Has anyone else noticed people are turning off their wifi and staying away from their phones a bit more often?Is it all this hype about 5G being harmful? When I found out that wireless uses the exact same frequencies that my microwave oven uses I was pretty weirded out.
>5G WiFi>Microwaveam confuse.
>>71391403on your wifi router you should have 2.4ghz frequency.to heat your food, microwaves use 2.4ghz.coincidence? i think not
>>71391432no, my WiFi router uses 60Ghz and 5Ghz frequency.
>>71391483you dont have them both turned on all the time do you? if so, you are cooking yourself when you sleep
>>71391515I know you're baiting but you would feel the heat if the wifi waves were the same as microwaves.
>>71391515 i dont think im cooking myself but the router's cheap fucking antennae get too hot to comfortably touch.
>>71391784That's nod normal :DDD-t. EE
>>71391432Microwave uses 2.4mhz, you're off by a factor of 1,000 retard
>>71391794yeah, i think this router might fail soon. any recommendations for a router thatis a maximum of 3U in sizeat least 4 10Gb/s RJ-45 ports5Ghz and 60Ghz WiFi
>>71391814Both microwaves and routers commonly use 2.4GHz because the FCC says that's the band they're allowed to use.The big difference is microwaves are usually a thousand times more powerful and focus all their energy on a point six inches away from the waveguide
>>71391858Source? Oh that's right, you're trolling and literally anyone can look this up themselves
>>713918952.4mhz isn't even microwave, it's short wave or HF depending on who you ask.Are you the anti 5G spammer from yesterday false flagging?
>>71391515If my phone is burning me, why don't I feel it?
>>713913705G isn't harmful, the conspiracy theorists are wrong.A candle and the sun both emit energy in the same wavelength in the form of physical light, doesn't mean the candle will burn you.>>71391858This. You are comparing a 4w appliance meant for communication to a 700w+ appliance specifically made to heat water.>>71391895https://www.air802.com/fcc-rules-and-regulations.htmlPic related
>>71391370relax OP, the plastic you are swallowing in water will give you cancer way before wireless does.
>>713919234W appliance that typically puts out a watt or less of RF power
>>71391814That is absolutely not true. Not even in the microwave spectrum.
>>71391909>>71391923>Still no source that microwave ovens use 2.4ghzThis is amusing. Keep squirming
>>71391971Are you retarded or just gayhttp://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Waves/mwoven.html
>>71391753>>71391918microwaves have effects at levels below thermal. they are especially damaging to sperm cells
>>71391993It literally says 2,4 mhz retard, just like I've been telling you
>>71391370>>71391432>>exact same frequencies that my microwave oven usesthe reason for this is that the frequency wifi operates is in an unlicensed band. This band is unlicensed because the FCC made an exception for microwaves. Wifi also uses 5 GHz because the 2.4 GHz bands have become crowded.>>71391483>>60 GHzbullshit. Also, 60 GHz is one of the absolute worst frequencies. It has very high atmospheric attenuation
>>71392074get a frequency counter and turn on your microwave
>>71392092>collating anonymous posts to attack anyone that doesnt agree with the scientifically false "non-ionizing radiation is safe" narrativeto borrow a canard from you: schizo
>>7139207560ghz "wifi" exists and is used for very short range uninterrupted line of sight connections. The only good use case for it at the moment is wireless laptop docking, and wireless display link for video conferencing. It's not something you really move around much.It is also used in point to point links. My work had one that was about 1km and I think that was pushing the limit of it even, but it held a bi-directional 1gbps link stable as fuck.
>>71392052Well then, what we need to do to stop this is use higher frequencies. Above a certain frequency there's basically no penetration through the skin. This occurs at about mm waves. 5g uses millimeter waves.Here have a study:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17929264/
>>71392078I don't own a microwave you fat fucking american
>>71392141sure then all the retarded morons can choose to blanket their houses specifically in toxic microwaves instead of massive areas covered by uninsurable cell towers
>>71392111>stop exposing me for the schizo spammer I amSee>>71391976
>>71392164not him but your compilation image doesn't actually show anything and makes you come across as kind of unhinged
If anyone here looks at a microwave that has a 10 fucking amp from the wall current draw, and a home router with it's little pissant cord and power brick, AND THINKS THEY ARE THE SAME THING, then just immediately kill yourself.
>>71392052no no no I cant be wrong I've been spouting that non ionizing radiation isnt harmful on the internet for a decade now
>>71392195is your microwave on 24/7? is the signal modulated with modern algorithms and pulse frequencies that makes it much more toxic to biology? is it cooking food when you're sleeping and most vulnerable to damage from microwaves?
>>71392184>not him butYes, it is you.
>>71392222>Three days of constant spam this week>However long you've been spamming this on /sci/>Still hyperfocused on modulation>Still no evidenceinb4 mods ban you and you freak out again. Dance for us.
>>71392257thats it, beg the janny to censor things you dont like, tranny. beg.
>>71392291>Less than 50 posts in and already resorting to tranny spamlollercausted again
>>71392311>n-no stop calling me trannyI hit a nerve on that fronthole eh
>>71392242I'm not making an argument, I'm starting clearly that that is you. We both know you've samefagged before in this manner, you're not fooling anyone.
>>71392350Keep resorting to "tranny tranny industry shill tranny" as your goto response, it only makes you easier to identify to the Texas Instruments hit squads I'm hiring with my industry shill money ;)
>>71392222the FUCKING microwave CANT EVEN COOK THE INSIDE OF MY FUCKING BURRITO when it is 7 INCHES away and outputting DIRECTED FUCKING 1200W of 2.4ghz evil.The pissant router that sits 30 feet away from my bed puts out 250miliwatts. The phone sitting 3 feet away from me puts out maybe 25mw at idle.
>>71392360>im not making an argumentthat much is clear>>71392366dont miss tranny>>71392373contemporary studies show that microwaves interfere with biological processes. try moving over to wired solutions.
>>71391370>Microwave ovensWhat is microwave time...
>>71392074Fucking retard https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikrowellenherd#Gefahren
>>71392400THEN LINK A SOURCE FOR THESE STUDIES OR YOUR STATEMENT IS INVALID.
>>71392052What study is this? There are studies which show non-ionizing radiation is harmful at low intensity, but every study I've seen that shows this either can't be reproduced, or was published in a trash journal. Meta studies consistently show there is no causal link between low intensity non-ionizing radiation and cancer or any other disease.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607572/holy fucking shit it's trueCertain frequencies can and will have cognitive effects, cancer effects etc.This is big. Why is no one talking about this shit?
>>71392518>>71392521ICNRIP employees go away
>>71392552because fucking shills say it's completely harmless. since when did black and white thinking apply to anything
>This kills the ICNIRP shill
http://it-takes-time.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Shinjyo-2014-Significant-Decrease-of-Clinical-Symptoms-after-Mobile-Phone-Base-Station-Removal-.pdfSomeone posted this in another thread on /sci/ I think, it's pretty clear that phone masts should not be emitting 24/7 the way they are. Where I live there are masts popping up all over and there are tons of dead trees and bees and barely any birds.Something is fucky.
Reminder that this schizo spammer has self-admittely spent multiple years of his life compiling an apparently damning list of over "2,600" studies yet he can't even provide one quality study that conclusively proves 5G to be harmful
>>71392604hey check it out, I found some counter-arguing evidence.this one says it's official, so I win
>>71392604>Tumor site: 4channel
>>71392552What a clusterfuck. The underlying studies have serious issues which prevents gleaning any real useful data, and the authors agree in the conclusion:>However, to date, with the exception of high-power microwave radiation, which has widely established hazardous effects, the biological effects of microwaves remain controversial. In epidemiology, there is no conclusive evidence showing that microwaves have carcinogenic effects. Concurrently, the discovery that microwaves have positive biological effects has presented new challenges for research and applications in this field. The results of EEG and analyses of the structure of the brain after radiation have also confirmed the influence of microwaves. Studies have extensively explored the underlying mechanisms by which microwaves influence learning and memory functions, especially synaptic structures and functions, oxidative stress and apoptosis, protein synthesis, genes and individual susceptibility and energy metabolism. Previous studies have produced a large amount of information, and some progress has been made in theory, but the mechanisms have not yet been fully determined, and many points are still disputed. The largest problem in these studies is that they used different parameters, such as the frequency, modulation, power density and irradiation time, to apply microwave radiation, in addition to using a variety of research methods. Therefore, their reproducibility and comparability are poor. To determine the precise dose-effect relationship between microwave radiation and its biological effects, further detailed studies must be performed.The most we can get is that yes, obviously microwave radiation can influence an organism just like any other environmental variable, but the degree of influence is extremely small.
>>71392750Just looked into this case, cell-tower was pre-emptively shut down because that was the first thing people thought. Now they found chemicals in the water from guess who?Fucking Nestle. https://www.mantecabulletin.com/news/local-news/whats-causing-cancer-in-ripon/Who is more evil Telecom-networks or "Let's kill the babies" Nestle?Yeah I am on Nestle for this one.
>>71392794why are tons of people in the 5G cities complaining about headaches, tinnitus and insomnia
>>71392801>>71392822>why are tons of people in cities complaining about headaches, tinnitus and insomniafixed
>>71392794Only if you don't understand what's said there.Epidemiologic studies are very low quality, yet they insist that means it's bad. It's part of the problem in the nutrition science and why it changes so often and is extremely inaccuarate. Double-blind placebo-controlled studies are the best evidence there is, they are however very expensive and there's close to none of them.
>>71392858probably because 3G and 4G masts are harmful but not quite as harmful as 5G masts
I'd love to erect a faux 5G mast in some bumfuck community and watch them screech about "muh nosebleeds muh insomnia" only to reveal that it was never even turned on
>>71392763https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyrdQE503Schere's the source for the image, watch it and learn something
>>71392822Why do people who like miles away from wind turbines complain about the same thing? Placebo. Or more specifically: Nocebo. Once the technology melts into the massive framework of things which support modern life that normies don't even know about, the complains will go away.
>>71392878lmao someone needs to do that
>>71392872>muh anecdotal evidence gathered from sources which are explicitly anti-5GI hope you're not seriously presenting this as solid evidence for your case
>>71392881give me a half hour to make a counterargument video also not tied to any trusting or strong source of evidence.
>>71392878how would you prove it's never been turned on? microwave radiation is silent and invisible. unless the bumfucks have meters to record its output you can just scrub your records for damage control. telecoms corporations would never scrub or alter evidence in their favor though, im just being a schizo.>>71392889>>71392899>>71392915tranny telecoms shill brought friends today, got the multi-dilation station?
>muh 5g cancersounds just like those people who are "allergic" to WiFi
>>71392949just like those people who are "allergic" to asbestoswhy cant phone corps get insurance on their microwave transmitter tech?
>>71392993>the jude scientist
>>71393013NOOOOOO OUR COMMUNIST UTOPIA WHERE EVERYONE IS THE SAME AND NOBODY IS SPECIAL
>>71392936>how would you prove it's never been turned on? microwave radiation is silent and invisible. unless the bumfucks have meters to record its output you can just scrub your records for damage control. telecoms corporations would never scrub or alter evidence in their favor though, im just being a schizo.This is extreme autism, I'm literally just talking about a funny hypothetical situation and you're trying to say that le evil telecoms industry has pulled this stunt.
>>71393013Not an argument. The article has merit and supplies additional sources.Back to >>>/pol/ with ya.
>>71393126you're right, I now feel it necessary to apologize to the innocent white christian boy angelic telecoms industry, for they are entirely pure and innocent and would never hurt a fly let alone a human in pursuit of complete control on behalf of their financiers>>71393155dilate
>>71391370So happy I never bought a Smartphone. Still using my trusty Nokia E50
>>71393169> I now feel it necessary to apologize to the innocent white christian boy angelic telecoms industry, for they are entirely pure and innocent and would never hurt a fly let alone a human in pursuit of complete control on behalf of their financiersThis but unironically
>>71393185uhh i don't think the device matters as much as the network you are using. even if it's 3g/4g, the major isp's will not support them for long. verizon is shutting off 3g this year i think
>turn on microwave oven>wifi stops workingevery time
>>71392979The insurance company was probably taken over by luddites.
>>71392146>i don't own a microwave because i'm not fatfuck off europoor
>>71391971>>Still no source that microwave ovens use 2.4ghz>This is amusing. Keep squirmingGet out of /g/ you fucking nigger, you can't even distinguish between MHz and GHz
>>71393587luddites are based
>>71393489>put modem in microwave>press start>wifi disconnectswtf they told me the extra microwaves would boost the signal
>>71391370>Has anyone else noticed people are turning off their wifi and staying away from their phones a bit more often?No
>>71394043>newfag doesn't know how to t.t. not a newfag
>>71394078t. definitely no friends
>>71394097>>71394043>newfag schizospammer admits he has no friendsw e w
>>71394124t. ICNIRP tranny with no friends
>>71391370Guess what else emits 2.4GHz waves? Literally anything that has a temperature.
>>71394171you got a source for that one?
Every single wi-fi sickness claim has been debunked by double blind test.>but this time it's gonna be different!
>>71394194gonna need a source
>>71391370>When I found out that wireless uses the exact same frequencies that my microwave oven uses I was pretty weirded out.Why? Do you know the first thing about RF mechanics? Do you know how wireless data transmission works?
>>71394000anon stop I'm serious
>>71394189everyone LMAO at the physicslet
>>71394171The best part is you can't even hide from it since your body emits it as well. You literally get irradiated by every military/civilian frequency at the same time by simply existing.
>>71394222why can I put my signal analyser antenna up to my body and not detect 2.4 ghz?>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15784787how many of those studies used frequencies and modulation technologies and replicated the EMF environments, dimensions and material geometries of the living conditions of the sensitized? im guessing zero
It's another homeschooled brainlet thread
>>71394248>>71394294oh no no trannybros they're taking away our microwave towers
>>71394222https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30920673>The ability to establish causation between the electromagnetic environment and their condition is therefore the result of EHS subjects' trajectories, rather than their starting point. This observation is not congruent with models attributing IEI-EMF to nocebo reactions, which raises the question of these models' ecological validitycope
>>71394280>why can I put my signal analyser antenna up to my body and not detect 2.4 ghz?You can if it's sensitive enough.>how many of those studies used frequencies and modulation technologies and replicated the EMF environments, dimensions and material geometries of the living conditions of the sensitized?Literally the study I linked at? They used cellphones.>modulationIf you somehow think modulated wave is different from a sine wave Fourier has a few words with you.
oh no no Glastonbury in England just blocked 5G trannybrosoh no no nooo everyone else was supposed to be a microwaved tranny just like us
>>71394369>human give off less than an attowatt of microwave energyLOL>Literally the study I linked at? wrong>If you somehow think modulated wave is different from a sine wave Fourier has a few words with you.you're ignorant
>>71394369oh no no no trannybrohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1UtRnGn5hc
>>71394307>>71394373>Incapable of presenting any sort of logical argument as to why 2.4 GHz RF/5G cell RF is harmful>Gets called a retard>"haha you guys are trannys lol"Killer strategy, I'm sure you've really convinced everyone.
>>71394307>>71394307He's right. 2.4 GhZ is emitted by anything pretty much.Objects at certain temperatures emit certain frequencies/wavelengths. Frequency and wavelength is proportionally inverse. Gamma rays and the ionised radiation is very low frequency. That's how things "glow" in the first place. It's simply objects releasing radiation on the spectrum of visible light by heating, I believe the visible wavelength begins at like 550°C. If you ever played around with fire, by putting metal objects in a fire they will start to glow red. Red is the lowest wavelength of visible light.it's basic physics
>>71394399>One is power vs time and one is power vs frequency>hurr why it look different
>>71394424OH NO NOOO NO NOOOOOOhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsaB7ewFsN0
FYI if you are seriously worried that 5G is a massive conspiracy to cook everyone with radiation, and turn to sketchy no-proof websites to back you up, you should probably go talk to a mental health professional.These are textbook symptoms of schizophrenia.
>>71394399>LOLSo you agree that it does emit radiation. Good.>wrongEh?>that picNow look at the ultra-complex waveform of white noise. Any information-dense signal regardless of its origin will be close to white noise. Basics of information theory
>>71394428>Gamma rays and the ionised radiation is very low frequencyGamma rays and ionizing radiation are very very high frequencies above light which is in turn above radio. The glowing is either cherenkov radiation or ionized gases depending on the context.
>>71394428>Gamma rays and the ionised radiation is very low frequency.excuse me>>71394437see pic related you can transform the two
>>71391370usaians are stupid
>>71394458I know, but I'm pretty sure the genius who made the pic and the spammer who's graced this board with his presence either don't, or hope their audience doesn't realize the difference and trusts them that spiky graph bad and square graph good
>>71394449>attowatt of microwave radiation>or any radiation>doing anythingcome on tranny>ehwhat you wrote is wrong>Now look at the ultra-complex waveform of white noise. Any information-dense signal regardless of its origin will be close to white noise. Basics of information theoryyou definitely dont work in the phone industry>>71394482thanks for conceding that the graphs back up what the text is saying in that image
>>71394500The text is attempting to do a visual comparison of three waveforms using two completely different types of graph, while insisting that one causes cancer somehow.inb4 "industry tranny" or a hot epic wojak
>>71394533the two graph types are entirely convertible into eitheryou're not presenting an argument against the text portion of the image for a reason
>>71394458Oof, so red, spiky and scary, must be 6g or something.
>>71394549that's what the studies show. the more information packed in via modulation (especially LTE, which is the basis for 5G), the more toxic to biology
>>71394500>miliwatt of microwave radiation>doing anythingCome on, schizo. >what you wrote is wrongIt literally isn't? >you definitely dont work in the phone industryYou're definitely blind and/or retarded.
5G isn't a frequency its a protocol.Arguing that its harmful is literally retarded because it can be transmitted at any frequency.
>>71394571>>miliwatt of microwave radiation>>doing anythingsee pic tranny>it LITERALLY isn't!!!?it is lol>ur dumb cope
>>71394568This right in from schizonews, information kills. In case you didn't catch it, the more dense the signal the closer it is to white noise. Compare the two pictures. Can't get any more natural than white noise.
>>71394603you're not far from spamming scat again to derail are you tranny? that's how soundly you're getting thrashed
>>71394548Then why didn't the guy who wrote it do the conversion himself?The source for that pic is your .info site you keep spamming which is a completely laughable screed not worthy of my time. Whenever anyone geniunely tries to talk to you, you sperg the fuck out, proclaim victory, get banned, then come back minutes later pretending any previous threads never happened and demanding everyone who responds to you (who you generally accuse of being a single person) go through each item in your massive gish gallops and refute them. If anyone is clueless enough to take you up on this, you refuse to recognize any of their points and either resort to calling people industry trannies or repeating mantras about certain evidence you believe is irrefutable.tl:dr keep it up you're spreading awareness about how bugfuck crazy the anti radio retards are
>>71394595>it is lolThen you were unable to read the study or even look at the picture I posted giving more evidence to my hypotheses.
>>71394629massive cope and denial of objective reality, par the course for hired trannieshere's the website which the tranny is under instructions not to name in case anyone wants to inform themselves on this topic: wi-cancer.infothousands of citations to peer-reviewed studies and journals are all there>>71394638none of the studies meet real world criteria. even the recent NTP study was nowhere near real world exposure and it still found massively increased rates of exotic brain and heart cancers with minimal exposure to phone microwaves.
>>71394594it has to use higher frequencies for it to have enough of a bandwidth gain over 4g and they want to put cell towers everywhere because they have a shorter range you could have one in front of your yard basically
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_radiationhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien%27s_displacement_lawBasically everything under 30.36THz is emitted at 20°C.
>>71394626No arguments it is then. I agree, physics is debatable but you can't really argue with math. Modulated signal is simply a sum of many sine waves, and since the total power is unchanged the intensity of each of those of waves must be miniscule. Keep digging your grave.
>>71394697just not at levels that distort biology, such as phones and cell towerslearn more: bioinitiative.org
>>71394695>it has to use higher frequencies for it to have enough of a bandwidth gain over 4gIt literally doesn't.
Niggers how do you think heat is generated at fundamental levels? How do you campfires work?They release a fuckton of sub-visible light (microwaves, radiowaves) in really high amounts.If cell phone towers are dangerous to health, so are campfires and anything that emitts high amounts of heat!
>>71394683>here's the website which the tranny is under instructions not to name in case anyone wants to inform themselves on this topic: wi-cancer.infoThe point was A: Saving me a trip to the archive to find it and B: Making you post it first so you couldn't accuse me of putting words in your mouth, a task which you performed as expected.
>>71394711you can't address any of the contemporary studies showing that modulation causes greater damage, let alone the NTP study that used very light modulation and still was shown to cause massive rates of catastrophic cancers
>>71394683>none of the studies meet real world criteria.Gonna need a source on every one of 8600 studies listed there not meeting real world criteria.
>>71394717>>71394717see >>71394735Campfires output way more energy than cell towers.
>>71394735>fires release a "fuckton" of microwavesare you actually retarded or just industry disingo in light of getting BTFO'd yet again
>>71391370I want /x/chizos to leave my board
>>71394754you made the claim, you prove they did meet real world criteria
>>71394753>you can't address any of the contemporary studies showing that modulation causes greater damageOf course I can't because once you start doing a PROPER - double blind - study the effect disappears. Why would I even argue a fundamentally flawed study? Really scraping the bottom of the barrel here, m8.
>>71394765see >>71394697You're literally 50IQ tier right now with your physics knowledge.
>>71394785>Of course I can't because once you start doing a PROPER - double blind - study the effect disappears[citation needed yet again]
>>71394779>how many of those studies used frequencies and modulation technologies and replicated the EMF environments, dimensions and material geometries of the living conditions of the sensitized? im guessing zeroDid you write this?
>>71394803There you go buddy. >>71394222
>>71394796you call attowatts a "fuckton" of radiationholy macaronibtw you will never look like a girl>>71394811yes, get to work showing they matched anything close to the real world conditions people are now living in under 5G towers with tons of other phones and wifi emitters around and the cabling in their houses etc etchave fun
>>71394844you presented the studies without substantiating that they are anything like real world situations. i asked you to provide evidence they were (you cant) and you didnt. so i'll dismiss those industry funded studiescheers
>>71394845you made the claim they don't meet the criteria, go ahead and prove it.
>>71394865>>71394860also see >>71392661
>>71394860>i asked you to provide evidence they wereThis crossover experiment exposed EHS participants to 4 hours of nighttime EMF or an inactive sham condition over the course of 4 weeks. One is enough to prove your claim wrong, you explicitly stated that zero studies were in real world conditions. Good Day.
>>71394927>zero source>zero citation>they were using 5G tech back in 1960 or whenever the industry funded study was donecheers
>>71393911you blaspheme by saying that in /g/
>>71394829>attowatts from campfirehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_content_of_biofuel>Wood fuel (C6H10O5) - 16 – 21 MJ/kgAt least 16 fucking Mega Jouleswww.aebiom.org/IMG/pdf/WOOD_FUELS_HANDBOOK_BTC_EN.pdf>At high moisture contents (60%) about 1.6 kWh/kg is available.>For almost perfectly dry wood about 5 kWh/kg is available.It means that burning a kilogram of wood releases more energy than a cell tower.85% of cell towers are less than 3kW.
>>71392661>Where I live there are masts popping up all over and there are tons of dead trees and bees and barely any birds.Where I live(the capital of my country) there is LTE advanced everywhere as well as green trees and birds. Not much bees though.
>>7139495498% is released as infrared retard, barely any of it is microwaves and the microwaves are not modulated as they are by cell towersnice try cringelord
>>71394940>zero source>zero citation>>71394222
>>71394973your 1940s industry funded study cannot match real world conditions im afraid, which is why we will use precautionary principle in future (as in Italy) to roll back cell towers and certain phone tech
>>71394991Never knew they had cellphones in 1940s.
>>71395001yeah it was probably more like the 1880s, that sounds more like the timeframe which ICNIRP bases its guidelines on instead of actual contemporary science
>>71394963>barely any of it is microwavesNone of it is. Fire doesn't get hot enough.
Did you come here because your thread on /sci/ wasn't getting attention?
>>71395007Today there's less radiation than since the start of using wireless communication because better modulation needs less power yet niggers like you keep popping up.
>>71395045Oh shit nigger you mentioned one of his trigger words
>>71395029Absolute fucking retarded tripfag. Kill yourself already please.
>>71395038>get btfo on every single angle>resort to what you think are personal attacksdump the collation of random anon posts next before spamming scat telecoms tranny>>71395045the "better" modulation also happens to be much more toxic to all biology. amazing isnt it
>>71395061>the "better" modulation also happens to be much more toxic to all biologyShow me a double blind study made in "real world conditions" that provides evidence to that.
>>71395059lol a campfire doesn't even get hot enough to release the full visible spectrum.
>>71395061Links to each post that BTFO me on an angle pls
if you guys want to see this telecoms tranny shill spamming his scat in action, check out this archived thread. he managed to get the thread deleted by spamming another 7 or so threads with the same NPC image and text format. maybe one of the jannies was also a telecoms tranny and he called in a favor?https://warosu.org/sci/thread/S10708724
>>71395078Please I'm begging you to kill yourself. People this stupid make me lose faith in humanity.
>>71394963Not true at all. Even if it isn't consider that microwaves have both lower frequency and higher wavelength than IR. IR should be more dangerous, no? If not, where is the logic? by what process do microwaves cause cancer?
>>71395090Holy fuck, was it autism?
>>71395078Microwave radiation also happens to be way below visible spectrum. In fact the temperature of outer space emits in microwave spectrum.
>>71395077the studies are currently done on in-vitro cellsin another 10 years when everyone has cancer from 5G we'll have another NTP study with LTE signals showing what I'm saying here
>>71395090>those cringe Shareblue tier "Anti-5G" edits xe made to respond to your argumentsyou're really right about this telecoms tranny
>>71395105>by what process do microwaves cause cancerAccording to this nigger it's not the frequency but the modulation of it. The information blackpills cells and they die or something. >>71395136>the studies are currently done on in-vitro cellsI specifically asked for real world conditions, how hard is that?
>>71395105humans evolved to take advantage of infrared and visible light, not microwaves. if you absorb infrared, your cells thrive. if you absorb microwaves, your cells get confused and stressed.same principle with ozone and oxygen.
>>71395165real world conditions are essentially impossible hence the precautionary principle will be applied and cell towers will be forced to cease emissionthe NTP study is already more than enough reason for this outcome
>>71395189>if you absorb infrared, your cells thrive.Not really, they are trying to get rid of it by constantly emitting it. They emit less microwaves so it must be less harmful to them. >>71395210>real world conditions are essentially impossibleThen you having an argument is impossible.
>>71395189You realize that cells really die when visible lights them? That's why when you sunta your skin starts falling off. The seperating skin is your dead cells. Visible light has been also shown to actually cause cancer, especially in the UV spectrum.All-natural sun. We should have evolved around that, no?Your theory is so stupid on so many motherfucking levels it's ridiculous.By the way I am not a fucking tranny, I'd stuff them all into ovens if I could
>>71395221>what is an infrared sauna>"They emit less microwaves so it must be less harmful to them"stunning>>real world conditions are essentially impossible>Then you having an argument is impossible.this also goes for you, but the NTP study is enough that the precautionary principle must be adhered to stringently instead of not at all like it is in too many areas in the West
>>71395123Just isn't true. The chemical reaction of fire isn't pelting you with microwaves, the heat is all from the infra red spectrum, which isn't microwaves lol.
>>71395244>not understanding how sunlight interacts with biology>not understanding that microwaves are precluded from having any positive reaction with biologysorry but you are a tranny
>>71395249The wood blasts you with microwaves even before it's on fire.
>>71395268with whole yottawatts of unmodulated matural microwave radiation, no human has a chance to survive around a log of wood
>>71395245>what is an infrared saunaEssentially an oven? Heat shock of any origin is harmful to the cells, you know.
>>71395288But what if it's secretly modulating it? It could be so densely modulated we couldn't tell. I suggest cutting all trees just to be sure.
>>71395291too much of a good thing is a bad thing. you have a choice if you're exposed to infrared. it cant travel through walls. microwaves, on the other hand, have no positive interaction with biology and cook you 24/7 if you live around a cell tower>>71395313yottawatts are big btw i was agreeing with you, logs put out 10 billion times more microwaves than 5G cell towers. that's what's causing tinnitus and nosebleeds in children.
>>71395331>it cant travel through walls. Then you must absolutely thrilled for 5g because it can't travel through the walls either. It can't even travel though the air well to be honest. The age of neighbours shitting up your wifi ranges is finally coming to the end.
>>71395313Fucking logs, man.
>>71395264>not understanding that microwaves are needed for your braincells to profilerate>not understanding that the studies confirmed that using GSM cell phones improves cognitive performanceit was in the study.not only that but guess what else emitts microwaves in naturelmao, YOU are a tranny schizo. I knew a tranny schizo once you must be one of them.you have no proof cells react to microwaves emitted at cell tower levels. otherwise you'd get a nobel prize
>>71394189>does YouTube "research" on radiation for literal years>doesn't even know what blackbody radiation isT H E S T A T E
>>71395368people have windows. if the new tech has steerable collimated beams then they can just up the power to go through walls.but you're wrong anyway because 5G utilizes "densification" of signals- both mHz and gHz all rolled up for maximum data transmission, ergo maximum disease in the populace>>71395383the NTP study shows that im afrad>>71395389>attowattsMY SIDES
Human eye can't see above 2.4ms. WiFi 5G is bullshit.
>>71395331Make your house out of microwave reflective or absorbant material
>>71395415how about we just dont pollute the Earth with microwaves? thats the future
>>71395395>even the tranny NPC king is telling the truth on this topicOH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD
>>71395423>dont polluteBut what about the profit? These peoples children starve to death otherwise.
>>71395410>steerable collimated beamsDescribe them in your own words
>>71394373>oh no no Glastonbury in England just blocked 5G trannybroshttps://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/48601042>Fears surrounding its safety have led some campaigners to petition for its ban at the world-famous festival.>some campaigners petition for its banI love how you just make up/wildly exaggerate news stories to try and make a point because you have so few actual examples of successful 5G boycotts.
>>71395410>people have windowsStill less impact than from 2g then. >but you're wrong anyway because 5G utilizes "densification" of signals- both mHz and gHz all rolled up for maximum data transmissionIncorrect. It uses multiple bands of ghz radiation. The difference between the bands is measured in mhz.
NTP STUDY SHOWED LONGER LIFESPAN IN RATS EXPOSED TO 3G and 2G NETWORKS:Were there any surprise findings?NTP found longer lifespans among the exposedmale rats. This may be explained by an observeddecrease in chronic kidney problems that are oftenthe cause of death in older rathttps://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/materials/cell_phone_radiofrequency_radiation_studies_508.pdfNo shit rats get more cancer if they live longer. Holy shit. I am gonna full set my microwave for longer lifespan and use cell phones 24/7. NTP STUDY IS CLEAR. RF PROLONGS LIFESPAN
>>71395452Like a rifle but with microwaves. Ebil goberment up to no good again.
>>71395447profits mean nothing when the population is disabled and sterile>>71395452michaelwave shoot on tagert>>71395457>Incorrect. It uses multiple bands of ghz radiation. The difference between the bands is measured in mhz.I'm sorry but you are wrong. There is blanket coverage at around 700mHz-1gHz and then it's claimed they'll use tens of gHz for ultrafast transmission laterbut it'll be rolled back way before then
>>71391370Huh? Mines on all the time.
>>71395474>get malginant heart and brain cancer>but they lived longer (statistically insignificant)nice try
>>71395483>profits mean nothing when the population is disabled and sterileActual real communist detected. How will you finance a healthy population?
>>71395483>michaelwave shoot on tagertSo you barely know what it is. Describe how it's harmful in your own words.
>>71394629>Then why didn't the guy who wrote it do the conversion himselfkek when the schizo started spamming the text originally he didn't even have the Laplace transformed graph. I'm betting he realised his fuckup and made it later on
>>71395516disabling and sterilizing the population is a communist tactic, as is importing millions of 50 IQ somalisgood thing white men are on physical removal training courses as we speak
>>71395090>*PARP* 5G is b- *SPLLLURRRRRRT* 5G is bad for y- *PHRRRRRRRRRTT* proven health eff- *SQUELCH* fuuuualways knew the brap posters were tranny kikes
>>71395513Rates of cancer get higher the longer you live in every species, including humans. Nothing surprising.>(statistically insignificant)Do you tnink RF is the only cause of cancer (if it did that, anyway)? What proof do you have it wasn't a sketchy diet they gave to rats?
>>71395542read the study, microwave radiation from old 2G and 3G signals was empirically shown to cause exotic heart and brain cancersnow 4G LTE and 5G are way more aggressive than those old signals and they're rolling them out untested... hmm makes you think
>>71395542>Rates of cancer get higher the longer you live in every species, including humans.I'm not sure it has to be that way, but who am I to judge.
>>71391943most wifi aps only put out 100mW (0.1W)>>71391971this fucking guynever seen your wifi signal drop when someone uses the microwave?fuck me, so much denial for something that is so easy to look up
>>71395090>>71395117>>71395162>>71395538>36 minutes ago>35 minutes ago >32 minutes ago>telecoms tranny>telecoms trannyYou're not even trying to disguise it anymore jej
>>71395624nice conspiracy theory
>>71395410>gets exposed for not knowing basic things about radiation such as blackbody radiation>i-it wasn't significant anyway Is it possible to have negative credibility?
>>71395686>Is it possible to have negative credibility?yes I could be shilling for telecoms ITT
>>71395624hahaha the samefagging is through the roof lmao
>>71395717I can't give you a proper source because the mainstream media has been ordered to not report on 5G health effects or dangers
>>71395765>I can't give you a proper sourceThese threads in a nutshell
>>71395793>NTP studylol>>71395804called it earlier, mentally ill tranny>>71392111
>>71392155>toxic microwavesWhat part of "higher frequency waves can't penetrate as well as lower frequency waves" do you not understand?
>>71395819how can they reach anyone's phone then
>>71395804>>71395872you are powerless. give up and get help.
>>71395899>you are powerless. give up and get help.
>>71395808>called it earlier, mentally ill tranny
>>71395765>the mainstream media has been ordered to not report on 5G health effects or dangers
>>71395952>>71395985>>71396023>>71396035just suck his dick already
>>71396143>just suck his dick already
>>71391370Me and my family have been turning the roter off over night for as long as we had one.It isn't a conspiracy thing as much as frugality.
>>71391370There is quit a lot of anti-5G sentiment in my town.
https://www.webmd.com/schizophrenia/schizophrenia-symptoms#1Let's take a look and see how these fit our 5G alarmist friend in the thread here:>Persecutory delusions. The feeling someone is after you or that you’re being stalked, hunted, framed, or tricked.He thinks "tranny shills" are roaming 4chan to promote 5G, not normal people who are tired of mental ill spam. He thinks the RF industry has been actively suppressing studies for decades, and that this is a massive coverup. He thinks that 4chan moderation is complicit in this conspiracy by "censoring" 5G threads.>Somatic delusions. These center on the body. The person thinks they have a terrible illness or bizarre health problem like worms under the skin or damage from cosmic rays.Based on this thread, it should be self-evident how this applies.>Confused thoughts and disorganized speechAgain, look no further than this thread.He's come to a preconceived decision and will seek support of it anywhere he can find it, the opposite of examining the evidence and coming to a conclusion.
>>71396248yikes and not based, tranny-like post
>>71396248Saved, watch him prove your point
>>71396263Letting impressionable boomers on the internet was a mistake, fucking ruskis
>>71396263>>71396286>still clinging to the russian collusion conspiracy theorycringe
>>71396292>>still clinging to the telecoms collusion conspiracy theorycringe
>>71391828>at least 4 10Gb/s RJ-45 ports>>>>10Gb/sa computer with 4 10G sfps with 10G SFPs running pfSense>5Ghz and 60Ghz WiFian 802.11ad access pointuse your fucking head, retard
>>71396324who was it that war-gamed the voter fraud? oh yeah the demoturds as proven by wikileaks
>>71396369>who was it that war-gamed the voter fraud? oh yeah the demoturds as proven by wikileaks
This thread was moved to >>>/b/802038650