feels forced to me, like they came up with it during early stages and just went with it for the whole design process. it's not as good as they probably think it is
Well, actually, that´s not the 2020´s official logo.
>>368903Looks absolutely stunning. It's not it, though
Pretty obvious choice a thousand other designs would have thought of.
Conceptually it’s pretty good, too bad it’s ugly
>>368903The the japs officially embracing future funk/vaporwave?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJsUpeXK6Jo
Altering the original logo is not allowed in any official capacity
actual logo pic related
>>368903Didn't read the brief/10
The 2s look top-heavy and stupid
>>368980Looks more 60s/70s than vaporwave
>>368988Would've been better if the star in the middle had consistent sharp points
>>368988>>369056Yeah, the more I look to this logo I get more and more disgustedDoes anyone know why they didn't justify and made it symmetric?
>>368988Was just about to post this. Actual logo is good, the one in OP is meh. It's clever to a point; subverting the ring use to represent the Americas in order to get the flag in is an oversight.
>>369061It has three-way symmetry, doofus.
>>368988just makes me feel sad and angry, what is it een meant to be, it represents nothingcompare/contrast the 64 summer olympics logoboldcleansimpleit's just a big red circle with a gradient but it works
>>369071in 1964 im guessing this was a baller logo, now its like a grade school project. Not bad just that the tech has become that user freidly now.
>>369061it's got a pattern
>>368988This one is much better. OP logo is trying too hard to be simple when really they're adding a bunch of elements that dont complement each other. My problem with the official one though is that it looks somewhat messy. If it was symmetrical it'd be easier to look at.
>>368940Looks like one of those layered lollipops
>>369071ok buddy, it looks like flag and the rings literally office clip art
its clever, but it doesnt look good or balance well
>>369071I like it. It just needs to be modernized a bit.
>>369071>represents nothing>what is a chrysanthemum (basically national flower of Japan)>why is it shaped like a circle (flag)>what is mathmatical beauty (its entirely constructed out if three shaoes. Even though its asymetricallity admittedly makes it messier; it adds to the woah factor that the internal flowers renains symetrical)
>>368988>45 rectangles>45*4= 180 sides>204 countries in the olympics.For an extra 6 rectangles; they couldve made the sneakiest flag ever.
>>368903Its hardly even clever.>hurdur ohhhhhh we cans mmaje circles toos ahahahaha>oohpshie dur is one more curcle>wait japan curvke flag>hurdhduhdusbejdyejsusheudr
>>368940hell yeah bitch>>369227you didn't get it did you
>>369073>hurr durr the more combligaded it is the bedderYou're fucking retarded
>>368903I love this. Ties the year and Japan's flag into one elegant logo. Clearly communicates everything it needs to: the event, the year, and the place. All the elements are incorporated well into each other.>>368988Now this just looks like a clusterfuck. I can't tell what it's trying to communicate. All the elements are totally disjointed from each other and I have no idea what the big checkered ring is supposed to be.
>>368903this is reddit, this is memes, this is videogamesthe logo is supposed to convey a feeling and an atmosphere, a style, emotions, it should convey energy. it's not a place for shitty reddit jokes. as a logo it's completely without merit. it's a masterclass in being a fag
>>370063Didn't hate the 2020 ver. to begin with, but this one definitely has more soul and creativity to it.
>>370063aah the 90s liberal use of serifs
>>370067don't get me wrong, it's "clever" but there's more to design than being clever. a logo needs longevity and richness. a bit of mystique>>370070it really dates it but I still love it. it's due for a comeback I reckonhere's another I like but I can see why it's a bit more contentious.the elements are too tightly packed together and the fade effect could certainly be a bit more neatly done. I just love the pattern
>>370063God damn I still love this one so much. It's just too good.The font choice always did make me think of Marlboro though.
>>370070I blame Nirvana.
>>369485This actually looks more dated
>>368903A bad design meant to amaze normies.I mean look how close the yellow ring gets to the black 2. DISGUSTING
>>370377Looks more late-80s than mid-60s, imo.
It looks interesting lol
>>369485modernized a bit....fuck this world!!!
>>368903spacing is fucked
>>368903Looks like shit.
>>371546I like A and B, B being my favorite. A just appeals to my love for nice clean geometric shapes. Also love how they put the gradient in B to make part of it gold while keeping the rest flat, looks nice.C and D makes me want to puke.
>>368903idk guys, i kinda think it slaps
>>370738No you are just a zoomer. It looks like those neo synth/vapor wave shit. So neo 80s, not actually 80s feel.MAYBE if not putting those retarded spaces in the sun it would look a little bit better.
>>371772>>370738that lined gradient style was actually a late '70s thing that carried until the end of the '80s.
>>369063>subverting the ring use to represent the AmericasWhy does everyone think that there's this beef between America and Japan? There isn't.