, bomb).Which is why it's more of an engineer sandbox than a strategy game.
Not on my watch!
>>17544746From the guy who designed Remember Me
>>17599521This sounds like a good game. Is it on steam?Also, here's a cool pic.
An EXILE being used for interstellar civilian transport purposes
>>17606624It is on Steam yes, just googleChildren of a dead Earth>>17606919Last Exile had plenty of wonderful ideas. A shame it went haywire midway and gave birth to a very bad fanservive sequel.I won't say we need more series like that because we need much better series than that.
>>17545734We need more “realistic” spaceships. I have to find the thread I started in the archives.
>>17608010You can have the "utilitarian spaceship" thread I created https://desuarchive.org/m/thread/17453724/
>>17608027also linked to >>17599521 btw
>>17607880Ripped off Xenogears, at least in base background story.
>>17559787They didn't turn on their gellar fields, Slaanesh got to them.
Anyone got more space freighters? Realistic or no. They're comfy as fuck.
>>17567815This thing looks like a decommissioned warship.
>>17609280Because of you I quickly read the Wikipedia for that plot.Honestly they are far different enough to be considered completely separate. There's far enough story involving ancient astronaut.Not trying to defend "Last Exile" thought, it was a waste of good ideas and magnificent graphic.>>17610159Here you go.>>17610184It's from Freelancer and it is a warship, so that anon was in infraction of Article 1 to 1 plus corollary, forbidding ship explicitly meant for combat.
>>17610154Googling this made me discovers many of the pic I like come from the same artisthttps://www.artstation.com/captflushgarden
>>17611025Sadly was. But then again, so was Xenogears.
>>17611485And now I know where Thunderbird got their name for an airliner.God that pic design is even more stupid than the series.
>>17588271Terrible opinions, my dudeThe other guy did a decent job of explaining it and i don't want to sperg for 20 posts. If you don't get it, at least be aware you're in the minority with that idea.
>>17588176>>17618524Ok you both win, please explain the joke now.
From the game Subnautica
Christ. This thread has been around for almost a month!?
keep on rocking
>>17628031/m/ is a slow threadmeaning I came in time to bump it several time, I guess CIVILIAN spaceship is too restrictive, next thread will have to be combat minded
>>17628031>>17629550>Expanse postingBased and protomoleculepilled.
So, where is my dystopian ugly mobile home spacepod?