This thread is a contest where we post the worst logos we've ever seen.Try to beat this, faggots.
>>350007or this gem
>>350010"It took me a few seconds to draw it, but it took me 34 years to learn how to draw it in a few seconds." — Paula (((Scher)))
>>350007What if this guy actually looks like that and what if his burgers actually look like that?
>>350126in case you're serious: first, it's still ugly as fuck 2000s CorelDRAW. second, it's so complex it's an illustration, not a logo, because it scales like shit and is hardly applicable to anything. third, cartoons are best reserved for kids stuff, not restaurants. fourth, portraying the owner and the product is some of the most tired ideas for a logo.
>>350127You literally described the average pizzeria logo
>>350007he looks like he's about to Cosby that burger
https://www.gnu.org/graphics/package-logos.htmlMost logos on this page
>>350409>the absolute state"anyone can be a designer" they said
>>350399fucking this. Its literally just a swiggle. Did a two year old draft the logo?
>>350409This one is kino.
this is such a dead board
>>350427slow doesn't mean dead
>>350007why does he look like Putin
>>350420consider that this is in cursive
Bump form the dead.
>>350023what you have against Paula Scher ?
This was from some pizza place I think.
>>352427he looks like the pizza is paining him
i made this shit a long time ago
This shit is terribly wrong, and those guys want their logo on every of my production, can't get it through anymore.
>>352443that grunge font is searing my corneas
>>350399Nah, That shit has aged like wine from the 80's
>>352451Fuckin Birth of a Hero font A.K.A Every screamo band's logo in 2009.
>>350399That is not a logo.That is someone testing their mouse with the brush in MSPaint.
>>352443yeah it's in the wrong language
>>352781it's not that bad...
>>350418what the hell was that even for
>>350007move aside cunts
>>353629shut the darn up sent from my viewsonic
>>350023>>352410Pentagram in general have the most... weird logo designs. Like the fucking fading Weight Watchers rebrand.
>>350007a challenger appears
>>354055what the fuck
found this absolute masterpeice doing market research
>Pronounced "cunts">Logo literally in the shape of a cunt
>>354628It's pronounced cunst though.
>>354055>>354621Oh shit. Pizzagate 2.0?
>>354626>Can you make the list of services below the smart phones bolder so they stand out more?>I know in my last round of changes that I had requested you put in the web addresses before the social media handles in case people can't tell that the icons mean Facebook, Twitter etc. but I've given it more thought and I think you should expand these to include the “https://www.” in case the person looking at them can't tell that they're websites.>I'm not sure if using a white man as your mascot is inclusive enough. Can you turn him into a minority in Photoshop? Maybe change the color of his skin so he looks asian? Just a suggestion.
>>350399is it bad that i like it
>>352781I know that place, and I know Carlitos, and I can say: that logo is accurate, Carlitos is ugly as fuck... and so the food, fucking terrible.
>>350399does everything a good logo should. Not too complex, instantly recognizable, retains clarity from any size.
>>353629fuck off faggot
>>350007i think this one got an award for worst logo of Colombia.its from a public transport thing
they should do a visual update for their logo
this is presented like courageous design of future.
>>356174Walking into GW is already like opening a time capsule, I don't think the logo can save it
>>356201you'd be surprised of what a new visual identity can do
>>350409>https://www.gnu.org/graphics/package-logos.htmlwhat the fuck
OUT OF MY WAY YOU FUCKING SHITS
Coast to coast
>>352427cant find the full pictre roght now but thats from some philly cheese steak place
>>352443Très sale anon
>>355457i like this little dude hahaha
>>356245Hey this one looks actually dec-*opens it*oh never mind.
>>350279I think a difference between poor planned out and ugly
>>350007okay, I get most of the shit on that burger, but what in the name of hell is that purple stuff
>>354628Kunst is german and does is not remotely pronounced like cunt. Check let Google pronounce it for you.
I hate this logo, what it stands for, and anything its attached to. FUCK this logo to eternity
>>356454Not bad.>>353629Not bad.>>352781Not necessarily bad, but the illustration is ugly.>>350399Not bad in principle/composition, the arc should have just been pathed.>>356827This and viewsonic have to be the best logos in this thread. Principle, design, and branding wise.
>>356793it's a jellyfish burger
>>355457>>350425>>352427This is great reaction image material
>>355457He is a good fren.
>>356454Looks like a padlock
This is a government agency from Brazil called "Ministério da Justiça".
>>356908I actually like the Realtek logo. I cant say that it is good, but I like the quirky-ness. I would wear it on a t-shirt.
>>350010this is absolutely not ugly, i like it
>>356908Good idea, shit logo.
Bitch is Thicc af
>>354626>>354711>open this and get a kick out of it>notice I live 15 minutes away
>>356060^This wins. Hideous.
>>356827What does this logo stand for? I see people wearing it, but I don't get it.
This is the logo of a village.>Everyone thinks that turtles live in that village because of this logo.
>>353629I unironically avoid viewsonic products solely because of the shitty logo
bootleg ben and jerrys from Aldi, tastes like shit too.
>>356174I never want this logo to change.
>go and post these>being this rudeRude
i vomit everytime i see it
>>356503>>356914>>357142Wow how could the owner possible green light these?Heres one for website redesign that never went through. He wanted everything changed BUT THE LOGO...
>>350010drained and cool
>>355145Was gonna post
>>357356Lol what kind of company?
They payd 3.5 million hungarian forints for this logo design.
>>357384fish fry restaurant
>>357179Unironic shameless consumerism
>>350007a bit too faggy for me but they did well with the art style.
>>355145fuck off audacity is doing its best
>>357355The "i" looks like its a drunk guy kicking the D while trying to swing with the L at the D
I know this site,is in spain,WTF I KNOW THIS GUY
>>354055>>354621Really don't think that the world waited for pedos to start drawing triangles in abime
>>357142This one is pretty good desu
>>355457this one is gold
>>350007I bet reddit has more talented and professional graphic designers than you faggots. And that's still not saying much.
god this thread sucks>hurr durr minimalist design bad i need to spend 20 years on a logo or i dont deserve a paycheck>hurr durr i hate this brand so by default its logo is badfuck off(besides the legitimately bad ones like OPs of course)
>>359495>t. Assrekt Supreme fanboyDid you spend £800 on a red pencil and nobody in your office gave a shit?
>>350010postmodern and jewpilled
>>359496nah but i did buy a few hoodies and resold them to some saps for above retail after wearing them for a few years.regardless of myself, you hate the brand, not the logo. you hate what it represents and the people who use it (probably out of jealousy or spite, not sure)this thread is about bad LOGOs, not companies you dislike. Supreme logo is just some text in a box, it's pretty inoffensive and if it didnt carry around the baggage that you dislike you wouldnt give a shit. you just sound like an upset manchild desu
>>353629Can confirm, I own Viewsonic
>>356072>>356176these are unironically good
>>357142>why is that cow so attractive???AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
>>358366>>356827>>353629>>350399these are arguably pretty good>>357142I like it/the art isn't too bad, but maybe not a good logo
>>359514It's probably more to do with the logo being absolutely bog standard and banal, but it's held up as a success because millenials think spending a lot of money on branded, ordinary stuff is ironic and therefore cool.This reflects what's going on in the design world. Things aren't appreciated because of their artistic execution or intelligent concept, they're lauded almost for their laziness in being able to explain away the minimum amount of work. Bad design is now good design, because this 40 page brand guideline says so.Nobody is jealous or spiteful of Supreme tat. It's neither attractive nor particularly useful, and any designer worth his salt could just buy it or create perfect imitations of it. It's just all a bit tragic that faggots like you will defend them when they're encouraging the death of the field you show enough interest in to argue on a Sri Lankan Brass Polishing forum.>I wore these clothes for years then sold them for above retailShit that didn't happen.
>>359730you forget that supreme is not a high fashion brand or something really worth even discussing here. it was a small time skate shop that ripped off a barbara kreuger design in the first place for some shirts. the fact that it's taken off so much is just proof that a simple design with the right marketing can go a long way. good luck with believing in some phony idea that design always has to be complex and intricate for it to be worth anything. it sounds more like you're just jealous that you put in more work than is needed and get paid less than what you deserve (if you even work in the industry)the designer of the citibank logo got paid 1.5 million dollars for this logo and she finished it during the meeting. is she a bad designer because she didn't spend months on an intricate design for them?if you want to be a pretentious artist and gloat about the complexity of your work go right ahead. this is the graphic design board though, so i think you're in the wrong place.>Shit that didn't happen.ok dude, i'm not gonna post grailed receipts or whatever so you believe me, but i don't know why i would lie about something like that. supreme doesnt make stuff a second time. almost every piece they make is a 1 off, so it hardly ever loses it's value. if you don't want to believe me you are free to not lol.
>>359684First one barely passesUr opinions bad anon
>>357355Its a croatian store, ive been in it and the logo isnt that bad
>>356882Supreme is fucking retarded
>>355145Its a good normal logo you cuck
>>359781it's german you dumb croat
>>359781lidl is german, they just have their stores everywere in europe
>>350409Most of these are fine, they're for packages, programs and libraries mostly, not a corporations. Extensions to LaTeX and GNU shouldn't have random logos and incorporating the ox and TEX logos into package logos is a way to easily recognize what they're for.
>>357200The reaper of souls will slowly end you if you ever stand on a sideways ladder.
Currently re-branding this place. I could smear shit on the walls and it would be better.
>>360019as long as u color the shit texture an appealing warm color that inspire hunger, like yellow, orange, etc. i agree with your statement
>>357386Someone got paid a pretty big sum for this too IIRC
>>350007Well yeah. I gotta put aluminum around the rest of the ceiling and then I gotta buy a new lock for the door.
>>360021I was thinking a rich brown. Focus more on the coffee aspect. But I'll try that.
>>357200Its called a crest not a logo you stupid zoomer
>>355457why is he hovering
>>360024i love how the Swedish version is just ???confusion ???
>>357179Supreme tardSupreme brickSupreme betaSupreme lack of brain cellsSupreme happy meslSupreme faggotSupreme cuntSupreme nigger
>>360670>>360683it is the same international brandkinda
>>357179They make extremely short print Tee Shirts and hoodies like this one that costs $800. Nobody on the street actually wears their official products, but it's far more popular than Louis Vuitton or Mercedes when it comes to what logo you want on your wallet or snapback.
>>360920a bit misleading to say the hoodie costs $800. they cost about $150 generally, scarcity and hype bring resell prices upwards of $800.
>>356176high concept, low execution
i wonder if anyone can defend this piece of crap logo.
>>356454>golden roast>its fucking white
>>357142this one is full of SOUL
>>360019it's not that horrible ignoring the horrible gradients
>>356454It looks so hairy
I've hated this mouse for as long as I can remember.
>>350007It's like the character is telling me to eat shit and the burger looks like he feels like shit.3,5/10 might dine.
>>353629Fuck off you flaming Gala, I didn't even know what ViewSonic was selling and I was already sold.
>>356503A FUCKING LEOPARD
>>358412I laughed thank you
>>362041BUGS IN THE HOUSE>>>>>CALL THE MOUSE
>>356236I threw up in my mouth and swallowed it.
>>356827This logo does the job my boi. Just because you are a poor fag and hate the brand doesnt make it bad.
>>356176Djon Fedor? Fedor John?
>>356908Kinda looks like it spells FML
>>350409>mfw recutilsIs this a joke?
>>350010>History of Zedomax?>Here’s the original logo of Zedomax Max created when he was 9 years old, a “ghost” company he made in his bedroom as a 4th grader in elementary school:https://zedomax.com/blog/about/Makes sense
>>360024Any Europe bros care to explain what the Fuck was the thought process behind this?
What does GD think of this ?
>>350007Doesn't beat the shitty logo of the local spic takeaway near me.
>>356908Good idea, but their so inconsistent with the style.The claws, and letter R look like an 8 bit sprite, but the rest of it is just minimalistic angular shapes, and to top it off, the legs, and arms aren't even symetrical. It was a really good idea, but whever drew it just had no clue what they were doing.
>>360647you're mentally ill, I'm sorry you think youre hating a brand but in reality its just a scapegoat because you hate yourself.
>>362713Should've gone for BEEZ NICHE BALMS.Do want though nice.
>>350007Circle K bathroom mascot
>>357386I like this. It's simple, and is easily recognizable as m n b.
>>350007I have to see this every day on my way to work.
>>360684Tío rico can translate to “Tasty Uncle”
>>362325John Fedor they pay 1 500 usd for that.johnfedor.by
>>363047it makes me want to drink just to forget I ever saw it
>>360646Would probably look better as an embroidered patch
>>360027you mean like shit?
>>354055Conspiratard meme aside, it looks more like nachos than a pizza.
>>352781Don't you dare to mess with Carlitos
>>360604It's the chicken
>>357179The logo is the entire reason the clothes are worn in the first place.I shit you not.
>>356454Hurr come eat my golden roast
>>357386 > muh
>>357200This is a crest, not a logo, and regardless, it's dope.
>>363591>>That's the secret
>>350007There's something I dislike about this guy's caricature. And lol at that red-green gradient.
>>357386>They payd 3.5 million hungarian forints for this logo design.I always wonder, does this count as just logo or the whole rebranding?
>>362713Don't like it a lot but had a hearty kek
>>355145Open source logos in general.
>>357355I don't mind the design so much as the clashing colors.
>>362901Fuck you my girlfriend is working on a difficult assignment and I'm at the other end of the room trying not to fall over laughing
>>350279Diamond is not crash flashbacks
>>365622I'd totally steal this logo but damn it has a watermark copyright there can anyone help me out and remove it? My company flies out (helicopter style) barefooted coons before they notice so it would be perfect
>>353629What? The ViewSonic logo is kino
>>350007I think in terms of popular logos, go daddy's is maybe the worst of all time
>>356827Supreme's iconic box logo is a ripoff of the style of graphic designer Barbara Kruger.
>>356908I'm gonna fight for this lil guy. I acknowledge what >>362717 said about the clashing styles, but that's kinda what I've always liked about it, it's so unexpected that it shot right past annoying and came back around for me.This is coming from someone who gets really annoyed when people try to do "pixel art" that doesn't actually conform to a grid and shit like that, so I dunno. This one just appeals to me in a weird way.
>>366044It's kind of generic and dull feeling, but it's well executed enough.
>>353629Anything with a bird cannot be shit (change my mind)
>>357386They just went full HP on this one. Why do designers seem to dislike anti-subtlety?
>>366096>Why do designers seem to dislike anti-subtlety?if this work was subtle, no one would care. subtle work is done all the time, it's simply not posted here.
>>355145>crap, it's 2015 already and our logo is outdated with all the gloss and shiz>quick, make a vector of it but limit the colours to 4 and replace the heavy shadow with barely-noticable bevel>fucking A+ work Harry *pops a bottle of champagne*
>>366136>>355145>>357383tried to make it look better. opinions?
>>366186>>366136>>357383>>355145fuck i forgot the file
>>366187you did the obvious but yeah, anything is better than what they have.I'd give it a different font though, something condensed like the original, like Fira Sans or Oswald. because otherwise, there's little difference from Spotify.
>>354774This is unironically spectacular.
>>356174>>357344Agree. Never change.
I win bitches
>>366187>>366186It's certainly a step up visually, but it smells corporate and bloodsucking to me now. Draws mental comparisons to any number of paid streaming services.
france national television just paid 300k for its new graphic charter, the 300k are of course paid with public money :)))))
>>366242they probably paid this for a whole redesign, not just logos.
>>366246That's exactly what I said
>>366242Looking at this “rebrand” I think it’s an improvement.
Honorable mention: old logo of the Kabelkanal, today called "kabel eins", German TV channelIt looks slightly less bad in the idents but is still garbage.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwmzJsDuV_g
>>350427>this is such a dead board>I'm responding to you 9 months laterguess you were right after all
>>362698Corruption. Making a bribe or illegitimate payment look like a legal if daft trade of services.
>>366242omfg i saw this, it looks so completely devoid of reason to exist nowi mean, those weird trapezoids had no flair to them either, but they were so ingrained in people that people know them anyway, and then some amazing designer decided "hurrr durr i make le minimalist dot im so smart"granted, many other parts of the redesign look great... but fuck this minimalist logo
>>365953I was always confused, is that hair or stink lines?
>>350409Come on; logos made by programmers for libraries is low hanging fruit.
>>366256well, it's clearly a cable and the colors are the most saturated colors you could get on analog TV thus guaranteed to always stick out, plus it snuggly fits into the top left corner - at least a 6/10