[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: Untitled.png (584 KB, 877x587)
584 KB
584 KB PNG
Analyses of skeletons from the Mary Rose are fleshing out the crew’s past, offering further evidence that Tudor England was a bustling scene of ethnic diversity.
>>
>The Guardian
Garbage editorializing. One of the major sources they cite only found evidence for <500 individuals of African descent in the 16th-17th centuries. Not quite a melting pot.
>>
Does "African heritage" mean a crewmember was an octaroon from spain?
>>
>>6296471
Means he was a slave. During a time of slavery in the British Empire
>>
>>6296331
>sailors

Deck hands are hardly sailors. They were most likely indentured servants like even many white deck hands were.
>>
>>6296331
Are they seriously trying to say that 18th century Britain, a country that facilitated the slave trade and strongly believed in racial superiority, was a bastion of diversity?
>>
>>6296331
>african blacks only
>diversity

So is East St Louis diverse?
>>
>>6296717
>>6296672
It's the tudor era. They try to push the narrative of racial diversity having started in the early modern age to far earlier times in order to "proof racists" that their nations have always been mixed.
>>
>>6296717
No they are claiming the tudor period was actually racially diverse, because 99% white British is not 100%.
>>
>>6296331
>ship's crew
>representative of local population
how
>>
Dr Miranda Kaufmann, the author of Black Tudors: The Untold Story, said the findings joined existing evidence of racial diversity in Tudor society, with England home to black sailors, craftsmen and court musicians.

But, she added, as the Mary Rose sank shortly before English merchants began trading in Morocco, she believes Mary Rose crew with north African heritage – or their relatives – were more likely to have travelled through Spain or Portugal before coming to England.
>>
>>6296672
>Tudor Era
>Time of Slavery in the British Empire.
Fucking pick one. The Tudor era ended in 1603, and the English Empire didn't gain it's firat colony (not counting Ireland) until 1609. The first slave ships didn't arrive there until the 1620s, and at the time, the concept of chattel slavery didn't exist in English law, so they were purchased, 'freed', then made to work off the cost of purchasing and freeing them as indentured servants for a set number of years. A racial heirarchy didn't develop within ondebtured servitude until the 1640s, and the concept of chattel slavery wouldn't exist in English law until the 1660s, by which time everyone alive when the Mary Rose took off was dead.
>>6296471
Not necessarilly. English Merchants had had a strong presence in much of West Africa (what would eventually become Nigeria & Ghana) for almost as long as the Portugese have, so there were definitely some Black people in England during this time period. DESU the only way this DNA result could possibly be surprising to you is if you get all your English history from butthurt Tommy Robinson supporting stormfags who legitimately believe that Britain was 100% ethnically PUUUUUUUURE right up to the day the Windrush docked.
>>
>>6296331
But why are Lefties so being obsessed with blacks
>>
>>6296898

its obvious since the roman era the odd merchant from one race would have been elsewhere but the constant 'the world/britain' has always been so diverse!!' just looks silly and desperate.

Most Brits would probably have never seen a black person
>>
>>6296331
IDC what your spergs have to say but that's a classic negroid skull
>>
>>6296331
Shill.
>>
>>6298352
>Most Brits would probably have never seen a black person
True, but most Brits would probably have never set sail on any kind of a ship let alone the Mary Rose. Funnily enough history books are rarely written about Harris, the shit-stained farmhand who tilled a field for forty years then dropped dead for no reason, without ever leaving his ~200-man home-town, or learning how to read.
If we're going to exclusively focus on history as it was viewed by urban dwellers, rich-bastards, and well-travelled merchants/soldiers/missionaries, then we can't pretend like those areas of life were as ethnically homogenous as the 99% of the country wgere nothing worth documenting ever fucking happened.
>>
>>6296812
>Dr Miranda Kaufmann, the author of Black Tudors: The Untold Story, said the findings joined existing evidence of racial diversity in Tudor society, with England home to black sailors, craftsmen and court musicians

1. (((Kaufmann)))
2. The 'sailors' would probably have been like those mentioned in the OP, North Africans who they describe simply as 'African' in a sly, deceitful attempt at conjuring up images of huge Negroid populations in mediaeval England
3. The 'craftsmen' they mention were non-existent, barring perhaps the odd Berber/Moor bringing textiles from Morocco or Tunisia
4. The 'court musician' I have heard of before, though I forget his name, and I distinctly recall it being made clear that there was no proof that he even existed

In the Roman period, 'Africa' originally referred to a single strip of land centred around modern Tunisia, and throughout the Dark and Middle Ages 'African' invariably meant 'a person from North Africa'
>>
>>6296717

>Tudors
>18th century

I know this board struggles with anything from before 1939, but come on.
>>
>>6300585
Don't be dense. This board is on average, massively stupid in regards to things post 1939 as well.
>>
>>6296331

I'm not sure why they're bigging this up as some shock revelation. It's been known that the crew of Mary Rose were from continental Europe for decades. One if theories about why it sank in the first place is that the crew didn't understand the orders in English to close the hatches and gun ports befire turning.
>>
>>6296449

The Mary Rose museum themselves say exactly the same thing.
>>
>>6300573

>deceitful attempt at conjuring up images of huge Negroid populations in mediaeval England
>accompanying artists impressions show this not to be the case

Cool conspiracy theory though.
>>
File: aussie.png (600 KB, 476x556)
600 KB
600 KB PNG
>>6300606
>>
>>6300637

Great rebuttal with plenty of evidence to prove me wrong.
>>
>>6300650
Thank you. It's a welcome change to see somebody concede defeat so graciously, and without the usual childish whining that accompanies post-demolition responses on this site.

Have a nice day, Mr McGee
>>
>>6300650
>>6300741
You are both fags of gigantic proportions.
>>
>>6300751

No u.
>>
>>6300751
I'm more a cigarillo than a cigarette, Pablo
>>
The Portuguese used east African sailors to find Indian Goa
>>
How much of history is even true at this point? I wonder how many different peoples' agendas went into creating the mosaic of history.
>>
>>6296331

Merely seeing the wine aunt and the baboon is enough to tell you that no legitimate science, anthropology or historical research has taken place.
>>
>>6296331
why do people like to pretend there were no black people in europe before the modern age?
>>
>>6301953
why do people like to pretend there were no white people in sub saharan africa before the modern age?
>>
>>6296331

>Melting pot of ethnic diversity
>Some nogs on a ship

Fuck it, bring back censorship. These companies promote censorship of the little man on social media and blackball alternative media channels, they should start getting a taste of their own medicine.
>>
>>6301953
>>6302211
Because most people have no understanding of history whatsoever.
>>
>>6296735
>They try to push the narrative of racial diversity having started in the early modern age to far earlier times in order to "proof racists" that their nations have always been mixed.
>>
File: devon.jpg (65 KB, 361x511)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>6300606
>>deceitful attempt at conjuring up images of huge Negroid populations in mediaeval England
>>
File: Paul Whiteman.jpg (622 KB, 953x721)
622 KB
622 KB JPG
>>6303002

>OMG Guys out of the hundreds of thousands of European paintings ten have Blacks in them!
>>
File: Christmas 8.png (2.87 MB, 2880x1800)
2.87 MB
2.87 MB PNG
>>6303002

>Look at all the vibrant diversity! Britain was always a country for Berbers and Nigerians
>>
>>6303026
I don't know it's like there was huge demographic expansion in England in the 18th and 19th centuries. While in the pre-modern period a more diverse admixture is to be expected.
>>
File: Edinburgh c. 1950.jpg (2.14 MB, 2880x1800)
2.14 MB
2.14 MB JPG
>>6303002

>Only White Supremacists and neo-Nazis think that Medieval Europe wasn't a rich, multicultural cross-way of the rich tapestry of the global community
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHhuBZEZESU


>>6303031

Yes because countries become more racially homogenous as time goes on. That's what my English literature professor taught me.
>>
>>6303065
I guess, if the population is expanding yeah, more homogeneity but if they reach a demographic plateau than it will be expected that importing population would be one way out.
>>
File: No ?.png (271 KB, 1330x1002)
271 KB
271 KB PNG
>>6303021

>If only you knew how bad things really are
>>
File: DRXHqg2WsAAQb5p.jpg (63 KB, 676x432)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
>>6303065
>medieval Europe
>video of 1950's post industrial/post war population boom
>>
File: St Joseph's Class 3.jpg (249 KB, 1000x720)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
>>6303079

If you are implying that all the Blacks left or something then I doubt they were a large population to begin with. My guess is that there were basically no Blacks, and of those present, their markedly different appearance caused artists to depict them due to the novelty factor. Of the cherry-picked examples you find of Blacks depicted in European art, their proportion of that art is in all likelihood a great overrepresentation of their actual presence in the relevant country.

Pic semi-related
>>
>>6298338
In every non specialized debate they always end in the lowest tier of civilizations so the left must feel bad for them, besides they have to enforce their agenda in white countries
>>6303009
the keyword is "huge"
>>
>>6303002
Ican't fathom that individual behind these post can serious in the blatantly stupid posts and not just fat neckbeard baiting for (you)'s to validate his pathetic existence through attention whoring.
How fucking retarded one must be to justify a notion that medieval europe was a racial melting pot by posting some low amount of paintings that have some times black person in it, be he some slave to a noble, St Maurice or just a randomly rare black person.
Like how can these individuals exists and type on 4channel?
>>
File: frog cringe.jpg (5 KB, 250x174)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
>>6296331
So is this a fake screenshot or what?
Surely nobody is dumb enough to unironically claim that one ship's worth of Africans means the whole of England was a "melting pot of ethnic diversity"?
>>
>>6303947
This is the current most popular mainstream media of absolute state of the western world.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/mar/14/mary-rose-crew-might-have-included-sailors-african-heritage

Welcome to the brave new modern world, anon. I hope you enjoy your stay and all the progressive sights it's ready to show you, the future is so bright...
>>
>>6303026
>>6303021
https://youtu.be/jfN60ZlZhpY?t=47
here's a nigger in edwardian england
>>
>>6304050
>that fight at 4:45
lol
>>
>>6296331
Lmao look at that smug nigger.
>>
File: 1541956711461.jpg (90 KB, 800x532)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>>6296331
You see this, Brits? Even back then Britain was multicultural, so stop complaining about African immigration! It was good for you back then so it will good for you right now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bHlaLjL1M4
>>
File: Mijtens.jpg (219 KB, 828x1125)
219 KB
219 KB JPG
>>6303926
>fat neckbeard
>baitingpathetic existence attention >whoring.fucking retarded

reeee
>>
>>6304239
>that bottom text format.
LMAO it makes all sence now, you're an RHWW We Wuz nigger.
Learn how to post on 4chan first and then goback to your WeWuzians propaganda, nigger.
>>
>>6303002
>>6303009
>>6303079
>>6304239
Go back, nigger >>>realhistoryww
>>
File: whitewash.webm (1.71 MB, 854x480)
1.71 MB
1.71 MB WEBM
>>
>>6304161
If brits didn't follow Thatcher and instead went full communism they might have ended up like China, an ethnostate that camps muslims.
>>
>>6304310
Reagan, Thatcher and Catholicucks are the degenerate trinity that put neoliberal capitalism above their own people.
Fuck em all.
>>
File: BLACKED.jpg (56 KB, 557x262)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
>>6304285
>>6304273

>nigger
>nigger

cry more white boi
>>
>>6304301
This is unironically correct though
Only 2014 anti sjw spergs would be so against this
>>
File: cockwash.jpg (35 KB, 480x360)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
>>6304353
WE
>>
>>6304420
>image of circumcision
>man on left is being restrained
>/pol/tards still say its just cockwashing
>as if having your cock washed by another man isnt gay as hell


white boys invented faggotry, and mad that they couldnt clean their own dick cheese and shit from their cocks.
>>
File: 1646842387.jpg (23 KB, 325x304)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>6304528
WUZ
>>
>>6301953
What percentage of Europe's population in 1600 was black African?
>>
File: kangs.jpg (69 KB, 500x391)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>>6304535
Kangz
>>
File: 1510650178336.png (805 KB, 899x360)
805 KB
805 KB PNG
>>6304564
N'SHIET
>>
>>6304572
Damn, even then civilized society hated the blacks.
>>
>>6304546
no way to say as the censi didnt list people by race.

but quite a few.

whats funny is white people like to think they arent just descended from barbarian migrant invaders

>inb4 celts were white
>>
File: Wall-scene-tomb-of-Huy.jpg (106 KB, 915x481)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>6304572
DAS RITE!

>>6304577
>hate the blacks
>keep breeding and trading with them

pick one.
>>
>>6304577
>what is war
>>
>>6304580
>but quite a few.

If they didn't have a census how do you know this? Can you quantify "quite a few"? England had about 4 million people at the time.
>>
File: BLACKED (2).jpg (140 KB, 558x600)
140 KB
140 KB JPG
>>6304572
>civilized society hated the blacks.

i wonder why?
>>
File: 1474281332738.jpg (106 KB, 640x362)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>6304585
>nubian nigger slaves bringing gifts to their Egyptian overlords
*smacks lips*
So you be sayan.
>>
>>6300573
>(((Kaufmann)))
HAHAHA EPIK JEWJEWJEWJEWJEWJEWJEWJEWJEWJEW XDDD!!!
>>
File: 1487422524563.jpg (308 KB, 743x808)
308 KB
308 KB JPG
>>6304593
In ancient medditeranian tan was representitive of a working class males who worked under sun too long.
Fair people were represented a beutiful domestic noble class.
This pattern is common in pretty much every ancient north equator civilization from europe, middle east, egypt, persia, india, china and even japan.

Charcoal people were always represented slaves or non-human demons ;)
So you can continue posting nigger fantasy, kaffir nigger.
>>
>>6304623
Wrong
Fairness was only appreciated among women
Men were preferred dark
>>
File: Drake_Jewel_1.jpg (69 KB, 475x608)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>>6304590
>England had about 4 million people at the time.

theres no way you could know this either as the defined borders of "Europe" weren't established

>If they didn't have a census how do you know this?

I don't know this, it's a casual estimate based on research done in 1911." quite a few", would be in my interpretation, enough to be noted, yet not enough to justify political representation. so if I was to say out of 4 million, maybe 30,000 spread out in different regions.

the problem arises when you try to define who is "black"

/pol/ will insist black= dark skin, then subsaharan africans when its convenient, yet when you ask to define subsaharan africans, they say bantu, when you ask them to define that, they say congoids, and so on. their definition of blacks is anything they can associate their racial paradigm with.

going so far as to say civilized eastern africans who are subsaharan are caucasoids. Yet somalians are niggers, despite being in east africa.

and when shown metallurgy and civilization on west african, they attriibute it to arabs.

its really a no win topic. unless you have a political axe to grind.

I just say they were there throughout history, but in no where near the numbers they are now. and thats in no way a justification for unchecked immigration
>>
>>6304645
Men were working in open field or battlefield under sun.
Women were working mostly domestic house chores.
There are some exceptions, but nobility was mostly represented as fair richfags who didn't need to work outside.
>>
>>6304657
>theres no way you could know this either as the defined borders of "Europe" weren't established

Just use modern ones.

>I don't know this, it's a casual estimate based on research done in 1911." quite a few", would be in my interpretation, enough to be noted, yet not enough to justify political representation. so if I was to say out of 4 million, maybe 30,000 spread out in different regions.

30k is .0075% of England at the time.
>>
>>6304623

>Fair people were represented a beautiful domestic noble class.

anyone ever seen historical revsionism this hard?

>In ancient medditeranian tan was representitive of a working class males who worked under sun too long.

what ever helps you cope better anon
>>
File: germanic.jpg (73 KB, 770x545)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
>>6304684
>30k is .0075% of England at the time.

thats an acceptable estimate in my opinion. seeing as englands history post roma was literally snownigger central
>>
File: races of the world.png (491 KB, 1547x1512)
491 KB
491 KB PNG
>>6304657
>going so far as to say civilized eastern africans who are subsaharan are caucasoids.
They are quite literally caucasoids. White or Black isn't a race but an outdated imperial census to diffirintiate slave from master. It only stuck and became prominent in americas.
Negroid is a race and it has bunch of subraces like Nilots, Pigmies, Bantus etc.
Caucasoid is a race and it has bunch of subraces from diverse europids, taurids, iranids, hemetics, arabids etc.
"Whites" as a concept more represents europeans than other middle easterners and north africans and even thait is kind of debatable.
"Blacks" are mostly the just negroids, but there are also cases where mixed populations like that of east africans also take "black" identity due to how close and similar they look, that's also debatable.

Also obsessing about what /pol/oid opinion is, is fucking pathetic.
>>
>>6304700
>anyone ever seen historical revsionism this hard?
It's not revisionism* but actually established fact. It's just your subhuman brain interpretation how sees this as an race issue other that class and work condition.
Women in history mostly were domestic and so didn't have much sun as working men, just like nobles.
It was artistic convention of ancient art which played on cultural influence.
>c-cope
Study actual history than some shitty afro-american revsionism portying themselves as descendant of ancient meso americans, egyptians, chinese, white moors etc.
Or well, continue posting bait if that's your sole purpose, we all crave attention in any form sometimes i guess.
>>
>>6304657
>/pol/ will insist
This isn't /pol/ but /his/, nigger. Go back there if you're so much insecure to care about what stormnigs think what is white or black.
>>
>>6304752
Oh so somalians are civilised caucasiods?
>>
>>6304847
>civilised
Wouldn't say so, seeing in how much mess their county is.
>caucasoids
Genetically and racially they are caucasoids like ethiopians, arabs, berbers, caucasians, europeans etc.
But they themselves take african/black identity if it worths anything.
>>
>>6298338
Why are storm fags so obessed with them?
>>
>>6302211
Who pretends that?
>>
>>6304528
>>6304420
Ah you know egyptians would use red to represent cushites and black to represent nilotes
>>
>>6304908
Cushites weren't nigs but caucasoids just like levantines and berbers, even most egyptians art seperates nubian nilot nigs from cushite egyptians.
Note, when i say "caucasoid" i don't mean they were "nordic aryan blonde" shit like stormnigs claim. Original egyptians (before they became cosmopolitan melting pot) were caucasian people who spoke afro-asiatic language which is related to semetic and berber ones.
>>
>>6304899
anyone with half a brain, white people were extremely rare in SSA in the past just like black people were extremely rare in Europe
>>
>>6304899
>>6305096
Whites couldn't easily travel into Subsaharan Africa due to disease.
>>
>>6304752
Which is my point. Defining “black” is nearly impossible . And the sub race argument doesn’t work consistently . /pol/ opinions are accepted as facts throughout 4chan . Half of this board is debunking that shit.
>>
>>6304887
Without blacks the social hierarchy will shift and place them at the bottom . So they have to constantly put blacks down.
>>
>>6304908
Citation needed
>>
>>6305118
That’s dumb anon. People crossed the Sahara all the time there were even cities and villages throughout the desert
>>
>>6305261
/pol/ opinions is wast opinion of mainstream normie culture and not just 4chan.
Actual scientific(Darwinist) understanding of what human races are, isn't very popular and hated by either racist extremist or egalitarian extremists who deny that race as a concept even exists.
This is particularly american problem, but since american culture and influence is spread among rest of the world, the misunderstanding becomes mainstream in other countries.
>>
>>6305308
I mean I can argue against Darwin , but I’m glad we have an understanding
>>
>>6305279
Ethiopians described themselves as red and nilotes as black
>>
>>6305285
Europeans couldn't really travel into inner Subsaharan Africa until treatments were found for malaria. If you are unaware of that then that is you not knowing your history not me being "dumb".
>>
>>6305261
The definition doesn't need to work 100% of the time, 98% is plenty enough for the definition to be of use
>>
>>6305486
>Europeans couldn't really travel into inner Subsaharan Africa until treatments were found for malaria
yeah because non-Europeans are somehow immune to malaria, right?
>>
>>6305751
SS Africans are literally adapted to malaria bc sickle cell, but develop rickets in Europe

>In the United States, vitamin D insufficiency varies dramatically by ethnicity. Among males aged 70 years and older, the prevalence of low serum 25(OH) D levels was 23% for non-Hispanic whites, 45% for Mexican Americans, and 58% for non-Hispanic blacks. Among women, the prevalence was 28.5%, 55%, and 68%, respectively.

>People with darker skin produce less vitamin D than those with lighter skin, for the same amount of sunlight.
>>
>>6305751
Subsaharan Africans have a higher level of immunity, yes. I'm not sure whether you are trolling for 'yous' quite honestly.
>>
File: Belafonte_3.jpg (97 KB, 725x536)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
>>6305737
>, 98% is plenty enough for the definition to be of use

it works maybe 40% of the time and dropping, precisely because of migration and racemixing.

thats why the us is 56% already. when 90% barely half a century ago.

19th century demographic classifications like race matter less and less in the face of cross breeding
>>
>>6305486
>all of subsaharan is malaria infested so Europeans couldn’t cross the Sahara
>Europeans literally skated through the America’s despite yellow fever, malaria, and influenza.
>>
>>6306108
>Europeans literally skated through the America’s
no
>>
>>6296331
Don't even need to read the headline. Just the pic of the smug nigger and the cat lady is enough.
>>
>>6305821
This is true, but still most africans aren't resistant because sickle cell allele homozygotes all died until recently.
>>
>>6304700
That's just a Black Figure Amphora. Not meant to represent a person's particular color or race.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-figure_pottery
Black-figure pottery painting, also known as the black-figure style or black-figure ceramic (Greek, μελανόμορφα, melanomorpha) is one of the styles of painting on antique Greek vases. It was especially common between the 7th and 5th centuries BC, although there are specimens dating as late as the 2nd century BC.
>>
>>6306310
it probably knows and doesn't care anon
people spread disinfo on /his/ all the time now
>>
>>6306162
>figuratively
>>
>>6306310
>it’s black figure pottery just a random style with no evidence to support that assumption except people’s interpretation
>no way it could be because there were blacks in Ancient Greece
>>
>>6306811
native North Americans really held back the tide, for a good century or two senpai
>>
>>6306878
bro...they were just too much to rule at the time. 50 men seized roughly 1000km few months.
>>
>>6296331
Who the fuck cares about English history only boomers that’s who. Fuck off m8.
>>
>>6308187
nah
>>
File: Joao_IV_proclaimed_king.jpg (226 KB, 1200x997)
226 KB
226 KB JPG
>>6296331
has anyone pointed out that England and Portugal had close relations at the time and that Portugal had substantial African possessions by the early 16th century?

bro was probably a Portuguese sailor.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.