>Transfers funds to binance>Funds are now incognito>Withdraw funds to wallets belonging to companies that will be running nodes>No way to tell which wallets are receiving LINK from the team.And you faggots think they're dumping.
>>14723281Doesn’t make sense because there’s no need to hide it
>>14723281Discord trannies will use anything to try and recover their lost linksWait til we find out the recipients of these tokens
>>14723314It makes a lot of sense.
>>14723281ThE teAm IS nOt DUmpInG HArd !
>>14723334only if you're an emotional baghodling cultist
So Sergey has decentralized OTC salesGenius
>>14723314Not hiding it would be bullish, why would you want that? (Sarcasm)
Or, you know, whichever corporation could've just made a new address, and the funds would move there directly, instead of through binance, which both costs more, and has the risk of keeping link on exchange, even if for a short while.
>>14723281You know that ethereum addresses are anonymous and you can basically make a private key in notepad?
>>14723281It's genius!They could absolutely low key distribute.>>14723314Microsoft might not everyone to know how many/which shitcoins they're holding
>>14723666Go back to fReddit, Satan.
Do not share your wallet address is another security level to protect your investment.
>>14723752STOP POSTING GOD DAMN MEMESDO YOU SICK FUCKS NOT REALIZE THAT SOME PEOPLE HAVE THEIR LIVELIHOODS AT STAKE IN THIS MARKET?EVERYTHING IS RIDING ON THIS CRYPTO SHIT FOR ME!!! IF THIS FAILS I DON'T HAVE A GOD DAMN FUTURE!I'M DOWN 25% ON LINK AND 15% ON BTC THANKS TO ENDLESS MEMES, SHITPOSTS AND FUDEVERY MARKET ENTRY IS A DISASTER, AND NO WONDER, I CONSUME NON STOP DISINFORMATION IN THIS SHIT HOLE!
>>14723694I don't think you understand how fucking autistic these people are at keeping shit low profile. If the chainlink team transferred funds to another wallet directly, that wallet would be under complete supervision by breadcrumb followers here for the rest of eternity. Do you really think anyone important wants the world to see each and every transaction they make?
>>14725603You are from Reddit and need to go back. Everyone who was dropping crumbs knows you fags are here and won’t dump anything anymore.
>>14725658Considering I've been one of the people dropping breadcrumbs since 2017, I think i'll stay right where I am faggot.
>>14725435It's not their fault that you are this fucking dumb
>>14723281I just want the increased supply to be acknowledged on any of the market cap sites. They have always had these tokens, any intelligent investor should have priced that in when buying.The team having less tokens should increase the market cap, which should offset the increased supply. Even if the supply suddenly doubled, LINK would be valued at 1.50 which is still 5x over any smart buyer's price.
>>14725435rule 1 of investing and gambling, use your own ideas, never take tips.
>>14724700>Microsoft is buying Chainlink tokens
>>14725435poo pee pee poo
>>14725658Ew why do you care so much lol get a life and have sex loser
>>14725435FUCKING GO BACK THE ONLY REASON WE GO HERE IS FOR MEMES WE ARE LONG TERM HOLDERS WHY DO NORMIES LIKE YOU HAVE TO RUIN ITEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGEETTTTTT THEEEEE FUCKKK OFFFF MY BOARRRDDDD
Linkies will justify anything it's hilariousI bet even if the Link smart contract was hacked and it went to $0 you'd still call it fud and not sell, and somehow claim it's bullish
Op is right, I have two wallets book marked that each began receiving tokens from binance 8 days ago. Each now has 4 million link. The transfers were in amounts below 10,000 link out of binance to different wallets but they all ended up in wallets that now have millions of mink tokens.
>>14727279Can you source the wallets?
>>14727453Thanks anon>>14727986Source them?
>>14725435Saying you're down on link is outing yourself as a very new newfag
absolutely no big company will ever spend a single cent on these stupid LINK tokens are you completely high on crack or something?
>>14728173Damn, you're right. They definitely aren't selling on binance.
>>14728043Look at the wallets above you. Literal braindead tard.
>>14728050They will spend USD to use a smart contract. It will all be converted to link on the back end and the user won’t know. Being able to take and distribute any form of payment is alreay in the plan.
Hey, I don’t mean to fud, but Link and PSD2 seem irrelevant to each other, no? I mean, with open banking, it’s true that bank accounts data will be available to licensed third party providers, but that data will come from a single bank, no? Seems to me that this data is useless if the data is coming from a centralised point... it’s just gonna dump isn’t it...? There’s no swift announcement coming and psd2 is irrelevant so the devs are dumping for the lack of upcoming news.. christ.