[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: 69dtdylevcy21.jpg (67 KB, 640x806)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
based
also
>tfw no tactical nuke
>>
>>41484871
The misconception here is that normies care about any of these rights. They'll gladly label speech as hate speech, condone wiretapping and surveillance to fight terrorism, and they'll infringe on the 2nd with the false notion that it will keep them safe. Freedom is a responsibility normies don't want, and they'll throw away your rights to avoid it.
>>
>>41484930

this. why the fuck do people still think "abluhbluhbluh you're being INCONSISTENT" is a good argument? they literally do not. give. a. shit.
>>
>>41484971
It's very hard to think like a leftist when you're not a leftist.
>>
>>41484971
Because if you're someone with integrity, it matters.
Every argument has its place. Every needle of logic you jab in the back of the regressive left is of import.
>>
>>41485238
>if you're someone with integrity, it matters.
You overestimate the opponent, for them the argument is a means to an end, not a practice of logic or integrity. They're not open to discussion, they're telling you they're right based on a false sense of moral superiority under the pretense of public safety.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.