[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



LOL Russell BTFO'ing your favorite philosophers like it's no big fucking deal
>>
Another one bites the dust
>>
File: 1554581360888.jpg (48 KB, 625x425)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>>13639078
>it has been evident that Man has not the cosmic importance which he formerly arrogated to himself.
>>
>>13639078
Tell you what, Marxists can have Man, the planet, and 'practicality'. In return we'll let the philosopher king Russell and his ilk tackle the real issues, the ones of cosmic importance, at their own leisure.
>>
Time for a real book
>>
>>13639078
>Russell thinks his philosophy is of cosmic importance and transcends the planet
>was already outdated within his own lifetime
Is there a better provider of philosophical keks than his History of Western Philosophy?
>>
>>13639215
Kuhn is a meme, read Bachelard and Meyerson instead.
>>
>>13639215
Like half of that book is dead wrong. He gets ripped a new asshole in Higher Superstition.
>>
>>13638921
>russell
>>
>>13638921
>visited vs desired, visible vs desirable

Tardy semantic harping, typical of Russell. He's right in that Utilitarianism is bad idea tho, solely because all normative ideas don't account for externalities of practicalities (while positivism does). For instance, everyone chilling out in hedonistic bliss soon leads to consequences where nobody can chill out anymore. Short term bliss sacrificed all future. And the ideology can't foresee that because they put the pyramid on its tip and thought it would stand there.
>>
>>13639204
Marx couldn't even keep his own children alive. Marxists get nothing. Go extinct, your genes are inferior.
>>
>>13638921
i dont think anyones favourite philosopher is john stuart mill on this board
>>
>>13639303
I couldn't give less of a fuck about Marx's kids that died 15 years ago, this is like trying to claim that the Catholic Church's rampant peadophilia means Christianity is structurally wrong, total non-sequitur. Besides, you're probably a 'White' (i.e. mixed race) American, who cares what you think about genes lmao
>>
Russell is a cuck, but so are Marx and JS Mill
>>
>>13639078
>you are arrogant for not wanting to spend an entire life in wage slavery so oxford pedophiles can diddle boys in comfort
>>
>>13639355
Marx was a hypocrite, in addition to being demonstrably wrong. I just like to celebrate from time to time the screaming, agonizing death of his progeny, and his bloodline's extinction.
It is good to see a Jew go extinct. Political proclivities are heritable, remember.

As for Genes, I am in fact white. Not an American though. And the inferiority of left-wing people is well documented. Why else would they murder their own infants to such a degree? It's obviously a conscious decision to go extinct, and I approve.
>>
>>13639381
>Says Karl, the man who literally never worked a day in his life, and mooched off of a powerful industrialist so that he could write lies in a poorly edited book while throwing contemptuous slurs at the actual working class.


Yiiiiiiikes!
>>
>>13639388
He had more kids than Hitler mate. So'd Stalin. In fact a lot of you right-leaning types think the White race is going extinct, no? So nice job on that front, good luck convincing everyone to have 8 children in future lol. Guess Marx is still doing what you consider to be his job even after extinction. I also doubt your supposed Whiteness. American or perhaps Southern European or some shit is my guess
>>
If only we had listened to him and started WW3
>>
>>13638921
>john stuart mill
>anyone's favorite philosopher
>>13639355
Zizek wrote this post.
>>
>>13639229
>>13639236
elaborate, please.
>>
How do utilitarians claim to avoid falling right into the is-ought gap? It always seemed to me that they couldn’t do it.
>>
File: Russellnietzsche.jpg (153 KB, 1185x277)
153 KB
153 KB JPG
His comment about Nietzsche
>>
>>13640304
>literally a facts dont care about your feelings tier argument
holy shit, I never knew RUssel was this retarded
>>
>>13640311
you sound like a woman



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.