[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: windows_7_professional.jpg (134 KB, 500x500)
134 KB
134 KB JPG
prove me wrong.
protip: you can't
>>
>>70565855
yes I love it's quad core utilization .. oh wait a sec.
>>
>>70565855
agreed
any windows from ME to 7 was the greatest
>>
malware
>>
>>70565855
Microsoft realized their mistake of making a perfect product, nobody wants to buy an upgrade.
never again.
>>
Might be that last Windows I ever regularly use and it's quite sad what became of it after 7. My first was 3.1 and remember how big a deal 95 was. Don't think we will ever have that same feeling again.
>>
>>70565855
if it's so good why is microsoft abandoning support for it? checkmate atheists
>>
>>70565911
*2K
>>
>>70565855
windows peaked at 2000
7 is the least unbearable version that's still usable today
>>
>>70566307
u sperg shut up
>>
File: w7.png (254 KB, 612x361)
254 KB
254 KB PNG
Yeah it's great indeed.
>>
>>70565855
Seems to be correct. Thought, if I had to smash my nuts in a vice and use Win10 I'd use Win 10 AME.
>>
>>70567368
Yeah, because who cares about all that telemetry shit if it means a 12 seconds faster boot.
>>
File: win10 spyware.jpg (968 KB, 638x5176)
968 KB
968 KB JPG
>>70565914
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (27 KB, 480x360)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
>>70567368

>measuring OS competency by boot time
>being this low level of screeching autism
>>
File: 1525388794348.png (77 KB, 380x349)
77 KB
77 KB PNG
>>70566307
>Windows?
>*Crack*
>*Sip*
>Nothing beats Windows 2000, those were the days.
>>
oh look, another Micropenis Winfag 7 shill, fuck off. use arch and install gentoo at the same time.
>>
File: System.png (181 KB, 1631x931)
181 KB
181 KB PNG
>>70565900
>quad core
What year is this??
>>
>>70567368
> He doesn't have an SSD
>>
>>70568567
It's still slow on ssd.
>>
>>70568573
7 boots faster than 8 or 10 on a SSD.
>>
>>70568584
why do people give a shit about boot times? what about the OS's capabilities and freedom?
>>
It’s objectively the best as opposed to figuratively the best?
>>
>>70568632
Because they are retarded and have no better arguments. But on a proper PC, like >>70568564 7 boots faster than 8 or 10.
>>
>>70567368
>Implying "fast startup" is even a boot
>>
>>70568632
I'll never understand. If it's done booting by the time I'm done grabbing some coffee I'm happy. Do people really restart that frequently? Since that's the only time I could see boot times becoming notiecable.
>>
>>70567368
Doesn't really matter to me much because I leave it on most of the time. Also would be interesting to see that vs various linux distro and macosx included.
>>
>>70565855
No longer in development. Your claim may hold some water to it, however, if you specify "best legacy OS".
>>
>>70569247
It's supported until 2025.
>>
>>70568584
Imagine being this delusional.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.