[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/3/ - 3DCG

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 23 posters in this thread.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


Please consider donating to help the victims of the KyoAni studio fire: https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-kyoani-heal


File: teaserbreit.jpg (161 KB, 1280x625)
161 KB
161 KB JPG
>He thinks his renders are better because he uses paid software
>>
Why does nobody on this fucking board pirate shit
>>
File: DfaDjlDVMAEIKyT.jpg (69 KB, 986x555)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>He spends thousands of dollars in an animation software he could make faster and free on Blender
>>
>>688036
>>688035
>>688037
>buying and pirating
you do realize there is an inbetween option right?
what are student licenses
>>
>>688046

Blendlets cant wrap their head around this concept.
>>
>>688035
Nobody thinks that, you absolute disgusting and retarded shithead.
The end result is always dependent on the artist AND the tool, but the work of the artist weights much more.
But a better tool can make your work much faster and there are tons of things you simply cannot do with one tool, so you need a better one, or more than one.
>>688037
There is no open source equivalent of Houdini, so if you want to do high quality VFX with lots of simulation you are fucked with Blender. It's simply not possible since Blenders Simulation tools are shitty and 20 years behind. Even Ton acknowledged this.
There would be no "Man in the High Castle" or "Next Gen" without Houdini. End yourself you fucking retarded open source cocksucker.
Both of these are not even top class, forget making a real triple A blockbuster movie just with open source software.
>>
>>688035
Cycles isn't a very good renderer. I stick to what I've learned, mainly Renderman and Octane.
>>
>>688035
>>688037
>blender shill
>starting another shitty software war thread
>trump pics
kys asap OP, you're cancer on this Earth
>>
>>688059
this
Cycles is utter garbage, I really don't know why anyone would defend it
>>
>>688081
Who said anything about blender until now, friend?

Blender lives rent-free inside your head.
>>
>>688150
Reread the quoted posts, reretard.
>>
File: cute.png (67 KB, 353x156)
67 KB
67 KB PNG
>>688035
>>
>>688046

I buyrate, personally
>>
>>688190
>buyrate
What do you mean, exactly?
>>
>>688150
oh yeah, I really wonder which free software anyone could refer to on this forsaken board
nice try though, you should be proud
tell us about your extra chromosomes now
>>
>>688191
I'd think it's buying stuff and instantly refunding but still keeping the files. Although this won't work for software.
>>
>>688035
From what I've seen on this board, Mental does seem better than Cycles. I have no idea what is going on with all that noise.
>>
>>688452
and it's not only the noise mate.. Cycle's physical properties and color space are inherently messed up
>>
>>688471
How so? I've never had a problem with color space since filmic came along. Previously I had to save raw and edit in photoshop to fix exposure.
>>
>>688583
filmic is a crutch that attempts to correct the problems, but the overall thing remains incorrect
in other words, it's a subjective fix on top of a flawed foundation
>>
File: 1543668545392.png (1.7 MB, 2560x1361)
1.7 MB
1.7 MB PNG
>>688615
>the overall thing remains incorrect
But how, exactly? I did a quick test, and it appears to handle color well.
>>
>>688036
Many either do and don't mention, or they use actually use Blender, which you couldn't steal if you try.

Also, if you are someone who can afford the license without much issue, there will generally be less issues with getting stuff to just werk, while being sufficiently up to date to utilize the pirated software with the rest of your workflow.
>>
>>688046
are there any guides to removing the digital watermark from the student licenses
>>
>>688035
>he thinks he will stay employed using blender
>>
File: Opens My Suse.png (182 KB, 1280x1024)
182 KB
182 KB PNG
>>688035
>>688037
>>
>>688169
now kiss
>>
>>688621
Clueless here, but is that standard procedure to leave specular on your plane? Colors would be more true and darker/richer without.
>>
File: 1548179792778.png (43 KB, 899x480)
43 KB
43 KB PNG
>>689807
Yes, if physical plausibility is the goal. That shader follows Disney's approach, which uses specular as an artist-friendly control, on dielectric materials, for F0 reflectivity. It corresponds to the range between 0 and 8 % reflectivity, and 0.5 (the default) is 4 %, typical of dielectrics.
>>
>>688037
>>688035
Blender is for 16 year olds who make a 30 sided non manifold object with double faces in between games of fortnite, and think they are ready to work for blizzard
>>
>>688793
Yes, its called pspad
>>
>>690352
Are zir triggered faggot?
>>
File: 1535101308282.jpg (42 KB, 400x459)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
>>690352
>Blender is for 16 year olds who make a 30 sided non manifold object with double faces in between games of fortnite
oh shit my sides
>>
File: 1486261039270.jpg (85 KB, 314x262)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
>>690352
mindblowingly accurate
>>
>>690352
Based lmfao
>>
File: 321.png (211 KB, 272x264)
211 KB
211 KB PNG
>>690352
ha ha wtf



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.