[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/fa/ - Fashion


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: 162065C_D_08X1.jpg (18 KB, 406x508)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
i know /fa/ hates converee, but what do you think of 70s chucks?

Also general shoe thread
>>
>>14473740
>what do you think of 70s chucks?
I don't like. Too gimmicky.
>>
>>14473740
looks like the other chucks. which is what everyone else will think when they see you wearing them, so what's the price difference?
>>
>>14473745
>gimmicky
It's a bloody shoe mate
>>14473750
one can assume better quality materials you can get them for like 60 bucks which isnt so bad for a if shoes i guess
>>
>>14473740
70s cons are a meme it’s always the same people wearing them. Just go on eBay and get made in USA converse
>>
File: 1452304010909.png (44 KB, 500x338)
44 KB
44 KB PNG
>>14473759
>buying used shoes
>>
File: HunterSThompsonChucks.jpg (51 KB, 619x415)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>14473740
They're fine if you wanna look like this guy
>>
>>14473759
>it’s always the same people wearing them
Who?
>>
>>14473770
>not wanring to look like thompson
>>
>>14473815
If you want to look like hunter s thompson, you don't look like hunter s thompson
>>
>>14473740
only use them for lifting
>>
>>14473897
Based af
>>
>>14473740
They fit like shit dude avoid these goober shoes
>>
>>14474024
T. Fat ass feet
>>
For me, it's the PF Flyer All American
>>
>>14474040
Nah queer Super narrow u have hobbit feet
>>
>>14474066
My feet are pretty average width. Works fine.
>>
Do people like jack purcells more than 70s
>>
>>14473740
Just get them, why are you asking these random fags?
>>
>>14474592
What do you think of them?
>>
File: jerry 5s.jpg (129 KB, 1151x686)
129 KB
129 KB JPG
>>14473740
I don't hate them but they're boring.
Look at my mane jerry for white shoe inspo.
>>
>>14473740
Uninspired.
>>
>>14473759
>70s cons for $1.29 in local thrift store
what do?
>>
File: yul brynner.jpg (56 KB, 550x558)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
>>14473740
Steve McQueen used to wear white chuck allstars, and I just saw Ryan Reynolds rocking some. I'm officially calling them /fa/. Most of you wretched plebs don't even know who Steve Mcqueen is nor Yul Brenner, this generation is utter filth.
>>
>>14474689
Die boomer
>>
File: products_gallery5.jpg (52 KB, 820x500)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
>>
My favourite pair of shoes ever. I love my back and white 70s Chucks. Regular Chucks look like dog shit compared to them.
>>
Hitops are better. Also you look fresh if you pull them under a grey or navy suit
>>
>>14475018
>hitops are better
No, not at all. Lol.
>>
File: H6xmRu7.jpg (30 KB, 480x270)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
>>14473757
>>14473750
person who has owned both regular chucks and chuck 70s here.

70s are absolutely worth the price jump. The materials are noticeably better, (in my opinion) the chunkier sole gives the shoe a much more balanced look, and (most importantly) 70s are way comfier. I didn't find regular converse to be awful, but Chuck 70s are probably one of my comfiest shoes.

pic related is a comparison between the sidewall height of chuck taylors and chuck 70s
>>
>>14475269
Yup this. 70s soles are much better. If you want another option, SLPs are good too (shoes like pottery)
>>
File: 1562468572020.png (484 KB, 585x441)
484 KB
484 KB PNG
>>14474040
>>14474066
>>14474514
>My feet are pretty average width
Fucking dumb cunt thought chucks were for narrow feet
>Works fine.
The fucking cope on this bitch ass nigga holy shit.
>>
>>14475681
Shut up faggot go shove a pair of 1970s up your ass
>>
can men pull off white high top chucks without being a gay faggot?
>>
>>14473897
sleaze larpers btfo
>>
>>14475681
What cope are you talking about dumbass
>>
>>14473897
/sleazecore/ btfo
>>
>>14475817
>without being a gay faggot?
what board do you think you're on
>>
>>14476884
/fa/ is the straightest board on 4chan
>>
Test
>>
Why does /fa/ hate chucks again? I love my grey hitops, been wearing them for years now and am only just getting around to replacing them now that the sole is nearly burst on them

Quality is as meh tier as any asian produced fashion shoe but at the price that's a given, they seem like a pretty solid though pretty normie choice for casual wear

Is it because they aren't autism core moon boots or artisan crafted from ed gein's lampshade scraps hobo sandles?
>>
File: 1560059051809.jpg (140 KB, 1080x947)
140 KB
140 KB JPG
>>14475748
>>14476210
>samefag
Nigga trying to say his feet are narrow or average when he in denial of his fat ass hobbit feet. Hahaha stay mad white boi
>>
File: Diora Baird.jpg (180 KB, 1000x1500)
180 KB
180 KB JPG
>>14475817
No shit they can pull it off, but since you posted that reply everyone here can see you're a fucking incel nigga
>>
>>14477033
What the fuck are you talking about you illiterate nigger.
One guy called them too narrow, and that they don't fit.
I said my feet are average width and they fit fine. Jesus fucking christ.
>>
>>14477090
Dumbest nigga I have ever seen in denial about this feet, go get laid nigga.
>>
af1 > chucks
>>
File: 1559970383133.jpg (150 KB, 1200x800)
150 KB
150 KB JPG
>>14478178
Those two should not even be compared. Like two different categories you absolute dumb cunt.
>>
File: go back 2 skool.jpg (73 KB, 1080x447)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
>casually sneaks thru your lowtops thread
>>
File: janoskis.png (228 KB, 570x570)
228 KB
228 KB PNG
Thinking of getting these

Should I get all white or the black/white usuals?
>>
>>14479398
No no no no, no more of those shoes, they get to stay back in 2014-2016, please don’t get those, those are the shoes that 8th graders wear.
>>
>>14479398
>>14479468
Based nigga, this nigga speaking facts leave in 2014-2016. There are way better all white nikes or triple black nikes you can get. Janoskis for skater fags nigga.
>>
>>14479398
Are like like 13? These were cool like 10 years ago for high schoolers.
>>
thinking of getting these
>>
File: 1534423145229.png (17 KB, 882x758)
17 KB
17 KB PNG
I bought a new pair of converse but it rapes my feet if I don't wear socks. It scratches the back (achilles tendon) until it bleeds. What in G*d's name. The old pair I had didn't do that. I bet zoomers did this.
>>
>>14480404
Why would you wear converse if youre older than 24
>>
>>14474058
>>14473740
Should I get chuck 70s or the cheaper pf flyers center lo?

I just want a comfy converse looking low top
>>
>>14480694
Boom
>>
Converse are söy
>>
>>14473740
>70s chucks
They are pretty cheap and are suitable for active stuff.
So if you buy them and don't like them for any actual fits, you can use them as beaters or to the gym.
I wouldn't run in them though
>>
File: 1460580469002.png (121 KB, 268x265)
121 KB
121 KB PNG
>>14474617
yes thats right
>look at a new york jew comedian from the 90s for your fashion style inspiration
this will instantly effay you
>>
>>14475269
>based chuck anon visually shows differ4ence
but as you can see, the toe boxo on the 70s is even bigger than normal chucks, making them even more clownish than they were

79s are better in terms of constyruction, also more comfortable footbed.

but they objectively look like shit

normal basline chucks are the only choice. but your foot will hate you
>>
File: mpv-shot0001.jpg (61 KB, 720x720)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
is there a human being here who can tell me what these shoes are? thanks in advance
>>
>>14480404
time to get Nike Zoom Vomero 12 or 13
>>
>>14482438
917 blazers in obsidian



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.