>Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal, and it is useless to let go the reins and then expect her not to kick over the traces. You must keep her on a tight rein. Women want total freedom or rather - to call things by their names - total licence. If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your mastersHow can one man be so based?
Yes, given equality, many women would dominate their male counterparts. More men would still dominate women because we are physically more capable and via our role for millennia psychologically more equipped on average. A violent and uncontrolled animal, sounds like most men. Switch this to commentary on humans instead of half of them. You fear the beast capable of equal cunning yet physically weaker in all aspects.
>>6624530With greater physical prowess and confidence men may gain traits of trust, camaraderie etc with other living beings around them instead of constant insecurity and viciousness, including around other humans. This doesn't happen with women.
thats it. thats the whole human drama. once a group of people get too successful, their carb intake increase and testosterone go down. women gain equality and power, men no longer feel like they have a place and become docile, another tribe then takes over. its been going on forever.
>>6624536Cato would say that sex is an evil form of consumption and luxury. I will never have sex for it corrupts the mind.
>>6623945last true Roman. Rome stopped being Rome after romans started speaking greek
>>6624530>More men would still dominate womenCato's point is that women would use a man's natural weakness for sex to rule them. A man's power in a relationship comes from his ability to provide and protect. A women's her ability to satisfy a man physically and emotionally. If a women then gains the ability to provide and protect herself in a society, a man loses all leverage. We see this how divorce laws once favored males to gain custody because of the males ability to provide. Now as women can provide, custody almost always reverts to the woman.
>>6625018Based and Latin pilled.
>>6625039based and sharia pilled
>>6623945>Cato was such a beta boy that he needs structures of oppression when dealing with women.Lmao @ soi boi that can't handle dealing with women (the weaker sex) on an even and fair playground. Instead of trying to bring women down why not raise yourself up, make yourself better.
>>6625018They were Greek influenced from their inception
>>6625039only mentally ill turbofeminists and lesbians "don't need no man", most women are feminine, want a pretty princess marriage and a disney prince, crave dickings and need a man to take care of all the things women aren't inclined to do, in fact the turbofeminists are just lying to themselves, of course they can learn to change the oil, but its a chore whereas typical dads love to tinker with their car and the boiler for 2 hours just for fun, in fact mine developed an autistic obsession with the gutters and the roof because we had a leak once
>>6625294no! Etruscan with Turkish influence
>>6624768Women are capable of the same. You are bitter and ignorant.
>>6623945Who is this tremendously based specimen?
>>6625384Correction:Most things we do as a society, whether that's being a dentist or accountant or whatever-- these are not really that difficult, most people can be trained to do it... in fact, soon robots will be trained to do it... so women can do it too. Doesn't mean women are capable of the same as men.
>>6623945Cato is one of the most autistic people in history.
>>6625532The post you quoted was responding to women being insecure and vicious and incapable of camaraderie and trust. To think the latter two are exclusive to men and the former pair is the same to women is myopic and inexperienced. Bitter, ignorant, amd insecure men will make up bullshit about others and believe it before admitting fault or inability. If you aren't the same individual, you're little different.
>>6625525Cato the Elder.
>>6625548>one of the greatestFTFY
This Cato was so much greater than the old fool they had in the fall of the Republic. Repeating "CARTHAGO DELENDA EST" at every single senate meeting, every single day might seem a little extreme for your average person reading about it, but let's be honest here, the Carthaginian dog had brutalized Rome and attempted to bring it to it's knees before. Do you believe, truly, that had Hannibal had the skill to completely wipe Rome off the face of the earth that he would have not taken such an opportunity? You and i both know, my dear friends that the dogs would have vaporized every single trace of Rome's existence. But the cowardly elephant fucker could not pull it off. Even when Rome lost 20% (TWENTY PERCENT) OF IT'S ENTIRE MALE POPULATION, they would not bow. They would not surrender. H*nnibal, the fat fucking kissass didn't stand a chance against the Roman fighting spirit. So now, after all that is said and done and "peace" has been achieved what was Rome supposed to do? Forgive and forget? Let the phoenician dogs live in peace? I don't think so. Leaving Carthage be would have been a crassus error. The dogs would be scheming, plotting in the shadows once more on how they will attempt to destroy Rome. So not only was it not over the top to repeat "CARTHAGO DELENDA EST" at every single senate meeting, every single day by day. It was downright NECESSARY. Never forget the crimes that have gone unpunished. Never forget the hundreds of thousands of brave Romans fallen against the deceitful phonecian dog. For everything that is fair and just. For everything that is good in life. For everything that is Roman. I am of the opinion, that Carthage MUST be destroyed.
>>6624928Cato would tell you that you must marry and beget children so that the city remains strong.
>>6625384The only thing women hate more than men is other women
>>6625286Cato the younger
men value sex and claim to be good at sex (which they are not, especially with virgin girls) only because they know it is on sex and harmless fun that a woman bases her decision to let men continue to care for her. If a woman was able to acknowledge a man in a non sexual way, then men would care more about this way than sex. But that is not the case, women center their life on sex and they love to let compete for them, take only the men who show how well they can entertain women.The blow back for women is that repulsive, poor men continue to try to be noticed by women and men do not know when to stop.Another problem for women, is that once a man is chosen by a woman for the fucking and caring, the man thinks he no longer competes against other men, and that woman no longer has any orbiters. The man thinks his victory is perpetual. Then the woman gets less and less harmless fun that she craves, so she choose a few other disposable orbiters. Then the current provider no longer feels acknowledged and begins to seek the validation of another woman.Also, women do not have babies because ''muh genes'' muh evolution.Women have babies because-they love to spread their legs-their parents push them for grand children-they get bored and they see the family as a way to keep the relationship alive-they see other women having babies and being okay with it This stuff about ''tough healthy males'' comes from the male love to interpret anything through their fantasy of dominance and submission, but this is because they love to confuse dominance with being active and submission with being passive so that they delude themselves that they are not the weaker sex by being so active, whereas their activities turn out to be only making women comfy and make life harder for men.
>>6627382Women know this male clinging to power fantasies by heart and they have no problem using it to avoid being as destitute as a men can become, while still thinking that those women realize the female fantasy of intimacy, of going beyond passing for and knowing to be slutty goldiggers, by being devoted to the realization of the fantasy of grandiosity of a few men or more commonly by having children and creating a family.What women want the most is harmless fun and intimacy. THey get to realize their fantasy first when they are young with men, by trying to let their ''ego'' on the side and realize the sexual fantasies of the men who fuck them. WOmen quickly learn that the only healthy way to relate to men is to be capitalistic on the male market.But The fantasy of being intimate is realized with having children. THis is what men do not understand. Women love ''to be selfless'' by caring about children and they delude themselves that their compassion and unconditional love for the children is a good thing. Childless women direct their retarded compassion towards animals and children they do not know.So women love children for the intimacy. Women rely on men for the sex and care they give.only women know how to love:love of men towards women = love of women towards children = unconditional love (utopian for men, effective for women)love of men towards children (= an aid to retire and stop their suffering) = love of women towards men = utility towards more pleasures and less pains now and in the future
>>6627328Cato would tell you youre a faggot
>>6627328>>6627672he'd do both, then creampie your boipucci in an attempt to get you pregnant to beget said children
Why are men so obsessed with women?
>>6627692Cato was against sleeping with young boys. He said its disgusting to see that a pretty boy is worth more than a hard worker
>>6626885Based and Carthago Delanda Est pilled
>That time when the Senate asked if he needed more funds to prosecute the war in Hispania and Cato said no and proceeded to raze every village in his path to feed and pay for his soldiers. What an absolute madman.
>>6625570I'm the anon that made the viciousness post but not the one you replied to just now.I thought it was evident we were just generalizing- of course it's possible for some women to not be vicious and it is obvious to any fan of History,but in order to evoke some kind of idea I had to establish a simplr premise- women are so and so because of x- and didn't deem it necessary to preface it by saying "Well, under certain circumstances, some females may tend towards this type of behavior etc etc" and clearly NotAllWomen. I don't know why you took this as an attack on yourself and frankly it's pathetic that you need this kind of clarification, and what's funny is that my premise still stands, untouchable as ever.
>>6625548Go back to burning your own children, African.
>>6627699Need them for children. Also lust, but that is only really a bother between 15 and 30.
>>6625294False the Greeks got their ideas from who the Romans were before they were colonizing Rome. Greeks an Italians are ultimates the same people who mixed with 2 different populations.
Uneducated plebs ought to read the classics before opening their traps: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/fustel/AncientCity.pdf