>>3434289>>3434288>>3434287Jesus Christ fuck off
>>3434290What's the issue? I wanted to share the alternate versions for other people in the thread.
Can we just please get back to the usual threading without barking at each other?
>>3434305I'm honestly just confused about what >>3434290is about.
>>3434308This is one of the few threads on /c/ where someone is always irritated at another.It's a shame because this is a collective thread for my favourite character. From someone rapid-firing threads to their image limit with archived pictures to another shouting fuck off to someone for simply sharing variations of an image. It wasn't like this a dozen or so threads ago. Now we can't have a thread without drama. Come on guys, We're all here for the same thing, no?
>>3434311I think it's just that guyI didn't post the old images just now either
Now that we're done bickering for now, just a little heads up.Use https://buhitter.com in combination with Twitter's search when looking for images on Twitter.Pic related didn't show up on Twitter search for me at all even though it contained an Ann-related tag, it did however on Buhitter. This also was the case with a couple of other images so be aware of that.
>>3434308So wait, OP is the one doing these archive posts? Wasn't he complaining that threads get filled up too fast?
>>3434470Honestly, just drop it at this point. I don't care who, what, how, or why. I just want threads to go back to how they were, none of this unneccessary drama.
>>3434470Must have been him since he was the only other one in the thread and it wasn’t me. It’s strange.
>>3434287>>3434288>>3434289It's in higher quality on Pixiv, and I think there's also an extra variant.https://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=74481119
>>3434291I appreciated it anon
again? why, man?
From Reddit, couldn't find any art account from the poster
Not sure of the source of this. You can find a link to a site if you use Google, but I don't think it's trustworthy. Nice pic though.
Yo bro please, I don't mind if you post in short burst but don't max out the thread again on a whim.Also can you at least make sure that you don't include so many duplicates from you previous posting sprees?I'm just politely asking, is all
>>3438680I'm not the one posting these, but I don't see why this is a problem when the point of /c/ threads is to dump images.
>>3438695I mean ok, but plenty of these he already dumped in his previous posting sprees.I don't see much in it if we just cycle through the same images again and again
>>3438699There could be new posters who want these images, there's plenty of people who lurk these threads. If he wants to dedicate his time dumping images then good on him. Once we reach image limit simply start a new thread, and what do you know, there's another 150 image slots available to use. Most /c/ threads would kill to have this much activity.
>>3438701Yes, but then the problem is that OP doesn't want to make a new thread until this one 404s. So for people who like to use this thread to find or share new images, we basically have to wait about 24 hours to start doing that again.
>>3438704>>3438701I don't see why new lurkers can't just use the archives.This guy even seems to just go through archives to get his images. Just include a link in the OP or something like that. Why else would we be numbering the threads if we're just going to cycle through the same images again. The more regular lurkers and posters get the short stick.Why would we refer to previous threads and number them if we're just gonna cycle through the same 200 or so imagesWhy is it suddenly a thing now when it hasn't been for the last 40 or 50 threads.I don't want to make this a big thing but it just keeps happening over and over again recently
>>3438704>Yes, but then the problem is that OP doesn't want to make a new thread until this one 404sWell how about he just makes one as soon as it dies then? Problem solved. If the issue hinges on one man’s stubbornness then that’s the weakest link that should be changed.>>3438709Most /c/ threads use old images, it’s not the end of the world if someone wants to share some old ones. Some of these weren’t even posted before if you search them on the archive.
>>3438704It’s OP himself who’s dumping the old images anyway as we saw at the beginning of the thread. He shouldn’t have a problem with it.
>>3440342>>3438696please sage after the image limithttps://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=48642865