[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/g/ - Technology



Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: tcbing.jpg (195 KB, 1289x966)
195 KB
195 KB JPG
https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/10/unsafe-search/
>>
File: 1547017776532.gif (1.52 MB, 257x266)
1.52 MB
1.52 MB GIF
Based Bing
>>
How do i know that's true?
>>
File: 1546645364393.jpg (123 KB, 734x869)
123 KB
123 KB JPG
And even more alarmingly is the fact that a TechCrunch employee decided to investigate 'whats the best search engine for CP?' and tricked some schmucks into paying him to do it.
>>
How would they know without looking for it in the first place?
>>
File: Exactly-As-Planned.jpg (139 KB, 311x456)
139 KB
139 KB JPG
>>69304549
goodbye jewggle
>>
you can easily do the same using google.
>>
>>69306746
Just go to Bing and search generic stuff like img upload. I'm scared to try it though.
>>
So I'm getting microsoft rewards AND supporting a superior porn search engine?
Absolutely based.
>>
Bing is a good way to search for porn desu senpai. pedos and Winjeets should still kill themselves though
>>
Stop spamming this thread. We don't care. Go away.
>>
My website gets thousands of visitors a month from Google. And about 1 to 3 visitors from Bing.

Are there even non-pedos who use Bing?
>>
The problem of this article is that it is untrue, and that because the material may not be viewed, almost nobody has any means to check that it is untrue.

Apart from incidents, which are probably removed very fast, there has not been and is there is no child pornography on Bing in the past year. It is true that the keyword recommendations are very disturbing. They probably reflect what other people have been searching for.

Source: I’m sexually attracted to (some) children, and I sometimes use Bing to search for legal photos of (naked) children, because I know that Bing uses PhotoDNA to filter out everything illegal. I have never seen any child pornography. There’s only naturism without any sexual posing and models (woman) that might look 15-17 but are actually from legit porn sites.

You may think that’s disgusting or immoral, and I can understand the disgusting part. I know that I’m sexually attracted to young boys since I was 15/16 years old, and I have decided to never act on that attraction. I have a stable relationship with another adult. However, viewing naturism photos of children is not illegal, and I don’t think I harm anyone by viewing such photos.

I you want to have some information about pedophilia, as there are lots of myths about it, I think this is a good resource with linked sources: https://pedofieltweets.wordpress.com/2018/12/30/pedophilia-essential-facts . Main point to take away, is that most abuse isn’t committed by pedophiles, and that it is very likely that most pedophiles don’t abuse children.
>>
>>69307141
I unironically use Bing.
>>
>>69307145
>t. bing shilling pedo r*dditor
end it
>>
>>69304549
I'd be curious to learn the connection between the writer of this article and Google. Purely for research purposes, of course.
>>
>>69307166
Yeah, but are there any non-pedos who use Bing?
>>
File: 1504860333589.png (479 KB, 800x975)
479 KB
479 KB PNG
>>69304549
>online safety startup
>>
>>69307145
>t. kloeri
>>
>>69307104
>Just go to Bing and search generic stuff like img upload. I'm scared to try it though.
holy shit i just did this you are not kidding wtf
>>
>>69304549
>Israeli authorities
>Israeli
Every damn time.
>>
>>69307174
>>
>>69307197
>holy shit i just did this you are not kidding wtf
Is this a trap?
>>
>>69307212
don't, you will regret it
>>
>>69307141
>*type 'hillary clinton em' into Google search*
>only thing that comes up is 'hillary clinton emoji'
>*type the same thing into Bing or any other search*
>get 'hillary clinton email'

>*image search for 'American inventors' in Google*
>get a bunch of black people
>*do the same in Bing*
>Thomas Edison, Benjamin Franklin, the list goes on and on...
really makes you think
>>
>>69307236
Yeah, Google could use some competition. But people are so used to using them.
>>
>>69307212
>Is this a trap?
It's not. If you're still curious use Tor, but I don't think that the images are technically illegal (at least in 'murica).
>>
File: 1446118567804-0.jpg (26 KB, 300x295)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
>>69307179
>ISRAELI startup
>>
bing if true
>>
>>69307203
>do not search the terms in this article
>>
Most of it is just legal nudes of kids and posing in skimpy outfits. The rest is just 18yo+ porn stars pretending to be underage. I would not even call it softcore.
>>
>>69307288
>typing certain combinations of letters into a search engine is now illegal
>>
>>69307349
>certain interpretations of electrical states is illegal
>>
>>69307263
kek
>>
lol
Cutemouse.online Forum Avi Tag Page Converting
>>
Check out the pedo in the comments. What a brave soul.
>>
>>69304549
>try to scroll to the bottom of this page
>before I reach the bottom, I'm sent to the homepage of the websight
Never seen this before, how annoying!
>>
>>69307460
umatrix solves this
>>
>>69307412
DO EET!
>>
>>69304549
I wouldnt put it beyond Microsoft to pay shills to post this here and try to get at least some publicity for Bing. They're really that desperate.
>>
>>69307212
It's true. Don't do this search if you live in the US or another first world shithole, just in case.
>>
>>69307630
>chasing down people who might or might not be in your jurisdiction because they searched for a combination of words.
yup! a real good use of resources!
>>
Bing images is kino for porn searching. I've noticed this before though, it's not even inobvious, the search suggestions are just blatantly pedophilic. If it's something this easy to run into I doubt it's not something that isn't more widely known than you'd think.
>>
>>69307460
>websight
>>
>>69307777
Quads of truth. You search for teen porn and the suggestions will lead you down the garden path to underage girls.
>>
>>69307777
>>69307818
Same with yandex tbqh
its pretty much everything except for google
>>
>Those dastardly pedos getting their jollys from pixels that make up an image of a naked child. The scoundrels!
>>
>Pedos will swarm to use Bing now
>CIA Niggers and NSA Pajeets have the perfect honeypot for stupid pedos

BASED AS FUCK
>>
>>69304549
This is disgusting.
What sort of search terms are these people using to look at this filth? What would one of those sickos type into the search box in order to view this kind of material?
>>
>>69307918
ur gross
>>
>>69307918
see
>>69307412
>>
>>69307777
how is it better for regular porn? i don't really know what i'm currently missing if i use jewgle
>>
>>69307145
kill yourself post haste pedo apologist
>>
Also do people actually use search engines to find porn lmao
>>
>>69307904
>>CIA Niggers and NSA Pajeets have the perfect honeypot for stupid pedos
>BASED AS FUCK


bro cia niggers, nsa pajeets, and microsoft's gmen counterparts ARE the pedophiles

why do u think the tech company with the most government contracts, microsoft, is best at finding CP? cause they designed it that way for a combination of reasons: to hunt them, for entrapment of others, and for their own perverse ends.

now i bet non-google search engines just leave out all the censorship in a futile effort to gain back market share from google search
>>
>>69307921
Better than being a tripfag
>>
wtf i love bing now
>>
>>69304549
Am I the only one who noticed this? I used to search for something like girl bikini when I was like 15 and I'd get so much pedoshit in search suggestions like 3 year old sex and little girls pooing in the suggestions. An entire row of anime little girls getting fucked would show after searching for hot anime girls.
>>
>>69308127
It's been pretty well known for a while
Not sure why they're only just reporting on it
>>
>>69307212
I just did you need safe search off though. No sex just naked (mostly topless).
>>
>>69307225
pussy ass faggot
>>
Search for 'Cat Goddess' with image safe search off for epic lulz.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwNQqnEYMXw
youtube suggested me this video now D:
>>
>>69308266
How horrifying!
>>
>>69308270
fuck me it actually is.
>>
>>69308189
>Your honor I only searched for those pictures for the lulz

>>69308266
Fascinating.
>>
wtf i love bing now
>>
>>69307104
I was told by others (I never verified for obvious reasons, but this place is the kind of place you'd believe people with this sort of thing) that typing in img src does the same.
>>
>>69304549
Not gonna lie, I used xvideo and xhamster for a long time and bing is way better.

I can find exactly any type of porn I want on bing and no one tells me it’s “too hardcore”.

Never tried CP, mostly just BBW shitting & diaper porn.

Go to any “thumbnail” site for petite women or something that sounds like a small skinny girl and there will be CP.

Normal folks deal with it in search of our midget/dookie porn...
>>
Based?
T. Ebophile



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.