I'm really into naval history, I don't demand a perfect simulation, but I am afraid the game will have a lot of wehraboos in pay to win ships dominating every game and I don't want to play one of these shard to learn, hard to perfect mmos. thoughts?
>>40254946get war-thunder naval forces instead
>>40254946It's Ok.Not Great or Bad just 5/10
It's grindier than WT and that's saying something.
>>40254946it's a grindy shithell that's not that fun, it's super repetitive and gets boring quick, and pay to win is alive and well.also it takes up a gigafuck of hard drive space for what it isdon't get it, not worth it at all.
>>40254946get warthunder. world of anything is fucking trash compared to WT, frankly its about as realistic as tank, plane, warship sims get
>>40254982holy shit anon, no
>>40254991>>40254992got anything better then?
>>40254982>rng>its a good sim guysHoly fuck no.
>>40255006>combined armsArma 3>airDCS>groundsteel beasts>waterCold Waters, but that's subs
>>40254956>>40254957>>40254962>>40254963>>40254982>>40254991>>40254992>>40255006>>40255016>>40255022Lost me at the word "grind", thanks mateys, I'm gonna listen to you and pass on this one.
>>40254946the grind isn't bad as long as the ships you're interested in are tier 1-5war thunder grind is fine from 1-4if you just pretend the game doesn't exist past those tiers they're great
>>40254956>You shouldn't eat garbage>You should eat shit instead
>>40255172There is one way in which WoW beats WT in naval combat: WoW has carriers. They play really strangely for a vehicle vs vehicle wargame, almost like an RTS, and they are like nothing else. You actually control the squadrons of bombers as they go around and tell them who to bomb and how. They really change up what the dynamic would be in every game they're in and add a completely unique playstyle.Besides that, though, yeah. Both WoW and WT are very grindy (although WT gives you cool stuff a bit earlier) and WoW is less "simulation" and more "cartoon" than WT.
>>40254946Rise above your nature and play Rule The Waves instead.
>>40255378is that good? I've seen people make some cool scenarios with it
>>40254946>I don't demand a perfect simulationI don't think anyone does, but WoW is heavily on the arcade side of the spectrum. The most intricate sims out there on the individual ship/boat level are submarine simulators like Silent Hunter; unfortunately there isn't much for surface vessels at all.
>>40254982>>40254956>WTfags thinking their pile of shit is any better than the other pile of shitThis will never not be hilarious
>>40254946As others said. WoW is very grindy, especially past tier 5. Not to mention it is p2w with special ships (some are OP as hell) and paying to get currency to just to upgrade your ship. But other than that, it's not terrible to play, but it does get repetitive. Your best bet OP is to play older naval games.
>>40255518>paying to get currency to just to upgrade your ship.You don't need to buy credits to upgrade your ship. If you're not earning enough, you're either dying too early, not doing enough damage, or both.
>>40255518They remove premiums that are overpowered.>>40255783T8+ is designed to rob you of your credits without any additional modifiers. They want to push players back into the middle tiers.You can make money, but not if everything is stock.>>40254946Play it and get to T7. Easy to learn, hard to master.>>40255230CVs are getting completely reworked in less than a month. WT only has light cruisers IIRC, whereas Yamato, Iowa, and now Alaska are available in WoWs.
>>40255831>T8+ is designed to rob you of your credits without any additional modifiers. They want to push players back into the middle tiers.I can consistently make a profit on my Seattle despite using premium consumables and without premium time.
>>40255831>They remove premiums that are overpowered.Thank god for that.
>>40256233Bully for you.>>40256370They're still in game, they just don't sell them and never will. You can get one in a random crate, but that's rare as hell. I mean, they'll never, ever sell the Imperator Nikolai again, but I can still sail in her when I want to be a dick.
>>40254956>>40254982>war thunder >navalAhahaha! Nice "warships" you got there.
you should download azur lane or kantai kolle instead
>>40254982>frankly its about as realistic as tank, plane, warship sims getAnybody that believes this is a literal single-digit IQ moron.
>>40256797I mean, he’s technically right when it comes to the warships. Not because it’s realistically stic, but because it’s the most realistic 40’s era warship game. Considering the only competition is...Warship Gunner 2, that’s not saying much.Unless there’s some 1000$ Steel Battalion esque thing out there somewhere.
>>40256418jesus fucking christ
>>40256835>but because it’s the most realistic 40’s era warship gameThe Silent Hunter games would like a word.
>>40256418I'd like to think this is just running at 10x speed to keep gameplay interesting, but it looks like they're playing with toy RC botes
>>40256988I wouldn’t really call submarines warships, but yeah. I’ll admit that I forgot about them.Does “40’s surface warship simulator” tickle your autism?
>>40254982WT would be good if Gaijin was not a bunch of retarded monkeys. Game is much better as a sim but it gets completely ruined by retarded grind, terrible balance, atrocious map design and game objectives designed by a drunk bonobo. It's only sort of okay for planes.
>>40254946Played a whole bunch of WT (mostly plane sim) and WoWs, had a lot of fun in both. Both have an aspect of grind to them, but neither will actually give you an advantage in a single game for having done said grind (apart from some marginal 'crew' and equipment effects, the notable exception being in WT tanks where you have to unlock the ability to put out fires. That part is cancer.). The grind is mainly to unlock 'more advanced' (higher performance) vehicles, but the battles for both are always somewhat balanced fairly tightly around a single performance level.If you like looking at pretty WW2 vehicles both are fantastic. Just don't 'buy in' to the sunk cost fallacy of the grind and instead play for fun. I'd say just download them and have a go, both are free to play. That said, DCS is also technically free to play if you fancy a higher fidelity plane sim and both it and the IL2 series have much better flight models than war thunder which can vary wildly in authenticity from plane to plane.
>>40254946>one (insert x here) boiI hate this meme so goddamn much
Are there any strategy games where you play against other players in order to be the ruler of the game?
>>40257544Fifty thousand angry Anons vs one memey boi
>>40257014The clip is actually sped upT. have flown the plane used at the end, it turns nowhere near that well
<1 year in war thunder faggot herei can't put it down, but i don't usually play video gamesi just like to fly planes, and don't really want to deal with full sims so it works for me>inb4 gaijew induced angeri just had to quit /wtg/ now everything is better. truly fucking cancer, the worst group of shitstains i have posted with on all of the internet.
>>40258526/wowsg/ isn't much better. I personally hunt down those assholes when I see their tag in a match.
>War Thunder?>World of Ship?Go get Azur Lane instead.
>>40255172If your mount is called invincible, how come I can see it?
Warbotes is pretty fun.
I forgot, I'm home now so I can post screenshots.