I've never taken Young Earthers seriously, but why is it that all of human history fits perfectly into that 6,000 year window?
It doesn't when you remember they also believe the entire world was underwater for a year c.2300 BC
>>6302910whats a young earther?
Because that's typically how far back Mesopotamian histories went, to about 3000 BC which is around the time writing became widespread. Ancient Hebrew biblical writers generally inherited this tradition and had a good idea about the timeframe they were working with for the "modern world" that in Mesopotamian tradition began about 3000 BC. >>6302945they say earth is ~6000 years old
>>6302910>why is it that all of human history fits perfectly into that 6,000 year windowwhat makes you think it does? Gobekli Tepe is ~12k years old, friendwritten records being young doesn't mean anything that happened before them just never actually did
and what do you call people who believe that humans came onto earth via asteroids or some shit?
>>6302910>but why is it that all of human history fits perfectly into that 6,000 year window?theres a glitch with egypytian long/short chronology that is useful to exploit if you want to add shit into history to fit and make yourself from a legendary heritage. and sieze power.thats why its called temporal powersyou control the timeline. therefore the paradigm.
>>6302982>what do you call people who believe that humans came onto earth via asteroids or some shit?a sect of believers in some mythology that makes no sense to me
>>6302945Fundamentalist Christians. Also Creationists.They just took the age of everyone in the bible and came up with a shit number like 6000 years, though the number fluctuates between 5000 and 12 000 as the fundamentalists can seem to agree on how long some people lived. According to some, there's people in the bible who lived 250 years or more.
>>6302982TranspermiaSounds gayer then it is, unlike the trans movement this makes a lot of sense
>>6302986and that shit that humans evolved from Apes is more believable or what?and mammals became king of the planet because the real kings (dinosaurs) of the animal kingdom died by some meteoritewhat would you say if both were a result of an alien race doing experiments and then dumping them on earthor what if all of the above is true and related?
>>6303193Not him, but>and that shit that humans evolved from Apes is more believable or what?Humans and Apes evolved from a common ancestor. A huge fossil record confirms>and mammals became king of the planet because the real kings (dinosaurs) of the animal kingdom died by some meteoriteWe've found the caldera>what would you say if both were a result of an alien race doing experiments and then dumping them on earthExtraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
>>6303218>Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidencenot a fan of this guys quote and you can't really proof this in any wayit is not impossible though that an alien race much more intelligent than us and other creatures in the universe dabbled with the thought of creating "artificial" life just look at humanity trying to play god and create robots in resembles of themselves, same thingmaybe it got out of control or they weren't satisfied, man did you guys never play Starcraft? at the very least I don't think there is one cause and origin for humanity and there are other humans in the universe on other planets
>>6303237>it is not impossibleBut there's simply no evidence for it, making it conjecture, no more or less a scientific theory than young-Earth creationism, and no more or less history than StarCraftEvidence that a meteor wiped out the dinosaurs IS extraordinary. We've found the caldera, whose radiocarbon dating checks out to the precise moment in the fossil records when all the dinosaur fossils disappear and are replaced with giant mammal fossils. All the evidence points to a rock the size of Mt Everest smacking into the Yucatan peninsula and wreaking catastrophic havoc on an animal line which had already been in decline. These aren't just words on a screen, they're assertions all backed by hard evidence.
>>6302910The earth was made in 6000 years and 1000 years is how long it took for earth to chill the fuck out until it was a full planet.
>>6302910Because Civ games start year 4000 bc?
>>6304316Just one more turn.
>>6303073That's the real reason I have a problem with creationism. At least the whole young earth 6k years or whatever ones.If you actually read chronicles, it is incredibly abstract. It's obviously a chronicle of the families, but not nearly as concise as you'd think it would be. At least, as you'd think it would be after these people tell you it's irrefutable evidence.Of course, it all stems from the days in genesis being literal days as well. It seems insulting to God for a religious follower jump to their own conclusions. Young earth is never mentioned in the Bible, why do these people have an obsession with it?
>>6302945A common symptom of brain damage.
6,000 years is about the longest period humans have gone so far with an unbroken line of record keeping. Essentially we've been living with the ability to trace back some civilization or society until around that time period, and anything before then has no surviving record that we can decipher or interpret. So as long as we living in a civilization are concerned, our existence as people living with the same basic concepts and views of life stops around 6,000 years ago.That's essentially the idea anyway, which makes sense as to why early Christians and Jews establish this logic. That is the furthest back they were able to find in recorded history of people living in functioning societies. Both Jews and early Christians were compilers of records and information.
>>6302910Because it’s fundamentally true
>>6303218>humans and apes evolved from a common ancestorThat implies to some people (brainlets) we are fundamentally different from apes. We are apes, too.